Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1609.00614 · Foundations of Physics

Can We Falsify the Consciousness-Causes-Collapse Hypothesis in Quantum Mechanics?

J. Acácio de Barros, Gary Oas

Published Jun 29, 2017• 25 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-017-0110-7

Related papers

Does Consciousness Cause Quantum Collapse

Kelvin J. McQueen

Philosophy now•Aug 4, 2017•5 citations

Comment on the paper Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness by Yu and Nikolic (2011)

Catherine M Reason

This is a brief comment on the paper "Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness" by Shan Yu and Danko Nikolic [1]. Yu and Nikolic argue that the "consciousness causes collapse hypothesis" interpretation of quantum mechanics, or CCCH, can be falsified by a particular experimental setup. This claim is incorrect and the cause of the error appears to be a confusion over where and when a collapse can be assumed to occur.

arXiv:1707.01346•Jul 5, 2017•0 citations

Does consciousness really collapse the wave function?

Fred H. Thaheld

Biosystems•Apr 11, 2005•24 citations

Quantum Mechanics May Need Consciousness

Andrew Knight

The assertion by Yu and Nikolic that the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment of Kim et al. empirically falsifies the consciousness-causes-collapse hypothesis of quantum mechanics is based on the unfounded and false assumption that the failure of a quantum wave function to collapse implies the appearance of a visible interference pattern.

arXiv:2005.13317•May 26, 2020•0 citations

Discrimination Mind and Wavefunction Collapse:A Novel Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Based on the Temporal Resolution of Consciousness

Haiqing Wan

English Abstract Since its inception, quantum mechanics has been troubled by the "measurement problem": why does observation cause the wavefunction to collapse, and what role does consciousness play in this process? Building upon von Neumann's measurement chain theory[1] and integrating the concept of "discrimination mind" (vikalpa) from Eastern philosophy, this paper proposes a testable novel hypothesis—consciousness, through its discriminative function, determines the manifestation of quantum system determinacy via its own temporal resolution. This hypothesis redefines the boundary between classical and quantum mechanics from "object size" to "the relative relationship between the sampling rate of consciousness and the rate of change of the observed object," and provides three progressively layered, mutually complementary, and falsifiable experimental designs. It offers an explanatory framework for the foundational problems of quantum mechanics that possesses both philosophical depth and scientific operability.

•Jun 20, 2026•0 citations

Note on Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness

Henry Margenau

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1978•13 citations
English Abstract Since its inception, quantum mechanics has been troubled by the "measurement problem": why does observation cause the wavefunction to collapse, and what role does consciousness play in this process? Building upon von Neumann's measurement chain theory[1] and integrating the concept of "discrimination mind" (vikalpa) from Eastern philosophy, this paper proposes a testable novel hypothesis—consciousness, through its discriminative function, determines the manifestation of quantum system determinacy via its own temporal resolution. This hypothesis redefines the boundary between classical and quantum mechanics from "object size" to "the relative relationship between the sampling rate of consciousness and the rate of change of the observed object," and provides three progressively layered, mutually complementary, and falsifiable experimental designs. It offers an explanatory framework for the foundational problems of quantum mechanics that possesses both philosophical depth and scientific operability.