Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1710.08211 · Physical Review A

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with source state errors and statistical fluctuation

Cong Jiang, Zong‐Wen Yu, Xiang‐Bin Wang

Published Mar 22, 2017• 35 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We show how to calculate the secure final key rate in the four-intensity decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol with both source errors and statistical fluctuations with a certain failure probability. Our results rely only on the range of only a few parameters in the source state. All imperfections in this protocol have been taken into consideration without assuming any specific error patterns of the source.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.95.032325

Related papers

Statistical fluctuation analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with three-intensity decoy-state method

Zong‐Wen Yu, Yi-Heng Zhou, Xiang‐Bin Wang

We present an improved statistical fluctuation analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with a three-intensity decoy-state method. Taking the statistical fluctuations for different sources jointly, we present more tightened formulas for some key quantities used in calculating the secure final key. Numerical simulation shows that, given the total number of pulses ${10}^{12}$, our method improves the key rate by about 97% for a distance of 50 km compared with the result given by Xu et al. [F. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. A 89, 052333 (2014)], and improves the key rate by $145%$ for a distance of 100 km compared with the result from full optimization of all parameters but treating the statistical fluctuations traditionally, i.e., treating the fluctuations for different sources separately.

arXiv:1410.3265•Physical Review A•Mar 23, 2015•109 citations

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with source state errors in photon number space

Cong Jiang, Zong‐Wen Yu, Xiang‐Bin Wang

The existing decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) theory assumes perfect control of the source states, which is an impossible task for any real setup. In this paper, we study the decoy-state MDI-QKD method with source errors without presuming any unverifiable error patterns. In our method we need the range of only a few parameters in the source state.

arXiv:1710.08216•Physical Review A•Dec 20, 2016•34 citations

Boosting the performance of loss-tolerant measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Hua-Jian Ding, Xiao Ma, Jing-Yang Liu +3 more

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution can remove all possible detector side channels, and is robust against state preparation flaws when further combined with the loss-tolerant method. However, the secure key rate in this scenario is relatively low, thus hindering its practical application. Here, we first present a four-intensity decoy-state protocol where the signal intensity is modulated only in Z basis for key generation while the decoy intensities are modulated in both Z and X bases for parameter estimation. Moreover, we adopt collective constraint and joint-study strategy in statistical fluctuation analysis. We have also experimentally demonstrated this protocol and the result indicates high performance and good security for practical applications.

Optics Letters•Apr 24, 2023•3 citations

Decoy-state quantum key distribution with both source errors and statistical fluctuations

Xiang‐Bin Wang, Lin Mei Yang, Cheng-Zhi Peng +1 more

We show how to calculate the fraction of single-photon counts of the 3-intensity decoy-state quantum cryptography faithfully with both statistical fluctuations and source errors.Our results rely only on the bound values of a few parameters of the states of pulses.

arXiv:0902.4660•New Journal of Physics•Jul 15, 2009•104 citations

Practical passive decoy state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with unstable sources

Li Liu, Fen-Zhuo Guo, Qiaoyan Wen

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) with the active decoy state method can remove all detector loopholes, and resist the imperfections of sources. But it may lead to side channel attacks and break the security of QKD system. In this paper, we apply the passive decoy state method to the MDI-QKD based on polarization encoding mode. Not only all attacks on detectors can be removed, but also the side channel attacks on sources can be overcome. We get that the MDI-QKD with our passive decoy state method can have a performance comparable to the protocol with the active decoy state method. To fit for the demand of practical application, we discuss intensity fluctuation in the security analysis of MDI-QKD protocol using passive decoy state method, and derive the key generation rate for our protocol with intensity fluctuation. It shows that intensity fluctuation has an adverse effect on the key generation rate which is non-negligible, especially in the case of small data size of total transmitting signals and long distance transmission. We give specific simulations on the relationship between intensity fluctuation and the key generation rate. Furthermore, the statistical fluctuation due to the finite length of data is also taken into account.

Scientific Reports•Sep 6, 2017•6 citations

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with a passive decoy-state method

Yu-Zhu Shan, Shi‐Hai Sun, Xiang-Chun Ma +3 more

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) can remove all detector loopholes. When it is combined with the decoy-state method, the final key is unconditionally secure, even if Alice and Bob do not have strict single-photon sources. However, active modulation of source intensity, which is used to generate the decoy state, may leave side channels and leak additional information to Eve. In this paper, we consider the MDI-QKD with a passive decoy state, in which both Alice and Bob send pulses to an untrusted third party, Charlie. Then, in order to estimate the key generation rate, we derive two tight formulas to estimate the lower bound of the yield and the upper bound of the error rate that both Alice and Bob send a single-photon pulse to Charlie. Furthermore, the statistical fluctuation due to the finite length of data is also taken into account based on the standard statistical analysis.

Physical Review A•Oct 28, 2014•19 citations
We show how to calculate the secure final key rate in the four-intensity decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol with both source errors and statistical fluctuations with a certain failure probability. Our results rely only on the range of only a few parameters in the source state. All imperfections in this protocol have been taken into consideration without assuming any specific error patterns of the source.
We present an improved statistical fluctuation analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with a three-intensity decoy-state method. Taking the statistical fluctuations for different sources jointly, we present more tightened formulas for some key quantities used in calculating the secure final key. Numerical simulation shows that, given the total number of pulses 1012{10}^{12}1012, our method improves the key rate by about 97% for a distance of 50 km compared with the result given by Xu et al. [F. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. A 89, 052333 (2014)], and improves the key rate by 145145%145 for a distance of 100 km compared with the result from full optimization of all parameters but treating the statistical fluctuations traditionally, i.e., treating the fluctuations for different sources separately.
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution can remove all possible detector side channels, and is robust against state preparation flaws when further combined with the loss-tolerant method. However, the secure key rate in this scenario is relatively low, thus hindering its practical application. Here, we first present a four-intensity decoy-state protocol where the signal intensity is modulated only in Z basis for key generation while the decoy intensities are modulated in both Z and X bases for parameter estimation. Moreover, we adopt collective constraint and joint-study strategy in statistical fluctuation analysis. We have also experimentally demonstrated this protocol and the result indicates high performance and good security for practical applications.
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) with the active decoy state method can remove all detector loopholes, and resist the imperfections of sources. But it may lead to side channel attacks and break the security of QKD system. In this paper, we apply the passive decoy state method to the MDI-QKD based on polarization encoding mode. Not only all attacks on detectors can be removed, but also the side channel attacks on sources can be overcome. We get that the MDI-QKD with our passive decoy state method can have a performance comparable to the protocol with the active decoy state method. To fit for the demand of practical application, we discuss intensity fluctuation in the security analysis of MDI-QKD protocol using passive decoy state method, and derive the key generation rate for our protocol with intensity fluctuation. It shows that intensity fluctuation has an adverse effect on the key generation rate which is non-negligible, especially in the case of small data size of total transmitting signals and long distance transmission. We give specific simulations on the relationship between intensity fluctuation and the key generation rate. Furthermore, the statistical fluctuation due to the finite length of data is also taken into account.
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) can remove all detector loopholes. When it is combined with the decoy-state method, the final key is unconditionally secure, even if Alice and Bob do not have strict single-photon sources. However, active modulation of source intensity, which is used to generate the decoy state, may leave side channels and leak additional information to Eve. In this paper, we consider the MDI-QKD with a passive decoy state, in which both Alice and Bob send pulses to an untrusted third party, Charlie. Then, in order to estimate the key generation rate, we derive two tight formulas to estimate the lower bound of the yield and the upper bound of the error rate that both Alice and Bob send a single-photon pulse to Charlie. Furthermore, the statistical fluctuation due to the finite length of data is also taken into account based on the standard statistical analysis.