Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1705.10474

Entanglement Entropy in Pure $Z_2$ Gauge Lattices

Mihael Hategan

Published May 30, 2017• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We show that the Hilbert space of physical states on a pure $Z_2$ gauge lattice in $1 + 1$ and $2 + 1$ dimensions is geometrically separable if the fundamental physical degrees of freedom are taken to be the plaquettes. This results in a physical entanglement entropy that is not affected by gauge fixing. We introduce a lattice model that is physically equivalent to the original and whose entanglement entropy, calculated using link degrees of freedom, is the same as the entanglement entropy calculated using physical states. We also show that, for non-physical gauge link states, entanglement entropy quantifies constraints between gauge choices in plaquettes adjacent to the boundary.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1705.10474

Related papers

Entanglement entropy in lattice theories with Abelian gauge groups

Mihael Hategan

We revisit the issue of the geometrical separability of the Hilbert space of physical states on lattice Abelian theories in the context of entanglement entropy. We discuss the conditions under which vectors in the Hilbert space, as well as the gauge-invariant algebra, admit a tensor product decomposition with a geometrical interpretation. With the exception of pure gauge lattices with periodic boundary conditions which contain topological degrees of freedom, we show that the Hilbert space is geometrically separable.

arXiv:1809.00230•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Aug 31, 2018•4 citations

Entanglement entropy in lattices with non-Abelian gauge groups

Mihael Hategan

Entanglement entropy, taken here to be geometric, requires a geometrically separable Hilbert space. In lattice gauge theories, it is not immediately clear if the physical Hilbert space is geometrically separable. In a previous paper we have shown that the physical Hilbert space in pure gauge Abelian lattice theories exhibits some form of geometric scaling with the lattice volume, which suggest that the space is locally factorizable and, therefore, geometrically separable. In this paper, we provide strong evidence that indicates that this scaling is not present when the group is non-Abelian. We do so by looking at the scaling of the dimension of the physical Hilbert space of theories with certain discrete groups. The lack of an appropriate scaling implies that the physical Hilbert space of such a theory does not admit a local factorization. We then extend the reasoning, as sensibly possible, to SU(2) and SU(N) to reach the same conclusion. Lastly, we show that the addition of matter fields to non-Abelian lattice gauge theories makes the resulting physical Hilbert space locally factorizable. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2404.05851•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•May 6, 2024•1 citation

Revisiting entanglement entropy of lattice gauge theories

Ling-Yan Hung, Yidun Wan

It is realized recently that the entanglement entropy in gauge theories is ambiguous because the Hilbert space cannot be expressed as a simple direct product of Hilbert spaces defined on the two regions; different ways of dividing the Hilbert spaces near the boundary leads to significantly different result, to the extreme that it could annihilate the otherwise finite topological entanglement entropy between two regions altogether. In this article, we first show that the topological entanglement entropy in the Kitaev model [1] which is not a true gauge theory, is free of ambiguity. Then, we give a physical interpretation, from the perspectives of what can be measured in an experiment, to the purported ambiguity of true gauge theories, where the topological entanglement arises as redundancy in counting the degrees of freedom along the boundary separating two regions. We generalize these discussions to non-Abelian gauge theories.

arXiv:1501.04389•Journal of High Energy Physics•Apr 1, 2015•38 citations

Entanglement entropy and nonabelian gauge symmetry

William Donnelly

Entanglement entropy has proven to be an extremely useful concept in quantum field theory. Gauge theories are of particular interest, but for these systems the entanglement entropy is not clearly defined because the physical Hilbert space does not factor as a tensor product according to regions of space. Here we review a definition of entanglement entropy that applies to abelian and nonabelian lattice gauge theories. This entanglement entropy is obtained by embedding the physical Hilbert space into a product of Hilbert spaces associated to regions with boundary. The latter Hilbert spaces include degrees of freedom on the entangling surface that transform like surface charges under the gauge symmetry. These degrees of freedom are shown to contribute to the entanglement entropy, and the form of this contribution is determined by the gauge symmetry. We test our definition using the example of two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory, and find that it agrees with the thermal entropy in de Sitter space, and with the results of the Euclidean replica trick. We discuss the possible implications of this result for more complicated gauge theories, including quantum gravity.

arXiv:1406.7304•Classical and Quantum Gravity•Oct 21, 2014•178 citations

Entanglement entropy for pure gauge theories in 1+1 dimensions using the lattice regularization

Sinya Aoki A, Etsuko Itou, Keitaro Nagata

We study the entanglement entropy (EE) for pure gauge theories in 1[Formula: see text]+[Formula: see text]1 dimensions with the lattice regularization. Using the definition of the EE for lattice gauge theories proposed in a previous paper,1 we calculate the EE for arbitrary pure as well as mixed states in terms of eigenstates of the transfer matrix in (1[Formula: see text]+[Formula: see text]1)-dimensional lattice gauge theory. We find that the EE of an arbitrary pure state does not depend on the lattice spacing, thus giving the EE in the continuum limit, and show that the EE for an arbitrary pure state is independent of the real (Minkowski) time evolution. We also explicitly demonstrate the dependence of EE on the gauge fixing at the boundaries between two subspaces, which was pointed out for general cases in the paper. In addition, we calculate the EE at zero as well as finite temperature by the replica method, and show that our result in the continuum limit corresponds to the result obtained before in the continuum theory, with a specific value of the counterterm, which is otherwise arbitrary in the continuum calculation. We confirm the gauge dependence of the EE also for the replica method.

arXiv:1608.08727•International Journal of Modern Physics A•Dec 18, 2016•7 citations

Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields

Horacio Casini, Marina Huerta, J. A. Rosabal

In gauge theories the presence of constraints can obstruct expressing the global Hilbert space as a tensor product of the Hilbert spaces corresponding to degrees of freedom localized in complementary regions. In algebraic terms, this is due to the presence of a center---a set of operators which commute with all others---in the gauge invariant operator algebra corresponding to a finite region. A unique entropy can be assigned to algebras with a center, giving a place to a local entropy in lattice gauge theories. However, ambiguities arise on the correspondence between algebras and regions. In particular, it is always possible to choose (in many different ways) local algebras with a trivial center, and hence a genuine entanglement entropy, for any region. These choices are in correspondence with maximal trees of links on the boundary, which can be interpreted as partial gauge fixings. This interpretation entails a gauge fixing dependence of the entanglement entropy. In the continuum limit, however, ambiguities in the entropy are given by terms local on the boundary of the region, in such a way relative entropy and mutual information are finite, universal, and gauge independent quantities.

arXiv:1312.1183•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Apr 7, 2014•330 citations
Entanglement Entropy in Pure Z2Z_2Z2​ Gauge Lattices
We show that the Hilbert space of physical states on a pure Z2Z_2Z2​ gauge lattice in 1+11 + 11+1 and 2+12 + 12+1 dimensions is geometrically separable if the fundamental physical degrees of freedom are taken to be the plaquettes. This results in a physical entanglement entropy that is not affected by gauge fixing. We introduce a lattice model that is physically equivalent to the original and whose entanglement entropy, calculated using link degrees of freedom, is the same as the entanglement entropy calculated using physical states. We also show that, for non-physical gauge link states, entanglement entropy quantifies constraints between gauge choices in plaquettes adjacent to the boundary.
We revisit the issue of the geometrical separability of the Hilbert space of physical states on lattice Abelian theories in the context of entanglement entropy. We discuss the conditions under which vectors in the Hilbert space, as well as the gauge-invariant algebra, admit a tensor product decomposition with a geometrical interpretation. With the exception of pure gauge lattices with periodic boundary conditions which contain topological degrees of freedom, we show that the Hilbert space is geometrically separable.
Entanglement entropy, taken here to be geometric, requires a geometrically separable Hilbert space. In lattice gauge theories, it is not immediately clear if the physical Hilbert space is geometrically separable. In a previous paper we have shown that the physical Hilbert space in pure gauge Abelian lattice theories exhibits some form of geometric scaling with the lattice volume, which suggest that the space is locally factorizable and, therefore, geometrically separable. In this paper, we provide strong evidence that indicates that this scaling is not present when the group is non-Abelian. We do so by looking at the scaling of the dimension of the physical Hilbert space of theories with certain discrete groups. The lack of an appropriate scaling implies that the physical Hilbert space of such a theory does not admit a local factorization. We then extend the reasoning, as sensibly possible, to SU(2) and SU(N) to reach the same conclusion. Lastly, we show that the addition of matter fields to non-Abelian lattice gauge theories makes the resulting physical Hilbert space locally factorizable. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
It is realized recently that the entanglement entropy in gauge theories is ambiguous because the Hilbert space cannot be expressed as a simple direct product of Hilbert spaces defined on the two regions; different ways of dividing the Hilbert spaces near the boundary leads to significantly different result, to the extreme that it could annihilate the otherwise finite topological entanglement entropy between two regions altogether. In this article, we first show that the topological entanglement entropy in the Kitaev model [1] which is not a true gauge theory, is free of ambiguity. Then, we give a physical interpretation, from the perspectives of what can be measured in an experiment, to the purported ambiguity of true gauge theories, where the topological entanglement arises as redundancy in counting the degrees of freedom along the boundary separating two regions. We generalize these discussions to non-Abelian gauge theories.
Entanglement entropy has proven to be an extremely useful concept in quantum field theory. Gauge theories are of particular interest, but for these systems the entanglement entropy is not clearly defined because the physical Hilbert space does not factor as a tensor product according to regions of space. Here we review a definition of entanglement entropy that applies to abelian and nonabelian lattice gauge theories. This entanglement entropy is obtained by embedding the physical Hilbert space into a product of Hilbert spaces associated to regions with boundary. The latter Hilbert spaces include degrees of freedom on the entangling surface that transform like surface charges under the gauge symmetry. These degrees of freedom are shown to contribute to the entanglement entropy, and the form of this contribution is determined by the gauge symmetry. We test our definition using the example of two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory, and find that it agrees with the thermal entropy in de Sitter space, and with the results of the Euclidean replica trick. We discuss the possible implications of this result for more complicated gauge theories, including quantum gravity.
We study the entanglement entropy (EE) for pure gauge theories in 1[Formula: see text]+[Formula: see text]1 dimensions with the lattice regularization. Using the definition of the EE for lattice gauge theories proposed in a previous paper,1 we calculate the EE for arbitrary pure as well as mixed states in terms of eigenstates of the transfer matrix in (1[Formula: see text]+[Formula: see text]1)-dimensional lattice gauge theory. We find that the EE of an arbitrary pure state does not depend on the lattice spacing, thus giving the EE in the continuum limit, and show that the EE for an arbitrary pure state is independent of the real (Minkowski) time evolution. We also explicitly demonstrate the dependence of EE on the gauge fixing at the boundaries between two subspaces, which was pointed out for general cases in the paper. In addition, we calculate the EE at zero as well as finite temperature by the replica method, and show that our result in the continuum limit corresponds to the result obtained before in the continuum theory, with a specific value of the counterterm, which is otherwise arbitrary in the continuum calculation. We confirm the gauge dependence of the EE also for the replica method.
In gauge theories the presence of constraints can obstruct expressing the global Hilbert space as a tensor product of the Hilbert spaces corresponding to degrees of freedom localized in complementary regions. In algebraic terms, this is due to the presence of a center---a set of operators which commute with all others---in the gauge invariant operator algebra corresponding to a finite region. A unique entropy can be assigned to algebras with a center, giving a place to a local entropy in lattice gauge theories. However, ambiguities arise on the correspondence between algebras and regions. In particular, it is always possible to choose (in many different ways) local algebras with a trivial center, and hence a genuine entanglement entropy, for any region. These choices are in correspondence with maximal trees of links on the boundary, which can be interpreted as partial gauge fixings. This interpretation entails a gauge fixing dependence of the entanglement entropy. In the continuum limit, however, ambiguities in the entropy are given by terms local on the boundary of the region, in such a way relative entropy and mutual information are finite, universal, and gauge independent quantities.