Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1710.07847 · Journal of Mathematical Psychology

On universality of classical probability with contextually labeled random variables

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Maria Kon

Published Jun 22, 2018• 33 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.jmp.2018.06.001

Related papers

On universality of classical probability with contextually labeled random variables: Response to A. Khrennikov

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Maria Kon

arXiv:1812.04721•Journal of Mathematical Psychology•Jan 30, 2019•1 citation

Classical versus quantum probability: Comments on the paper “On universality of classical probability with contextually labeled random variables” by E. Dzhafarov and M. Kon

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

arXiv:1808.02379•Journal of Mathematical Psychology•Jan 29, 2019•9 citations

On unification of classical and quantum probability

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Journal of Modern Optics•Apr 1, 2004•0 citations

Embedding Quantum into Classical: Contextualization vs Conditionalization

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Janne V. Kujala

We compare two approaches to embedding joint distributions of random variables recorded under different conditions (such as spins of entangled particles for different settings) into the framework of classical, Kolmogorovian probability theory. In the contextualization approach each random variable is "automatically" labeled by all conditions under which it is recorded, and the random variables across a set of mutually exclusive conditions are probabilistically coupled (imposed a joint distribution upon). Analysis of all possible probabilistic couplings for a given set of random variables allows one to characterize various relations between their separate distributions (such as Bell-type inequalities or quantum-mechanical constraints). In the conditionalization approach one considers the conditions under which the random variables are recorded as if they were values of another random variable, so that the observed distributions are interpreted as conditional ones. This approach is uninformative with respect to relations between the distributions observed under different conditions because any set of such distributions is compatible with any distribution assigned to the conditions.

arXiv:1312.0097•PLoS ONE•Mar 28, 2014•28 citations

Post-Classical Probability Theory

Howard Barnum, Alexander Wilce

arXiv:1205.3833•Fundamental theories of physics•Dec 9, 2015•36 citations

Classical Probability Theories

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations
We compare two approaches to embedding joint distributions of random variables recorded under different conditions (such as spins of entangled particles for different settings) into the framework of classical, Kolmogorovian probability theory. In the contextualization approach each random variable is "automatically" labeled by all conditions under which it is recorded, and the random variables across a set of mutually exclusive conditions are probabilistically coupled (imposed a joint distribution upon). Analysis of all possible probabilistic couplings for a given set of random variables allows one to characterize various relations between their separate distributions (such as Bell-type inequalities or quantum-mechanical constraints). In the conditionalization approach one considers the conditions under which the random variables are recorded as if they were values of another random variable, so that the observed distributions are interpreted as conditional ones. This approach is uninformative with respect to relations between the distributions observed under different conditions because any set of such distributions is compatible with any distribution assigned to the conditions.