Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1805.05446 · Brazilian Journal of Physics

Inconsistency of a Realistic Interpretation of Quantum Measurements: a Simple Example

Pablo L. Saldanha

Published May 9, 2020• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s13538-020-00757-8

Related papers

Commentaire de « On Simple Inconsistency of Simple Realist Interpretations of QM and Related Mathematical Theories »

Yvon Gauthier

Chapitre 15 Commentaire de « On Simple Inconsistency of Simple Realist Interpretations of QM and Related Mathematical Theories » was published in Passages à la limite et seuils critiques. Morceaux Choisis/ Selected Papers on page 327.

Presses de l'Université Laval eBooks•Jun 15, 2020•0 citations

On the Quantum Measurement Problem

Časlav Brukner

arXiv:1507.05255•The frontiers collection•Nov 14, 2016•152 citations

Making Consistent Inferences from Quantum Measurementsa

Robert B. Griffiths

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Dec 1, 1986•4 citations

Comment on "Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements"

Juan José Seoane, Xabier Oianguren-Asua, Albert Solé +1 more

In their paper (arXiv:2402.09879), Aredes and Saldanha analyze several paradoxes related to weak values and present a "general argument" that aims to show that "realistic interpretations ...of weak values lead to inconsistencies". Although we agree with the identified inconsistencies for the specific weak values analyzed there, in this Comment we demonstrate that the origin of these inconsistencies is not their general argument, which is formally incorrect. We use Bohmian mechanics as a counterexample to confirm that their conclusions are not valid for all weak values and quantum theories. In particular, we show that weak values postselected in position can in fact be interpreted within Bohmian mechanics as properties of quantum systems, detached from any measuring devices, in a consistent and meaningful way.

quant-pharXiv:2603.18713•Physical Review A•Mar 20, 2026•3 citations

Commentaire de « On Simple Inconsistency of Simple Realist Interpretations of QM and Related Mathematical Theories »

Presses de l'Université Laval eBooks•Jun 15, 2020•0 citations

Consistent quantum measurements

Robert B. Griffiths

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Aug 4, 2015•15 citations
In their paper (arXiv:2402.09879), Aredes and Saldanha analyze several paradoxes related to weak values and present a "general argument" that aims to show that "realistic interpretations ...of weak values lead to inconsistencies". Although we agree with the identified inconsistencies for the specific weak values analyzed there, in this Comment we demonstrate that the origin of these inconsistencies is not their general argument, which is formally incorrect. We use Bohmian mechanics as a counterexample to confirm that their conclusions are not valid for all weak values and quantum theories. In particular, we show that weak values postselected in position can in fact be interpreted within Bohmian mechanics as properties of quantum systems, detached from any measuring devices, in a consistent and meaningful way.