Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1706.04114 · Quantum Information Processing

Discrete phase-space structures and Wigner functions for N qubits

C. Muñoz, A. B. Klimov, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

Published May 9, 2017• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s11128-017-1607-x

Related papers

Wigner function for discrete phase space: Exorcising ghost images

Arturo Argüelles, Thomas Dittrich

arXiv:quant-ph/0504210•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jun 10, 2005•20 citations

Discrete phase-space structure of n-qubit mutually unbiased bases

A. B. Klimov, José Luis Romero, Gunnar G. Bjork +1 more

arXiv:0806.0726•Annals of Physics•Oct 30, 2008•37 citations

Discrete Wigner Function Formulation of Qubits

Warren Schudy, Michael J. Holmes

•Apr 28, 2005•0 citations

Wigner functions and spin tomograms for qubit states

Петер Адам, V. A. Andreev, Iulia Ghiu +3 more

We establish the relation of the spin tomogram to the Wigner function on a discrete phase space of qubits. We use the quantizers and dequantizers of the spin tomographic star-product scheme for qubits to derive the expression for the kernel connecting Wigner symbols on the discrete phase space with the tomographic symbols.

arXiv:1312.6848•Dec 24, 2013•0 citations

Discrete Wigner Function Derivation of the Aaronson–Gottesman Tableau Algorithm

Lucas Kocia, Yifei Huang, Peter Love

The Gottesman–Knill theorem established that stabilizer states and Clifford operations can be efficiently simulated classically. For qudits with odd dimension three and greater, stabilizer states and Clifford operations have been found to correspond to positive discrete Wigner functions and dynamics. We present a discrete Wigner function-based simulation algorithm for odd-d qudits that has the same time and space complexity as the Aaronson–Gottesman algorithm for qubits. We show that the efficiency of both algorithms is due to harmonic evolution in the symplectic structure of discrete phase space. The differences between the Wigner function algorithm for odd-d and the Aaronson–Gottesman algorithm for qubits are likely due only to the fact that the Weyl–Heisenberg group is not in S U ( d ) for d = 2 and that qubits exhibit state-independent contextuality. This may provide a guide for extending the discrete Wigner function approach to qubits.

arXiv:1703.04630•Entropy•Jul 11, 2017•12 citations

Finite Phase Space, Wigner Functions, and Tomography for Two-Qubit States

Петер Адам, V. A. Andreev, Iulia Ghiu +3 more

Journal of Russian Laser Research•Sep 1, 2014•15 citations
The Gottesman–Knill theorem established that stabilizer states and Clifford operations can be efficiently simulated classically. For qudits with odd dimension three and greater, stabilizer states and Clifford operations have been found to correspond to positive discrete Wigner functions and dynamics. We present a discrete Wigner function-based simulation algorithm for odd-d qudits that has the same time and space complexity as the Aaronson–Gottesman algorithm for qubits. We show that the efficiency of both algorithms is due to harmonic evolution in the symplectic structure of discrete phase space. The differences between the Wigner function algorithm for odd-d and the Aaronson–Gottesman algorithm for qubits are likely due only to the fact that the Weyl–Heisenberg group is not in S U ( d ) for d = 2 and that qubits exhibit state-independent contextuality. This may provide a guide for extending the discrete Wigner function approach to qubits.