We show that scattering a quantum particle on a one-dimensional potential barrier as well as scattering the electromagnetic wave on a quasi-one-dimensional layered structure (both represent scattering problems with one 'source' and two 'sinks') violate the superposition principle; the role of nonlinear elements is played here by the potential barrier and the layered structure, splitting the incident (probability and electromagnetic) wave into two parts (transmitted and reflected). This explains why all attempts to solve the tunneling time problem within the framework of the standard (linear) models of these processes, both in quantum mechanics and in classical electrodynamics, have been unsuccessful. We revise the traditional formulation of the superposition principle, present a new (nonlinear) wave model, by the example of the quantum-mechanical scattering process, and show that concepts of the tunneling time developed on its basis are free from the Hartman paradox.
We show that scattering a quantum particle on a one-dimensional potential barrier as well as scattering the electromagnetic wave on a quasi-one-dimensional layered structure (both represent scattering problems with one 'source' and two 'sinks') violate the superposition principle; the role of nonlinear elements is played here by the potential barrier and the layered structure, splitting the incident (probability and electromagnetic) wave into two parts (transmitted and reflected). This explains why all attempts to solve the tunneling time problem within the framework of the standard (linear) models of these processes, both in quantum mechanics and in classical electrodynamics, have been unsuccessful. We revise the traditional formulation of the superposition principle, present a new (nonlinear) wave model, by the example of the quantum-mechanical scattering process, and show that concepts of the tunneling time developed on its basis are free from the Hartman paradox.
Entanglement is usually associated with compound systems. We first show that a one-dimensional (1D) completed scattering of a particle on a static potential barrier represents an entanglement of two alternative one-particle sub-processes, transmission and reflection, macroscopically distinct at the final stage of scattering. The wave function for the whole ensemble of scattering particles can be uniquely presented as the sum of two isometrically evolved wave packets to describe the (to-be-)transmitted and (to-be-)reflected subensembles of particles at all stages of scattering. A noninvasive Larmor-clock timing procedure adapted to either subensemble shows that namely the dwell time gives the time spent, on the average, by a particle in the barrier region, and it denies the Hartman effect. As regards the group time, it cannot be measured and hence it cannot be accepted as a measure of the tunneling time. We argue that nonlocality of entangled states appears in quantum mechanics due to inconsistency of its superposition principle with the corpuscular properties of a particle. For example, this principle associates a 1D completed scattering with a single (one-way) process, while a particle, as an indivisible object, cannot take part in transmission and reflection, simultaneously.
We develop a new quantum-mechanical approach to scattering a particle on a one-dimensional (1D) system of two identical rectangular potential barriers, which implies modelling the dynamics of its subprocesses -- transmission and reflection -- at all stages of scattering. On its basis we define, for each subprocess, the dwell time as well as the local (exact) and asymptotic (extrapolated) group times. Our concept of the asymptotic transmission group time confirms the validity of the Wigner phase time in the opaque limit, as well as the existence of the usual and generalized Hartman effects predicted on its basis. On the energy scale, this concept is valid everywhere in the high energy region as well as in the low energy region, excepting resonance points and their neighborhoods. On the contrary, the Buttiker dwell time is valid, as the transmission time, just only at the resonance points. Our concept of the transmission dwell time predicts monotonous growth of the tunneling time when the distance between the opaque barriers increases. By our approach only this time scale yields the true time spent, on average, by transmitted particles in the region occupied by the system. We explain why the asymptotic and local transmission group times cannot play this role and why the concept of {\it transmission group} velocity lies beyond the scope of special relativity. And else, all the transmission times admit only indirect measurements. Hence the unambiguous interpretation of all tunneling-time experiments is impossible when the transmission dynamics at all stages of scattering is unknown.
We develop a new quantum-mechanical approach to scattering a particle on a one-dimensional (1D) system of two identical rectangular potential barriers, which implies modelling the dynamics of its subprocesses -- transmission and reflection -- at all stages of scattering. On its basis we define, for each subprocess, the dwell time as well as the local (exact) and asymptotic (extrapolated) group times. Our concept of the asymptotic transmission group time confirms the validity of the Wigner phase time in the opaque limit, as well as the existence of the usual and generalized Hartman effects predicted on its basis. On the energy scale, this concept is valid everywhere in the high energy region as well as in the low energy region, excepting resonance points and their neighborhoods. On the contrary, the Buttiker dwell time is valid, as the transmission time, just only at the resonance points. Our concept of the transmission dwell time predicts monotonous growth of the tunneling time when the distance between the opaque barriers increases. By our approach only this time scale yields the true time spent, on average, by transmitted particles in the region occupied by the system. We explain why the asymptotic and local transmission group times cannot play this role and why the concept of {\it transmission group} velocity lies beyond the scope of special relativity. And else, all the transmission times admit only indirect measurements. Hence the unambiguous interpretation of all tunneling-time experiments is impossible when the transmission dynamics at all stages of scattering is unknown.
Abstract This is a review of studies of quantum tunneling, which is described by the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation, and electromagnetic tunneling, where “superluminal” velocities and times of tunneling are considered. Integral and integrodifferential equations have been presented to describe tunneling. According to these equations, superluminal motion is impossible. The paradoxical Hartman effect has been discussed and explained. It has been shown that the velocity of passage of a particle in a beam through a barrier in the case of steady-state and time-dependent quantum tunneling is equal to the velocity of its incidence on the barrier and quasiphotons inside any layer of matter carry the energy always at a subluminal velocity. However, the tunneling time of a single particle or a photon is meaningless.
After the review by Hauge and Stovneng the old question of "How long does it take to tunnel through the barrier?" has not still lost its relevance. As before, there is no clear answer to this question even for the one-dimensional completed scattering (OCS). In this paper we show that this seemingly simple question stands alongside with such fundamental problems of quantum mechanics (QM) as the Schrodinger's-cat and and EPR-Bohm paradoxes. Their common feature is that the states of a scattered particle, a radioactive atom and electron EPR-pair represent pure {\it micro-cat} states. It is widely accepted that the EPR-Bohm paradox implies the non-existence of local hidden variables (LHVs), the cat paradox represents a macro-objectification problem and the tunneling time is an observer-dependent quantity whose definitions must be 'operational'. At the same time, according to the probabilistic approach (Accardi, Khrennikov, Philipp, Hess {\it et al.}) to Bell's inequality that underlies the EPR-Bohm experiments, its experimental violation means simply that it contains probability distributions associated with mutually incompatible statistical data. We argue that this approach must be extended onto micro-cat states because they describe, too, mutually incompatible statistical data. The current practice to interpret the squared modulus of a micro-cat state as the probability density should be recognized as erroneous. It is this practice that makes QM incompatible with classical physical theories and, thereby, makes the micro-world 'unspeakable'. The known 'operational' tunneling-time concepts, elaborated in line with this practice, are logically inconsistent. We argue that the TTP and the cat paradox must be solved at the level of single electrons and atoms, without resorting to environment and measurement contexts. We present a new model of the OCS and solve the TTP on its basis.
A new approach to the problem of scattering the plane electromagnetic TE wave on a homogeneous dielectric layer is presented, which does not predict, unlike the standard model, the Hartman effect for the tunneling time in the case of scattering the TE wave in the regime of a frustrated total internal refection (FTIR). The basic idea of this approach is that a correct definition of the tunneling velocity and time is possible if only the dynamics of both its subprocesses — transmission and reflection — is known at all stages of the scattering process investigated. It is shown that the Wigner (group) tunneling time was introduced without taking into account of this requirement, and, as a consequence, both this characteristic itself and the associated with it Hartman effect have no relation to transferring the light energy through the layer. The dwell transmission time, which is directly related to it, does not lead to the Hartman effect.