We prove quantitative limitations on any approximate simultaneous cloning or broadcasting of mixed states. The results are based on information-theoretic (entropic) considerations and generalize the well-known no-cloning and no-broadcasting theorems. We also observe and exploit the fact that the universal cloning machine on the symmetric subspace of $n$ qudits and symmetrized partial trace channels are dual to each other. This duality manifests itself both in the algebraic sense of adjointness of quantum channels and in the operational sense that a universal cloning machine can be used as an approximate recovery channel for a symmetrized partial trace channel and vice versa. The duality extends to give control of the performance of generalized universal quantum cloning machines (UQCMs) on subspaces more general than the symmetric subspace. This gives a way to quantify the usefulness of a priori information in the context of cloning. For example, we can control the performance of an antisymmetric analog of the UQCM in recovering from the loss of $n\ensuremath{-}k$ fermionic particles.
We prove quantitative limitations on any approximate simultaneous cloning or broadcasting of mixed states. The results are based on information-theoretic (entropic) considerations and generalize the well-known no-cloning and no-broadcasting theorems. We also observe and exploit the fact that the universal cloning machine on the symmetric subspace of n qudits and symmetrized partial trace channels are dual to each other. This duality manifests itself both in the algebraic sense of adjointness of quantum channels and in the operational sense that a universal cloning machine can be used as an approximate recovery channel for a symmetrized partial trace channel and vice versa. The duality extends to give control of the performance of generalized universal quantum cloning machines (UQCMs) on subspaces more general than the symmetric subspace. This gives a way to quantify the usefulness of a priori information in the context of cloning. For example, we can control the performance of an antisymmetric analog of the UQCM in recovering from the loss of n\ensuremath−k fermionic particles.
Quantum cryptography converts structural restrictions on quantum information into operational secrecy. This article develops the chain connecting nonorthogonal-state discrimination, trace distance and fidelity, the Helstrom bound, no-cloning, no-broadcasting, information-disturbance relations, conditional entropy, and privacy amplification. A linearity argument proves that no universal device can copy arbitrary pure states, while the mixed-state no-broadcasting theorem identifies pairwise commutativity as the exact boundary of exact broadcastability. These results explain why an eavesdropper cannot retain a perfect replica of every signal and wait for later basis disclosure. They are not, however, complete security proofs. Modern quantum key distribution must cover coherent attacks, quantum memory, public reconciliation leakage, imperfect sources and detectors, finite samples, authentication, and composition with later applications. The review connects state discrimination to adversarial guessing probability through conditional min-entropy and explains how entropic uncertainty and entanglement-based reductions transform observed statistics into a lower bound on extractable key. Approximate cloning, unambiguous discrimination, channel loss, side channels, and device-independent certification are examined as qualifications to elementary intuition. The central result is a hierarchy: nonorthogonality restricts distinguishability; data processing forbids perfect information amplification; parameter estimation bounds an adversary’s conditional states; and quantum-proof hashing yields a key close in trace distance to an ideal independent key. Cryptographic security therefore depends on quantum limitations embedded within a fully specified protocol and adversarial model.
The no-cloning theorem is a cornerstone result in quantum mechanics that forbids copying of general quantum information. More quantitatively, even given N copies of an unknown state, any channel producing an (N+1)-copy state incurs a nonzero trace-distance error on some inputs. Turning this around, one can ask about the sample complexity of approximate N→N+1 cloning: for a desired small error ε, what N suffices? For arbitrary pure states on a Hilbert space H, the answer is N≃dimH/ε - astronomically large for most H of interest. What if the input is promised to lie in a structured family? We examine a range of families fundamental to many-body physics and quantum information: n-mode fermionic Gaussian and Slater states, n-mode bosonic Gaussian states, and qudit phase states. For fermions, we construct optimal cloning channels, reducing the complexity from exponential to polynomial in n. For bosonic Gaussian states, we construct an explicit cloner that certifies polynomial complexity, without any constraint on the energy of the state; this channel, however, is not optimal in general. The fermionic and bosonic results follow from a single representation-theoretic framework, which generalizes previous work by Werner and by Chiribella and Yang; it also yields the cloners' unitary implementation. Furthermore, we explain why for many families the cloning complexity is linear in the dimension of the family manifold, via a controlled saddle-point evaluation of the frame potential at high N. The same calculation accounts for the analogous scaling of tomography complexity. The above framework does not cover phase states; for these we give an independent construction of a channel with optimal cloning fidelity. Our work complements recent results on cloning stabilizer states.
In this work, we extensively study the problem of broadcasting of quantum correlations (QCs). This includes broadcasting of quantum entanglement as well as correlations that go beyond the notion of entanglement (QCsbE). It is quite well known from the ``no-broadcasting theorem'' that perfect broadcasting of QCs is not possible. However, it does not rule out the possibility of partial broadcasting of QCs where we can get lesser correlated states from a given correlated state. In order to have a holistic view of broadcasting, we investigate this problem by starting with a most general representation of two qubit mixed states in terms of the Bloch vectors. As a cloning transformation we have used universal symmetric optimal Buzek-Hillery (BH) cloner both locally and nonlocally. Unlike entanglement, we find that it is impossible to broadcast QCsbE optimally. Lastly, we generalize these results for any symmetric or asymmetric cloning machines as well. This result brings out a fundamental difference between the correlations defined from the perspective of entanglement and the correlations measure which claims to go beyond entanglement.
State cloning and state transposition are fundamental transformations that, despite being desirable, cannot be perfectly realised as a consequence of two distinct requirements of quantum theory: cloning is forbidden by linearity, while transposition is ruled out by complete positivity. In this work, we show that, in spite of these disparate conceptual restrictions, the best physically allowed realisation of both transformations arises from a single physical process described by an isometry, which simultaneously implements their best possible approximations. This complementary relation allows us to determine the exact quantum and private classical capacities of the universal symmetric N→N+K cloning channel in the fully general multicopy qudit setting, thereby closing the remaining gap in the quantum capacity problem for universal cloning. We provide an explicit circuit that simultaneously implements optimal pure-state N→K transposition and optimal N→N+K symmetric cloning, both attaining the same fidelity. Additionally, we prove that the optimal N→K pure-state transposition channel is unique and realised by an estimation strategy. We also obtain the optimal mixed-state N→1 transposition, and discuss its differences from its pure-state analogue.
Due to the axioms of quantum mechanics, perfect cloning of an unknown quantum state is impossible. But since imperfect cloning is still possible, a question arises: ``Is there an optimal quantum cloning machine?'' Buzek and Hillery answered this question and constructed their famous B-H quantum cloning machine. The B-H machine clones the state of an arbitrary single qubit in an optimal manner and hence it is universal. Generalizing this machine for a two-qubit system is straightforward, but during this procedure, except for product states, this machine loses its universality and becomes a state-dependent cloning machine. In this paper, we propose some classes of optimal universal local quantum state cloners for a particular class of two-qubit systems, more precisely, for a class of states with known Schmidt basis. We then extend our machine to the case that the Schmidt basis of the input state is deviated from the local computational basis of the machine. We show that more local quantum coherence existing in the input state corresponds to less fidelity between the input and output states. Also we present two classes of a state-dependent local quantum copying machine. Furthermore, we investigate local broadcasting of two aspects of quantum correlations, i.e., quantum entanglement and quantum discord, defined, respectively, within the entanglement-separability paradigm and from an information-theoretic perspective. The results show that although quantum correlation is, in general, very fragile during the broadcasting procedure, quantum discord is broadcasted more robustly than quantum entanglement.
An unknown quantum state cannot be copied and broadcast freely due to the no-cloning theorem. Approximate cloning schemes have been proposed to achieve the optimal cloning characterized by the maximal fidelity between the original and its copies. Here, from the perspective of quantum Fisher information (QFI), we investigate the distribution of QFI in asymmetric cloning machines which produce two nonidentical copies. As one might expect, improving the QFI of one copy results in decreasing the QFI of the other copy. It is perhaps also unsurprising that asymmetric phase-covariant cloning outperforms universal cloning in distributing QFI since a priori information of the input state has been utilized. However, interesting results appear when we compare the distributabilities of fidelity (which quantifies the full information of quantum states), and QFI (which only captures the information of relevant parameters) in asymmetric cloning machines. Unlike the results of fidelity, where the distributability of symmetric cloning is always optimal for any d-dimensional cloning, we find that any asymmetric cloning outperforms symmetric cloning on the distribution of QFI for d ≤ 18, whereas some but not all asymmetric cloning strategies could be worse than symmetric ones when d > 18.