Quantum algorithms have demonstrated promising speed-ups over classical algorithms in the context of computational learning theory - despite the presence of noise. In this work, we give an overview of recent quantum speed-ups, revisit the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm in a new learning problem extension over an arbitrary cyclic group and discuss applications in cryptography, such as the Learning with Errors problem. We turn to post-quantum cryptography and investigate attacks in which an adversary is given quantum access to a classical encryption scheme. In particular, we consider new notions of security under non-adaptive quantum chosen-ciphertext attacks and propose symmetric-key encryption schemes based on quantum-secure pseudorandom functions that fulfil our definitions. In order to prove security, we introduce novel relabeling techniques and show that, in an oracle model with an arbitrary advice state, no quantum algorithm making superposition queries can reliably distinguish between the class of functions that are randomly relabeled at a small subset of the domain. Finally, we discuss current progress in quantum computing technology, particularly with a focus on implementations of quantum algorithms on the ion-trap architecture, and shed light on the relevance and effectiveness of common noise models adopted in computational learning theory.
Quantum algorithms have demonstrated promising speed-ups over classical algorithms in the context of computational learning theory - despite the presence of noise. In this work, we give an overview of recent quantum speed-ups, revisit the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm in a new learning problem extension over an arbitrary cyclic group and discuss applications in cryptography, such as the Learning with Errors problem. We turn to post-quantum cryptography and investigate attacks in which an adversary is given quantum access to a classical encryption scheme. In particular, we consider new notions of security under non-adaptive quantum chosen-ciphertext attacks and propose symmetric-key encryption schemes based on quantum-secure pseudorandom functions that fulfil our definitions. In order to prove security, we introduce novel relabeling techniques and show that, in an oracle model with an arbitrary advice state, no quantum algorithm making superposition queries can reliably distinguish between the class of functions that are randomly relabeled at a small subset of the domain. Finally, we discuss current progress in quantum computing technology, particularly with a focus on implementations of quantum algorithms on the ion-trap architecture, and shed light on the relevance and effectiveness of common noise models adopted in computational learning theory.
Quantum computing is a significant threat to classical public-key cryptography. In strong "quantum access" security models, numerous symmetric-key cryptosystems are also vulnerable. We consider classical encryption in a model which grants the adversary quantum oracle access to encryption and decryption, but where the latter is restricted to non-adaptive (i.e., pre-challenge) queries only. We define this model formally using appropriate notions of ciphertext indistinguishability and semantic security (which are equivalent by standard arguments) and call it QCCA1 in analogy to the classical CCA1 security model. Using a bound on quantum random-access codes, we show that the standard PRF-based encryption schemes are QCCA1-secure when instantiated with quantum-secure primitives. We then revisit standard IND-CPA-secure Learning with Errors (LWE) encryption and show that leaking just one quantum decryption query (and no other queries or leakage of any kind) allows the adversary to recover the full secret key with constant success probability. In the classical setting, by contrast, recovering the key requires a linear number of decryption queries. The algorithm at the core of our attack is a (large-modulus version of) the well-known Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm. We emphasize that our results should not be interpreted as a weakness of these cryptosystems in their stated security setting (i.e., post-quantum chosen-plaintext secrecy). Rather, our results mean that, if these cryptosystems are exposed to chosen-ciphertext attacks (e.g., as a result of deployment in an inappropriate real-world setting) then quantum attacks are even more devastating than classical ones.
Post-quantum cryptography studies the security of classical, i.e. non-quantum cryptographic protocols against quantum attacks. Until recently, the considered adversaries were assumed to use quantum computers and behave like classical adversaries otherwise. A more conservative approach is to assume that also the communication between the honest parties and the adversary is (partly) quantum. We discuss several options to define secure encryption and authentication against these stronger adversaries who can carry out 'superposition attacks'. We re-prove a recent result of Boneh and Zhandry, stating that a uniformly random function (and hence also a quantum-secure pseudorandom function) can serve as a message-authentication code which is secure, even if the adversary can evaluate this function in superposition.
Large-scale quantum computing poses a major threat to classical public-key cryptography. Recently, strong “quantum access” security models have shown that numerous symmetric-key cryptosystems are also vulnerable. In this paper, we consider classical encryption in a model that grants the adversary quantum oracle access to encryption and decryption, but where we restrict the latter to non-adaptive (i.e., pre-challenge) queries only. We formalize this model using appropriate notions of ciphertext indistinguishability and semantic security (which are equivalent by standard arguments) and call it QCCA 1 in analogy to the classical CCA 1 security model. We show that the standard pseudorandom function ( PRF )-based encryption schemes are QCCA 1 -secure when instantiated with quantum-secure primitives. Our security proofs use a strong bound on quantum random-access codes with shared randomness. Revisiting plain IND − CPA -secure Learning with Errors ( LWE ) encryption, we show that leaking only a single quantum decryption query (and no other leakage or queries of any kind) allows the adversary to recover the full secret key with constant success probability. Information-theoretically, full recovery of the key in the classical setting requires at least a linear number of decryption queries. Our results thus challenge the notion that LWE is unconditionally “just as secure” quantumly as it is classically. The algorithm at the core of our attack is a new variant of the well-known Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm. Finally, we emphasize that our results should not be interpreted as a weakness of these cryptosystems in their stated security setting (i.e., post-quantum chosen-plaintext secrecy). Rather, our results mean that, if these cryptosystems are exposed to chosen-ciphertext attacks (e.g., as a result of deployment in an inappropriate real-world setting) then quantum attacks are even more devastating than classical ones.
The rapid development of quantum computing technologies poses a serious threat to modern public-key cryptographic systems. Classical cryptographic algorithms such as RSA and elliptic-curve cryptography rely on mathematical problems that can be efficiently solved using quantum algorithms. Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) aims to develop cryptographic schemes that remain secure even in the presence of quantum adversaries. This paper investigates the mathematical foundations of PQC, focusing on lattice-based, code-based, and hash-based cryptographic constructions. Security models based on computational complexity theory are analyzed, and illustrative examples using Learning With Errors (LWE) and decoding problems are presented. Experimental analysis demonstrates that PQC schemes provide strong resistance against both classical and quantum attacks when appropriate parameters are selected. The results highlight the importance of adopting new cryptographic standards to ensure long-term data security in quantum computing environments.
Abstract It is viewed as revolutionary technology, offering incredible potential in terms of computing power within different scientific and industrial sectors. Quantum computers provide remarkable computing power; however, they also present significant security risks to existing public-key cryptography systems used to secure digital communication, online banking systems, government, medical applications, cloud computing systems, and IoT systems. Security of commonly used encryption schemes like RSA, DH, and ECC depends on mathematical problems that are impossible for classical computers to solve but can be easily resolved with the help of powerful enough quantum computers by using Shor’s algorithm. Furthermore, Grover’s algorithm makes exhaustive search attacks much faster, thus effectively lowering the security level of symmetric encryption schemes since it provides the speed-up for brute-force attacks. Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) turned out to be an effective and scalable method to protect digital data from attacks using quantum computing. In contrast to quantum cryptography, which requires a special quantum communication channel, PQC uses classical cryptographic algorithms that cannot be broken down by either classical or quantum computer due to certain mathematical problems. This research paper offers an extensive exploration of post-quantum cryptography through the analysis of the development of quantum computing, weaknesses of current cryptographic techniques, and mathematics behind quantum-resistant algorithms. Moreover, this paper explores the major classes of PQC techniques such as lattice-based, code-based, hash-based, multivariate, and isogeny-based cryptography and provides details about their security and application. Moreover, the report gives an overview of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Project and analyzes recent standardizations of quantum-proof algorithms to be utilized in future digital infrastructures. Keywords: Post-Quantum Encryption, Quantum Security, Quantum-Proof Public-Key Cryptography, Lattice-Based Security Protocols, ML-KEM Key Encapsulation Mechanism, ML-DSA Digital Signature Algorithm, NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography, Contemporary Cybersecurity, Secure Communications, Cryptographic Algorithms.
Quantum computing brings about a new problem to traditional cryptographic algorithms; it violates the security of current encryption methods. This chapter is concerned with investigating two areas, quantum cryptography and post-quantum security measures, detailing their concepts, developments, and consequences. Quantum cryptography utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics and particularly makes use of superposition and entanglement. Post-quantum cryptography (PQC), on the other hand, is an approach to constructing cryptographic algorithms that will be immune to quantum attacks while at the same time keeping compatibility with classical methods. The chapter focuses on the aspects of integration between quantum cryptographical advancements and post-quantum algorithmic progressions and mutual distinctions have been explained. Possible shortcomings to scalability, implementation, and standardization issues of both approaches are discussed, as well as an examination of combined QKD and post-quantum algorithms architectures.