© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:1705.06574 · Physical Review A

Evaluation of counterfactuality in counterfactual communication protocols

David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, Axel Gottfries, C. H. W. Barnes

Published Dec 18, 2017• 28 citations

Abstract

We provide an in-depth investigation of parameter estimation in nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers (NMZIs) using two information measures: the Fisher information and the Shannon mutual information. Protocols for counterfactual communication have, so far, been based on two different definitions of counterfactuality. In particular, some schemes have been based on NMZI devices, and have recently been subject to criticism. We provide a methodology for evaluating the counterfactuality of these protocols, based on an information-theoretical framework. More specifically, we make the assumption that any realistic quantum channel in MZI structures will have some weak uncontrolled interaction. We then use the Fisher information of this interaction to measure counterfactual violations. The measure is used to evaluate the suggested counterfactual communication protocol of H. Salih et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)]. The protocol of D. R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur and C. H. W. Barnes [Phys. Rev. A 94, 062303 (2016)], based on a different definition, is evaluated with a probability measure. Our results show that the definition of Arvidsson-Shukur and Barnes is satisfied by their scheme, while that of Salih et al. is only satisfied by perfect quantum channels. For realistic devices the latter protocol does not achieve its objective.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.062316

Related papers

Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer

Robert B. Griffiths

Possible paths of a photon passing through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer on its way to a detector are analyzed using the consistent histories formulation of quantum mechanics, and confirmed using a set of weak measurements (but not weak values). The results disagree with an analysis by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)], and agree with a conclusion reached by Li et al. [Phys. Rev. A 88, 046102 (2013)]. However, the analysis casts serious doubt on the claim of Salih et al. (whose authorship includes Li et al.) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)] to have constructed a protocol for counterfactual communication: a channel which can transmit information even though it contains a negligible number of photons.

arXiv:1604.04596•Physical Review A•Sep 16, 2016•79 citations

Comment on “Multitime quantum communication: Interesting but not counterfactual”

Lev Vaidman A

In a recent paper, Griffiths [Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)] analyzed a protocol for transmission of information between two parties introduced by Salih et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)]. There is a considerable controversy about the counterfactuality of this protocol, and Griffiths suggested to resolve it by introducing a new measure of channel usage, which he called ``Cost.'' I argue that this measure is not appropriate because the original interaction-free measurement protocol which triggered the definition of the concept of counterfactuality is not counterfactual according to this measure.

arXiv:2306.16756•Physical Review A•Nov 8, 2023•2 citations

Postselection and counterfactual communication

David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, C. H. W. Barnes

A recently proposed quantum protocol for counterfactual communication [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 99, 010103(R) (2019)] relies on postselection to eliminate the weak trace in the transmission channel. We show that the postselection in this protocol additionally eliminates the flow of Fisher information from transmitter to receiver. However, we also show that a classical communication protocol with postselection can be counterfactual. Hence, we argue that postselection should not be allowed in genuine quantum counterfactual communication. In the proposed quantum protocol, the probability of discarding an event by postselection tends to zero with an increasing number of ideal optical components. But the counterfactual violation strength tends to infinity at a faster rate. Consequently, the quantum protocol is not counterfactual proper.

arXiv:1904.01036•Physical Review A•Jun 10, 2019•18 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer' ”

Robert B. Griffiths

While much of the technical analysis in the preceding Comment is correct, in the end it confirms the conclusion reached in my previous work [Phys. Rev. A 94, 032115 (2016)]: A consistent histories analysis provides no support for the claim of counterfactual quantum communication put forward by Salih et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)].

arXiv:1712.01895•Physical Review A•Feb 9, 2018•12 citations

Direct counterfactual quantum-communication protocol beyond a single-photon source

Zheng-Hong Li, Shang-Yue Feng, M. Al-Amri +1 more

The direct counterfactual quantum-communication protocol involving double-chained Mach-Zehnder interferometers requires a single-photon input. Here, we show that even with multiphoton light sources, including a strong coherent light source as input, the counterfactual communication can be achieved with success probability approaching unity in the ideal asymptotic limit. The path evolution of multiple photons is nonlocally controlled. Thus, information is transmitted without any photons, or any other auxiliary information carriers, appearing in the public transmission channel. The effect is quantum since quantum measurements are an essential requirement for this protocol. Furthermore, a modified scheme is proposed in which the number of interferometers is reduced.

arXiv:2202.03935•Physical Review A•Sep 15, 2022•10 citations

Optical Communication with Invisible Photons

Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

It has always been a self-evident and obvious feature of any kind of communication that there should be an exchange of objects like photons or electrons between the sender and the receiver to convey any information. In this chapter a protocol is presented in which information is transmitted between a sender and receiver with no particles in the transmission channel. The basic building block of this counterfactual communication protocol, the Mach–Zehnder interferometer, is discussed. The concept of interaction-free measurement is also introduced.

Oxford University Press eBooks•May 7, 2020•0 citations

We provide an in-depth investigation of parameter estimation in nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers (NMZIs) using two information measures: the Fisher information and the Shannon mutual information. Protocols for counterfactual communication have, so far, been based on two different definitions of counterfactuality. In particular, some schemes have been based on NMZI devices, and have recently been subject to criticism. We provide a methodology for evaluating the counterfactuality of these protocols, based on an information-theoretical framework. More specifically, we make the assumption that any realistic quantum channel in MZI structures will have some weak uncontrolled interaction. We then use the Fisher information of this interaction to measure counterfactual violations. The measure is used to evaluate the suggested counterfactual communication protocol of H. Salih et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)]. The protocol of D. R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur and C. H. W. Barnes [Phys. Rev. A 94, 062303 (2016)], based on a different definition, is evaluated with a probability measure. Our results show that the definition of Arvidsson-Shukur and Barnes is satisfied by their scheme, while that of Salih et al. is only satisfied by perfect quantum channels. For realistic devices the latter protocol does not achieve its objective.

Possible paths of a photon passing through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer on its way to a detector are analyzed using the consistent histories formulation of quantum mechanics, and confirmed using a set of weak measurements (but not weak values). The results disagree with an analysis by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)], and agree with a conclusion reached by Li et al. [Phys. Rev. A 88, 046102 (2013)]. However, the analysis casts serious doubt on the claim of Salih et al. (whose authorship includes Li et al.) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)] to have constructed a protocol for counterfactual communication: a channel which can transmit information even though it contains a negligible number of photons.

In a recent paper, Griffiths [Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)] analyzed a protocol for transmission of information between two parties introduced by Salih et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)]. There is a considerable controversy about the counterfactuality of this protocol, and Griffiths suggested to resolve it by introducing a new measure of channel usage, which he called ``Cost.'' I argue that this measure is not appropriate because the original interaction-free measurement protocol which triggered the definition of the concept of counterfactuality is not counterfactual according to this measure.

A recently proposed quantum protocol for counterfactual communication [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 99, 010103(R) (2019)] relies on postselection to eliminate the weak trace in the transmission channel. We show that the postselection in this protocol additionally eliminates the flow of Fisher information from transmitter to receiver. However, we also show that a classical communication protocol with postselection can be counterfactual. Hence, we argue that postselection should not be allowed in genuine quantum counterfactual communication. In the proposed quantum protocol, the probability of discarding an event by postselection tends to zero with an increasing number of ideal optical components. But the counterfactual violation strength tends to infinity at a faster rate. Consequently, the quantum protocol is not counterfactual proper.

The direct counterfactual quantum-communication protocol involving double-chained Mach-Zehnder interferometers requires a single-photon input. Here, we show that even with multiphoton light sources, including a strong coherent light source as input, the counterfactual communication can be achieved with success probability approaching unity in the ideal asymptotic limit. The path evolution of multiple photons is nonlocally controlled. Thus, information is transmitted without any photons, or any other auxiliary information carriers, appearing in the public transmission channel. The effect is quantum since quantum measurements are an essential requirement for this protocol. Furthermore, a modified scheme is proposed in which the number of interferometers is reduced.

It has always been a self-evident and obvious feature of any kind of communication that there should be an exchange of objects like photons or electrons between the sender and the receiver to convey any information. In this chapter a protocol is presented in which information is transmitted between a sender and receiver with no particles in the transmission channel. The basic building block of this counterfactual communication protocol, the Mach–Zehnder interferometer, is discussed. The concept of interaction-free measurement is also introduced.