Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1711.08066 · New Journal of Physics

Measurement contextuality and Planck’s constant

Lucas Kocia, Peter Love

Published Jun 25, 2018• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Contextuality is a necessary resource for universal quantum computation and non-contextual quantum mechanics can be simulated efficiently by classical computers in many cases. Orders of Planck's constant, ℏ, can also be used to characterize the classical-quantum divide by expanding quantities of interest in powers of ℏ—all orders higher than ℏ 0 can be interpreted as quantum corrections to the order ℏ 0 term. We show that contextual measurements in finite-dimensional systems have formulations within the Wigner–Weyl–Moyal (WWM) formalism that require higher than order ℏ 0 terms to be included in order to violate the classical bounds on their expectation values. As a result, we show that contextuality as a resource is closely related to orders of ℏ as a resource within the WWM formalism. This offers an explanation for why qubits can only exhibit state-independent contextuality under Pauli observables as in the Peres–Mermin square while odd-dimensional qudits can also exhibit state-dependent contextuality. In particular, qubit states exhibit contextuality when measured by qubit Pauli observables regardless of the state being measured and so the Weyl symbol of these observables lack an order ℏ 0 contribution altogether. On the other hand, odd-dimensional qudit states exhibit contextuality when measured by qudit observables depending on the state measured and so odd-dimensional qudit observables generally possess non-zero order ℏ 0 terms, and higher, in their WWM formulation: odd-dimensional qudit states that exhibit measurement contextuality have an order ℏ 1 contribution in their expectation values with the observable that allows for the violation of classical bounds while states that have insufficiently large order ℏ 1 contributions do not exhibit measurement contextuality.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/aacef2

Related papers

Contextuality as a resource for measurement-based quantum computation beyond qubits

Markus Frembs, Sam Roberts, Stephen D. Bartlett

Contextuality—the obstruction to describing quantum mechanics in a classical statistical way—has been proposed as a resource that powers quantum computing. The measurement-based model provides a concrete manifestation of contextuality as a computational resource, as follows. If local measurements on a multi-qubit state can be used to evaluate nonlinear boolean functions with only linear control processing, then this computation constitutes a proof of strong contextuality—the possible local measurement outcomes cannot all be pre-assigned. However, this connection is restricted to the special case when the local measured systems are qubits , which have unusual properties from the perspective of contextuality. A single qubit cannot allow for a proof of contextuality, unlike higher-dimensional systems, and multiple qubits can allow for state-independent contextuality with only Pauli observables, again unlike higher-dimensional generalisations. Here we identify precisely that strong non-locality is necessary in a qudit measurement-based computation (MBC) that evaluates high-degree polynomial functions with only linear control. We introduce the concept of local universality , which places a bound on the space of output functions accessible under the constraint of single-qudit measurements. Thus, the partition of a physical system into subsystems plays a crucial role for the increase in computational power. A prominent feature of our setting is that the enabling resources for qubit and qudit MBC are of the same underlying nature, avoiding the pathologies associated with qubit contextuality.

arXiv:1804.07364•New Journal of Physics•Sep 24, 2018•44 citations

Contextuality as a Resource for Models of Quantum Computation with Qubits

Juan Bermejo-Vega, Nicolas Delfosse, Dan E. Browne +2 more

A central question in quantum computation is to identify the resources that are responsible for quantum speed-up. Quantum contextuality has been recently shown to be a resource for quantum computation with magic states for odd-prime dimensional qudits and two-dimensional systems with real wave functions. The phenomenon of state-independent contextuality poses a priori an obstruction to characterizing the case of regular qubits, the fundamental building block of quantum computation. Here, we establish contextuality of magic states as a necessary resource for a large class of quantum computation schemes on qubits. We illustrate our result with a concrete scheme related to measurement-based quantum computation.

arXiv:1610.08529•Physical Review Letters•Sep 21, 2017•143 citations

Demonstrating the contextuality of quantum mechanics with observables in Hilbert spaces of arbitrary dimensions

Adrien Laversanne-Finot, Andreas Ketterer, Mariana R. Barros +4 more

The contextuality of quantum mechanics can be shown by the violation of inequalities based on measurements of well chosen observables. An important property of such observables is that their expectation value can be expressed in terms of probabilities of obtaining two exclusive outcomes. In order to satisfy this, inequalities have been constructed using either observables with a dichotomic spectrum or using periodic functions obtained from displacement operators in phase space. Here we unify both strategies by introducing general conditions to demonstrate the contextuality of quantum mechanics from measurements of observables of arbitrary dimensions. Among the consequences of our results is the impossibility of having a maximal violation of contextuality in the Peres-Mermin scenario with discrete observables of odd dimensions. In addition, we show how to construct a large class of observables with a continuous spectrum enabling the realization of contextuality tests both in the gaussian and non-gaussian regimes.

•Dec 10, 2015•0 citations

No quantum solutions to linear constraint systems from monomial measurement-based quantum computation in odd prime dimension

Markus Frembs, Cihan Okay, Ho Yiu Chung

We combine the study of resources in measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) with that of quantum solutions to linear constraint systems (LCS). Contextuality of the input state in MBQC has been identified as a key resource for quantum advantage, and in a stronger form, underlies algebraic relations between (measurement) operators which obey classically unsatisfiable (linear) constraints. Here, we compare these two perspectives on contextuality, and study to what extent they are related. More precisely, we associate a LCS to certain MBQC which exhibit strong forms of state-dependent contextuality, and ask if the measurement operators in such MBQC give rise to state-independent contextuality in the form of quantum solutions of its associated LCS. Our main result rules out such quantum solutions for a large class of MBQC. This both sharpens the distinction between state-dependent and state-independent forms of contextuality, and further generalises results on the non-existence of quantum solutions to LCS in finite odd (prime) dimension.

quant-pharXiv:2601.11367•Jan 19, 2026•0 citations

Contextually in a Peres—Mermin square using arbitrary operators

Adrien Laversanne-Finot, Andreas Ketterer, Mariana R. Barros +4 more

The contextuality of quantum mechanics can be shown by the violation of inequalities based on measurements of well chosen observables. These inequalities have been designed separately for both discrete and continuous variables. Here we unify both strategies by introducing general conditions to demonstrate the contextuality of quantum mechanics from measurements of observables of arbitrary dimensions. Among the consequences of our results is the impossibility of having a maximal violation of contextuality in the Peres-Mermin scenario with discrete observables of odd dimensions. In addition, we show how to construct a large class of observables with a continuous spectrum enabling the realization of contextuality tests both in the Gaussian and non-Gaussian regimes.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Mar 1, 2016•1 citation

A Contextual $ψ$-Epistemic Model of the $n$-Qubit Stabilizer Formalism

Piers Lillystone, Joseph Emerson

Contextuality, a generalization of non-locality, has been proposed as the resource that provides the computational speed-up for quantum computation. For universal quantum computation using qudits, of odd-prime dimension, contextuality has been shown to be a necessary and possibly sufficient resource. However, the role of contextuality in quantum computation with qubits remains open. The $n$-qubit stabilizer formalism, which by itself cannot provide a quantum computer super-polynomial computational advantage over a classical counterpart, is contextual. Therefore contextuality cannot be identified as a sufficient resource for quantum computation. However it can be identified as a necessary resource. In this paper we construct a contextual $ψ$-epistemic ontological model of the $n$-qubit stabilizer formalism, to investigate the contextuality present in the formalism. We demonstrate it is possible for such a model to be outcome deterministic, and therefore have a value assignment to all Pauli observables. In our model the value assignment must be updated after a measurement of any stabilizer observable. Remarkably, this includes the value assignments for observables that commute with the measurement. A stronger manifestation of contextuality than is required by known no-go theorems.

arXiv:1904.04268•Apr 8, 2019•4 citations
Contextuality is a necessary resource for universal quantum computation and non-contextual quantum mechanics can be simulated efficiently by classical computers in many cases. Orders of Planck's constant, ℏ, can also be used to characterize the classical-quantum divide by expanding quantities of interest in powers of ℏ—all orders higher than ℏ 0 can be interpreted as quantum corrections to the order ℏ 0 term. We show that contextual measurements in finite-dimensional systems have formulations within the Wigner–Weyl–Moyal (WWM) formalism that require higher than order ℏ 0 terms to be included in order to violate the classical bounds on their expectation values. As a result, we show that contextuality as a resource is closely related to orders of ℏ as a resource within the WWM formalism. This offers an explanation for why qubits can only exhibit state-independent contextuality under Pauli observables as in the Peres–Mermin square while odd-dimensional qudits can also exhibit state-dependent contextuality. In particular, qubit states exhibit contextuality when measured by qubit Pauli observables regardless of the state being measured and so the Weyl symbol of these observables lack an order ℏ 0 contribution altogether. On the other hand, odd-dimensional qudit states exhibit contextuality when measured by qudit observables depending on the state measured and so odd-dimensional qudit observables generally possess non-zero order ℏ 0 terms, and higher, in their WWM formulation: odd-dimensional qudit states that exhibit measurement contextuality have an order ℏ 1 contribution in their expectation values with the observable that allows for the violation of classical bounds while states that have insufficiently large order ℏ 1 contributions do not exhibit measurement contextuality.
Contextuality—the obstruction to describing quantum mechanics in a classical statistical way—has been proposed as a resource that powers quantum computing. The measurement-based model provides a concrete manifestation of contextuality as a computational resource, as follows. If local measurements on a multi-qubit state can be used to evaluate nonlinear boolean functions with only linear control processing, then this computation constitutes a proof of strong contextuality—the possible local measurement outcomes cannot all be pre-assigned. However, this connection is restricted to the special case when the local measured systems are qubits , which have unusual properties from the perspective of contextuality. A single qubit cannot allow for a proof of contextuality, unlike higher-dimensional systems, and multiple qubits can allow for state-independent contextuality with only Pauli observables, again unlike higher-dimensional generalisations. Here we identify precisely that strong non-locality is necessary in a qudit measurement-based computation (MBC) that evaluates high-degree polynomial functions with only linear control. We introduce the concept of local universality , which places a bound on the space of output functions accessible under the constraint of single-qudit measurements. Thus, the partition of a physical system into subsystems plays a crucial role for the increase in computational power. A prominent feature of our setting is that the enabling resources for qubit and qudit MBC are of the same underlying nature, avoiding the pathologies associated with qubit contextuality.
A central question in quantum computation is to identify the resources that are responsible for quantum speed-up. Quantum contextuality has been recently shown to be a resource for quantum computation with magic states for odd-prime dimensional qudits and two-dimensional systems with real wave functions. The phenomenon of state-independent contextuality poses a priori an obstruction to characterizing the case of regular qubits, the fundamental building block of quantum computation. Here, we establish contextuality of magic states as a necessary resource for a large class of quantum computation schemes on qubits. We illustrate our result with a concrete scheme related to measurement-based quantum computation.
The contextuality of quantum mechanics can be shown by the violation of inequalities based on measurements of well chosen observables. An important property of such observables is that their expectation value can be expressed in terms of probabilities of obtaining two exclusive outcomes. In order to satisfy this, inequalities have been constructed using either observables with a dichotomic spectrum or using periodic functions obtained from displacement operators in phase space. Here we unify both strategies by introducing general conditions to demonstrate the contextuality of quantum mechanics from measurements of observables of arbitrary dimensions. Among the consequences of our results is the impossibility of having a maximal violation of contextuality in the Peres-Mermin scenario with discrete observables of odd dimensions. In addition, we show how to construct a large class of observables with a continuous spectrum enabling the realization of contextuality tests both in the gaussian and non-gaussian regimes.
We combine the study of resources in measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) with that of quantum solutions to linear constraint systems (LCS). Contextuality of the input state in MBQC has been identified as a key resource for quantum advantage, and in a stronger form, underlies algebraic relations between (measurement) operators which obey classically unsatisfiable (linear) constraints. Here, we compare these two perspectives on contextuality, and study to what extent they are related. More precisely, we associate a LCS to certain MBQC which exhibit strong forms of state-dependent contextuality, and ask if the measurement operators in such MBQC give rise to state-independent contextuality in the form of quantum solutions of its associated LCS. Our main result rules out such quantum solutions for a large class of MBQC. This both sharpens the distinction between state-dependent and state-independent forms of contextuality, and further generalises results on the non-existence of quantum solutions to LCS in finite odd (prime) dimension.
The contextuality of quantum mechanics can be shown by the violation of inequalities based on measurements of well chosen observables. These inequalities have been designed separately for both discrete and continuous variables. Here we unify both strategies by introducing general conditions to demonstrate the contextuality of quantum mechanics from measurements of observables of arbitrary dimensions. Among the consequences of our results is the impossibility of having a maximal violation of contextuality in the Peres-Mermin scenario with discrete observables of odd dimensions. In addition, we show how to construct a large class of observables with a continuous spectrum enabling the realization of contextuality tests both in the Gaussian and non-Gaussian regimes.
A Contextual ψψψ-Epistemic Model of the nnn-Qubit Stabilizer Formalism
Contextuality, a generalization of non-locality, has been proposed as the resource that provides the computational speed-up for quantum computation. For universal quantum computation using qudits, of odd-prime dimension, contextuality has been shown to be a necessary and possibly sufficient resource. However, the role of contextuality in quantum computation with qubits remains open. The nnn-qubit stabilizer formalism, which by itself cannot provide a quantum computer super-polynomial computational advantage over a classical counterpart, is contextual. Therefore contextuality cannot be identified as a sufficient resource for quantum computation. However it can be identified as a necessary resource. In this paper we construct a contextual ψψψ-epistemic ontological model of the nnn-qubit stabilizer formalism, to investigate the contextuality present in the formalism. We demonstrate it is possible for such a model to be outcome deterministic, and therefore have a value assignment to all Pauli observables. In our model the value assignment must be updated after a measurement of any stabilizer observable. Remarkably, this includes the value assignments for observables that commute with the measurement. A stronger manifestation of contextuality than is required by known no-go theorems.