arXiv:1703.08870 · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Weak value controversy

Lev Vaidman A

Published Oct 2, 2017• 91 citations

Abstract

Recent controversy regarding the meaning and usefulness of weak values is reviewed. It is argued that in spite of recent statistical arguments by Ferrie and Combes, experiments with anomalous weak values provide useful amplification techniques for precision measurements of small effects in many realistic situations. The statistical nature of weak values is questioned. Although measuring weak values requires an ensemble, it is argued that the weak value, similarly to an eigenvalue, is a property of a single pre- and post-selected quantum system.This article is part of the themed issue 'Second quantum revolution: foundational questions'.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0395

Related papers

Experimental realization of robust weak measurements

Enrico Rebufello, Fabrizio Piacentini, Alessio Avella +7 more

Despite being very influential on both foundations and applications of quantum mechanics, weak values are still somewhat controversial. Although there are some indications that weak values are physical properties of a single quantum system, the common way weak values are presented is statistical: it is commonly believed that for measuring weak values one has to perform many weak measurements over a large ensemble of pre- and postselected particles. Other debates surround the anomalous nature of weak value and even their quantumness. To address these issues, we present some preliminary data showing that anomalous weak values can be measured using just a single detection, i.e. with no statistics. In our experiment, a single click of a detector indicates the weak value as a single photon property, which moreover lies well beyond the range of eigenvelues of the measured operator. Importantly, the uncertainty with which the weak values is measured is smaller than the difference between the weak value and the closet eigenvalue. This is the first experimental realization of robust weak measurements.

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology IIFeb 25, 20200 citations

Comment on "How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads"

Lev Vaidman A

In a recent Letter [PRL 113, 120404 (2014)] Ferrie and Combes claimed to show "that weak values are not inherently quantum, but rather a purely statistical feature of pre- and post-selection with disturbance." In this Comment I will show that this claim is not valid. It follows from Ferrie and Combes misunderstanding of the concept of weak value.

arXiv:1409.5386Sep 18, 201411 citations

A comment on the paper "How can a Result of a Single Coin Toss Turn Out to be 100 Heads" by C. Ferrie and J. Combes

D. Sokolovski

The authors of a recent paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120404 (2014)] suggest that "weak values are not inherently quantum but rather a purely statistical feature of pre- and postselection with disturbance". We argue that this claim is erroneous, since such values require averaging with distributions which change sign. This type of averaging arises naturally in quantum mechanics, but may not occur in classical statistics.

arXiv:1410.0570Oct 2, 20142 citations

Non-statistical Weak Measurements

Jeff Tollaksen, Yakir Aharonov (a

Non-statistical weak measurements yield weak values that are outside the range of eigenvalues and are not rare, suggesting that weak values are a property of every pre-and-post-selected ensemble. They also extend the applicability and valid regime of weak values.

Jan 1, 200611 citations

What Is a Quantum-Mechanical “Weak Value” the Value of?

B. E. Y. Svensson

A so called “weak value” of an observable in quantum mechanics (QM) may be obtained in a weak measurement + post-selection procedure on the QM system under study. Applied to number operators, it has been invoked in revisiting some QM paradoxes ( e.g. , the so called Three-Box Paradox and Hardy’s Paradox). This requires the weak value to be interpreted as a bona fide property of the system considered, a par with entities like operator mean values and eigenvalues. I question such an interpretation; it has no support in the basic axioms of quantum mechanics and it leads to unreasonable results in concrete situations.

arXiv:1301.4328Foundations of PhysicsSep 4, 201327 citations

No 'anomalous' weak values in a classical theory

D. Sokolovski

The authors of a recent paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120404 (2014)] suggest that weak values are not inherently quantum but rather a purely statistical feature of pre- and postselection with disturbance. We argue that this claim is erroneous, since such values require averaging with distributions which change sign. This type of averaging arises naturally in quantum mechanics, but may not occur in classical statistics.

Oct 2, 20140 citations