Demonstrating quantum advantage with less powerful but more realistic devices is of great importance in modern quantum information science. Recently, a significant quantum speedup was achieved in the problem of learning a hidden parity function with noise. However, if all data qubits at the query output are completely depolarized, the algorithm fails. In this work, we present a quantum parity learning algorithm that exhibits quantum advantage as long as one qubit is provided with nonzero polarization in each query. In this scenario, the quantum parity learning naturally becomes deterministic quantum computation with one qubit. Then the hidden parity function can be revealed by performing a set of operations that can be interpreted as measuring nonlocal observables on the auxiliary result qubit having nonzero polarization and each data qubit. We also discuss the source of the quantum advantage in our algorithm from the resource-theoretic point of view.
Demonstrating quantum advantage with less powerful but more realistic devices is of great importance in modern quantum information science. Recently, a significant quantum speedup was achieved in the problem of learning a hidden parity function with noise. However, if all data qubits at the query output are completely depolarized, the algorithm fails. In this work, we present a quantum parity learning algorithm that exhibits quantum advantage as long as one qubit is provided with nonzero polarization in each query. In this scenario, the quantum parity learning naturally becomes deterministic quantum computation with one qubit. Then the hidden parity function can be revealed by performing a set of operations that can be interpreted as measuring nonlocal observables on the auxiliary result qubit having nonzero polarization and each data qubit. We also discuss the source of the quantum advantage in our algorithm from the resource-theoretic point of view.
Noise is often regarded as anathema to quantum computation, but in some settings it can be an unlikely ally. We consider the problem of learning the class of n-bit parity functions by making queries to a quantum example oracle. In the absence of noise, quantum and classical parity learning are easy and almost equally powerful, both information-theoretically and computationally. We show that in the presence of noise this story changes dramatically. Indeed, the classical learning problem is believed to be intractable, while the quantum version remains efficient. Depolarizing the qubits at the oracle's output at any constant nonzero rate does not increase the computational (or query) complexity of quantum learning more than logarithmically. However, the problem of learning from corresponding classical examples is the learning parity with noise problem, for which the best known algorithms have superpolynomial complexity. This creates the possibility of observing a quantum advantage with a few hundred noisy qubits. The presence of noise is essential for creating this quantum-classical separation.
We develop a framework for learning from noisy quantum experiments in which fault-tolerant devices access uncharacterized systems through noisy couplings. Introducing the complexity class NBQP ("noisy BQP''), we model noisy fault-tolerant quantum computers that cannot generally error-correct the oracle systems they query. Using this class, we prove that while noise can eliminate the exponential quantum learning advantages of unphysical, noiseless learners, a superpolynomial gap remains between NISQ and fault-tolerant devices. Turning to canonical learning tasks in noisy settings, we find that the exponential two-copy advantage for purity testing collapses under local depolarizing noise. Nevertheless, we identify a setting motivated by AdS/CFT in which noise-resilient physical structure restores this quantum learning advantage. We then analyze noisy Pauli shadow tomography, deriving lower bounds characterizing how instance size, quantum memory and noise jointly control sample complexity, and design algorithms with parametrically matching scalings. We study similar tradeoffs in quantum metrology, and show that the Heisenberg-limited sensitivity of existing error-correction-based protocols persists only up to a timescale inverse-polynomial in the error rate per probe qubit. Together, our results demonstrate that the primitives underlying quantum-enhanced experiments are fundamentally fragile to noise, and that realizing meaningful quantum advantages in future experiments will require interfacing noise-robust physical properties with available algorithmic techniques.
Abstract The main promise of quantum computing is to efficiently solve certain problems that are prohibitively expensive for a classical computer. Most problems with a proven quantum advantage involve the repeated use of a black box, or oracle, whose structure encodes the solution. One measure of the algorithmic performance is the query complexity, i.e., the scaling of the number of oracle calls needed to find the solution with a given probability. Few-qubit demonstrations of quantum algorithms, such as Deutsch–Jozsa and Grover, have been implemented across diverse physical systems such as nuclear magnetic resonance, trapped ions, optical systems, and superconducting circuits. However, at the small scale, these problems can already be solved classically with a few oracle queries, limiting the obtained advantage. Here we solve an oracle-based problem, known as learning parity with noise, on a five-qubit superconducting processor. Executing classical and quantum algorithms using the same oracle, we observe a large gap in query count in favor of quantum processing. We find that this gap grows by orders of magnitude as a function of the error rates and the problem size. This result demonstrates that, while complex fault-tolerant architectures will be required for universal quantum computing, a significant quantum advantage already emerges in existing noisy systems.
Noise in quantum information processing is often viewed as a disruptive and difficult-to-avoid feature, especially in near-term quantum technologies.However, noise has often played beneficial roles, from enhancing weak signals in stochastic resonance to protecting the privacy of data in differential privacy.It is then natural to ask: Can we harness the power of quantum noise that is beneficial to quantum computing?An important current direction for quantum computing is its application to machine learning, such as classification problems.One outstanding problem in machine learning for classification is its sensitivity to adversarial examples.These are small, undetectable perturbations from the original data where the perturbed data is completely misclassified in otherwise extremely accurate classifiers.They can also be considered as worst-case perturbations by unknown noise sources.We show that by taking advantage of depolarization noise in quantum circuits for classification, a robustness bound against adversaries can be derived where the robustness improves with increasing noise.This robustness property is intimately connected with an important security concept called differential privacy, which can be extended to quantum differential privacy.For the protection of quantum data, this quantum protocol can be used against the most general adversaries.Furthermore, we show how the robustness in the classical case can be sensitive to the details of the classification model, but in the quantum case the details of the classification model are absent, thus also providing a potential quantum advantage for classical data.This opens the opportunity to explore other ways in which quantum noise can be used in our favor, as well as identifying other ways quantum algorithms can be helpful in a way which is distinct from quantum speedups.
We consider the problem of learning stabilizer states with noise in the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework of Aaronson (2007) for learning quantum states. In the noiseless setting, an algorithm for this problem was recently given by Rocchetto (2018), but the noisy case was left open. Motivated by approaches to noise tolerance from classical learning theory, we introduce the Statistical Query (SQ) model for PAC-learning quantum states, and prove that algorithms in this model are indeed resilient to common forms of noise, including classification and depolarizing noise. We prove an exponential lower bound on learning stabilizer states in the SQ model. Even outside the SQ model, we prove that learning stabilizer states with noise is in general as hard as Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) using classical examples. Our results position the problem of learning stabilizer states as a natural quantum analogue of the classical problem of learning parities: easy in the noiseless setting, but seemingly intractable even with simple forms of noise.
In this thesis we address the question, what is the resource, or property, that enables the advantage of quantum computers?The theory of quantum computers dates back to the eighties, so one would think there already is an answer to this question.There are several proposed solutions, but to this date, there is no consensus on an answer.Primarily, the advantage of quantum computers is characterized by a speedup for certain computational problems.This speedup is measured by comparing quantum algorithms with the bestknown classical algorithms.For some algorithms we assume access to an object called oracle.The oracle computes a function, and the complexity of the oracle is of no concern.Instead, we count the number of queries to the oracle needed to solve the problem.Informally, the question we ask using an oracle is: if we can compute this function efficiently, what else could we then compute.However, using oracles while measuring a quantum speedup, we assume access to vastly different oracles residing in different models of computation.For our investigation of the speedup, we introduce a classical simulation framework that imitates quantum algorithms.The simulation suggests that the property enabling the potential quantum speedup is the ability to store, process, and retrieve information in an additional degree of freedom.We then theoretically verified that this is true for all problems that can be efficiently solved with a quantum computer.In parallel to this, we also see that quantum oracles sharply specify the information we can retrieve from the additional degree of freedom, while regular oracles do not.A regular oracle does not even allow for an extra degree of freedom.We conclude that comparing quantum with classical oracle query complexity bounds does not provide conclusive evidence for a quantum advantage.I want to thank Jan-Åke Larsson, without whom this research would not have been possible.If there is any magic in the world, it shows through Jan-Åke's ability to simultaneously be a good supervisor, colleague, and friend.I would also like to thank my co-supervisor Peter Jonsson, for many valuable discussions -not only restricted to theoretical computer science.To my friends and collogues that have challenged me to become better, especially Jonathan Jogenfors