arXiv:1702.00078 · Physical Review A

Measurement uncertainty from no-signaling and nonlocality

Justyna Łodyga, Waldemar Kłobus, Ravishankar Ramanathan, Andrzej Grudka, Michał Horodecki, Ryszard Horodecki

Published Jul 25, 2017• 7 citations

Abstract

One of the formulations of Heisenberg uncertainty principle, concerning so-called measurement uncertainty, states that the measurement of one observable modifies the statistics of the other. Here, we derive such a measurement uncertainty principle from two comprehensible assumptions: impossibility of instantaneous messaging at a distance (no-signaling), and violation of Bell inequalities (nonlocality). The uncertainty is established for a pair of observables of one of two spatially separated systems that exhibit nonlocal correlations. To this end, we introduce a gentle form of measurement which acquires partial information about one of the observables. We then bound disturbance of the remaining observables by the amount of information gained from the gentle measurement, minus a correction depending on the degree of nonlocality. The obtained quantitative expression resembles the quantum mechanical formulations, yet it is derived without the quantum formalism and complements the known qualitative effect of disturbance implied by nonlocality and no-signaling.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.012124

Related papers

No-signaling versus quantum constraints for spatio-temporal correlations caused by weak measurement

Justyna Łodyga, Waldemar Kłobus, Andrzej Grudka +2 more

One of the formulations of Heisenberg uncertainty principle, concerning so-called measurement uncertainty, states that the measurement of one observable modifies the statistics of the other. Here, we derive such a measurement uncertainty principle from two comprehensible assumptions: impossibility of instantaneous messaging at a distance (no-signaling), and violation of Bell inequalities (non-locality). The uncertainty is established for a pair of observables of one of two spatially separated systems that exhibit non-local correlations. To this end, we introduce a gentle form of measurement which acquires partial information about one of the observables. We then bound disturbance of the remaining observables by the amount of information gained from the gentle measurement, minus a correction depending on the degree of non-locality. The obtained quantitative expression resembles the quantum mechanical formulations, yet it is derived without the quantum formalism and complements the known qualitative effect of disturbance implied by non-locality and no-signaling.

arXiv:1602.03783Feb 11, 20160 citations

The Uncertainty Principle Determines the Nonlocality of Quantum Mechanics

Jonathan Oppenheim, Stephanie Wehner

Two central concepts of quantum mechanics are Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and a subtle form of nonlocality that Einstein famously called "spooky action at a distance." These two fundamental features have thus far been distinct concepts. We show that they are inextricably and quantitatively linked: Quantum mechanics cannot be more nonlocal with measurements that respect the uncertainty principle. In fact, the link between uncertainty and nonlocality holds for all physical theories. More specifically, the degree of nonlocality of any theory is determined by two factors: the strength of the uncertainty principle and the strength of a property called "steering," which determines which states can be prepared at one location given a measurement at another.

arXiv:1004.2507ScienceNov 18, 2010366 citations

Local measurement uncertainties impose a limit on nonlocal quantum correlations

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

In quantum mechanics, joint measurements of noncommuting observables are only possible if a minimal unavoidable measurement uncertainty is accepted. On the other hand, correlations between noncommuting observables can exceed classical limits, as demonstrated by the violation of Bell's inequalities. Here, the relation between the uncertainty-limited statistics of joint measurements and the limits on expectation values of possible input states is analyzed. It is shown that the experimentally observable statistics of joint measurements explain the uncertainty limits of local states, but result in less restrictive bounds when applied to identify the limits of nonlocal correlations between two separate quantum systems. A tight upper bound is obtained for the four correlations that appear in the violation of Bell's inequalities and the statistics of pure states saturating the bound is characterized. The results indicate that the limitations of quantum nonlocality are a necessary consequence of the local features of joint measurements, suggesting the possibility that quantum nonlocality could be explained in terms of the local characteristics of quantum statistics.

arXiv:1809.04725Physical Review AJul 22, 201914 citations

Noise and disturbance in quantum measurements and operations

Masanao Ozawa

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle has been understood to set a limitation on measurements, whereas the long standing mathematical formulation does not allow such an interpretation. Recently, a new relation was found by the present author to give a universally valid relation between noise and disturbance in general quantum measurements, and it has become clear that the new relation plays a role of the first principle to derive various quantum limits on measurement and information processing. Here, we discuss the state-dependent notion of precise measurements of a given observable, and consider a perfect distance such that zero distance implies the perfect correlation. Then, we shall show that even in the perfect error notions both the position measuring noise and the momentum disturbance can be arbitrarily small. We also show that it is possible to generalize the new noise-disturbance uncertainty relation to perfect error distances.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIEMay 5, 20068 citations

Extending Bell's Theorem: Nonlocality via Measurement Dependence

G. Bacciagaluppi, R. Hermens, G. Leegwater

Besides well-known conditions of locality or factorisability, deriving the Bell inequalities requires assuming that the distribution of hidden variables and Alice's and Bob's measurement settings be independent of each other. We show that (analogously to violations of locality due to action at a distance) certain violations of this Measurement Independence assumption can be associated with a notion of signalling in principle, thus making them also testable in principle, and spell out the appropriate conditions. Accordingly, we show that by imposing no-signalling one can prove a version of Bell's theorem that does not require the assumption of Measurement Independence. We discuss the "Schulman model" as an example, as well as lessons for "experimental metaphysics".

quant-pharXiv:2602.11300Feb 13, 20260 citations

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

One of the most striking deviations of quantum mechanics from classical mechanics is that any measurement of a microscopic system involves the interaction with the measuring instruments. The interaction cannot be neglected and in fact leads to uncontrollable disturbance on the system. In 1927, Werner Karl Heisenberg in his celebrated paper established the quantitative expression for unavoidable momentum disturbance caused by any position measurement. The crucial word here is simultaneously. The uncertainty relation gives the lower bound on the product of the uncertainties of two pairs of variables. But it says nothing about the accuracy with which individual observables can be measured. The physical meaning of energy-time uncertainty is different from that of x-px uncertainty. Position and momentum are observables to which Hermitian operators are assigned and which are measured at a particular time. An important implication of the uncertainty principle is that quantum systems do follow classical trajectories which conflict with our everyday experience.

CRC Press eBooksSep 29, 20221 citation