Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1708.06677

The locality of quantum subsystems I

Adam Brownstein

Published Aug 22, 2017• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Many of the contemporary formulations of quantum mechanics describe the marginal probability distributions of entangled many-body systems in a non-local way. Unlike the non-locality of joint distributions, the non-locality of marginal distributions is not forced by theory or experiment. This paper investigates the issue in the context of the Copenhagen, de Broglie-Bohm and sum-over-paths interpretations. A dissociation between information flow into quantum subsystems and the tensor product structure of wavefunctions is highlighted in connection to the problem.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1708.06677

Related papers

Non-locality I: Non-dynamical models of the EPR–Bohm experiment

W. Michael Dickson

We now have under our belts several interpretations of quantum mechanics, each requiring, or anyhow advocating, some understanding of quantum probabilities. In the next two chapters, I will consider some connections among various interpretations of quantum probabilities and non-locality. I do so in the context of the well-known EPR–Bohm experiment, though it is worth emphasizing at the start that non-locality is very likely the rule rather than the exception for quantum-mechanical systems. Entanglement of systems occurs not only in the confines of a laboratory, but also in the course of quite typical interactions among quantum-mechanical systems. Nonetheless, the EPR-Bohm experiment shines a bright light on the phenomenon of non-locality, and is therefore the most useful context in which to explore the relation between probability and non-locality. In this chapter, I consider models of the EPR–Bohm experiment that deliver probabilities for the various outcomes given the initial state of the pair of particles. In the next chapter, I consider fully dynamical models, i.e., ones that provide a dynamics for the complete state of the pair of particles as well as probabilities for various outcomes based on these complete states. The EPR–Bohm experiment The EPR–Bohm experiment is well known, but some observations about it are important for later.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 2, 1998•0 citations

Quantum Information and Locality

Dennis Dieks

The surprising aspects of quantum information are due to two distinctly non-classical features of the quantum world: first, different quantum states need not be orthogonal and, second, quantum states may be entangled. Non-orthogonality leads to the blurring of classical distinctions. On the other hand, entanglement leads via non-locality to teleportation and other ``entanglement-assisted'' forms of communication that go beyond what is classically possible. In this article we attempt to understand these new possibilities via an analysis of the significance of entanglement for the basic physical concepts of a ``particle'' and a ``localized physical system''. Classical particles can be individuated on the basis of qualitative differences in their sets of properties. But in entangled states the ``particle labels'' of the quantum formalism usually do not pick out such sets of individuating particle properties. It is sometimes nevertheless possible to think in terms of individual particles, which may be localized; but we argue that in general the structure of quantum mechanics is at odds with such a particle interpretation. This finally leads us to the conclusion that quantum mechanics is best seen as not belonging to the category of space-time theories, in which physical quantities are functions on space-time points. The resulting picture of the quantum world is relevant for our understanding of the way in which quantum theory is non-local, and it sheds light on the novel aspects of quantum information.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 24, 2017•5 citations

The locality of quantum subsystems II: A 'local sum-over-paths' ontology for quantum subsystems

Adam Brownstein

Subsystems of entangled quantum systems are not traditionally described in a local way. This paper begins to address the issue by constructing an explicit local hidden variable theory for quantum subsystems. The interpretation is based on a modified sum-over-paths approach, where the paths of the subsystem obtain information about the external system during interactions. The interpretation utilizes the conception that there is a dissociation between the tensor product structure of wavefunctions and information flow into quantum subsystems.

arXiv:1708.06711•Aug 22, 2017•0 citations

Contrasting Implications of the Frequentist and Bayesian Interpretations of Probability when Applied to Quantum Mechanics Theory

James L. Beck

An examination is made of the differing implications from applying the two mainstream interpretations of probability, frequentist and Bayesian, to QM (quantum mechanics) theory for the Bohm-EPR experiment. The joint probability distribution for the possible spin outcomes for two particles with coupled spins is examined. Contrasting conclusions are made: (i) Under the frequentist interpretation, the QM spin distribution implies a widely-discussed non-locality because probabilistic conditioning on a spin measurement is viewed as corresponding to a causal influence. Under the Bayesian interpretation, this conditioning is viewed as providing information relevant to the spin probabilities and the argument for non-locality loses its force. (ii) The frequentist interpretation leads to the locality condition used by John Bell in 1964 to establish conditions for the existence of hidden variables behind the spin probability distribution but this condition is not consistent with the product (Bayes) rule of probability theory. Under the Bayesian interpretation, there is no motivation for this locality condition and a new stochastic hidden-variable model is given that reproduces the spin distribution. (iii) Bell's original 1964 inequality provides a necessary condition for the existence of a third-order joint probability distribution for three spin variables that is compatible through marginalization with the second-order joint distributions for the three possible spin pairs. Bell's inequality is logically equivalent to the 1969 CHSH inequality that involves expectations of four pairs of four spin variables; the CHSH inequality must be satisfied in order for a fourth-order joint probability distribution for the four spin variables to exist. When any of these inequalities are violated, a joint probability distribution for three spin outcomes fails to be valid because some probabilities are negative.

arXiv:1804.02106•Apr 6, 2018•1 citation

Nonlocal multipartite correlations from local marginal probabilities

Lars Erik Würflinger, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Antonio Acín +2 more

Understanding what can be inferred about a multiparticle quantum system given only the knowledge of its subparts is a highly nontrivial task. Clearly, if a global system does not contain an information resource of some kind, neither do its subparts. For the case of entanglement as an information resource, it is known that the converse of this last statement is not true: Some nonentangled reduced states are only compatible with global states which are entangled. We extend this result to correlations and provide local marginal correlations that are only compatible with global genuinely tripartite nonlocal correlations. Quantum nonlocality can thus be deduced from the mere observation of local marginal correlations.

arXiv:1203.4968•Physical Review A•Sep 20, 2012•31 citations

De Broglie – Bohm Theorem in an underlying structure of Space and Spacetime

Salim Yasmineh

Abstract The concept of simultaneity is relative in special relativity whereas, it seems to have a definite meaning in quantum mechanics. On the other hand, theory and experiments in quantum mechanics have revealed the existence of non-local causal relations. We propose to use the invariant space-time interval introduced by special relativity as a benchmark for constructing a spacetime framework presenting a notion of an invariant time. We suggest that a physical system creates a non-local field within the spacetime framework and that the wavefunction of the physical system is an ontological entity that represents this non-local field. We propose to explain measurement and entanglement by using de Broglie Bohm theory in the context of the constructed spacetime framework.

•Feb 9, 2021•0 citations
Many of the contemporary formulations of quantum mechanics describe the marginal probability distributions of entangled many-body systems in a non-local way. Unlike the non-locality of joint distributions, the non-locality of marginal distributions is not forced by theory or experiment. This paper investigates the issue in the context of the Copenhagen, de Broglie-Bohm and sum-over-paths interpretations. A dissociation between information flow into quantum subsystems and the tensor product structure of wavefunctions is highlighted in connection to the problem.
We now have under our belts several interpretations of quantum mechanics, each requiring, or anyhow advocating, some understanding of quantum probabilities. In the next two chapters, I will consider some connections among various interpretations of quantum probabilities and non-locality. I do so in the context of the well-known EPR–Bohm experiment, though it is worth emphasizing at the start that non-locality is very likely the rule rather than the exception for quantum-mechanical systems. Entanglement of systems occurs not only in the confines of a laboratory, but also in the course of quite typical interactions among quantum-mechanical systems. Nonetheless, the EPR-Bohm experiment shines a bright light on the phenomenon of non-locality, and is therefore the most useful context in which to explore the relation between probability and non-locality. In this chapter, I consider models of the EPR–Bohm experiment that deliver probabilities for the various outcomes given the initial state of the pair of particles. In the next chapter, I consider fully dynamical models, i.e., ones that provide a dynamics for the complete state of the pair of particles as well as probabilities for various outcomes based on these complete states. The EPR–Bohm experiment The EPR–Bohm experiment is well known, but some observations about it are important for later.
The surprising aspects of quantum information are due to two distinctly non-classical features of the quantum world: first, different quantum states need not be orthogonal and, second, quantum states may be entangled. Non-orthogonality leads to the blurring of classical distinctions. On the other hand, entanglement leads via non-locality to teleportation and other ``entanglement-assisted'' forms of communication that go beyond what is classically possible. In this article we attempt to understand these new possibilities via an analysis of the significance of entanglement for the basic physical concepts of a ``particle'' and a ``localized physical system''. Classical particles can be individuated on the basis of qualitative differences in their sets of properties. But in entangled states the ``particle labels'' of the quantum formalism usually do not pick out such sets of individuating particle properties. It is sometimes nevertheless possible to think in terms of individual particles, which may be localized; but we argue that in general the structure of quantum mechanics is at odds with such a particle interpretation. This finally leads us to the conclusion that quantum mechanics is best seen as not belonging to the category of space-time theories, in which physical quantities are functions on space-time points. The resulting picture of the quantum world is relevant for our understanding of the way in which quantum theory is non-local, and it sheds light on the novel aspects of quantum information.
Subsystems of entangled quantum systems are not traditionally described in a local way. This paper begins to address the issue by constructing an explicit local hidden variable theory for quantum subsystems. The interpretation is based on a modified sum-over-paths approach, where the paths of the subsystem obtain information about the external system during interactions. The interpretation utilizes the conception that there is a dissociation between the tensor product structure of wavefunctions and information flow into quantum subsystems.
An examination is made of the differing implications from applying the two mainstream interpretations of probability, frequentist and Bayesian, to QM (quantum mechanics) theory for the Bohm-EPR experiment. The joint probability distribution for the possible spin outcomes for two particles with coupled spins is examined. Contrasting conclusions are made: (i) Under the frequentist interpretation, the QM spin distribution implies a widely-discussed non-locality because probabilistic conditioning on a spin measurement is viewed as corresponding to a causal influence. Under the Bayesian interpretation, this conditioning is viewed as providing information relevant to the spin probabilities and the argument for non-locality loses its force. (ii) The frequentist interpretation leads to the locality condition used by John Bell in 1964 to establish conditions for the existence of hidden variables behind the spin probability distribution but this condition is not consistent with the product (Bayes) rule of probability theory. Under the Bayesian interpretation, there is no motivation for this locality condition and a new stochastic hidden-variable model is given that reproduces the spin distribution. (iii) Bell's original 1964 inequality provides a necessary condition for the existence of a third-order joint probability distribution for three spin variables that is compatible through marginalization with the second-order joint distributions for the three possible spin pairs. Bell's inequality is logically equivalent to the 1969 CHSH inequality that involves expectations of four pairs of four spin variables; the CHSH inequality must be satisfied in order for a fourth-order joint probability distribution for the four spin variables to exist. When any of these inequalities are violated, a joint probability distribution for three spin outcomes fails to be valid because some probabilities are negative.
Understanding what can be inferred about a multiparticle quantum system given only the knowledge of its subparts is a highly nontrivial task. Clearly, if a global system does not contain an information resource of some kind, neither do its subparts. For the case of entanglement as an information resource, it is known that the converse of this last statement is not true: Some nonentangled reduced states are only compatible with global states which are entangled. We extend this result to correlations and provide local marginal correlations that are only compatible with global genuinely tripartite nonlocal correlations. Quantum nonlocality can thus be deduced from the mere observation of local marginal correlations.
Abstract The concept of simultaneity is relative in special relativity whereas, it seems to have a definite meaning in quantum mechanics. On the other hand, theory and experiments in quantum mechanics have revealed the existence of non-local causal relations. We propose to use the invariant space-time interval introduced by special relativity as a benchmark for constructing a spacetime framework presenting a notion of an invariant time. We suggest that a physical system creates a non-local field within the spacetime framework and that the wavefunction of the physical system is an ontological entity that represents this non-local field. We propose to explain measurement and entanglement by using de Broglie Bohm theory in the context of the constructed spacetime framework.