Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1612.05709

How long does a quantum particle or wave stay in given region of space?

S. Anantha Ramakrishna, Arun M. Jayannavar

Published Dec 17, 2016• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The delay time associated with a scattering process is one of the most important dynamical aspects in quantum mechanics. A common measure of this is the Wigner delay time based on the group velocity description of a wave-packet, which my easily indicate super-luminal or even negative times of interaction that are unacceptable. Many other measures such as dwell times have been proposed, but also suffer from serious deficiencies, particularly for evanescent waves. One important way of realising a timescale that is causally connected to the spatial region of interest has been to utilize the dynamical evolution of extra degrees of freedom called quantum clocks, such as the spin of an electron in an applied magnetic field or coherent decay or growth of light in an absorptive or amplifying medium placed within the region of interest. Here we provide a review of the several approaches developed to answer the basic question - how much time does a quantum particle (or wave) spend in a specified region of space? While a unique answer still evades us, important progress has been made in understanding the timescales and obtaining positive definite times of interaction by noting that all such clocks are affected by spurious scattering concomitant with the very clock potentials, however, weak they be and by eliminating the spurious scattering.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1612.05709

Related papers

The quantum scattering time in a linear potential

Zhi Xiao, Shuang Zheng, Ji‐Cai Liu

Abstract In this paper, we calculate the quantum time delays for a neutral particle scattering off the Earth gravitational linear potential. The quantum time delays are obtained by subtracting the classical returning time (CRT) from the Wigner time, the dwell time and the Larmor time respectively. Different from the conventional definition, our Larmor time is defined by aligning the magnetic field along particle’s direction of motion, and this definition does give reasonable results for motions through a free region and a square barrier. It is worth noting that in the zero magnetic field limit, the Larmor time coincides well with the CRT, which is due to the special shape of linear barrier, and may have some relevance to the weak equivalence principle. It is also found that the classical forbidden region plays an essential role for the dwell time τ DW to match with the CRT, and the difference between the dwell and the phase times, i.e. the self-interference time delay, is barrier shape sensitive and clearly shows the peculiarity of the linear barrier. All the time delays are on the order of sub-millisecond and exhibit oscillating behaviors, signaling the self-interference of the scattering particle, and the oscillations become evident only when the de Broglie wavelength λ k = 2 π / k is comparable to the characteristic length L c = [ 2 m 2 g / ℏ 2 ] − 1 / 3 . If the time delay measurement is experimentally realizable, it can probe the quantum nature for particle scattering off the gravitational potential in the temporal domain.

arXiv:2008.12546•Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Apr 23, 2021•5 citations

Tunneling times

Partha Ghose

Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 1999•0 citations

Dwell times for light and electrons

Bart A. van Tiggelen, A. Tip, Ad Lagendijk

Using a time-dependent scattering theory for light the authors obtain expressions for the time that light spends in a finite dielectric medium surrounded by vacuum, the so-called dwell time. Given an incoming wavepacket, they focus upon the light scattered in an arbitrary direction. In view of the similarity between Maxwell's equations and the Schrodinger equation, some useful results are derived for the case of Schrodinger potential scattering as well. They show that the dwell time of a Schrodinger particle is a derivative of the phase shifts with respect to the potential, rather than to energy as is the case for the phase-delay time. They indicate the relation to absorption arguments. Because the potential for classical waves is energy dependent, derivatives of the phase shift with respect to potential enter into the phase-delay time for classical waves.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 7, 1993•32 citations

Time development of a wave packet and the time delay

Hiromichi Nakazato

A one-dimensional scattering problem off a $\\delta$-shaped potential is solved analytically and the time development of a wave packet is derived from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The exact and explicit expression of the scattered wave packet supplies us with interesting information about the "time delay" by potential scattering in the asymptotic region. It is demonstrated that a wave packet scattered by a spin-flipping potential can give us quite a different value for the delay times from that obtained without spin-degrees of freedom.

•Jan 1, 1997•3 citations

Temporal aspects of one-dimensional completed scattering: An alternative view

Nikolay Leonidovich Chuprikov

A {\it completed} scattering of a particle on a static one-dimensional (1D) potential barrier is a combined quantum process to consist from two elementary sub-processes (transmission and reflection) evolved coherently at all stages of scattering and macroscopically distinct at the final stage. The existing model of the process is clearly inadequate to its nature: all one-particle "observables" and "tunneling times", introduced as quantities to be common for the sub-processes, cannot be experimentally measured and, consequently, have no physical meaning; on the contrary, quantities introduced for either sub-process have no basis, for the time evolution of either sub-process is unknown in this model. We show that the wave function to describe a completed scattering can be uniquely presented as the sum of two solutions to the Schrödinger equation, which describe separately the sub-processes at all stages of scattering. For symmetric potential barriers such solutions are found explicitly. For either sub-process we define the time spent, on the average, by a particle in the barrier region. We define it as the Larmor time. As it turned out, this time is just Buttiker's dwell time averaged over the corresponding localized state. Thus, firstly, we justify the known definition of the local dwell time introduced by Hauge and co-workers as well by Leavens and Aers, for now this time can be measured; secondly, we confirm that namely Buttiker's dwell time gives the energy-distribution for the tunneling time; thirdly, we state that all the definitions are valid only if they are based on the wave functions for transmission and reflection found in our paper. Besides, we define the exact and asymptotic group times to be auxiliary in timing the scattering process.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511024•Nov 3, 2005•1 citation

Barrier interaction time and the Salecker-Wigner quantum clock: Wave-packet approach

Chang-Soo Park

The time-of-flight measurement approach of Peres based on the Salecker-Wigner quantum clock is applied to the one-dimensional scattering of a wave packet from a rectangular barrier. By directly evaluating the expectation value of the clock-time operator in the asymptotic states of wave packet long after the scattering process, we derive an average wave-packet clock time for the barrier interaction, which is expressed as an average of the stationary-state clock time over all possible initial scattering states of the wave packet. We show that the average wave-packet clock time is identical to the average dwell time of a wave packet.

Physical Review A•Jul 23, 2009•10 citations
The delay time associated with a scattering process is one of the most important dynamical aspects in quantum mechanics. A common measure of this is the Wigner delay time based on the group velocity description of a wave-packet, which my easily indicate super-luminal or even negative times of interaction that are unacceptable. Many other measures such as dwell times have been proposed, but also suffer from serious deficiencies, particularly for evanescent waves. One important way of realising a timescale that is causally connected to the spatial region of interest has been to utilize the dynamical evolution of extra degrees of freedom called quantum clocks, such as the spin of an electron in an applied magnetic field or coherent decay or growth of light in an absorptive or amplifying medium placed within the region of interest. Here we provide a review of the several approaches developed to answer the basic question - how much time does a quantum particle (or wave) spend in a specified region of space? While a unique answer still evades us, important progress has been made in understanding the timescales and obtaining positive definite times of interaction by noting that all such clocks are affected by spurious scattering concomitant with the very clock potentials, however, weak they be and by eliminating the spurious scattering.
Abstract In this paper, we calculate the quantum time delays for a neutral particle scattering off the Earth gravitational linear potential. The quantum time delays are obtained by subtracting the classical returning time (CRT) from the Wigner time, the dwell time and the Larmor time respectively. Different from the conventional definition, our Larmor time is defined by aligning the magnetic field along particle’s direction of motion, and this definition does give reasonable results for motions through a free region and a square barrier. It is worth noting that in the zero magnetic field limit, the Larmor time coincides well with the CRT, which is due to the special shape of linear barrier, and may have some relevance to the weak equivalence principle. It is also found that the classical forbidden region plays an essential role for the dwell time τ DW to match with the CRT, and the difference between the dwell and the phase times, i.e. the self-interference time delay, is barrier shape sensitive and clearly shows the peculiarity of the linear barrier. All the time delays are on the order of sub-millisecond and exhibit oscillating behaviors, signaling the self-interference of the scattering particle, and the oscillations become evident only when the de Broglie wavelength λ k = 2 π / k is comparable to the characteristic length L c = [ 2 m 2 g / ℏ 2 ] − 1 / 3 . If the time delay measurement is experimentally realizable, it can probe the quantum nature for particle scattering off the gravitational potential in the temporal domain.
Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.
Using a time-dependent scattering theory for light the authors obtain expressions for the time that light spends in a finite dielectric medium surrounded by vacuum, the so-called dwell time. Given an incoming wavepacket, they focus upon the light scattered in an arbitrary direction. In view of the similarity between Maxwell's equations and the Schrodinger equation, some useful results are derived for the case of Schrodinger potential scattering as well. They show that the dwell time of a Schrodinger particle is a derivative of the phase shifts with respect to the potential, rather than to energy as is the case for the phase-delay time. They indicate the relation to absorption arguments. Because the potential for classical waves is energy dependent, derivatives of the phase shift with respect to potential enter into the phase-delay time for classical waves.
A one-dimensional scattering problem off a delta\\deltadelta-shaped potential is solved analytically and the time development of a wave packet is derived from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The exact and explicit expression of the scattered wave packet supplies us with interesting information about the "time delay" by potential scattering in the asymptotic region. It is demonstrated that a wave packet scattered by a spin-flipping potential can give us quite a different value for the delay times from that obtained without spin-degrees of freedom.
A {\it completed} scattering of a particle on a static one-dimensional (1D) potential barrier is a combined quantum process to consist from two elementary sub-processes (transmission and reflection) evolved coherently at all stages of scattering and macroscopically distinct at the final stage. The existing model of the process is clearly inadequate to its nature: all one-particle "observables" and "tunneling times", introduced as quantities to be common for the sub-processes, cannot be experimentally measured and, consequently, have no physical meaning; on the contrary, quantities introduced for either sub-process have no basis, for the time evolution of either sub-process is unknown in this model. We show that the wave function to describe a completed scattering can be uniquely presented as the sum of two solutions to the Schrödinger equation, which describe separately the sub-processes at all stages of scattering. For symmetric potential barriers such solutions are found explicitly. For either sub-process we define the time spent, on the average, by a particle in the barrier region. We define it as the Larmor time. As it turned out, this time is just Buttiker's dwell time averaged over the corresponding localized state. Thus, firstly, we justify the known definition of the local dwell time introduced by Hauge and co-workers as well by Leavens and Aers, for now this time can be measured; secondly, we confirm that namely Buttiker's dwell time gives the energy-distribution for the tunneling time; thirdly, we state that all the definitions are valid only if they are based on the wave functions for transmission and reflection found in our paper. Besides, we define the exact and asymptotic group times to be auxiliary in timing the scattering process.
The time-of-flight measurement approach of Peres based on the Salecker-Wigner quantum clock is applied to the one-dimensional scattering of a wave packet from a rectangular barrier. By directly evaluating the expectation value of the clock-time operator in the asymptotic states of wave packet long after the scattering process, we derive an average wave-packet clock time for the barrier interaction, which is expressed as an average of the stationary-state clock time over all possible initial scattering states of the wave packet. We show that the average wave-packet clock time is identical to the average dwell time of a wave packet.