A photodetector may be characterized by various figures of merit such as response time, bandwidth, dark count rate, efficiency, wavelength resolution, and photon-number resolution. On the other hand, quantum theory says that any measurement device is fully described by its positive-operator-valued measure (POVM) which generalizes the textbook notion of the eigenstates of the appropriate hermitian operator (the 'observable') as measurement outcomes. Here we show how to define a multitude of photodetector figures of merit in terms of a given POVM. We distinguish classical and quantum figures of merit and issue a conjecture regarding trade-off relations between them. We discuss the relationship between POVM elements and photodetector clicks, and how models of photodetectors may be tested by measuring either POVM elements or figures of merit. Finally, the POVM is advertised as a platform-independent way of comparing different types of photodetectors, since any such POVM refers to the Hilbert space of the incoming light, and not to any Hilbert space internal to the detector.
A photodetector may be characterized by various figures of merit such as response time, bandwidth, dark count rate, efficiency, wavelength resolution, and photon-number resolution. On the other hand, quantum theory says that any measurement device is fully described by its positive-operator-valued measure (POVM) which generalizes the textbook notion of the eigenstates of the appropriate hermitian operator (the 'observable') as measurement outcomes. Here we show how to define a multitude of photodetector figures of merit in terms of a given POVM. We distinguish classical and quantum figures of merit and issue a conjecture regarding trade-off relations between them. We discuss the relationship between POVM elements and photodetector clicks, and how models of photodetectors may be tested by measuring either POVM elements or figures of merit. Finally, the POVM is advertised as a platform-independent way of comparing different types of photodetectors, since any such POVM refers to the Hilbert space of the incoming light, and not to any Hilbert space internal to the detector.
Quantum mechanics cements the intimate relationship between the nature of light and its detection. Historically, quantum theories of photodetection have generally fallen into two categories: the first tries to determine what quantum field observable is measured when photoelectrons are detected, laying the theoretical groundwork for photodetection being possible. The second type are phenomenological theories, which take great care to model the details of specific photodetectors. In this dissertation, we fill in the gap between these two models in the modern literature on photodetection by constructing a fully quantum-mechanical and sufficiently realistic model that includes all stages of the photodetection process. We accomplish this within the framework of quantum information theory using the language of positive operator valued measures (POVMs). \n\nA POVM provides the most general description of a quantum measurement. In the context of single-photon detection, the photodetector POVM provides a complete characterization of the single-photon detector (SPD) from which all figures of merit can be calculated. Each element of the POVM is comprised of a weighted sum over single-photon state projectors. To construct SPD POVMs, we identify the states projected onto by a measurement and the associated weights. We first accomplish this for a simple time-dependent system, laying out how to efficiently project onto arbitrary single-photon states. Then, we describe the three stages of a realistic SPD: transmission, amplification, and measurement.\n\nIn the transmission stage of photodetection a photon enters a network of discrete energy levels, its energy propagating through that network and finally exiting into another output continuum of modes, a process entirely described by a single complex function. In the amplification stage of photodetection, a single excitation is amplified into a macroscopic signal via a nonlinear amplification mechanism. In the final stage, an inefficient ``classical'' measurement is made on the macroscopic signal. By combining these three stages we form a chain of inference from the final ``click'' to the input photon and construct a POVM projecting onto the input Hilbert space. Lastly, we discuss limits and tradeoffs that arise at each stage and implications for photodetection applications.\n\nThis dissertation contains previously published and unpublished material.
In optical quantum information processing, two of the most basic elements are the sources of quantum mechanical states of light, and the devices that can detect these states. In this chapter, we narrow this down to photon sources and photodetectors. We will describe first how detectors work, starting from abstract ideal detectors, via a complete description of realistic detectors in terms of POVMS, to a brief overview of current photodetectors. Subsequently, we will define what is a single-photon source, and how we can determine experimentally whether a source produces single photons or something else. Having laid down the ground rules, we will survey some of the most popular ways photons are produced in the laboratory. Finally, we take a look at the production of entangled photon sources and quantum non-demolition measurements of photons. A mathematical model of photodetectors Photodetectors are devices that produce a macroscopic signal when triggered by one or more photons. In the ideal situation, every photon that hits the detector contributes to the macroscopic signal, and there are no ‘ghost’ signals, or so-called dark counts. In this situation we can define two types of detector, namely the ‘photon-number detector’, and ‘detectors without number resolution’. First, the photon number detector is a (largely hypothetical) device that tells us how many photons there are in a given optical mode that is properly localized in space and time. This property is called ‘photon-number resolution’.
Quantum mechanics cements the intimate relationship between the nature of light and its detection. Historically, quantum theories of photodetection have generally fallen into two categories: the first tries to determine what quantum field observable is measured when photoelectrons are detected, laying the theoretical groundwork for photodetection being possible. The second type are phenomenological theories, which take great care to model the details of specific photodetectors. In this dissertation, we fill in the gap between these two models in the modern literature on photodetection by constructing a fully quantum mechanical and sufficiently realistic model that includes all stages of the photodetection process: transmission, amplification, and a final classical measurement. We accomplish this within the framework of quantum information theory using the language of positive operator valued measures (POVMs). This dissertation contains material previously published in three papers: Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2019). On nonlinear amplification: improved quantum limits for photon counting. Optics Express 27, 16, 23454-23463. Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2019). Quantum networks for single photon detection. Physical Review A, 100, 033836. Propp, Tz. B & van Enk, S. J. (2020). How to project onto an arbitrary single-photon wavepacket. Physical Review A, 102, 053707.
In the Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics, ideal measurements of physical variables are discussed using the spectral theory of Hermitian operators and the corresponding projector-valued measures (PVMs). However, more general types of measurements require the treatment in terms of positive-operator-valued measures (POVMs). In the Hamiltonian formulation of quantum mechanics, canonical coordinates are related to PVM. In this paper the results of an analysis of various aspects of applications of POVMs in the Hamiltonian formulation are reported. Several properties of state parameters and quantum observables given by POVMs or represented in an overcomplete basis, including the general Hamiltonian treatment of the Neumark extension, are presented. An analysis of the phase operator, given by the corresponding POVMs, in the Hilbert space and the Hamiltonian frameworks is also given.
Born's rule in its conventional textbook form applies to the small class of projective measurements only. It is well-known that a generalization of Born's rule to realistic experiments must be phrased in terms of positive operator valued measures (POVMs). This generalization accounts for things like losses, imperfect measurements, limited detection accuracy, dark detector counts, and the simultaneous measurement of position and momentum. Starting from first principles, this paper gives a self-contained, deductive introduction to quantum measurement and Born's rule, in its generalized form that applies to the results of measurements described by POVMs. It is based on a suggestive definition of what constitutes a detector, assuming an intuitive informal notion of response. The formal exposition is embedded into the context of a variaety of quotes from the literature illuminating historical aspects of the subject. The material presented suggests a new approach to introductory courses on quantum mechanics.
The positive operator valued measure (POVM) for a photon counting array detector is derived and found to equal photon flux density integrated over pixel area and measurement time. Since photon flux density equals number density multiplied by the speed of light, this justifies theoretically the observation that a photon counting array provides a coarse-grained measurement of photon position. The POVM obtained here can be written as a set of projectors onto a basis of localized states, consistent with the description of photon position in a recent quantum imaging proposal [Tsang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 253601 (2009)]. The wave function that describes a photon counting experiment is the projection of the photon state vector onto this localized basis. Collapse is to the electromagnetic vacuum and not to a localized state, thus violating the textbook rules of quantum mechanics but compatible with the theory of generalized observables and the nonlocalizability of an incoming photon.