We regard the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation as an ensemble mean representation of the stochastic motion of a single particle in a vacuum, subject to an undefined stochastic quantum force. The local mean of the quantum force is found to be proportional to the third spatial derivative of the probability density function, while its associated pressure is proportional to the second spatial derivative. The latter arises from the single particle diluted gas pressure, and this observation allows to interpret the quantum Bohm potential as the energy required to put a particle in a bath of fluctuating vacuum at constant entropy and volume. The stochastic force expectation value is zero and is uncorrelated with the particle location, thus does not perform work on average. Nonetheless, it is anti-correlated with volume and this anti-correlation leads to an uncertainty relation. We analyze the dynamic Gaussian solution to the Schrödinger equation as a simple example for exploring the mean properties of this quantum force. We conclude with a few possible interpretations as to the origins of quantum stochasticity.
We regard the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation as an ensemble mean representation of the stochastic motion of a single particle in a vacuum, subject to an undefined stochastic quantum force. The local mean of the quantum force is found to be proportional to the third spatial derivative of the probability density function, while its associated pressure is proportional to the second spatial derivative. The latter arises from the single particle diluted gas pressure, and this observation allows to interpret the quantum Bohm potential as the energy required to put a particle in a bath of fluctuating vacuum at constant entropy and volume. The stochastic force expectation value is zero and is uncorrelated with the particle location, thus does not perform work on average. Nonetheless, it is anti-correlated with volume and this anti-correlation leads to an uncertainty relation. We analyze the dynamic Gaussian solution to the Schrödinger equation as a simple example for exploring the mean properties of this quantum force. We conclude with a few possible interpretations as to the origins of quantum stochasticity.
We consider for clarity the simple case of the one dimensional non-relativistic Schrödinger equation and regard it as an ensemble mean representation of the stochastic motion of a single particle in a vacuum, subject to an undefined stochastic quantum force. By analyzing the Bohm potential it is found that the imaginary part of the quantum momentum is the root mean square fluctuation of the particle around its mean velocity, where the latter is the real part of the quantum momentum. The local mean of the quantum force is found to be proportional to the third spatial derivative of the probability density function, and its associated pressure to the second spatial derivative. The latter is decomposed from the single particle diluted gas pressure, and this pressure partition allows the interpretation of the quantum Bohm potential as the energy required to put a particle in a bath of fluctuating vacuum at constant entropy and volume. The stochastic force expectation value is zero and is uncorrelated with the particle location, thus does not perform work on average. Nonetheless it is anti-correlated with volume and this anti-correlation leads to a new type of an Heisenberg like relation. We imply the dynamic Gaussian solution to the Schrödinger equation as a simple example for exploring the mean properties of this quantum force. Still an interesting remained open task is the identification of the stochastic law that leads to these obtained mean properties.
We present a modified version of Nelson's seminal paper on the derivation of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation which draws on the equation of motion of a particle that moves under the influence of a classical force field and additional stochastic forces. The emphasis of our elaboration is focused on the implication of allowing stochastic forces to occur, viz. that the energy E of the particle is no longer conserved on its trajectory in a conservative force field. We correlate this departure Δ E from its classical energy with the energy/time uncertainty relation where Δ t is the average time for Δ E to persist. The stability of atoms, the zero-point energy of oscillators, the tunneling effect and the diffraction at slits are shown to be directly connected with the occurrence of such energy fluctuations. We discuss and rederive Nelson's theory entirely from this point of view and generalize his approach to systems of N particles which interact via pair forces. Achieving reversibility in a description of particle motion that is akin to Brownian motion, represents a salient point of the derivation. We demonstrate that certain objections raised against Nelson's theory are without substance. We also try to put the particular worldview of this version of stochastic quantum mechanics into perspective with regard to the established Copenhagen interpretation.
It is shown that the motion of a Brownian particle in the Smoluchowski approximation may be described by a Schrödinger-like equation defining a complex probability amplitude whose norm is the same as the stochastic probability density. Furthermore, the quantum dynamical operators have a physical meaning which arises in a natural way, from the stochastic nature of the process. These operators satisfy the usual commutation relations and thus the uncertainty principle. Here the constant ℏ is replaced by a parameter depending on the characteristics of the system. In particular, the potential-energy operator for a Brownian particle subject to no external forces can be interpreted as a Rayleigh dissipative function.
In this letter we attempt to trace back the origin of quantum uncertainty. We show that the Schrödinger equation can be mapped into the inviscid Favre-Reynolds turbulence equations of classical compressible fluids, albeit in zero temperature. Under this mapping the probability density function becomes the Reynolds time mean density of the fluid, the real and the imaginary parts of the momentum become the mean and turbulent root-mean-square velocities, respectively, where the latter obeys the first Fick law of diffusion and saturates the lower bound of the uncertainty principle. The mean pressure is proportional to the divergence of the turbulent mass flux and is the source for stochasticity. The roles of the pressure gradient force and the Reynolds stress tensor convergence, under this mapping, are illustrated in two well-known systems, namely, the 1 s orbital hydrogen atom and the 1D dynamic Gaussian wavepacket. Finally, we analyze within an independent part of the letter, a conjecture according to which this pressure results from vacuum fluctuations at the zero-point energy, mediated by random collisions of the particle with virtual photons. This suggests that the typical turbulent eddy is of the size of the Compton wavelength corresponding to a Reynolds averaging time scale which is twice the Zitterbewegung period. Moreover, according to this interpretation the quantized characteristics of the particle result from interactions with virtual photons.
Abstract We present a modified version of Nelson's seminal paper on the derivation of the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation which draws on the equation of motion of a particle that moves under the influence of a classical force field and additional stochastic forces. The emphasis of our elaboration is focused on the implication of allowing stochastic forces to occur, viz. that the energy E of the particle is no longer conserved on its trajectory in a conservative force field. We correlate this departure Δ E from its classical energy with the energy/time uncertainty relation where Δ t is the average time for Δ E to persist. The stability of atoms, the zero‐point energy of oscillators, the tunneling effect and the diffraction at slits are shown to be directly connected with the occurrence of such energy fluctuations. We discuss and rederive Nelson's theory entirely from this point of view and generalize his approach to systems of N particles which interact via pair forces. Achieving reversibility in a description of particle motion that is akin to Brownian motion, represents a salient point of the derivation. We demonstrate that certain objections raised against Nelson's theory are without substance. We also try to put the particular worldview of this version of stochastic quantum mechanics into perspective with regard to the established Copenhagen interpretation.
Newtonian force is based on a change in momentum in time, but momentum is a vector and so may change in magnitude and direction. In many cases, the change is of one form or the other. For example, for a bound particle the change is in kinetic energy i.e. in magnitude, while for a particle moving at constant speed in a circle or pressure in a Maxwell-Boltzmann gas, the change is in direction. For an MB gas, the probability for p and -p are the same so the average momentum at any point x is 0 and thus chunks of the gas do not move, even though a single particle in the gas moves. The pressure, on the other hand, is the average of 2pv (2p for impulse, v for flux) and so pressure for p and -p do not cancel. A quantum free particle is based on exp(ipx) which does not contain time and is a dynamical probability, This is both an eigenfunction of the momentum operator -id/dx and the kinetic energy operator -1/2m d/dx d/dx, yet as pointed out in Part II, there are two pieces (cos(px),sin(px)) with a spatial density and hence a kind of pressure/force. These, however, combine to give the sense of constant motion in one direction. We argue this is due to a dynamical probability, unlike a static balance of pressures/forces found in an MB gas or Newtonian statics. There is a density with pressure distribution cos(px), but this is continuously changing because the particle moves in one direction with constant p. Thus the two pressure distributions “balance” so to speak to create a constant p. Interference of exp(ipx) and say exp(-ipx) may “bring out” a “static” spatial density i.e. 2cos(px), but behind the scene the dynamical probabilities still exist. It is these which “hold” the cos(px) together which appears strange from a static point of view. For example, a quantum bound state has a static W*(x)W(x) spatial density at the same time that the single particle has an average classical kinetic energy KE(x)=En-V(x). Interference also gives rise to the notion of an impulse-pressure in quantum as one ignores the isin(px) and i sin(-px) terms. Creating a pressure scenario with p and -p leads to two considerations. First, there is an impulse-pressure (defined without flux) at each x point and secondly, this impulse-pressure changes with x. The time-independent Schrodinger equation is formulated in terms of energy (i.e. a scalar): KE(x)+V(x)=En where KE(x)= {-1/2m d/dx dW/dx} \ W and W=Sum over p a(p)exp(ipx). Thus, as in Newtonian mechanics, one thinks of -dV/dx solely accelerating a particle. The quantum particle however, is described by an ensemble W(x) which has pressure. This pressure is due to a combination of the form exp(ipx) and V(x), so V(x) does not simply change root mean square speed. exp(ipx), by itself, creates pressure when interference occurs as in a two slit scenario. We try to examine these ideas in this note.