Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1801.02096

On a new prediction of Causal Quantum Mechanics for the two-slit interference experiment with electrons

Eduardo Sergio Santini, Germán M. Chiappe, González, Rafael

Published Jan 6, 2018• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The causal quantum mechanics (i.e. Bohmian or de Broglie-Bohm or Bohm-de Broglie quantum mechanics) has made possible to calculate the trajectories of electrons in a typical double-slit experiment [C. Philippidis et al., Il Nuovo Cimento, 52 B, 15-28 (1979)]. The trajectories do not correspond to an uniform movement but to an accelerated one. The acceleration is caused by the quantum potential. From the quantum theoretical point of view, there is a probability for the electron to emit photons, with a certain emission power, during its movement from the slits to the screen. We find a quantum general formula for the emission power of photons, valid independently of the interpretation. Then, according to the Copenhagen interpretation, this formula gives a strictly zero value for the emission power because the electron moves as a free particle after it leaves the slit and before reach the screen. Then, there is no emission of photons. In the case of the causal interpretation, the emission power results, for a concrete real experiment, in a very tiny but not a zero value, driven by the square of the quantum potential gradient. We give an idea of the type of spectrum that could be measured. A brief idea of a possible experimental arrangement in order to detect this effect, is given.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1801.02096

Related papers

On the two-slit interference experiment with electrons : a theoretical prediction of Bohm-de Broglie quantum mechanics different from the prediction of usual Copenhagen quantum mechanics

Eduardo Sergio Santini, Germán M. Chiappe

The Bohm-de Broglie quantum mechanics has made possible to calculate the trajectories of electrons in a typical double-slit experiment[C. Philippidis et al., Il Nuovo Cimento, 52 B, 15-28 (1979)]. The trajectories do not correspond to an uniform movement but to an accelerated one. The acceleration is caused by the quantum potential. From the quantum theoretical point of view, the accelerated electrons should, with a certain probabil-ity, emit photons during its movement from the slits to the screen. According to the Copenhagen interpretation we found that this quantity is strictly zero because the electron moves as a free particle along its path after it leaves the slit and before reach the screen. Then, there is no emission of photons. On the other hand, by using the Bohm-de Broglie (BdB) approach we calculate the emission power, giving a general formula and which results, for a concrete real experiment, in a very tiny but not a vanishing value. We give an idea of the type of spectrum that could be measured. Therefore we have shown that the theoretical predictions of the usual quan-tum mechanics and that of Bohm-de Broglie’s interpretation are different. An experiment could determine the correct prediction.

Notas de Física•Apr 10, 2018•0 citations

Experimental Study of Bohm’s Trajectory Theory --- Comprehensive Double Slit Experiments (2)

Hui Peng

Young’s double slit experiments, which represent the mystery of quantum mechanics, have been interpreted by quantum probability waves and by de Broglie-Bohm trajectories/pilot waves. Computer simulations of Bohm’s theory predict that (1) trajectories cannot cross, and (2) there is a triangle-shape area behind the double slit, in which there is no trajectory, i.e., no photons. In this article, we report the observations of novel comprehensive double slit experiments, which show that trajectories exist and cross in the triangular area. We show new phenomena that, in 2D cross double slit experiments and which way 2D cross double slit experiments, photons propagate along trajectories in the far field, and behave as particle and distribute as wave.

International Journal of Physics•Apr 23, 2021•5 citations

Classical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

James Paul Wesley

Following de Broglie, Bohm, and others, it is assumed that quantum mechanics may be interpreted causally and that the $\ensuremath{\psi}$ function plays the role of a generating function for particle trajectories. By arguing that the $\ensuremath{\psi}$ function should not be interpreted as a probability amplitude, a new method for generating particle trajectories is postulated. The four-momentum of a scalar particle is assumed to be given as the gradient of an unspecified function $F(\ensuremath{\psi})$, where $\ensuremath{\psi}$ is a pure real solution of the Klein-Gordon equation. Since the location of a particle is determined solely by its trajectory, the probability distribution differs from $\ensuremath{\psi}{\ensuremath{\psi}}^{*}$; and therefore, ordinary experimental results differing from the traditional theory may, in principle, be predicted. Particle motion and trajectories are discussed for three examples: a free particle, a particle in a box, and the double slit.

Physical Review•Jun 15, 1961•8 citations

Bohmian Mechanics: Towards Illuminating The Quantum Potential

Matthew J. Brown

This thesis deals with the theoretical and experimental details of trying to understand \nand infer the quantum potential from Bohmian mechanics using Bohmian trajectories. In \nthis work, some of the key components of the history of Bohmian mechanics is given, a \ntheoretical explanation of how to measure the Bohmian potential, followed by an overview \nof the experimental apparatus and its components. Some tests of the experimental apparatus \nare then presented followed by a discussion of the results. Lastly, some interesting \nfollow up experiments are de ned and discussed. \n \nBohmian mechanics, while completely agreeing with quantum mechanics could not be \nmore di erent from the standard notions such as the fact that particles retain their classical \nidentity of a point like object that have de nite and causal trajectories. In this realm, rst \ndeveloped by de Broglie, these particles move and are guided by a wave, which turns out \nto be the wave function itself. Typically, the velocity of the particles anywhere in space \nis given by spatial derivatives of the phase of this wave and the energy content of the \nparticles is given by the temporal derivative. The trajectories can bend even when there \nare no outside (classical) forces that are acting on the objects. This is due to the fact that \nthese observations of Bohmian mechanics must conform to the standard measurements in \nquantum mechanics. \n \nOne detail that has gone unmeasured (in the sense of inference) in a laboratory setting, \nis the quantum potential (the mysterious force that moves particle to make sure they \nreproduce the measurements of quantum mechanics). Using the technique of measuring \nthe trajectories of photons, the question was asked, can the quantum potential for single \nphotons in the double slit be inferred? A setup has been built in order to try and answer this \nquestion using a single photon detecting camera and a heralding spontaneous parametric \ndown conversion source. Unfortunately, the quantum potential still goes unmeasured due \nto noise in the camera pictures destroying the integrity of the signal and an interesting \nproblem of trying to stitch together the quantum potential at the varying z-planes.

•Feb 20, 2018•1 citation

Double-Slit Interferometry: The De Broglie Particle-Wave Duality

Jacques Rault

The de Broglie wavelength λ= h/mv of simple particles (photon, electron, neutron) atoms (helium, neon) and molecules (fullerene, fluorous porphyrin) deduced from the de Broglie (dB) relation and those measured by double slits interferometry are compared.The de Broglie relation is verified in very large domains of velocity v and mass m of the particles, respectively 8 and 13 orders of magnitude.In this paper one analyses the interference spectra of photons and electrons and give the Intensity Relations IR(II-DI) between the interference intensity (II) by two slits and the diffracted intensity (DI) by one slit.The double slits interference in the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation is an interference of particle and pilot waves, internal and external waves each passing by a different slit.The velocities of these waves are discussed.From the universal de Broglie relation and the relation vp = vw between the particle and pilot waves one shows that only in the domain of the maximum of the light spectrum (λm~ 550 µm) the dB relation leads to the Plank-Einstein (PE) relation hν=mc 2 .A measure of the mass of the photon m* = 4 10 -36 Kg is deduced.The de Broglie relation for different wave lengths shows that the PE relation must be modified, the velocity of light is not constant as shown by various experiments: Global Positioning Systems GPS, red shift in astronomy etc.This has been discussed by Marmet in years 2000.The same conclusion was given by Sato in 2010 for electromagnetic waves.The trajectories of electrons observed by Jönsson by double slits interferometry and then calculated by Gondran according to the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation are then analyzed in detail.The correlations observed between the properties of these trajectories at short and long distances from the slits permit to give the general equation of the trajectories.The origin of these properties is discussed in the framework model of De Broglie and Bohm, assuming that at any point the intensity of the two waves (particle and pilot wave) passing by the 2 slits are deceasing functions of the distance to the slits.The changes of direction of the trajectories are explained.

Juniper Online Journal Material Science•Aug 21, 2023•0 citations

A suggested experiment to distinguish between the Bohmian Interpretation and the Standard Quantum Mechanics

Ke-Xia Jiang, Ke San-Min

Based on the double-slit experiment of electrons, we suggest a proposal of thought experiment to distinguish between the Bohmian Interpretation (BI) and the Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM). We mainly focus on the discussion of the meaning of the wave function (Schrödinger-$ψ$). The key technique is require to insert some slow-electrons or weak electron current into the space between the double-slit and the detector plane. We find that the two theories finally give out two totally different results about the affections which the externally inserted electrons cause to the original pattern of the interference fringes. Under the BI, the externally inserted electrons also can be influenced by the Quantum Potential (QP) in a totally same way with the electrons which come from the slits, so the positions they arrived at are preferred to certain bright zones, and the interference pattern will become more clearer. While under the SQM, the Schrödinger-$ψ$ does not represent an objectively real field, but only a mathematical construction of the probability characteristics of the particle itself, so the externally inserted electrons and the electrons which come from the slits have no correlations with each other. No any priority positions at the detector plane the externally inserted electrons will arrive. And the affections are only the addition of a uniform bright background. In such a meaning, the dark zones of the fringes of the interference pattern have been filled.

arXiv:1008.0424•Aug 2, 2010•0 citations
The causal quantum mechanics (i.e. Bohmian or de Broglie-Bohm or Bohm-de Broglie quantum mechanics) has made possible to calculate the trajectories of electrons in a typical double-slit experiment [C. Philippidis et al., Il Nuovo Cimento, 52 B, 15-28 (1979)]. The trajectories do not correspond to an uniform movement but to an accelerated one. The acceleration is caused by the quantum potential. From the quantum theoretical point of view, there is a probability for the electron to emit photons, with a certain emission power, during its movement from the slits to the screen. We find a quantum general formula for the emission power of photons, valid independently of the interpretation. Then, according to the Copenhagen interpretation, this formula gives a strictly zero value for the emission power because the electron moves as a free particle after it leaves the slit and before reach the screen. Then, there is no emission of photons. In the case of the causal interpretation, the emission power results, for a concrete real experiment, in a very tiny but not a zero value, driven by the square of the quantum potential gradient. We give an idea of the type of spectrum that could be measured. A brief idea of a possible experimental arrangement in order to detect this effect, is given.
The Bohm-de Broglie quantum mechanics has made possible to calculate the trajectories of electrons in a typical double-slit experiment[C. Philippidis et al., Il Nuovo Cimento, 52 B, 15-28 (1979)]. The trajectories do not correspond to an uniform movement but to an accelerated one. The acceleration is caused by the quantum potential. From the quantum theoretical point of view, the accelerated electrons should, with a certain probabil-ity, emit photons during its movement from the slits to the screen. According to the Copenhagen interpretation we found that this quantity is strictly zero because the electron moves as a free particle along its path after it leaves the slit and before reach the screen. Then, there is no emission of photons. On the other hand, by using the Bohm-de Broglie (BdB) approach we calculate the emission power, giving a general formula and which results, for a concrete real experiment, in a very tiny but not a vanishing value. We give an idea of the type of spectrum that could be measured. Therefore we have shown that the theoretical predictions of the usual quan-tum mechanics and that of Bohm-de Broglie’s interpretation are different. An experiment could determine the correct prediction.
Young’s double slit experiments, which represent the mystery of quantum mechanics, have been interpreted by quantum probability waves and by de Broglie-Bohm trajectories/pilot waves. Computer simulations of Bohm’s theory predict that (1) trajectories cannot cross, and (2) there is a triangle-shape area behind the double slit, in which there is no trajectory, i.e., no photons. In this article, we report the observations of novel comprehensive double slit experiments, which show that trajectories exist and cross in the triangular area. We show new phenomena that, in 2D cross double slit experiments and which way 2D cross double slit experiments, photons propagate along trajectories in the far field, and behave as particle and distribute as wave.
Following de Broglie, Bohm, and others, it is assumed that quantum mechanics may be interpreted causally and that the $\ensuremath{\psi}$ function plays the role of a generating function for particle trajectories. By arguing that the $\ensuremath{\psi}$ function should not be interpreted as a probability amplitude, a new method for generating particle trajectories is postulated. The four-momentum of a scalar particle is assumed to be given as the gradient of an unspecified function $F(\ensuremath{\psi})$, where $\ensuremath{\psi}$ is a pure real solution of the Klein-Gordon equation. Since the location of a particle is determined solely by its trajectory, the probability distribution differs from $\ensuremath{\psi}{\ensuremath{\psi}}^{*}$; and therefore, ordinary experimental results differing from the traditional theory may, in principle, be predicted. Particle motion and trajectories are discussed for three examples: a free particle, a particle in a box, and the double slit.
This thesis deals with the theoretical and experimental details of trying to understand \nand infer the quantum potential from Bohmian mechanics using Bohmian trajectories. In \nthis work, some of the key components of the history of Bohmian mechanics is given, a \ntheoretical explanation of how to measure the Bohmian potential, followed by an overview \nof the experimental apparatus and its components. Some tests of the experimental apparatus \nare then presented followed by a discussion of the results. Lastly, some interesting \nfollow up experiments are de ned and discussed. \n \nBohmian mechanics, while completely agreeing with quantum mechanics could not be \nmore di erent from the standard notions such as the fact that particles retain their classical \nidentity of a point like object that have de nite and causal trajectories. In this realm, rst \ndeveloped by de Broglie, these particles move and are guided by a wave, which turns out \nto be the wave function itself. Typically, the velocity of the particles anywhere in space \nis given by spatial derivatives of the phase of this wave and the energy content of the \nparticles is given by the temporal derivative. The trajectories can bend even when there \nare no outside (classical) forces that are acting on the objects. This is due to the fact that \nthese observations of Bohmian mechanics must conform to the standard measurements in \nquantum mechanics. \n \nOne detail that has gone unmeasured (in the sense of inference) in a laboratory setting, \nis the quantum potential (the mysterious force that moves particle to make sure they \nreproduce the measurements of quantum mechanics). Using the technique of measuring \nthe trajectories of photons, the question was asked, can the quantum potential for single \nphotons in the double slit be inferred? A setup has been built in order to try and answer this \nquestion using a single photon detecting camera and a heralding spontaneous parametric \ndown conversion source. Unfortunately, the quantum potential still goes unmeasured due \nto noise in the camera pictures destroying the integrity of the signal and an interesting \nproblem of trying to stitch together the quantum potential at the varying z-planes.
The de Broglie wavelength λ= h/mv of simple particles (photon, electron, neutron) atoms (helium, neon) and molecules (fullerene, fluorous porphyrin) deduced from the de Broglie (dB) relation and those measured by double slits interferometry are compared.The de Broglie relation is verified in very large domains of velocity v and mass m of the particles, respectively 8 and 13 orders of magnitude.In this paper one analyses the interference spectra of photons and electrons and give the Intensity Relations IR(II-DI) between the interference intensity (II) by two slits and the diffracted intensity (DI) by one slit.The double slits interference in the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation is an interference of particle and pilot waves, internal and external waves each passing by a different slit.The velocities of these waves are discussed.From the universal de Broglie relation and the relation vp = vw between the particle and pilot waves one shows that only in the domain of the maximum of the light spectrum (λm~ 550 µm) the dB relation leads to the Plank-Einstein (PE) relation hν=mc 2 .A measure of the mass of the photon m* = 4 10 -36 Kg is deduced.The de Broglie relation for different wave lengths shows that the PE relation must be modified, the velocity of light is not constant as shown by various experiments: Global Positioning Systems GPS, red shift in astronomy etc.This has been discussed by Marmet in years 2000.The same conclusion was given by Sato in 2010 for electromagnetic waves.The trajectories of electrons observed by Jönsson by double slits interferometry and then calculated by Gondran according to the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation are then analyzed in detail.The correlations observed between the properties of these trajectories at short and long distances from the slits permit to give the general equation of the trajectories.The origin of these properties is discussed in the framework model of De Broglie and Bohm, assuming that at any point the intensity of the two waves (particle and pilot wave) passing by the 2 slits are deceasing functions of the distance to the slits.The changes of direction of the trajectories are explained.
Based on the double-slit experiment of electrons, we suggest a proposal of thought experiment to distinguish between the Bohmian Interpretation (BI) and the Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM). We mainly focus on the discussion of the meaning of the wave function (Schrödinger-ψψψ). The key technique is require to insert some slow-electrons or weak electron current into the space between the double-slit and the detector plane. We find that the two theories finally give out two totally different results about the affections which the externally inserted electrons cause to the original pattern of the interference fringes. Under the BI, the externally inserted electrons also can be influenced by the Quantum Potential (QP) in a totally same way with the electrons which come from the slits, so the positions they arrived at are preferred to certain bright zones, and the interference pattern will become more clearer. While under the SQM, the Schrödinger-ψψψ does not represent an objectively real field, but only a mathematical construction of the probability characteristics of the particle itself, so the externally inserted electrons and the electrons which come from the slits have no correlations with each other. No any priority positions at the detector plane the externally inserted electrons will arrive. And the affections are only the addition of a uniform bright background. In such a meaning, the dark zones of the fringes of the interference pattern have been filled.