Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1802.10148

Time-dependent treatment of tunneling and Time's Arrow problem

S. A. Gurvitz

Published Feb 27, 2018• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

New time-dependent treatment of tunneling from localized state to continuum is proposed. It does not use the Laplace transform (Green's function's method) and can be applied for time-dependent potentials, as well. This approach results in simple expressions describing dynamics of tunneling to Markovian and non-Markovian reservoirs in the time-interval $-\infty

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1802.10148

Related papers

Quantum Theory of Tunneling

Mohsen Razavy

A Brief History of Quantum Tunneling Some Basic Questions Concerning Quantum Tunneling Simple Solvable Problems Time-Dependence of the Wave Function in One-Dimensional Tunneling Semiclassical Approximations Generalization of the Bohr - Sommerfeld Quantization Rule and its Application to Quantum Tunneling Gamow's Theory, Complex Eigenvalues, and the Wave Function of a Decaying State Tunneling in Symmetric and Asymmetric Local Potentials and Tunneling in Nonlocal and Quasi-Solvable Barriers Classical Descriptions of Tunneling Tunneling in Time-Dependent Barriers Decay Width and Scattering Theory The Method of Variable Reflection Amplitude Applied to Solve Multichannel Tunneling Problems Path Integral and Its Semi-Classical Approximation in Quantum Tunneling Heisenberg's Equations of Motion for Tunneling Wigner Distribution Function in Quantum Tunneling Decay Widths of Siegert States, Complex Scaling and Dilatation Transformation Multidimensional Quantum Tunneling Group and Signal Velocities Time-Delay, Reflection Time Operator and Minimum Tunneling Time More about Tunneling Time Tunneling of a System with Internal Degrees of Freedom Motion of a Particle in a Waveguide with Variable Cross Section and in a Space Bounded by a Dumbbell-Shaped Object Relativistic Formulation of Quantum Tunneling Inverse Problems of Quantum Tunneling Some Examples of Quantum Tunneling in Atomic and Molecular Physics Some Examples from Condensed Matter Physics Alpha Decay.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•259 citations

Alternative Method for Determining the Feynman Propagator of a Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanical Problem

M. Moshińsky

A direct procedure for determining the propagator associated with a quantum mechanical problem was given by the Path Integration Procedure of Feynman.The Green function, which is the Fourier Transform with respect to the time variable of the propagator, can be derived later.In our approach, with the help of a Laplace transform, a direct way to get the energy dependent Green function is presented, and the propagator can be obtained later with an inverse Laplace transform.The method is illustrated through simple one dimensional examples and for time independent potentials, though it can be generalized to the derivation of more complicated propagators.

arXiv:0711.3544•Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications•Nov 22, 2007•9 citations

Quantum tunneling time and tunneling in time-dependent potentials: A general formulation and some exactly solvable models

Ashok V. Pimpale

Progress in Quantum Electronics•Jan 1, 2004•6 citations

SOLUTION OF THE TIME DEPENDENT SCHROEDINGER EQUATION USING LAPLACE TRANSFORMATION METHOD.

Jean Hladik

•Jan 1, 1972•0 citations

Does the measurement take place when nobody observes it?

Shmuel Gurvitz

We consider non‐selective continuous measurements of a particle tunneling to a reservoir of finite band‐width (Λ). The particle is continuously monitored by frequent projective measurements (“quantum trajectory”), separated by a time‐interval τ. A simple analytical expression for the decay rate has been obtained. For Markovian reservoirs ( ), no effect of the measurements is found. Otherwise for a finite Λ, the decay rate always depends on the measurement time τ. This result is compared with alternative calculations, with no intermediate measurements, but when the measurement device is included in the Schrödinger evolution. We found that the detector affects the system by the decoherence rate ( ), related to the detector's signal. Although both treatments are different, the final results become very close for . This τ corresponds to the minimal time for which the detector's signal can be distinguished by an “observer”. This indicates a fundamental role of information in quantum motion and can be used for the extension of the quantum trajectory method for non‐Markovian environments.

arXiv:1605.05553•Fortschritte der Physik•Nov 8, 2016•10 citations

A comparison of solutions to the time dependent Schrödinger equation

Chi-Ming Chang

Various methods providing approximate solutions to the time dependent Schrödinger equation proposed in a previous paper are compared using two examples for which the exact analytic solutions are known. Results show that the new method proposed in the previous paper is better than the traditional method for time dependent parameters.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Oct 15, 1977•0 citations
New time-dependent treatment of tunneling from localized state to continuum is proposed. It does not use the Laplace transform (Green's function's method) and can be applied for time-dependent potentials, as well. This approach results in simple expressions describing dynamics of tunneling to Markovian and non-Markovian reservoirs in the time-interval $-\infty
A Brief History of Quantum Tunneling Some Basic Questions Concerning Quantum Tunneling Simple Solvable Problems Time-Dependence of the Wave Function in One-Dimensional Tunneling Semiclassical Approximations Generalization of the Bohr - Sommerfeld Quantization Rule and its Application to Quantum Tunneling Gamow's Theory, Complex Eigenvalues, and the Wave Function of a Decaying State Tunneling in Symmetric and Asymmetric Local Potentials and Tunneling in Nonlocal and Quasi-Solvable Barriers Classical Descriptions of Tunneling Tunneling in Time-Dependent Barriers Decay Width and Scattering Theory The Method of Variable Reflection Amplitude Applied to Solve Multichannel Tunneling Problems Path Integral and Its Semi-Classical Approximation in Quantum Tunneling Heisenberg's Equations of Motion for Tunneling Wigner Distribution Function in Quantum Tunneling Decay Widths of Siegert States, Complex Scaling and Dilatation Transformation Multidimensional Quantum Tunneling Group and Signal Velocities Time-Delay, Reflection Time Operator and Minimum Tunneling Time More about Tunneling Time Tunneling of a System with Internal Degrees of Freedom Motion of a Particle in a Waveguide with Variable Cross Section and in a Space Bounded by a Dumbbell-Shaped Object Relativistic Formulation of Quantum Tunneling Inverse Problems of Quantum Tunneling Some Examples of Quantum Tunneling in Atomic and Molecular Physics Some Examples from Condensed Matter Physics Alpha Decay.
A direct procedure for determining the propagator associated with a quantum mechanical problem was given by the Path Integration Procedure of Feynman.The Green function, which is the Fourier Transform with respect to the time variable of the propagator, can be derived later.In our approach, with the help of a Laplace transform, a direct way to get the energy dependent Green function is presented, and the propagator can be obtained later with an inverse Laplace transform.The method is illustrated through simple one dimensional examples and for time independent potentials, though it can be generalized to the derivation of more complicated propagators.
We consider non‐selective continuous measurements of a particle tunneling to a reservoir of finite band‐width (Λ). The particle is continuously monitored by frequent projective measurements (“quantum trajectory”), separated by a time‐interval τ. A simple analytical expression for the decay rate has been obtained. For Markovian reservoirs ( ), no effect of the measurements is found. Otherwise for a finite Λ, the decay rate always depends on the measurement time τ. This result is compared with alternative calculations, with no intermediate measurements, but when the measurement device is included in the Schrödinger evolution. We found that the detector affects the system by the decoherence rate ( ), related to the detector's signal. Although both treatments are different, the final results become very close for . This τ corresponds to the minimal time for which the detector's signal can be distinguished by an “observer”. This indicates a fundamental role of information in quantum motion and can be used for the extension of the quantum trajectory method for non‐Markovian environments.