After Bob sends Alice a bit, she responds with a lengthy reply. At the cost of a factor of two in the total communication, Alice could just as well have given the two possible replies without listening and have Bob select which applies to him. Motivated by a conjecture stating that this form of "round elimination" is impossible in exact quantum communication complexity, we study the orthogonal rank and a symmetric variant thereof for a certain family of Cayley graphs. The orthogonal rank of a graph is the smallest number $d$ for which one can label each vertex with a nonzero $d$-dimensional complex vector such that adjacent vertices receive orthogonal vectors. We show an exp$(n)$ lower bound on the orthogonal rank of the graph on $\{0,1\}^n$ in which two strings are adjacent if they have Hamming distance at least $n/2$. In combination with previous work, this implies an affirmative answer to the above conjecture.
After Bob sends Alice a bit, she responds with a lengthy reply. At the cost of a factor of two in the total communication, Alice could just as well have given the two possible replies without listening and have Bob select which applies to him. Motivated by a conjecture stating that this form of "round elimination" is impossible in exact quantum communication complexity, we study the orthogonal rank and a symmetric variant thereof for a certain family of Cayley graphs. The orthogonal rank of a graph is the smallest number d for which one can label each vertex with a nonzero d-dimensional complex vector such that adjacent vertices receive orthogonal vectors. We show an exp(n) lower bound on the orthogonal rank of the graph on {0,1}n in which two strings are adjacent if they have Hamming distance at least n/2. In combination with previous work, this implies an affirmative answer to the above conjecture.
After Bob sends Alice a bit, she responds with a lengthy reply. At the cost of a factor of two in the total communication, Alice could just as well have given Bob her two possible replies at once without listening to him at all, and have him select which one applies. Motivated by a conjecture stating that this form of “round elimination” is impossible in exact quantum communication complexity, we study the orthogonal rank and a symmetric variant thereof for a certain family of Cayley graphs. The orthogonal rank of a graph is the smallest number d for which one can label each vertex with a nonzero d-dimensional complex vector such that adjacent vertices receive orthogonal vectors. We show an exp(n) lower bound on the orthogonal rank of the graph on {0, 1} n in which two strings are adjacent if they have Hamming distance at least n/2. In combination with previous work, this implies an affirmative answer to the above conjecture.
We study two basic graph parameters, the chromatic number and the orthogonal rank, in the context of classical and quantum exact communication complexity. In particular, we consider two types of communication problems that we call promise equality and list problems. For both of these, it was already known that the one-round classical and one-round quantum complexities are characterized by the chromatic number and orthogonal rank of a certain graph, respectively. In a promise equality problem, Alice and Bob must decide if their inputs are equal or not. We prove that classical protocols for such problems can always be reduced to one-round protocols with no extra communication. In contrast, we give an explicit instance of a promise problem that exhibits an exponential gap between the one- and two-round exact quantum communication complexities. Whereas the chromatic number thus captures the complete complexity of promise equality problems, the hierarchy of "quantum chromatic numbers" (starting with the orthogonal rank) giving the quantum communication complexity for every fixed number of communication rounds thus turns out to enjoy a much richer structure. In a list problem, Bob gets a subset of some finite universe, Alice gets an element from Bob's subset, and their goal is for Bob to learn which element Alice was given. The best general lower bound (due to Orlitsky) and upper bound (due to Naor, Orlitsky, and Shor) on the classical communication complexity of such problems differ only by a constant factor. We exhibit an example showing that, somewhat surprisingly, the four-round protocol used in the bound of Naor et al. can in fact be optimal. Finally, we pose a conjecture on the orthogonality rank of a certain graph whose truth would imply an intriguing impossibility of round elimination in quantum protocols for list problems, something that works trivially in the classical case.
Alice and Bob want to know if two strings of length n are almost equal. That is, do the strings differ on at most a bits? Let 0 ⩽ a ⩽ n − 1. We show (1) any deterministic protocol—as well as any error-free quantum protocol ( C * version)—for this problem requires at least n − 2 bits of communication, and (2) a lower bound of n /2 − 1 for error-free Q * quantum protocols. We also show the same results for determining if two strings differ in exactly a bits. Our results are obtained by lower-bounding the ranks of the appropriate matrices.
We study the communication complexity of computing functions F: {0,1}ⁿ × {0,1}ⁿ → {0,1} in the memoryless communication model. Here, Alice is given x ∈ {0,1}ⁿ, Bob is given y ∈ {0,1}ⁿ and their goal is to compute F(x,y) subject to the following constraint: at every round, Alice receives a message from Bob and her reply to Bob solely depends on the message received and her input x (in particular, her reply is independent of the information from the previous rounds); the same applies to Bob. The cost of computing F in this model is the maximum number of bits exchanged in any round between Alice and Bob (on the worst case input x,y). In this paper, we also consider variants of our memoryless model wherein one party is allowed to have memory, the parties are allowed to communicate quantum bits, only one player is allowed to send messages. We show that some of these different variants of our memoryless communication model capture the garden-hose model of computation by Buhrman et al. (ITCS'13), space-bounded communication complexity by Brody et al. (ITCS'13) and the overlay communication complexity by Papakonstantinou et al. (CCC'14). Thus the memoryless communication complexity model provides a unified framework to study all these space-bounded communication complexity models. We establish the following main results: (1) We show that the memoryless communication complexity of F equals the logarithm of the size of the smallest bipartite branching program computing F (up to a factor 2); (2) We show that memoryless communication complexity equals garden-hose model of computation; (3) We exhibit various exponential separations between these memoryless communication models. We end with an intriguing open question: can we find an explicit function F and universal constant c > 1 for which the memoryless communication complexity is at least c log n? Note that c ≥ 2+ε would imply a Ω(n^{2+ε}) lower bound for general formula size, improving upon the best lower bound by [Nečiporuk, 1966].
We prove that the randomized communication complexity of Vector-in-Subspace in Rn with error at most 1/3 is Θ(n). Alice holds a unit vector u and Bob holds an n/2-dimensional subspace H; they must distinguish u∈H from u∈H⊥. An exact one-way quantum protocol uses O(logn) qubits, making the problem a geometric example of an exponential quantum advantage over interactive classical communication. Our lower bound matches Raz's O(n) upper bound, improves the Ω(n1/3) lower bound of Klartag and Regev, and removes the total-rank restriction in Grupel's Ω(n) result.
The proof establishes a Gaussian moment bound over complete rectangle partitions. A complex Gaussian representation yields a vanishing even moment whose cancellation is preserved when averaging over the partition. We control the signed conditional moments around a real center by decomposing conditional Gaussian measures into fixed coordinates and sub-Gaussian components. Combining this estimate with spherical harmonic analysis gives the communication lower bound.
We study the one-way communication complexity of the f-Boolean Hidden Partition problem. Here, Alice is given an n-bit string and Bob is given Ω(n) disjoint blocks of its indices together with a string of labels. Under the promise that the evaluations of f on these blocks either agree with all of the labels or disagree with all of them, Bob must determine which is the case using a single message from Alice. This problem generalizes the Boolean Hidden Matching and Hidden Hypermatching problems, which capture the special case where f is the parity function.
We establish classical and quantum communication bounds for f-Boolean Hidden Partition in terms of the sign degree d of f, proving a conjecture of Doriguello and Montanaro (TQC 2020). Their prior work gave logarithmic communication upper bounds for classical protocols when d≤1 and quantum protocols when d≤2, as well as polynomial lower bounds for certain structured functions with larger sign degree. We show that for every f of sign degree d≥2, the randomized classical communication complexity of this problem is Θ(n1−1/d) while its quantum communication complexity lies between Ω(n1−2/d) and $\bO{n^{1-1/\lceil d/2 \rceil} \log n}$. This completely characterizes the functions f admitting polynomial quantum advantage as those for which d≥2, with a new infinite family of exponential separations given by the case d=2.