Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1607.03413

Anyons in three dimensions with geometric algebra

Alexander Soiguine

Published Jul 6, 2016• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Even though it has been almost a century since quantum mechanics planted roots, the field has its share of unresolved problems. It could be the result of a wrong mathematical structure providing inadequate understanding of the quantum phenomena.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1607.03413

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics of Anyons

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 1, 2005•0 citations

Anyons in Three Dimensions with Geometric Algebra

Alexander Soiguine

Even though it has been almost a century since quantum mechanics planted roots, the field has its share of unresolved problems. Could this be the result of a wrong mathematical structure providing inadequate understanding of the quantum phenomena [1]? Part of the problem is that the terms “state”, “observable”, “measurement” require a clear unambiguous definition that will make them universally acceptable in both classical and quantum mechanics. This concrete definition will help to further develop a feasible formalism for the challenging area of quantum computing [2].

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics•Sep 5, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics of Anyons

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Mar 1, 1998•0 citations

Quantum Computing with Variable Complex Plane. Light Beam Guide Implementation

Alexander Soiguine

Following the B. Hiley belief that unresolved problems of conventional quantum mechanics could be the result of a wrong mathematical structure, an alternative basic structure is suggested. Critical part of the structure is modification of the sense of commonly used terms state, observable, measurement giving them a clear unambiguous definition. This concrete definition, along with using of variable complex plane, is quite natural in geometric algebra terms. It helps to establish a feasible language for the area of quantum computing. The suggested approach is used then in the fiber optics quantum information processing scenario.

arXiv:1703.00820•Feb 27, 2017•0 citations

Geometric and analytical aspects of anyons

Garth A. Baker, S. B. Mulay

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 1995•2 citations

Geometric Law of Quantum Mechanics and the Imaginary Unit

Kwon, Se Kyun

Mathematically, the imaginary unit 𝑖 has long been regarded as an algebraic generator extending the real numbers to the complex field. Yet a century after the birth of quantum mechanics (1925–2025), the answer to its oldest question is now clear: quantum mechanics is not merely a mathematical structure—it is a physical reality, and all quantities appearing in its non-commutative relations are physical. Therefore, 𝑖 is not a mere algebraic extension but the universal operator demanded by the geometric completeness of non-commutative reality between position and momentum. The imaginary unit is a physical reality. The canonical relation [𝑥, 𝑝] = 𝑖ℏ is not merely algebraic—it is a geometric law, showing that the complex structure of quantum mechanics arises inevitably from physical reality itself. It stands without contradiction, without complexity. This is nature. In the (𝑥, 𝑝) plane, 𝑖 represents a 90° rotation and ℏ quantizes the curvature of that rotation. Complex numbers thus arise as the natural geometric language of non-commutative physics, providing a geometric resolution to the century-old question of physical completeness first raised by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (1935).

•Nov 14, 2025•0 citations
Even though it has been almost a century since quantum mechanics planted roots, the field has its share of unresolved problems. Could this be the result of a wrong mathematical structure providing inadequate understanding of the quantum phenomena [1]? Part of the problem is that the terms “state”, “observable”, “measurement” require a clear unambiguous definition that will make them universally acceptable in both classical and quantum mechanics. This concrete definition will help to further develop a feasible formalism for the challenging area of quantum computing [2].
Following the B. Hiley belief that unresolved problems of conventional quantum mechanics could be the result of a wrong mathematical structure, an alternative basic structure is suggested. Critical part of the structure is modification of the sense of commonly used terms state, observable, measurement giving them a clear unambiguous definition. This concrete definition, along with using of variable complex plane, is quite natural in geometric algebra terms. It helps to establish a feasible language for the area of quantum computing. The suggested approach is used then in the fiber optics quantum information processing scenario.
Mathematically, the imaginary unit 𝑖 has long been regarded as an algebraic generator extending the real numbers to the complex field. Yet a century after the birth of quantum mechanics (1925–2025), the answer to its oldest question is now clear: quantum mechanics is not merely a mathematical structure—it is a physical reality, and all quantities appearing in its non-commutative relations are physical. Therefore, 𝑖 is not a mere algebraic extension but the universal operator demanded by the geometric completeness of non-commutative reality between position and momentum. The imaginary unit is a physical reality. The canonical relation [𝑥, 𝑝] = 𝑖ℏ is not merely algebraic—it is a geometric law, showing that the complex structure of quantum mechanics arises inevitably from physical reality itself. It stands without contradiction, without complexity. This is nature. In the (𝑥, 𝑝) plane, 𝑖 represents a 90° rotation and ℏ quantizes the curvature of that rotation. Complex numbers thus arise as the natural geometric language of non-commutative physics, providing a geometric resolution to the century-old question of physical completeness first raised by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (1935).