Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1804.11213 · Reviews in Mathematical Physics

Adiabatic theorems for general linear operators with time-independent domains

Jochen Schmid

Published Nov 19, 2018• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We establish adiabatic theorems with and without spectral gap conditions for general — typically dissipative — linear operators [Formula: see text] with time-independent domains [Formula: see text] in some Banach space [Formula: see text]. Compared to the previously known adiabatic theorems — especially those without a spectral gap condition — we do not require the considered spectral values [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] to be (weakly) semisimple. We also impose only fairly weak regularity conditions. Applications are given to slowly time-varying open quantum systems and to adiabatic switching processes.

DOI
10.1142/s0129055x19500144

Related papers

Adiabatensätze mit und ohne Spektrallückenbedingung

Jochen Schmid

In this work we generalize some of the previously known adiabatic theorems to situations with non-unitary evolutions in Banach spaces. We prove adiabatic theorems with uniform gap condition (generalizing a theorem of Abou Salem), adiabatic theorems with non-uniform gap condition (generalizing a theorem of Kato) and qualitative as well as quantitative adiabatic theorems without gap condition (generalizing theorems of Avron and Elgart, and Teufel). Additionally, we give a generalized version of an adiabatic theorem of higher order due to Nenciu. In all these adiabatic theorems the considered spectral values need not lie on the imaginary axis and in the adiabatic theorems with spectral gap condition and the adiabatic theorem of higher order compact subsets of the spectrum are sufficient (in particular, these subsets need not consist of eigenvalues). We explore the strength of the presented adiabatic theorems in numerous examples. In particular, we show that the theorems of the present work are more general than the previously known theorems. This work was finished in October 2010 and handed in as a diploma thesis at the mathematics department of the University of Stuttgart. The more recent results of Avron, Fraas, Graf und Grech which appeared in the meantime (in June 2011) are therefore not taken into consideration here. We point out, however, that the theorems of the present work are more general than the corresponding theorems of Avron, Fraas, Graf und Grech - with the exception of the adiabatic theorem of higher order which is in no logical relation to the adiabatic theorem of higher order of Avron, Fraas, Graf and Grech. We are about to gather the most important theorems of the present work in an article and will upload it to arXiv soon.

arXiv:1112.6338•Dec 29, 2011•0 citations

The Adiabatic Theorem of Quantum Mechanics

J. E. Avron, Alexander Elgart

We prove the adiabatic theorem for quantum evolution without the traditional gap condition. We show that the theorem holds essentially in all cases where it can be formulated. In particular, our result implies that the adiabatic theorem holds also for eigenvalues embedded in the continuous spectrum. If there is information on the Hölder continuity of the spectral measure, then one can also estimate the rate at which the adiabatic limit is approached. The adiabatic theorem of Quantum Mechanics describes the long time behavior of the solutions of an initial value problem where the Hamiltonian generating the evolution depends slowly in time. Traditionally, the theorem is stated for Hamiltonians that have an eigenvalue which is separated by a gap from the rest of the spectrum. Folk wisdom is that a gap condition is a sine qua non for the adiabatic theorem to hold. In particular, according to this folk wisdom, one does not expect a general adiabatic theorem for Hamiltonians that have an eigenvalue embedded in, say, the continuous spectrum. Our purpose is to show that this folk wisdom is wrong, and there is a general adiabatic theorem without a gap condition. All one really needs for the adiabatic theorem is a spectral projection for the Hamiltonian that depends smoothly on time.

•May 25, 1998•67 citations

Chapter 9: Optimization with the adiabatic theorem

Giacomo Nannicini

The adiabatic theorem is a powerful result concerning the evolution of quantum mechanical systems. Intuitively, it states the following: suppose we want to study the evolution of a quantum mechanical system governed by a given Hamiltonian \(\mathcal H\) (Def. 6.1), and the initial state of the system is the eigenstate of \(\mathcal H\) corresponding to its lowest eigenvalue. The laws of quantum physics tell us that the evolution of the system over time follows the Schrüdinger equation, Eq. (6.1). Suppose now that the Hamiltonian is not fixed, but rather, it changes very slowly over time, so that the evolution of the system is described by the differential equation \(i\,\frac{\mathrm{d} | \psi(t) \rangle}{\mathrm{d}t} = \mathcal{H}(t) | \psi(t) \rangle\), and \(\mathcal{H}(t)\) is slowly changing. If, for any value of the time parameter \(t\), there is always a gap between the lowest eigenvalue of \(\mathcal{H}(t)\) and all other eigenvalues, then the adiabatic theorem asserts that the state of the system always remains in an eigenstate with the lowest eigenvalue throughout the evolution. One specific case of interest in this chapter occurs when the time-dependent Hamiltonian \(\mathcal{H}(t)\) varies from an initial (time-independent) Hamiltonian \(\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{I}}\) to a final Hamiltonian \(\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{F}}\). If the change happens slowly, and the initial state of the system is an eigenstate of \(\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{I}}\) with minimum eigenvalue, the adiabatic theorem asserts that the evolution eventually leads to the eigenstate with minimum eigenvalue of the final Hamiltonian \(\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{F}}\). This result can be used for optimization: imagine that the initial Hamiltonian encodes an easy problem for which we can construct the eigenstate with minimum eigenvalue, and the final Hamiltonian encodes a difficult optimization problem whose solution is given by the eigenstate with minimum eigenvalue. By the adiabatic theorem, evolving the eigenstate of the initial Hamiltonian while slowly changing the Hamiltonian into the final one leads to the solution of the difficult optimization problem. Of course we need to know how slowly \(\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{I}}\) should be changed into \(\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{F}}\). The adiabatic theorem is at the heart of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), a framework that has been widely used to implement optimization algorithms on existing quantum hardware, because it has low requirements of quantum resources–although it does not guarantee improvements over classical algorithms in general. In this chapter we first discuss the adiabatic theorem, and then give an overview of QAOA.

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks•Dec 17, 2025•0 citations

Generalized Adiabatic Theorems: Quantum Systems Driven by Modulated Time-Varying Fields

Amro Dodin, Paul Brumer

We present generalized adiabatic theorems for closed and open quantum systems that can be applied to slow modulations of rapidly varying fields, such as oscillatory fields that occur in optical experiments and light-induced processes.The generalized adiabatic theorems show that a sufficiently slow modulation conserves the dynamical modes of time-dependent reference Hamiltonians.In the limiting case of modulations of static fields, the standard adiabatic theorems are recovered.Applying these results to periodic fields shows that they remain in Floquet states rather than in energy eigenstates.More generally, these adiabatic theorems can be applied to transformations of arbitrary time-dependent fields, by accounting for the rapidly varying part of the field through the dynamical normal modes, and treating the slow modulation adiabatically.As examples, we apply the generalized theorem to (a) predict the dynamics of a two-level system driven by a frequency-modulated resonant oscillation, a pathological situation beyond the applicability of traditional adiabatic theorems, and (b) to show that open quantum systems driven by slowly turned-on incoherent light, such as biomolecules under natural illumination conditions, can display only coherences that survive in the steady state.

arXiv:2105.01140•PRX Quantum•Jul 2, 2021•11 citations

Sufficient conditions for adiabaticity in open quantum systems

Alan C. Santos, M. S. Sarandy

The adiabatic approximation exhibits wide applicability in quantum mechanics, providing a simple approach for nontransitional dynamics in quantum systems governed by slowly varying time-dependent Hamiltonians. However, the standard adiabatic theorem is specifically derived for closed quantum systems. In a realistic open system scenario, the inevitable system-reservoir interaction must be taken into account, which strongly impacts the generalization of the adiabatic behavior. In this paper, we introduce sufficient conditions for the adiabatic approximation in open quantum systems. These conditions are simple yet general, providing a suitable instrument to investigate adiabaticity for arbitrary initial mixed states evolving under time local master equations. We first illustrate our results by showing that the adiabatic approximation for open systems is compatible with the description of quantum thermodynamics at thermal equilibrium, where irreversible entropy production is vanishing. We also apply our sufficient conditions as a tool in quantum control, evaluating the adiabatic behavior for the Hamiltonians of both the Deutsch algorithm and the Landau-Zener model under decoherence.

arXiv:2007.15138•Physical Review A•Nov 10, 2020•10 citations

General conditions for quantum adiabatic evolution

D. Comparat

Adiabaticity occurs when, during its evolution, a physical system remains in the instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. Unfortunately, existing results, such as the quantum adiabatic theorem based on a slow down evolution $[H(ϵt),ϵ\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0]$, are insufficient to describe an evolution driven by the Hamiltonian $H(t)$ itself. Here we derive general criteria and exact bounds, for the state and its phase, ensuring an adiabatic evolution for any Hamiltonian $H(t)$. As a corollary, we demonstrate that the commonly used condition of a slow Hamiltonian variation rate, compared to the spectral gap, is indeed sufficient to ensure adiabaticity but only when the Hamiltonian is real and nonoscillating (for instance, containing exponential or polynomial but no sinusoidal functions).

arXiv:quant-ph/0607118•Physical Review A•Jul 15, 2009•93 citations
We establish adiabatic theorems with and without spectral gap conditions for general — typically dissipative — linear operators [Formula: see text] with time-independent domains [Formula: see text] in some Banach space [Formula: see text]. Compared to the previously known adiabatic theorems — especially those without a spectral gap condition — we do not require the considered spectral values [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] to be (weakly) semisimple. We also impose only fairly weak regularity conditions. Applications are given to slowly time-varying open quantum systems and to adiabatic switching processes.
In this work we generalize some of the previously known adiabatic theorems to situations with non-unitary evolutions in Banach spaces. We prove adiabatic theorems with uniform gap condition (generalizing a theorem of Abou Salem), adiabatic theorems with non-uniform gap condition (generalizing a theorem of Kato) and qualitative as well as quantitative adiabatic theorems without gap condition (generalizing theorems of Avron and Elgart, and Teufel). Additionally, we give a generalized version of an adiabatic theorem of higher order due to Nenciu. In all these adiabatic theorems the considered spectral values need not lie on the imaginary axis and in the adiabatic theorems with spectral gap condition and the adiabatic theorem of higher order compact subsets of the spectrum are sufficient (in particular, these subsets need not consist of eigenvalues). We explore the strength of the presented adiabatic theorems in numerous examples. In particular, we show that the theorems of the present work are more general than the previously known theorems. This work was finished in October 2010 and handed in as a diploma thesis at the mathematics department of the University of Stuttgart. The more recent results of Avron, Fraas, Graf und Grech which appeared in the meantime (in June 2011) are therefore not taken into consideration here. We point out, however, that the theorems of the present work are more general than the corresponding theorems of Avron, Fraas, Graf und Grech - with the exception of the adiabatic theorem of higher order which is in no logical relation to the adiabatic theorem of higher order of Avron, Fraas, Graf and Grech. We are about to gather the most important theorems of the present work in an article and will upload it to arXiv soon.
We prove the adiabatic theorem for quantum evolution without the traditional gap condition. We show that the theorem holds essentially in all cases where it can be formulated. In particular, our result implies that the adiabatic theorem holds also for eigenvalues embedded in the continuous spectrum. If there is information on the Hölder continuity of the spectral measure, then one can also estimate the rate at which the adiabatic limit is approached. The adiabatic theorem of Quantum Mechanics describes the long time behavior of the solutions of an initial value problem where the Hamiltonian generating the evolution depends slowly in time. Traditionally, the theorem is stated for Hamiltonians that have an eigenvalue which is separated by a gap from the rest of the spectrum. Folk wisdom is that a gap condition is a sine qua non for the adiabatic theorem to hold. In particular, according to this folk wisdom, one does not expect a general adiabatic theorem for Hamiltonians that have an eigenvalue embedded in, say, the continuous spectrum. Our purpose is to show that this folk wisdom is wrong, and there is a general adiabatic theorem without a gap condition. All one really needs for the adiabatic theorem is a spectral projection for the Hamiltonian that depends smoothly on time.
The adiabatic theorem is a powerful result concerning the evolution of quantum mechanical systems. Intuitively, it states the following: suppose we want to study the evolution of a quantum mechanical system governed by a given Hamiltonian H\mathcal HH (Def. 6.1), and the initial state of the system is the eigenstate of H\mathcal HH corresponding to its lowest eigenvalue. The laws of quantum physics tell us that the evolution of the system over time follows the Schrüdinger equation, Eq. (6.1). Suppose now that the Hamiltonian is not fixed, but rather, it changes very slowly over time, so that the evolution of the system is described by the differential equation i d∣ψ(t)⟩dt=H(t)∣ψ(t)⟩i\,\frac{\mathrm{d} | \psi(t) \rangle}{\mathrm{d}t} = \mathcal{H}(t) | \psi(t) \rangleidtd∣ψ(t)⟩​=H(t)∣ψ(t)⟩, and H(t)\mathcal{H}(t)H(t) is slowly changing. If, for any value of the time parameter ttt, there is always a gap between the lowest eigenvalue of H(t)\mathcal{H}(t)H(t) and all other eigenvalues, then the adiabatic theorem asserts that the state of the system always remains in an eigenstate with the lowest eigenvalue throughout the evolution. One specific case of interest in this chapter occurs when the time-dependent Hamiltonian H(t)\mathcal{H}(t)H(t) varies from an initial (time-independent) Hamiltonian HI\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{I}}HI​ to a final Hamiltonian HF\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{F}}HF​. If the change happens slowly, and the initial state of the system is an eigenstate of HI\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{I}}HI​ with minimum eigenvalue, the adiabatic theorem asserts that the evolution eventually leads to the eigenstate with minimum eigenvalue of the final Hamiltonian HF\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{F}}HF​. This result can be used for optimization: imagine that the initial Hamiltonian encodes an easy problem for which we can construct the eigenstate with minimum eigenvalue, and the final Hamiltonian encodes a difficult optimization problem whose solution is given by the eigenstate with minimum eigenvalue. By the adiabatic theorem, evolving the eigenstate of the initial Hamiltonian while slowly changing the Hamiltonian into the final one leads to the solution of the difficult optimization problem. Of course we need to know how slowly HI\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{I}}HI​ should be changed into HF\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{F}}HF​. The adiabatic theorem is at the heart of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), a framework that has been widely used to implement optimization algorithms on existing quantum hardware, because it has low requirements of quantum resources–although it does not guarantee improvements over classical algorithms in general. In this chapter we first discuss the adiabatic theorem, and then give an overview of QAOA.
We present generalized adiabatic theorems for closed and open quantum systems that can be applied to slow modulations of rapidly varying fields, such as oscillatory fields that occur in optical experiments and light-induced processes.The generalized adiabatic theorems show that a sufficiently slow modulation conserves the dynamical modes of time-dependent reference Hamiltonians.In the limiting case of modulations of static fields, the standard adiabatic theorems are recovered.Applying these results to periodic fields shows that they remain in Floquet states rather than in energy eigenstates.More generally, these adiabatic theorems can be applied to transformations of arbitrary time-dependent fields, by accounting for the rapidly varying part of the field through the dynamical normal modes, and treating the slow modulation adiabatically.As examples, we apply the generalized theorem to (a) predict the dynamics of a two-level system driven by a frequency-modulated resonant oscillation, a pathological situation beyond the applicability of traditional adiabatic theorems, and (b) to show that open quantum systems driven by slowly turned-on incoherent light, such as biomolecules under natural illumination conditions, can display only coherences that survive in the steady state.
The adiabatic approximation exhibits wide applicability in quantum mechanics, providing a simple approach for nontransitional dynamics in quantum systems governed by slowly varying time-dependent Hamiltonians. However, the standard adiabatic theorem is specifically derived for closed quantum systems. In a realistic open system scenario, the inevitable system-reservoir interaction must be taken into account, which strongly impacts the generalization of the adiabatic behavior. In this paper, we introduce sufficient conditions for the adiabatic approximation in open quantum systems. These conditions are simple yet general, providing a suitable instrument to investigate adiabaticity for arbitrary initial mixed states evolving under time local master equations. We first illustrate our results by showing that the adiabatic approximation for open systems is compatible with the description of quantum thermodynamics at thermal equilibrium, where irreversible entropy production is vanishing. We also apply our sufficient conditions as a tool in quantum control, evaluating the adiabatic behavior for the Hamiltonians of both the Deutsch algorithm and the Landau-Zener model under decoherence.
Adiabaticity occurs when, during its evolution, a physical system remains in the instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. Unfortunately, existing results, such as the quantum adiabatic theorem based on a slow down evolution $[H(ϵt),ϵ\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0]$, are insufficient to describe an evolution driven by the Hamiltonian H(t)H(t)H(t) itself. Here we derive general criteria and exact bounds, for the state and its phase, ensuring an adiabatic evolution for any Hamiltonian H(t)H(t)H(t). As a corollary, we demonstrate that the commonly used condition of a slow Hamiltonian variation rate, compared to the spectral gap, is indeed sufficient to ensure adiabaticity but only when the Hamiltonian is real and nonoscillating (for instance, containing exponential or polynomial but no sinusoidal functions).