Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1711.08350 · Communications in Mathematical Physics

Empirical Measures and Quantum Mechanics: Applications to the Mean-Field Limit

François Golse, Thierry Paul

Published Mar 1, 2019• 28 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s00220-019-03357-z

Related papers

On the Mean Field and Classical Limits of Quantum Mechanics

François Golse, Clément Mouhot, Thierry Paul

arXiv:1502.06143•Communications in Mathematical Physics•Jan 14, 2016•127 citations

Intention as the Cause of Quantum Collapse: Rethinking the Scope and Limitations of Scientific Epistemology

Javed, Mohammad

This paper presents a conceptual and philosophical interpretation of quantum measurement, focusing on the role of human intention as a metaphysical variable in the process commonly described as wave-function collapse. Rather than proposing a physical mechanism or experimentally testable claim, the work examines how intention, observation, and meaning-making may be understood within the broader limits of scientific epistemology. The paper argues that science functions as a powerful methodological tool for modeling observable phenomena, but that its scope is necessarily bounded by empirical measurement and repeatability. Within this framework, the study explores how trans-empirical aspects of experience—such as intention, consciousness, and belief—can be discussed without being reduced to physical causation. The emphasis is not on rejecting scientific inquiry, but on clarifying its domain of applicability. Using concepts from quantum mechanics (superposition, collapse, observer-dependence) as interpretive structures, the paper develops a metaphysical model in which collapse is understood as a process of selection aligned with intention, rather than as a solely mechanical outcome of measurement. Behavioral and cognitive examples are presented as illustrative analogies, not as quantum experiments. This work is situated at the intersection of philosophy of science, consciousness studies, and conceptual interpretations of quantum mechanics. It contributes to the ongoing development of Javed’s Quantum Thought, a framework that seeks to integrate scientific reasoning with broader ontological reflection while maintaining clear distinctions between empirical science and metaphysical interpretation.

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Intention as the Cause of Quantum Collapse: Rethinking the Scope and Limitations of Scientific Epistemology

Javed, Mohammad

This paper presents a conceptual and philosophical interpretation of quantum measurement, focusing on the role of human intention as a metaphysical variable in the process commonly described as wave-function collapse. Rather than proposing a physical mechanism or experimentally testable claim, the work examines how intention, observation, and meaning-making may be understood within the broader limits of scientific epistemology. The paper argues that science functions as a powerful methodological tool for modeling observable phenomena, but that its scope is necessarily bounded by empirical measurement and repeatability. Within this framework, the study explores how trans-empirical aspects of experience—such as intention, consciousness, and belief—can be discussed without being reduced to physical causation. The emphasis is not on rejecting scientific inquiry, but on clarifying its domain of applicability. Using concepts from quantum mechanics (superposition, collapse, observer-dependence) as interpretive structures, the paper develops a metaphysical model in which collapse is understood as a process of selection aligned with intention, rather than as a solely mechanical outcome of measurement. Behavioral and cognitive examples are presented as illustrative analogies, not as quantum experiments. This work is situated at the intersection of philosophy of science, consciousness studies, and conceptual interpretations of quantum mechanics. It contributes to the ongoing development of Javed’s Quantum Thought, a framework that seeks to integrate scientific reasoning with broader ontological reflection while maintaining clear distinctions between empirical science and metaphysical interpret ation.

•Dec 17, 2025•0 citations

The classical–statistical limit of quantum mechanics

Mario Castagnino

arXiv:quant-ph/0503191•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jan 25, 2004•20 citations

Empirical quantum mechanics

Hirokazu Nishimura

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jun 1, 1996•1 citation

Quantum mean-field games

Vassili Nikitich Kolokoltsov

In this paper we are merging the two new branches of game theory: quantum games and mean-field games (MFG). Building a quantum analog of MFGs requires the full reconstruction of its foundations and methodology, because in N-particle quantum evolution particles are not separated in individual dynamics and the key concept of the classical MFG theory, the empirical measure defined as the sum of Dirac masses of the positions of the players, is not applicable in quantum setting. As a preliminary result we derive the new nonlinear stochastic Schrödinger equation, as the limit of the quantum filtering equation describing continuously observed and controlled system of a large number of interacting particles, the result that may have an independent value. We then show that to a control quantum system of interacting particles there corresponds a special system of classical interacting particles with the identical limiting MFG system, defined on an appropriate Riemanian manifold. Solutions of this system are shown to specify approximate Nash equilibria for N-agent quantum games.

arXiv:2005.02350•The Annals of Applied Probability•May 30, 2022•15 citations
This paper presents a conceptual and philosophical interpretation of quantum measurement, focusing on the role of human intention as a metaphysical variable in the process commonly described as wave-function collapse. Rather than proposing a physical mechanism or experimentally testable claim, the work examines how intention, observation, and meaning-making may be understood within the broader limits of scientific epistemology. The paper argues that science functions as a powerful methodological tool for modeling observable phenomena, but that its scope is necessarily bounded by empirical measurement and repeatability. Within this framework, the study explores how trans-empirical aspects of experience—such as intention, consciousness, and belief—can be discussed without being reduced to physical causation. The emphasis is not on rejecting scientific inquiry, but on clarifying its domain of applicability. Using concepts from quantum mechanics (superposition, collapse, observer-dependence) as interpretive structures, the paper develops a metaphysical model in which collapse is understood as a process of selection aligned with intention, rather than as a solely mechanical outcome of measurement. Behavioral and cognitive examples are presented as illustrative analogies, not as quantum experiments. This work is situated at the intersection of philosophy of science, consciousness studies, and conceptual interpretations of quantum mechanics. It contributes to the ongoing development of Javed’s Quantum Thought, a framework that seeks to integrate scientific reasoning with broader ontological reflection while maintaining clear distinctions between empirical science and metaphysical interpretation.
This paper presents a conceptual and philosophical interpretation of quantum measurement, focusing on the role of human intention as a metaphysical variable in the process commonly described as wave-function collapse. Rather than proposing a physical mechanism or experimentally testable claim, the work examines how intention, observation, and meaning-making may be understood within the broader limits of scientific epistemology. The paper argues that science functions as a powerful methodological tool for modeling observable phenomena, but that its scope is necessarily bounded by empirical measurement and repeatability. Within this framework, the study explores how trans-empirical aspects of experience—such as intention, consciousness, and belief—can be discussed without being reduced to physical causation. The emphasis is not on rejecting scientific inquiry, but on clarifying its domain of applicability. Using concepts from quantum mechanics (superposition, collapse, observer-dependence) as interpretive structures, the paper develops a metaphysical model in which collapse is understood as a process of selection aligned with intention, rather than as a solely mechanical outcome of measurement. Behavioral and cognitive examples are presented as illustrative analogies, not as quantum experiments. This work is situated at the intersection of philosophy of science, consciousness studies, and conceptual interpretations of quantum mechanics. It contributes to the ongoing development of Javed’s Quantum Thought, a framework that seeks to integrate scientific reasoning with broader ontological reflection while maintaining clear distinctions between empirical science and metaphysical interpret ation.
In this paper we are merging the two new branches of game theory: quantum games and mean-field games (MFG). Building a quantum analog of MFGs requires the full reconstruction of its foundations and methodology, because in N-particle quantum evolution particles are not separated in individual dynamics and the key concept of the classical MFG theory, the empirical measure defined as the sum of Dirac masses of the positions of the players, is not applicable in quantum setting. As a preliminary result we derive the new nonlinear stochastic Schrödinger equation, as the limit of the quantum filtering equation describing continuously observed and controlled system of a large number of interacting particles, the result that may have an independent value. We then show that to a control quantum system of interacting particles there corresponds a special system of classical interacting particles with the identical limiting MFG system, defined on an appropriate Riemanian manifold. Solutions of this system are shown to specify approximate Nash equilibria for N-agent quantum games.