© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:1706.06596 · Physical Review A

Tight bounds for the Pearle-Braunstein-Caves chained inequality without the fair-coincidence assumption

Jonathan Jogenfors, Jan-Åke Larsson

Published Aug 1, 2017• 5 citations

Abstract

In any Bell test, loopholes can cause issues in the interpretation of the results, since an apparent violation of the inequality may not correspond to a violation of local realism. An important example is the coincidence-time loophole that arises when detector settings might influence the time when detection will occur. This effect can be observed in many experiments where measurement outcomes are to be compared between remote stations because the interpretation of an ostensible Bell violation strongly depends on the method used to decide coincidence. The coincidence-time loophole has previously been studied for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt and Clauser-Horne inequalities, but recent experiments have shown the need for a generalization. Here, we study the generalized ``chained'' inequality by Pearle, Braunstein, and Caves (PBC) with $N\ensuremath{\ge}2$ settings per observer. This inequality has applications in, for instance, quantum key distribution where it has been used to reestablish security. In this paper we give the minimum coincidence probability for the PBC inequality for all $N\ensuremath{\ge}2$ and show that this bound is tight for a violation free of the fair-coincidence assumption. Thus, if an experiment has a coincidence probability exceeding the critical value derived here, the coincidence-time loophole is eliminated.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.022102

Related papers

Bell-inequality violation with entangled photons, free of the coincidence-time loophole

Jan-Åke Larsson, Marissa Giustina, Johannes Kofler +3 more

In a local realist model, physical properties are defined prior to and independent of measurement and no physical influence can propagate faster than the speed of light. Proper experimental violation of a Bell inequality would show that the world cannot be described with such a model. Experiments intended to demonstrate a violation usually require additional assumptions that make them vulnerable to a number of ``loopholes.'' In both pulsed and continuously pumped photonic experiments, an experimenter needs to identify which detected photons belong to the same pair, giving rise to the coincidence-time loophole. Here, via two different methods, we derive Clauser-Horne- and Eberhard-type inequalities that are not only free of the fair-sampling assumption (thus not being vulnerable to the detection loophole), but also free of the fair-coincidence assumption (thus not being vulnerable to the coincidence-time loophole). Both approaches can be used for pulsed as well as for continuously pumped experiments. Moreover, as they can also be applied to already existing experimental data, we finally show that a recent experiment [Giustina et al., Nature (London) 497, 227 (2013)] violated local realism without requiring the fair-coincidence assumption.

arXiv:1309.0712•Physical Review A•Sep 16, 2014•53 citations

Clauser-Horne/Eberhard Inequality Violation by a Local Model

Donald A. Graft

Thanks to its immunity to the detection loophole, the Clauser-Horne/Eberhard inequality plays an important role in tests of locality and in certification of quantum information protocols based on entanglement. I describe a local model that violates the inequality using a plausible mechanism relying upon a parameter of the apparatus, the source emission rate. The effect is generated through the analysis of time-tagged data using a standard windowed coincidence counting method. Significantly, the detection times here are not functions of the measurement settings, i.e., the fair coincidences assumption is satisfied. This finding has implications for the design and interpretation of experiments and for quantum information protocols, as it shows that the coincidence window mechanism cannot be eliminated by a demonstration of independence of the detection times and settings. The paper describes a reliable coincidence counting method and shows that it delivers an accurate count of true coincidences. Recent experimental tests of local realism based on the Clauser-Horne/Eberhard inequality are considered and it is shown that in one case (Christensen et al.) the emission rate is appropriately limited to ensure valid counting, and the data supports locality; in a second case (Giustina et al.) the experiment neglects to appropriately limit the emission rate, and the claimed violation can be accounted for locally.

arXiv:1507.06231•Advanced Science Engineering and Medicine•Jun 1, 2016•4 citations

Minimum detection efficiency required for a loophole-free violation of the Braunstein-Caves chained Bell inequalities

Adán Cabello, Jan-Åke Larsson, David Rodríguez

The chained Bell inequalities of Braunstein and Caves involving $N$ settings per observer have some interesting applications. Here we obtain the minimum detection efficiency required for a loophole-free violation of the Braunstein-Caves inequalities for any $N\ensuremath{\ge}2$. We discuss both the case in which both particles are detected with the same efficiency and the case in which the particles are detected with different efficiencies.

arXiv:0904.1033•Physical Review A•Jun 22, 2009•17 citations

Are Bell's conditions for local realism general enough?

Emilio Santos

Bell conditions for local realism are critically revisited. In particular for optical experiments I criticize Bell's proposed response of detectors to signals as extremely idealized. More physical conditions are proposed, whence a realistic local model of an optical experiment is possible which violates the Clauser-Horne (Bell) inequality. The possibility rests on the existence of a coincidence-time loophole in the experiments.

quant-pharXiv:2601.22833•The European Physical Journal Plus•Feb 2, 2026•2 citations

Chained Bell Inequality Experiment with High-Efficiency Measurements

Ting Rei Tan, Y. Wan, Stephen D. Erickson +6 more

We report correlation measurements on two ^{9}Be^{+} ions that violate a chained Bell inequality obeyed by any local-realistic theory. The correlations can be modeled as derived from a mixture of a local-realistic probabilistic distribution and a distribution that violates the inequality. A statistical framework is formulated to quantify the local-realistic fraction allowable in the observed distribution without the fair-sampling or independent-and-identical-distributions assumptions. We exclude models of our experiment whose local-realistic fraction is above 0.327 at the 95% confidence level. This bound is significantly lower than 0.586, the minimum fraction derived from a perfect Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality experiment. Furthermore, our data provide a device-independent certification of the deterministically created Bell states.

arXiv:1612.01618•Physical Review Letters•Mar 28, 2017•28 citations

Time-resolved measurement of Bell inequalities and the coincidence loophole

Mónica Agüero, Alejandro Andrés Hnilo, Marcelo Gregorio Kovalsky

We report an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with a pulsed source of entangled pairs of photons, recording the time of arrival of the pulses and of the detection of each single photon. This allows varying the parameters of the analysis (as the size of the time coincidence window) at will after the experiment has ended. Among other results, we present the measurement of the time variation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt parameter during the pulse. The obtained results close (or at least impose new and tight restrictions to) the last loophole that remains open in the tests of quantum mechanics vs local realism (the so-called coincidence loophole).

Physical Review A•Nov 30, 2012•22 citations

In any Bell test, loopholes can cause issues in the interpretation of the results, since an apparent violation of the inequality may not correspond to a violation of local realism. An important example is the coincidence-time loophole that arises when detector settings might influence the time when detection will occur. This effect can be observed in many experiments where measurement outcomes are to be compared between remote stations because the interpretation of an ostensible Bell violation strongly depends on the method used to decide coincidence. The coincidence-time loophole has previously been studied for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt and Clauser-Horne inequalities, but recent experiments have shown the need for a generalization. Here, we study the generalized ``chained'' inequality by Pearle, Braunstein, and Caves (PBC) with

N\ensuremath{\ge}2

settings per observer. This inequality has applications in, for instance, quantum key distribution where it has been used to reestablish security. In this paper we give the minimum coincidence probability for the PBC inequality for all

N\ensuremath{\ge}2

and show that this bound is tight for a violation free of the fair-coincidence assumption. Thus, if an experiment has a coincidence probability exceeding the critical value derived here, the coincidence-time loophole is eliminated.

In a local realist model, physical properties are defined prior to and independent of measurement and no physical influence can propagate faster than the speed of light. Proper experimental violation of a Bell inequality would show that the world cannot be described with such a model. Experiments intended to demonstrate a violation usually require additional assumptions that make them vulnerable to a number of ``loopholes.'' In both pulsed and continuously pumped photonic experiments, an experimenter needs to identify which detected photons belong to the same pair, giving rise to the coincidence-time loophole. Here, via two different methods, we derive Clauser-Horne- and Eberhard-type inequalities that are not only free of the fair-sampling assumption (thus not being vulnerable to the detection loophole), but also free of the fair-coincidence assumption (thus not being vulnerable to the coincidence-time loophole). Both approaches can be used for pulsed as well as for continuously pumped experiments. Moreover, as they can also be applied to already existing experimental data, we finally show that a recent experiment [Giustina et al., Nature (London) 497, 227 (2013)] violated local realism without requiring the fair-coincidence assumption.

Thanks to its immunity to the detection loophole, the Clauser-Horne/Eberhard inequality plays an important role in tests of locality and in certification of quantum information protocols based on entanglement. I describe a local model that violates the inequality using a plausible mechanism relying upon a parameter of the apparatus, the source emission rate. The effect is generated through the analysis of time-tagged data using a standard windowed coincidence counting method. Significantly, the detection times here are not functions of the measurement settings, i.e., the fair coincidences assumption is satisfied. This finding has implications for the design and interpretation of experiments and for quantum information protocols, as it shows that the coincidence window mechanism cannot be eliminated by a demonstration of independence of the detection times and settings. The paper describes a reliable coincidence counting method and shows that it delivers an accurate count of true coincidences. Recent experimental tests of local realism based on the Clauser-Horne/Eberhard inequality are considered and it is shown that in one case (Christensen et al.) the emission rate is appropriately limited to ensure valid counting, and the data supports locality; in a second case (Giustina et al.) the experiment neglects to appropriately limit the emission rate, and the claimed violation can be accounted for locally.

The chained Bell inequalities of Braunstein and Caves involving

N

settings per observer have some interesting applications. Here we obtain the minimum detection efficiency required for a loophole-free violation of the Braunstein-Caves inequalities for any $N\ensuremath{\ge}2$. We discuss both the case in which both particles are detected with the same efficiency and the case in which the particles are detected with different efficiencies.

We report correlation measurements on two ^{9}Be^{+} ions that violate a chained Bell inequality obeyed by any local-realistic theory. The correlations can be modeled as derived from a mixture of a local-realistic probabilistic distribution and a distribution that violates the inequality. A statistical framework is formulated to quantify the local-realistic fraction allowable in the observed distribution without the fair-sampling or independent-and-identical-distributions assumptions. We exclude models of our experiment whose local-realistic fraction is above 0.327 at the 95% confidence level. This bound is significantly lower than 0.586, the minimum fraction derived from a perfect Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality experiment. Furthermore, our data provide a device-independent certification of the deterministically created Bell states.

We report an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with a pulsed source of entangled pairs of photons, recording the time of arrival of the pulses and of the detection of each single photon. This allows varying the parameters of the analysis (as the size of the time coincidence window) at will after the experiment has ended. Among other results, we present the measurement of the time variation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt parameter during the pulse. The obtained results close (or at least impose new and tight restrictions to) the last loophole that remains open in the tests of quantum mechanics vs local realism (the so-called coincidence loophole).