The recent literature on near-term applications for quantum computers contains several examples of the applications of hybrid quantum-classical variational approaches. This methodology can be applied to a variety of optimization problems, but its practical performance is not well studied yet. This paper moves some steps in the direction of characterizing the practical performance of the methodology, in the context of finding solutions to classical combinatorial optimization problems. Our study is based on numerical results obtained applying several classical nonlinear optimization algorithms to Hamiltonians for six combinatorial optimization problems; the experiments are conducted via noise-free classical simulation of the quantum circuits implemented in Qiskit. We empirically verify that: (1) finding the ground state is harder for Hamiltonians with many Pauli terms; (2) classical global optimization methods are more successful than local methods due to their ability of avoiding the numerous local optima; (3) there does not seem to be a clear advantage in introducing entanglement in the variational form.
The recent literature on near-term applications for quantum computers contains several examples of the applications of hybrid quantum-classical variational approaches. This methodology can be applied to a variety of optimization problems, but its practical performance is not well studied yet. This paper moves some steps in the direction of characterizing the practical performance of the methodology, in the context of finding solutions to classical combinatorial optimization problems. Our study is based on numerical results obtained applying several classical nonlinear optimization algorithms to Hamiltonians for six combinatorial optimization problems; the experiments are conducted via noise-free classical simulation of the quantum circuits implemented in Qiskit. We empirically verify that: (1) finding the ground state is harder for Hamiltonians with many Pauli terms; (2) classical global optimization methods are more successful than local methods due to their ability of avoiding the numerous local optima; (3) there does not seem to be a clear advantage in introducing entanglement in the variational form.
Combinatorial optimization is a promising application for near-term quantum computers, however, identifying performant algorithms suited to noisy quantum hardware remains as an important goal to potentially realizing quantum computational advantages. To address this we present a variational quantum algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems with linear-depth circuits. Our algorithm uses an ansatz composed of Hamiltonian generators designed to control each term in the target combinatorial function, along with parameter updates following a modified version of quantum imaginary time evolution. We evaluate this ansatz in numerical simulations that target solutions to the MAXCUT problem. The state evolution is shown to closely mimic imaginary time evolution, and its optimal-solution convergence is further improved using adaptive transformations of the classical Hamiltonian spectrum. With these innovations, the algorithm consistently converges to optimal solutions, with interesting highly-entangled dynamics along the way. We further demonstrate the success of this approach by performing optimization of a truncated version of our ansatz with up to 32 qubits in a trapped-ion quantum computer, using measurements from the quantum computer to train the ansatz and prepare optimal solutions with high fidelity in the majority of cases we consider. The success of these large-scale quantum circuit optimizations, in the presence of realistic hardware constraints and without error mitigation, mark significant progress on the path towards solving combinatorial problems using quantum computers. We conclude our performant and resource-minimal approach is a promising candidate for potential quantum computational advantages.
Combinatorial Optimization problems play an important role in various domains such as logis- tics, life science or the financial sector. As their complexity in general grows exponentially with their problem size, finding the optimal solution classically becomes infeasible very fast. This raises the central question of whether quantum computers are in principle suitable for solving combinatorial optimization problems better and faster than classical computers. In order to find answers to that question, one needs to study quantum algorithms designed for those problems under ideal conditions (i.e., simulations, which are however limited due to exponential scaling) to investigate their potential, but one also needs real quantum hardware to test its viability and evaluate whether practical advantages are reasonable. In this regard, we consider variational quantum algorithms, especially the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) consisting of a problem and a mixer Hamiltonian with freely selectable parameters, originally proposed as variational hybrid ansatz with classical optimization. This algorithm structure of- fers flexible and relatively shallow circuits, which makes it suitable for current NISQ hardware. However, optimizing the variational circuit parameters can be an NP-hard problem at worst. In this thesis, we study different versions of QAOA, especially with a focus on limitations, perfor- mance and potential advantages opposite classical methods. The first part of the thesis concerns the investigation of various aspects regarding the imple- mentation of the variational QAOA protocol such as: the incorporation of a problem constraint either by adding a suitable penalty term of by choosing a suitable mixer (that restricts the search space), the scaling of the problem Hamiltonian in comparison to the mixer Hamiltonian, the choice of the initial values for the classical optimization of the circuit parameters, and finally the choice of the function to be minimized (i.e., CVaR vs. expectation value). We apply this proto- col to both the portfolio optimization and the feature selection and evaluate the performance. In order to improve QAOA, we consider the warm-start QAOA for different problem instances and analyze its improved performance with regard to involved quantum effects. For this purpose, we propose a classical pre-processing method and demonstrate that the warm-start results can be reproduced or even exceeded by this method. The second part addresses the issue that the standard variational form requires a high number of circuit parameters that have to be optimized at a sufficiently large depth, which is a major limitationforachievingpotentialscalingadvantagescomparedtoclassicalmethods. Toovercome this limitation, we investigate and further develop fixed schedules for QAOA, which only rely on two free parameters. We start with introducing the continuous adiabatic theorem as it motivates the form of QAOA and show its limitations, which we address by applying a discrete version of the theorem. With our findings, a new version of QAOA based on linear-ramps (LR-QAOA) is introduced and further developed. In order to derive suitable parameter values for this schedule, we propose a method based on extrapolation from smaller towards larger problem sizes. With our results obtained on a noiseless emulator, we evaluate the quantum runtime scaling and discuss whether a scaling advantage can be achieved compared to classical methods.
This paper presents a qualitative analysis of hybrid quantum-classical computing approaches aimed at solving complex optimization problems using near-term quantum processors. Hybrid algorithms leverage the strengths of quantum and classical computing to tackle computationally intensive tasks often constrained by current quantum hardware limitations. Through an extensive literature review and synthesis of recent empirical studies, we benchmark various hybrid algorithms, such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), focusing on their performance, scalability, and practical applicability on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. The study highlights the advantages, challenges, and future prospects of integrating hybrid quantum-classical computation in optimization domains, providing a comprehensive framework and qualitative insights into benchmarking methodologies and critical performance metrics.
Hybrid Quantum–Classical Optimization combines the advantages of quantum computing and classical optimization to address complex combinatorial optimization problems. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), as an outstanding Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQA), shows great potential in solving combinatorial optimization problems. Classical optimization methods play a crucial role in tuning the parameters of quantum circuits, affecting the algorithm’s convergence speed and solution quality. This paper designs and simulates QAOA circuits based on the Qiskit framework, focusing on comparing the performance of three classical optimizers— Adaptive Moment Estimation (Adam), Constrained Optimization BY Linear Approximations (COBYLA), and Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA)—in parameter optimization. Adam and SPSA perform more stably in deeper circuits, making them suitable for high-dimensional parameter spaces, whereas COBYLA tends to get trapped in local optima and exhibits greater fluctuations under limited iterations. The results further highlight the importance of classical optimizer selection and hyperparameter tuning in enhancing the performance of hybrid quantum–classical optimization algorithms.
Hybrid quantum/classical variational algorithms can be implemented on noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers and can be used to find solutions for combinatorial optimization problems. Approaches discussed in the literature minimize the expectation of the problem Hamiltonian for a parameterized trial quantum state. The expectation is estimated as the sample mean of a set of measurement outcomes, while the parameters of the trial state are optimized classically. This procedure is fully justified for quantum mechanical observables such as molecular energies. In the case of classical optimization problems, which yield diagonal Hamiltonians, we argue that aggregating the samples in a different way than the expected value is more natural. In this paper we propose the Conditional Value-at-Risk as an aggregation function. We empirically show -- using classical simulation as well as quantum hardware -- that this leads to faster convergence to better solutions for all combinatorial optimization problems tested in our study. We also provide analytical results to explain the observed difference in performance between different variational algorithms.
This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.