Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1805.01272 · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials

Collinear antiferromagnetic phases of a frustrated spin- 12 J1 – J2 – J1⊥ Heisenberg model on an AA-stacked bilayer honeycomb lattice

P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop

Published Mar 7, 2019• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.033

Related papers

Frustrated Spin-½ Heisenberg Magnet on an AA-Stacked Honeycomb Bilayer: High-Order Study of the Collinear Magnetic Phases of the J 1- J 2- J 1 ⊥ Model

P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Topologically different spin disorder phases of the J1-J2 Heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice

Jing Liu, Ya‐Min Quan, H. Q. Lin +1 more

arXiv:2006.04350•Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures•Feb 29, 2020•4 citations

DMRG study of the spin-1/2 J1-J2 Honeycomb Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Lattice

Shou-Shu Gong, Dong-Ning Sheng, Matthew P. A. Fisher

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 2, 2012•0 citations

The phase transitions of the frustrated J1-J2 Ising model on the honeycomb lattice

Shang-Wei Li, Yuan-Heng Tseng, Fu-Jiun Jiang

arXiv:2509.11437•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Sep 5, 2026•0 citations

Quantum phase diagram of a frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$--$J_{1}^{\perp}$ Heisenberg model on an $AA$-stacked bilayer honeycomb lattice

P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop

The zero-temperature quantum phase diagram of the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$--$J_{1}^{\perp}$ model on an $AA$-stacked bilayer honeycomb lattice is investigated using the coupled cluster method (CCM). The model comprises two monolayers in each of which the spins, residing on honeycomb-lattice sites, interact via both nearest-neighbor (NN) and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor isotropic antiferromagnetic (AFM) Heisenberg exchange iteractions, with respective strengths $J_{1} > 0$ and $J_{2} \equiv \kappa J_{1}>0$. The two layers are coupled via a comparable Heisenberg exchange interaction between NN interlayer pairs, with a strength $J_{1}^{\perp} \equiv \delta J_{1}$. The complete phase boundaries of two quasiclassical collinear AFM phases, namely the Neel and Neel-II phases, are calculated in the $\kappa \delta$ half-plane with $\kappa > 0$. Whereas on each monolayer in the Neel state all NN pairs of spins are antiparallel, in the Neel-II state NN pairs of spins on zigzag chains along one of the three equivalent honeycomb-lattice directions are antiparallel, while NN interchain spins are parallel. We calculate directly in the thermodynamic (infinite-lattice) limit both the magnetic order parameter $M$ and the excitation energy $\Delta$ from the $s^{z}_{T}=0$ ground state to the lowest-lying $|s^{z}_{T}|=1$ excited state (where $s^{z}_{T}$ is the total $z$ component of spin for the system as a whole, and where the collinear ordering lies along the $z$ direction) for both quasiclassical states used (separately) as the CCM model state, on top of which the multispin quantum correlations are then calculated to high orders ($n \leq 10$) in a systematic series of approximations involving $n$-spin clusters. The sole approximation made is then to extrapolate the sequences of $n$th-order results for $M$ and $\Delta$ to the exact limit, $n \to \infty$.

•May 3, 2018•0 citations

Transverse magnetic susceptibility of a frustrated spin-12J1−J2−J1⊥ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a bilayer honeycomb lattice

P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop

We use the coupled cluster method (CCM) to study a frustrated spin-12J1−J2−J1⊥ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a bilayer honeycomb lattice with AA stacking. Both nearest-neighbor (NN) and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic (AFM) exchange interactions are present in each layer, with respective exchange coupling constants J1 > 0 and J2 ≡ κJ1 > 0. The two layers are coupled with NN AFM exchanges with coupling strength J1⊥≡δJ1>0. We calculate to high orders of approximation within the CCM the zero-field transverse magnetic susceptibility χ in the Néel phase. We thus obtain an accurate estimate of the full boundary of the Néel phase in the κδ plane for the zero-temperature quantum phase diagram. We demonstrate explicitly that the phase boundary derived from χ is fully consistent with that obtained from the vanishing of the Néel magnetic order parameter. We thus conclude that at all points along the Néel phase boundary quasiclassical magnetic order gives way to a nonclassical paramagnetic phase with a nonzero energy gap. The Néel phase boundary exhibits a marked reentrant behavior, which we discuss in detail.

arXiv:1709.08205•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2017•2 citations
Quantum phase diagram of a frustrated spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1J_{1}J1​--J2J_{2}J2​--J1⊥J_{1}^{\perp}J1⊥​ Heisenberg model on an AAAAAA-stacked bilayer honeycomb lattice
The zero-temperature quantum phase diagram of the spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1J_{1}J1​--J2J_{2}J2​--J1⊥J_{1}^{\perp}J1⊥​ model on an AAAAAA-stacked bilayer honeycomb lattice is investigated using the coupled cluster method (CCM). The model comprises two monolayers in each of which the spins, residing on honeycomb-lattice sites, interact via both nearest-neighbor (NN) and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor isotropic antiferromagnetic (AFM) Heisenberg exchange iteractions, with respective strengths J1>0J_{1} > 0J1​>0 and J2≡κJ1>0J_{2} \equiv \kappa J_{1}>0J2​≡κJ1​>0. The two layers are coupled via a comparable Heisenberg exchange interaction between NN interlayer pairs, with a strength J1⊥≡δJ1J_{1}^{\perp} \equiv \delta J_{1}J1⊥​≡δJ1​. The complete phase boundaries of two quasiclassical collinear AFM phases, namely the Neel and Neel-II phases, are calculated in the κδ\kappa \deltaκδ half-plane with κ>0\kappa > 0κ>0. Whereas on each monolayer in the Neel state all NN pairs of spins are antiparallel, in the Neel-II state NN pairs of spins on zigzag chains along one of the three equivalent honeycomb-lattice directions are antiparallel, while NN interchain spins are parallel. We calculate directly in the thermodynamic (infinite-lattice) limit both the magnetic order parameter MMM and the excitation energy Δ\DeltaΔ from the sTz=0s^{z}_{T}=0sTz​=0 ground state to the lowest-lying ∣sTz∣=1|s^{z}_{T}|=1∣sTz​∣=1 excited state (where sTzs^{z}_{T}sTz​ is the total zzz component of spin for the system as a whole, and where the collinear ordering lies along the zzz direction) for both quasiclassical states used (separately) as the CCM model state, on top of which the multispin quantum correlations are then calculated to high orders (n≤10n \leq 10n≤10) in a systematic series of approximations involving nnn-spin clusters. The sole approximation made is then to extrapolate the sequences of nnnth-order results for MMM and Δ\DeltaΔ to the exact limit, n→∞n \to \inftyn→∞.
We use the coupled cluster method (CCM) to study a frustrated spin-12J1−J2−J1⊥ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a bilayer honeycomb lattice with AA stacking. Both nearest-neighbor (NN) and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic (AFM) exchange interactions are present in each layer, with respective exchange coupling constants J1 > 0 and J2 ≡ κJ1 > 0. The two layers are coupled with NN AFM exchanges with coupling strength J1⊥≡δJ1>0. We calculate to high orders of approximation within the CCM the zero-field transverse magnetic susceptibility χ in the Néel phase. We thus obtain an accurate estimate of the full boundary of the Néel phase in the κδ plane for the zero-temperature quantum phase diagram. We demonstrate explicitly that the phase boundary derived from χ is fully consistent with that obtained from the vanishing of the Néel magnetic order parameter. We thus conclude that at all points along the Néel phase boundary quasiclassical magnetic order gives way to a nonclassical paramagnetic phase with a nonzero energy gap. The Néel phase boundary exhibits a marked reentrant behavior, which we discuss in detail.