Canonical quantization relies on Cartesian, canonical, phase-space coordinates to promote to Hermitian operators, which also become the principal ingredients in the quantum Hamiltonian. While generally appropriate, this procedure can also fail, e.g., for covariant, quartic, scalar fields in five-and-more spacetime dimensions (and possibly four spacetime dimensions as well), which become trivial; such failures are normally blamed on the `problem' rather than on the `quantization procedure'. In Enhanced Quantization the association of $c$ -numbers to $q$ -numbers is chosen very differently such that: (i) there is no need to seek classical, Cartesian, phase-space coordinates; (ii) {\it every} classical, contact transformation is applicable and {\it no} change of the quantum operators arises; (iii) a new understanding of the importance of `Cartesian coordinates' is established; and (iv) although discussed elsewhere in detail, the procedures of enhanced quantization offer fully acceptable solutions yielding non-trivial results for quartic scalar fields in four-and-more spacetime dimensions. In early sections, this paper offers a wide-audience approach to the basic principles of Enhanced Quantization using simple examples; later, several significant examples are cited for a deeper understanding. An historical note concludes the paper.Canonical quantization relies on Cartesian, canonical, phase-space coordinates to promote to Hermitian operators, which also become the principal ingredients in the quantum Hamiltonian. While generally appropriate, this procedure can also fail, e.g., for covariant, quartic, scalar fields in five-and-more spacetime dimensions (and possibly four spacetime dimensions as well), which become trivial; such failures are normally blamed on the `problem' rather than on the `quantization procedure'. In Enhanced Quantization the association of $c$-numbers to $q$-numbers is chosen very differently such that: (i) there is no need to seek classical, Cartesian, phase-space coordinates; (ii) {\it every} classical, contact transformation is applicable and {\it no} change of the quantum operators arises; (iii) a new understanding of the importance of `Cartesian coordinates' is established; and (iv) although discussed elsewhere in detail, the procedures of enhanced quantization offer fully acceptable solutions yielding non-trivial results for quartic scalar fields in four-and-more spacetime dimensions. In early sections, this paper offers a wide-audience approach to the basic principles of Enhanced Quantization using simple examples; later, several significant examples are cited for a deeper understanding. An historical note concludes the paper.

Feb 15, 20170 citations

Exact theory of the Stern-Gerlach experiment - extended version

G. Coddens

The Stern-Gerlach experiment is notoriously counter-intuitive. The official theory is that the spin of a fermion remains always aligned with the magnetic field. Its directions are thus quantized: It can only be spin-up or spin-down. But that theory is based on mathematical errors in the way it (mis)treats spinors and group theory.We present here a mathematically rigorous theory for a fermion in a magnetic field, which is no longer counter-intuitive. It is based on an understanding of spinors in SU(2) which is only Euclidean geometry.Contrary to what Pauli has been reading into the Stern-Gerlach experiment,the spin directions are not quantized. The new corrected paradigm, which solves all conceptual problems, is that the fermions precess around the magnetic-field just as Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured.Surprizingly this leads to only two energy states, which should be qualified as precession-up and precession-down rather thanspin-up and spin down.Indeed, despite the presence of the many different possible angles $\theta$ betweenthe spin axis ${\mathbf{s}}$ and the magnetic field ${\mathbf{B}}$ , the fermions can only have two possible energies $m_{0}c^{2}\pm\mu B$ . The values $\pm\mu B$ do thus not correspond to the continuum of values $-{\boldsymbol{\mu\cdot}}{\mathbf{B}}$ Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. The energy term $V= -{\boldsymbol{\mu\cdot}}{\mathbf{B}}$ is a macroscopic quantity. It is a statistical average over a large ensemble of fermions distributed over the two microscopic states with energies $\pm\mu B$ , and as such not valid for individual fermions. The two fermion states with energy $\pm\mu B$ are not potential-energy states. We also explain themathematically rigorous meaning of the up and down spinors. They represent left-handed and right-handed reference frames, such that now everything is intuitively clearand understandable in simple geometrical terms. The paradigm shift does not affect the Pauli principle.The Stern-Gerlach experiment is notoriously counter-intuitive. The official theory is that the spin of a fermion remains always aligned with the magnetic field. Its directions are thus quantized: It can only be spin-up or spin-down. But that theory is based on mathematical errors in the way it (mis)treats spinors and group theory.We present here a mathematically rigorous theory for a fermion in a magnetic field, which is no longer counter-intuitive. It is based on an understanding of spinors in SU(2) which is only Euclidean geometry.Contrary to what Pauli has been reading into the Stern-Gerlach experiment,the spin directions are not quantized. The new corrected paradigm, which solves all conceptual problems, is that the fermions precess around the magnetic-field just as Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured.Surprizingly this leads to only two energy states, which should be qualified as precession-up and precession-down rather thanspin-up and spin down.Indeed, despite the presence of the many different possible angles $\theta$ betweenthe spin axis ${\mathbf{s}}$ and the magnetic field ${\mathbf{B}}$, the fermions can only have two possible energies $m_{0}c^{2}\pm\mu B$. The values $\pm\mu B$ do thus not correspond to the continuum of values $-{\boldsymbol{\mu\cdot}}{\mathbf{B}}$ Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. The energy term $V= -{\boldsymbol{\mu\cdot}}{\mathbf{B}}$ is a macroscopic quantity. It is a statistical average over a large ensemble of fermions distributed over the two microscopic states with energies $\pm\mu B$, and as such not valid for individual fermions. The two fermion states with energy $\pm\mu B$ are not potential-energy states. We also explain themathematically rigorous meaning of the up and down spinors. They represent left-handed and right-handed reference frames, such that now everything is intuitively clearand understandable in simple geometrical terms. The paradigm shift does not affect the Pauli principle.

Dec 11, 20200 citations

Enhanced Quantization

John R. Klauder

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooksDec 11, 201445 citations

The Exact Theory of the Stern–Gerlach Experiment and Why it Does Not Imply that a Fermion Can Only Have Its Spin Up or Down

G. Coddens

The Stern–Gerlach experiment is notoriously counter-intuitive. The official theory is that the spin of a fermion remains always aligned with the magnetic field. Its directions are thus quantized: It can only be spin-up or spin-down. However, that theory is based on mathematical errors in the way it (mis)treats spinors and group theory. We present here a mathematically rigorous theory for a fermion in a magnetic field, which is no longer counter-intuitive. It is based on an understanding of spinors in SU(2) which is only Euclidean geometry. Contrary to what Pauli has been reading into the Stern–Gerlach experiment, the spin directions are not quantized. The new corrected paradigm, which solves all conceptual problems, is that the fermions precess around the magnetic-field just as Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. Surprisingly, this leads to only two energy states, which should be qualified as precession-up and precession-down rather than spin-up and spin-down. Indeed, despite the presence of the many different possible angles θ between the spin axis s and the magnetic field B, the fermions can only have two possible energies m0c2±μB. The values ±μB thus do not correspond to the continuum of values −μ·B Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. The energy term V=−μ·B is a macroscopic quantity. It is a statistical average over a large ensemble of fermions distributed over the two microscopic states with energies ±μB, and as such not valid for individual fermions. The two fermion states with energy ±μB are not potential-energy states. We also explain the mathematically rigorous meaning of the up and down spinors. They represent left-handed and right-handed reference frames, such that now everything is intuitively clear and understandable in simple geometrical terms. The paradigm shift does not affect the Pauli principle.The Stern–Gerlach experiment is notoriously counter-intuitive. The official theory is that the spin of a fermion remains always aligned with the magnetic field. Its directions are thus quantized: It can only be spin-up or spin-down. However, that theory is based on mathematical errors in the way it (mis)treats spinors and group theory. We present here a mathematically rigorous theory for a fermion in a magnetic field, which is no longer counter-intuitive. It is based on an understanding of spinors in SU(2) which is only Euclidean geometry. Contrary to what Pauli has been reading into the Stern–Gerlach experiment, the spin directions are not quantized. The new corrected paradigm, which solves all conceptual problems, is that the fermions precess around the magnetic-field just as Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. Surprisingly, this leads to only two energy states, which should be qualified as precession-up and precession-down rather than spin-up and spin-down. Indeed, despite the presence of the many different possible angles θ between the spin axis s and the magnetic field B, the fermions can only have two possible energies m0c2±μB. The values ±μB thus do not correspond to the continuum of values −μ·B Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. The energy term V=−μ·B is a macroscopic quantity. It is a statistical average over a large ensemble of fermions distributed over the two microscopic states with energies ±μB, and as such not valid for individual fermions. The two fermion states with energy ±μB are not potential-energy states. We also explain the mathematically rigorous meaning of the up and down spinors. They represent left-handed and right-handed reference frames, such that now everything is intuitively clear and understandable in simple geometrical terms. The paradigm shift does not affect the Pauli principle.

SymmetryJan 14, 20215 citations

Methods of Quantization

Heimo G. Latal, W. Schweiger

Lecture notes in physicsJan 1, 200141 citations

c

-numbers to

q

-numbers is chosen very differently such that: (i) there is no need to seek classical, Cartesian, phase-space coordinates; (ii) {\it every} classical, contact transformation is applicable and {\it no} change of the quantum operators arises; (iii) a new understanding of the importance of `Cartesian coordinates' is established; and (iv) although discussed elsewhere in detail, the procedures of enhanced quantization offer fully acceptable solutions yielding non-trivial results for quartic scalar fields in four-and-more spacetime dimensions. In early sections, this paper offers a wide-audience approach to the basic principles of Enhanced Quantization using simple examples; later, several significant examples are cited for a deeper understanding. An historical note concludes the paper.

\theta

betweenthe spin axis

{\mathbf{s}}

and the magnetic field

{\mathbf{B}}

, the fermions can only have two possible energies

m_{0}c^{2}\pm\mu B

. The values

\pm\mu B

do thus not correspond to the continuum of values

-{\boldsymbol{\mu\cdot}}{\mathbf{B}}

Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. The energy term

V= -{\boldsymbol{\mu\cdot}}{\mathbf{B}}

is a macroscopic quantity. It is a statistical average over a large ensemble of fermions distributed over the two microscopic states with energies

\pm\mu B

, and as such not valid for individual fermions. The two fermion states with energy

\pm\mu B

are not potential-energy states. We also explain themathematically rigorous meaning of the up and down spinors. They represent left-handed and right-handed reference frames, such that now everything is intuitively clearand understandable in simple geometrical terms. The paradigm shift does not affect the Pauli principle.