arXiv:1610.05764 · Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Reply to “Comment on ‘Critical point scaling of Ising spin glasses in a magnetic field’ ”
Joonhyun Yeo, M A Moore
Abstract
In his Comment, Temesv\'ari objects to a remark in our paper [Phys. Rev. B 91, 104432 (2015)] that his result for the form of the Almeida-Thouless (AT) line obtained in an earlier paper by Parisi and Temev\'ari [Nucl. Phys. B 858, 293 (2012)] in six dimensions can be obtained by taking the limit of $d\ensuremath{\rightarrow}6$ in the equations valid for $d>6$ but that this violated one of the inequalities needed for their validity. He is just pointing out that they gave a derivation of the form of the AT line in six dimensions in Parisi and Temev\'ari [Nucl. Phys. B 858, 293 (2012)] which avoided this difficulty. However, it is still a perturbative approach and does not deal with the lack of a perturbative fixed point found by Bray and Roberts [J. Phys. C 13, 5405 (1980)] long ago.