Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1711.05891 · Modern Physics Letters A

Quantum backflow in solutions to the Dirac equation of the spin-1 2 free particle

Hong-Yi Su, Jing‐Ling Chen

Published Sep 25, 2018• 15 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It was known that a free, non-relativistic particle in a superposition of positive momenta can, in certain cases, bear a negative probability current — hence termed quantum backflow. Here, it is shown that more variations can be brought about for a free Dirac particle, particularly when negative-energy solutions are taken into account. Since any Dirac particle can be understood as an antiparticle that acts oppositely (and vice versa), quantum backflow is found to arise in the superposition (i) of a well-defined momentum but different signs of energies, or more remarkably (ii) of different signs of both momenta and energies. Neither of these cases has a counterpart in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. A generalization by using the field-theoretic formalism is also presented and discussed.

DOI
10.1142/s0217732318501869

Related papers

Free Particles/Antiparticles

P. Strange

As in non-relativistic quantum theory, the simplest problem to solve in relativistic quantum theory is that of describing a free particle. Much can be learned from this case which will be of use in interpreting the topics covered in later chapters. Furthermore, some of the most profound features of relativistic quantum theory are well illustrated by the free particle, so it is a very instructive problem to consider in detail. Another advantage of the free-particle problem is that the mathematics involved in solving it is not nearly as involved as that necessary for solving problems involving particles under the influence of potentials. Firstly we shall look briefly at the formulae for the current and probability density, then we shall go on to examine the solutions of the Dirac equation and investigate their behaviour. This leads us to a discussion of spin, the Pauli limit, and the relativistic spin operator. Next we consider the negative energy solutions and show how relativistic quantum theory predicts the existence of antiparticles. Some of the dilemmas this concept introduces and their resolution are discussed. At the end of the chapter we go back to the Klein paradox, and examine it for an incident spin-1/2 particle. We find that the Klein paradox exists for Dirac particles in exactly the same way as it existed for Klein—Gordon particles and has the same resolution and interpretation.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 17, 1998•0 citations

Probability backflow and a new dimensionless quantum number

Anthony J. Bracken, G.F. Melloy

Pure states of a free particle in non-relativistic quantum mechanics are described, in which the probability of finding the particle to have a negative x-coordinate increases over an arbitrarily long, but finite, time interval, even though the x-component of the particle's velocity is certainly positive throughout that time interval. It is shown that, for any state of this type, the greatest amount of probability which can flow back from positive to negative x-values in this counter-intuitive way, over any given time interval, is equal to the largest eigenvalue of a certain Hermitian operator, and it is estimated numerically to have a value near 0.04. This value is not only independent of the length of the time interval and the mass of the particle, but is also independent of the value of Planck's constant. It reflects the structure of Schrodinger's equation, rather than the values of the parameters appearing there. Backflow of positive probability is related to the non-positivity of Wigner's density function, and can be regarded as arising from a flow of negative probability in the same direction as the velocity. Generalizations are indicated, to the relativistic free electron, and to non-relativistic cases in which probability backflow occurs even in opposition to an arbitrarily strong constant force.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 21, 1994•140 citations

On the experiment-friendly formulation of quantum backflow

Maximilien Barbier, Arseni Goussev

In its standard formulation, quantum backflow is a classically impossible phenomenon in which a free quantum particle in a positive-momentum state exhibits a negative probability current. Recently, Miller et al. [Quantum 5, 379 (2021)] have put forward a new, "experiment-friendly" formulation of quantum backflow that aims at extending the notion of quantum backflow to situations in which the particle's state may have both positive and negative momenta. Here, we investigate how the experiment-friendly formulation of quantum backflow compares to the standard one when applied to a free particle in a positive-momentum state. We show that the two formulations are not always compatible. We further identify a parametric regime in which the two formulations appear to be in qualitative agreement with one another.

arXiv:2103.06728•Quantum•Sep 7, 2021•17 citations

An introduction to the quantum backflow effect

James M. Yearsley, J. J. Halliwell

We present an introduction to the backflow effect in quantum mechanics – the phenomenon in which a state consisting entirely of positive momenta may have negative current and the probability flows in the opposite direction to the momentum. We show that the effect is present even for simple states consisting of superpositions of gaussian wave packets, although the size of the effect is small. Inspired by the numerical results of Penz et al, we present a wave function whose current at any time may be computed analytically and which has periods of significant backflow, with a backwards flux equal to about 70 percent of the maximum possible backflow, a dimensionless number c bm ≈ 0.04, discovered by Bracken and Melloy. This number has the unusual property of being independent of ℏ (and also of all other parameters of the model), despite corresponding to a quantum-mechanical effect, and we shed some light on this surprising property by considering the classical limit of backflow. We conclude by discussing a specific measurement model in which backflow may be identified in certain measurable probabilities.

arXiv:1301.4893•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 10, 2013•30 citations

Towards a Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

J. Iliopoulos, Theodore N. Tomaras

Abstract The Klein–Gordon and the Dirac equations are studied as candidates for a relativistic generalisation of the Schrödinger equation. We show that the first is unacceptable because it admits solutions with arbitrarily large negative energy and has no conserved current with positive definite probability density. The Dirac equation on the other hand does have a physically acceptable conserved current, but it too suffers from the presence of negative energy solutions. We show that the latter can be interpreted as describing anti-particles. In either case there is no fully consistent interpretation as a single-particle wave equation and we are led to a formalism admitting an infinite number of degrees of freedom, that is a quantum field theory. We can still use the Dirac equation at low energies when the effects of anti-particles are negligible and we study applications in atomic physics.

•Oct 25, 2021•0 citations

Analytical examples, measurement models, and classical limit of quantum backflow

James M. Yearsley, J. J. Halliwell, R. Hartshorn +1 more

We investigate the backflow effect in elementary quantum mechanics---the phenomenon in which a state consisting entirely of positive momenta may have negative current and the probability flows in the opposite direction to the momentum. We compute the current and flux for states consisting of superpositions of Gaussian wave packets. These are experimentally realizable but the amount of backflow is small. Inspired by the numerical results of Penz et al. [Penz, Gr\"ubl, Kreidl, and Wagner, J. Phys. A 39, 423 (2006)], we find two nontrivial wave functions whose current at any time may be computed analytically and which have periods of significant backflow, in one case with a backward flux equal to about 70$%$ of the maximum possible backflow, a dimensionless number ${c}_{bm}\ensuremath{\approx}0.04$, discovered by Bracken and Melloy [Bracken and Melloy, J. Phys. A 27, 2197 (1994)]. This number has the unusual property of being independent of $\ensuremath{\hbar}$ (and also of all other parameters of the model), despite corresponding to an obviously quantum-mechanical effect, and we shed some light on this surprising property by considering the classical limit of backflow. We discuss some specific measurement models in which backflow may be identified in certain measurable probabilities.

arXiv:1202.1783•Physical Review A•Oct 15, 2012•42 citations
It was known that a free, non-relativistic particle in a superposition of positive momenta can, in certain cases, bear a negative probability current — hence termed quantum backflow. Here, it is shown that more variations can be brought about for a free Dirac particle, particularly when negative-energy solutions are taken into account. Since any Dirac particle can be understood as an antiparticle that acts oppositely (and vice versa), quantum backflow is found to arise in the superposition (i) of a well-defined momentum but different signs of energies, or more remarkably (ii) of different signs of both momenta and energies. Neither of these cases has a counterpart in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. A generalization by using the field-theoretic formalism is also presented and discussed.
As in non-relativistic quantum theory, the simplest problem to solve in relativistic quantum theory is that of describing a free particle. Much can be learned from this case which will be of use in interpreting the topics covered in later chapters. Furthermore, some of the most profound features of relativistic quantum theory are well illustrated by the free particle, so it is a very instructive problem to consider in detail. Another advantage of the free-particle problem is that the mathematics involved in solving it is not nearly as involved as that necessary for solving problems involving particles under the influence of potentials. Firstly we shall look briefly at the formulae for the current and probability density, then we shall go on to examine the solutions of the Dirac equation and investigate their behaviour. This leads us to a discussion of spin, the Pauli limit, and the relativistic spin operator. Next we consider the negative energy solutions and show how relativistic quantum theory predicts the existence of antiparticles. Some of the dilemmas this concept introduces and their resolution are discussed. At the end of the chapter we go back to the Klein paradox, and examine it for an incident spin-1/2 particle. We find that the Klein paradox exists for Dirac particles in exactly the same way as it existed for Klein—Gordon particles and has the same resolution and interpretation.
Pure states of a free particle in non-relativistic quantum mechanics are described, in which the probability of finding the particle to have a negative x-coordinate increases over an arbitrarily long, but finite, time interval, even though the x-component of the particle's velocity is certainly positive throughout that time interval. It is shown that, for any state of this type, the greatest amount of probability which can flow back from positive to negative x-values in this counter-intuitive way, over any given time interval, is equal to the largest eigenvalue of a certain Hermitian operator, and it is estimated numerically to have a value near 0.04. This value is not only independent of the length of the time interval and the mass of the particle, but is also independent of the value of Planck's constant. It reflects the structure of Schrodinger's equation, rather than the values of the parameters appearing there. Backflow of positive probability is related to the non-positivity of Wigner's density function, and can be regarded as arising from a flow of negative probability in the same direction as the velocity. Generalizations are indicated, to the relativistic free electron, and to non-relativistic cases in which probability backflow occurs even in opposition to an arbitrarily strong constant force.
In its standard formulation, quantum backflow is a classically impossible phenomenon in which a free quantum particle in a positive-momentum state exhibits a negative probability current. Recently, Miller et al. [Quantum 5, 379 (2021)] have put forward a new, "experiment-friendly" formulation of quantum backflow that aims at extending the notion of quantum backflow to situations in which the particle's state may have both positive and negative momenta. Here, we investigate how the experiment-friendly formulation of quantum backflow compares to the standard one when applied to a free particle in a positive-momentum state. We show that the two formulations are not always compatible. We further identify a parametric regime in which the two formulations appear to be in qualitative agreement with one another.
We present an introduction to the backflow effect in quantum mechanics – the phenomenon in which a state consisting entirely of positive momenta may have negative current and the probability flows in the opposite direction to the momentum. We show that the effect is present even for simple states consisting of superpositions of gaussian wave packets, although the size of the effect is small. Inspired by the numerical results of Penz et al, we present a wave function whose current at any time may be computed analytically and which has periods of significant backflow, with a backwards flux equal to about 70 percent of the maximum possible backflow, a dimensionless number c bm ≈ 0.04, discovered by Bracken and Melloy. This number has the unusual property of being independent of ℏ (and also of all other parameters of the model), despite corresponding to a quantum-mechanical effect, and we shed some light on this surprising property by considering the classical limit of backflow. We conclude by discussing a specific measurement model in which backflow may be identified in certain measurable probabilities.
Abstract The Klein–Gordon and the Dirac equations are studied as candidates for a relativistic generalisation of the Schrödinger equation. We show that the first is unacceptable because it admits solutions with arbitrarily large negative energy and has no conserved current with positive definite probability density. The Dirac equation on the other hand does have a physically acceptable conserved current, but it too suffers from the presence of negative energy solutions. We show that the latter can be interpreted as describing anti-particles. In either case there is no fully consistent interpretation as a single-particle wave equation and we are led to a formalism admitting an infinite number of degrees of freedom, that is a quantum field theory. We can still use the Dirac equation at low energies when the effects of anti-particles are negligible and we study applications in atomic physics.
We investigate the backflow effect in elementary quantum mechanics---the phenomenon in which a state consisting entirely of positive momenta may have negative current and the probability flows in the opposite direction to the momentum. We compute the current and flux for states consisting of superpositions of Gaussian wave packets. These are experimentally realizable but the amount of backflow is small. Inspired by the numerical results of Penz et al. [Penz, Gr\"ubl, Kreidl, and Wagner, J. Phys. A 39, 423 (2006)], we find two nontrivial wave functions whose current at any time may be computed analytically and which have periods of significant backflow, in one case with a backward flux equal to about 70% of the maximum possible backflow, a dimensionless number ${c}_{bm}\ensuremath{\approx}0.04$, discovered by Bracken and Melloy [Bracken and Melloy, J. Phys. A 27, 2197 (1994)]. This number has the unusual property of being independent of $\ensuremath{\hbar}$ (and also of all other parameters of the model), despite corresponding to an obviously quantum-mechanical effect, and we shed some light on this surprising property by considering the classical limit of backflow. We discuss some specific measurement models in which backflow may be identified in certain measurable probabilities.