Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1803.09472 · Scientific Reports

Analytic estimation of transition between instantaneous eigenstates of quantum two-level system

Takayuki Suzuki, Hiromichi Nakazato, Roberto Grimaudo, ANTONINO MESSINA

Published Nov 21, 2018• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Transition amplitudes between instantaneous eigenstates of a quantum two-level system are evaluated analytically on the basis of a new parametrization of its evolution operator, which has recently been proposed to construct exact solutions. In particular, the condition under which the transitions are suppressed is examined analytically. It is shown that the analytic expression of the transition amplitude enables us, not only to confirm the adiabatic theorem, but also to derive the necessary and sufficient condition for quantum two-level system to remain in one of the instantaneous eigenstates.

DOI
10.1038/s41598-018-35741-5

Related papers

Eigenstate tracking in open quantum systems

Jun Jing, M. S. Sarandy, Daniel A. Lidar +2 more

Keeping a quantum system in a given instantaneous eigenstate is a control problem with numerous applications, e.g., in quantum information processing. The problem is even more challenging in the setting of open quantum systems, where environment-mediated transitions introduce additional decoherence channels. Adiabatic passage is a well-established solution but requires a sufficiently slow evolution time that is dictated by the adiabatic theorem. Here we develop a systematic projection theory formulation for the transitionless evolution of general open quantum systems described by time-local master equations. We derive a time-convolutionless dynamical equation for the target instantaneous eigenstate of a given time-dependent Hamiltonian. A transitionless dynamics then arises in terms of a competition between the average Hamiltonian gap and the decoherence rate, which implies optimal adiabaticity timescales. We show how eigenstate tracking can be accomplished via control pulses, without explicitly incorporating counter-diabatic driving, thus offering an alternative route to accelerate adiabaticity. We examine rectangular pulses, chaotic signals, and white noise, and find that, remarkably, the effectiveness of eigenstate tracking hardly depends on the details of the control functions. In all cases the control protocol keeps the system in the desired instantaneous eigenstate throughout the entire evolution, along an accelerated adiabatic path.

arXiv:1605.07523•Physical Review A•Oct 28, 2016•31 citations

Invalidity of the quantitative adiabatic condition and general conditions for adiabatic approximations

Dafa Li

Abstract The adiabatic theorem was proposed about 90 years ago and has played an important role in quantum physics. The quantitative adiabatic condition constructed from eigenstates and eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian is a traditional tool to estimate adiabaticity and has proven to be the necessary and sufficient condition for adiabaticity. However, recently the condition has become a controversial subject. In this paper, we list some expressions to estimate the validity of the adiabatic approximation. We show that the quantitative adiabatic condition is invalid for the adiabatic approximation via the Euclidean distance between the adiabatic state and the evolution state. Furthermore, we deduce general necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of the adiabatic approximation by different definitions.

Laser Physics Letters•Apr 12, 2016•2 citations

Transition of a superposition of states under a delta-function pulse in a two-level system

Ariel Edery

Under a time-dependent perturbation, it is common to calculate the probability of a transition from one eigenstate to another eigenstate of a quantum system. Here we study the transition from a \textit{linear superposition of eigenstates} to an eigenstate under a delta-function pulse. We consider a two-level system with energy levels $E_1$ and $E_2$ and obtain exact analytical expressions for the coefficients $c_1$ and $c_2$ of the final state. The expressions are general since the coefficients $α_1$ and $α_2$ of the initial superposition state are free parameters constrained only by $|α_1|^2+ |α_2|^2=1$. This opens up new possibilities and in particular allows for an abrupt transition to a definite eigenstate with unit probability. We obtain a general analytical expression for the probability $P_{α_1,α_2 \to 2}$ of an initial superposition state to transition to the second eigenstate. Armed with this general expression we study some interesting special cases. With a delta-function pulse, the transitions are abrupt/instantaneous and we show that they do not depend on the energy gap $E_2-E_1$ and hence on the relative phase between the two eigenstates. For specific values of the interaction strength $β$, the initial superposition transitions abruptly to a definite eigenstate with unit probability. We discuss the similarities and differences such a transition has with the collapse of the wavefunction familiar in the context of a measurement.

quant-pharXiv:2603.02407•Physics Letters A•Mar 4, 2026•0 citations

General conditions for quantum adiabatic evolution

D. Comparat

Adiabaticity occurs when, during its evolution, a physical system remains in the instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. Unfortunately, existing results, such as the quantum adiabatic theorem based on a slow down evolution $[H(ϵt),ϵ\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0]$, are insufficient to describe an evolution driven by the Hamiltonian $H(t)$ itself. Here we derive general criteria and exact bounds, for the state and its phase, ensuring an adiabatic evolution for any Hamiltonian $H(t)$. As a corollary, we demonstrate that the commonly used condition of a slow Hamiltonian variation rate, compared to the spectral gap, is indeed sufficient to ensure adiabaticity but only when the Hamiltonian is real and nonoscillating (for instance, containing exponential or polynomial but no sinusoidal functions).

arXiv:quant-ph/0607118•Physical Review A•Jul 15, 2009•93 citations

UNDERSTANDING THE QUANTUM ADIABATIC THEOREM IN THE REPRESENTATION OF THE INSTANTANEOUS EIGENSTATE

Xiaobing Luo

Using representation transformation, we transform an exatly solvable two-level Hamiltonian into a time-independent one in the representation of the instantaneous eigenstate.In terms of the basis of the instantaneous eigenstate, the physical picture of the quantum adiabatic theorem becomes very clear, which will help us understand the quantum adiabatic theorem.

Journal of Jinggangshan University•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

General conditions for a quantum adiabatic evolution

D. Comparat

Adiabaticity occurs when, during its evolution, a physical system remains in the instantaneous eigenstate of the hamiltonian. Unfortunately, existing results, such as the quantum adiabatic theorem based on a slow down evolution (H(epsilon t), epsilon ? 0), are insufficient to describe an evolution driven by the hamiltonian H(t) itself. Here we derive general criteria and exact bounds, for the state and its phase, ensuring an adiabatic evolution for any hamiltonian H(t). As a corollary we demonstrate that the commonly used condition of a slow hamiltonian variation rate, compared to the spectral gap, is indeed sufficient to ensure adiabaticity but only when the hamiltonian is real and non oscillating (for instance containing exponential or polynomial but no sinusoidal functions).

arXiv:0906.4453•Jun 24, 2009•2 citations
Transition amplitudes between instantaneous eigenstates of a quantum two-level system are evaluated analytically on the basis of a new parametrization of its evolution operator, which has recently been proposed to construct exact solutions. In particular, the condition under which the transitions are suppressed is examined analytically. It is shown that the analytic expression of the transition amplitude enables us, not only to confirm the adiabatic theorem, but also to derive the necessary and sufficient condition for quantum two-level system to remain in one of the instantaneous eigenstates.
Keeping a quantum system in a given instantaneous eigenstate is a control problem with numerous applications, e.g., in quantum information processing. The problem is even more challenging in the setting of open quantum systems, where environment-mediated transitions introduce additional decoherence channels. Adiabatic passage is a well-established solution but requires a sufficiently slow evolution time that is dictated by the adiabatic theorem. Here we develop a systematic projection theory formulation for the transitionless evolution of general open quantum systems described by time-local master equations. We derive a time-convolutionless dynamical equation for the target instantaneous eigenstate of a given time-dependent Hamiltonian. A transitionless dynamics then arises in terms of a competition between the average Hamiltonian gap and the decoherence rate, which implies optimal adiabaticity timescales. We show how eigenstate tracking can be accomplished via control pulses, without explicitly incorporating counter-diabatic driving, thus offering an alternative route to accelerate adiabaticity. We examine rectangular pulses, chaotic signals, and white noise, and find that, remarkably, the effectiveness of eigenstate tracking hardly depends on the details of the control functions. In all cases the control protocol keeps the system in the desired instantaneous eigenstate throughout the entire evolution, along an accelerated adiabatic path.
Abstract The adiabatic theorem was proposed about 90 years ago and has played an important role in quantum physics. The quantitative adiabatic condition constructed from eigenstates and eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian is a traditional tool to estimate adiabaticity and has proven to be the necessary and sufficient condition for adiabaticity. However, recently the condition has become a controversial subject. In this paper, we list some expressions to estimate the validity of the adiabatic approximation. We show that the quantitative adiabatic condition is invalid for the adiabatic approximation via the Euclidean distance between the adiabatic state and the evolution state. Furthermore, we deduce general necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of the adiabatic approximation by different definitions.
Under a time-dependent perturbation, it is common to calculate the probability of a transition from one eigenstate to another eigenstate of a quantum system. Here we study the transition from a \textit{linear superposition of eigenstates} to an eigenstate under a delta-function pulse. We consider a two-level system with energy levels E1E_1E1​ and E2E_2E2​ and obtain exact analytical expressions for the coefficients c1c_1c1​ and c2c_2c2​ of the final state. The expressions are general since the coefficients α1α_1α1​ and α2α_2α2​ of the initial superposition state are free parameters constrained only by ∣α1∣2+∣α2∣2=1|α_1|^2+ |α_2|^2=1∣α1​∣2+∣α2​∣2=1. This opens up new possibilities and in particular allows for an abrupt transition to a definite eigenstate with unit probability. We obtain a general analytical expression for the probability Pα1,α2→2P_{α_1,α_2 \to 2}Pα1​,α2​→2​ of an initial superposition state to transition to the second eigenstate. Armed with this general expression we study some interesting special cases. With a delta-function pulse, the transitions are abrupt/instantaneous and we show that they do not depend on the energy gap E2−E1E_2-E_1E2​−E1​ and hence on the relative phase between the two eigenstates. For specific values of the interaction strength βββ, the initial superposition transitions abruptly to a definite eigenstate with unit probability. We discuss the similarities and differences such a transition has with the collapse of the wavefunction familiar in the context of a measurement.
Adiabaticity occurs when, during its evolution, a physical system remains in the instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. Unfortunately, existing results, such as the quantum adiabatic theorem based on a slow down evolution $[H(ϵt),ϵ\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0]$, are insufficient to describe an evolution driven by the Hamiltonian H(t)H(t)H(t) itself. Here we derive general criteria and exact bounds, for the state and its phase, ensuring an adiabatic evolution for any Hamiltonian H(t)H(t)H(t). As a corollary, we demonstrate that the commonly used condition of a slow Hamiltonian variation rate, compared to the spectral gap, is indeed sufficient to ensure adiabaticity but only when the Hamiltonian is real and nonoscillating (for instance, containing exponential or polynomial but no sinusoidal functions).
Adiabaticity occurs when, during its evolution, a physical system remains in the instantaneous eigenstate of the hamiltonian. Unfortunately, existing results, such as the quantum adiabatic theorem based on a slow down evolution (H(epsilon t), epsilon ? 0), are insufficient to describe an evolution driven by the hamiltonian H(t) itself. Here we derive general criteria and exact bounds, for the state and its phase, ensuring an adiabatic evolution for any hamiltonian H(t). As a corollary we demonstrate that the commonly used condition of a slow hamiltonian variation rate, compared to the spectral gap, is indeed sufficient to ensure adiabaticity but only when the hamiltonian is real and non oscillating (for instance containing exponential or polynomial but no sinusoidal functions).