Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1607.00319 · Physical Review A

Quantum smoothing for classical mixtures

D. Tan, Mahdi Naghiloo, Klaus Mølmer, Kater W. Murch

Published Nov 29, 2016• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Wave functions and density matrices represent our knowledge about a quantum system and give probabilities for the outcomes of measurements. If the combined dynamics and measurements on a system lead to a density matrix $\ensuremath{\rho}(t)$ with only diagonal elements in a given basis ${|n\ensuremath{\rangle}}$, it may be treated as a classical mixture, i.e., a system which randomly occupies the basis states $|n\ensuremath{\rangle}$ with probabilities ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{nn}(t)$. Equivalent to so-called smoothing in classical probability theory, subsequent probing of the occupation of the states $|n\ensuremath{\rangle}$ may improve our ability to retrodict what was the outcome of a projective state measurement at time $t$. Here, we show with experiments on a superconducting qubit that the smoothed probabilities do not, in the same way as the diagonal elements of $\ensuremath{\rho}(t)$, permit a classical mixture interpretation of the state of the system at the past time $t$.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.94.050102

Related papers

Weak Measurement and Quantum Smoothing of a Superconducting Qubit

Dian Tan

In quantum mechanics, the measurement outcome of an observable in a quantum system is intrinsically random, yielding a probability distribution. The state of the quantum system can be described by a density matrix (t), which depends on the information accumulated until time t, and represents our knowledge about the system. The density matrix (t) gives probabilities for the outcomes of measurements at time t. Further probing of the quantum system allows us to refine our prediction in hindsight. In this thesis, we experimentally examine a quantum smoothing theory in a superconducting qubit by introducing an auxiliary matrix E(t) which is conditioned on information obtained from time t to a final time T. With the complete information before and after time t, the pair of matrices [(t), E(t)] can be used to make smoothed predictions for the measurement outcome at time t. We apply the quantum smoothing theory in the case of continuous weak measurement unveiling the retrodicted quantum trajectories and weak values. In the case of strong projective measurement, while the density matrix (t) with only diagonal elements in a given basis |n> may be treated as a classical mixture, we demonstrate a failure of this classical mixture description in determining the smoothed probabilities for the measurement outcome at time t with both diagonal (t) and diagonal E(t). We study the correlations between quantum states and weak measurement signals and examine aspects of the time symmetry of continuous quantum measurement. We also extend our study of quantum smoothing theory to the case of resonance fluorescence of a superconducting qubit with homodyne measurement and observe some interesting effects such as the modification of the excited state probabilities, weak values, and evolution of the predicted and retrodicted trajectories.

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Past Quantum States of a Monitored System

Søren Gammelmark, Brian Julsgaard, Klaus Mølmer

A density matrix ρ(t) yields probabilistic information about the outcome of measurements on a quantum system. We introduce here the past quantum state, which, at time T, accounts for the state of a quantum system at earlier times t<T. The past quantum state Ξ(t) is composed of two objects, ρ(t) and E(t), conditioned on the dynamics and the probing of the system until t and in the time interval [t, T], respectively. The past quantum state is characterized by its ability to make better predictions for the unknown outcome of any measurement at t than the conventional quantum state at that time. On the one hand, our formalism shows how smoothing procedures for estimation of past classical signals by a quantum probe [M. Tsang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 250403 (2009)] apply also to describe the past state of the quantum system itself. On the other hand, it generalizes theories of pre- and postselected quantum states [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, J. Phys. A 24, 2315 (1991)] to systems subject to any quantum measurement scenario, any coherent evolution, and any Markovian dissipation processes.

arXiv:1305.0681•Physical Review Letters•Oct 15, 2013•147 citations

Quantum State Smoothing Cannot Be Assumed Classical Even When the Filtering and Retrofiltering Are Classical

Kiarn T. Laverick, Prahlad Warszawski, Areeya Chantasri +1 more

State smoothing is a technique to estimate a state at a particular time, conditioned on information obtained both before (past) and after (future) that time.For a classical system, the smoothed state is a normalized product of the filtered state (a state conditioned only on the past measurement information and the initial preparation) and the retrofiltered effect (depending only on the future measurement information).For the quantum case, while there are well-established analogues of the filtered state (ρ F ) and the retrofiltered effect ( ÊR ), their product does not, in general, provide a valid quantum state for smoothing.However, this procedure does seem to work when ρ F and ÊR are mutually diagonalizable.This fact has been used to obtain smoothed quantum states-purer than the filtered states-in a number of experiments on continuously monitored quantum systems, in cavity QED and atomic systems.In this paper we show that there is an implicit assumption underlying this technique: that if all the information were known to the observer, the true system state would be one of the diagonal basis states.This assumption does not necessarily hold, as the missing information is quantum information.It could be known to the observer only if it were turned into a classical measurement record, but then its nature would depend on the choice of measurement.We show by a simple model that, depending on that measurement choice, the smoothed quantum state can: agree with that from the classical method, disagree with it but still be co-diagonal with it, or not even be co-diagonal with it.That is, just because filtering and retrofiltering appear classical does not mean classical smoothing theory is applicable in quantum experiments.

arXiv:2305.12970•PRX Quantum•Dec 11, 2023•3 citations

Retrodictive approach to quantum state smoothing

Mingxuan Liu, Valerio Scarani, Alexia Auffèves +1 more

Smoothing is a technique for estimating the state of an imperfectly monitored open system by combining both prior and posterior measurement information. In the quantum regime, current approaches to smoothing either give unphysical outcomes, due to the non-commutativity of the measurements at different times, or require assumptions about how the environment is measuring the system, which with current technology is unverifiable. We propose a novel definition of the smoothed quantum state based on quantum Bayesian retrodiction, which mirrors the classical retrodictive approach to smoothing. This approach always yields physical results and does not require any assumption on the environment. We show that this smoothed state has, on average, greater purity than the state reconstructed using just the prior information. Finally, we make a connection with the smoothing theory of Guevara and Wiseman in a well-studied regime, and describe from a purely quantum perspective how it conditions on the posterior information.

arXiv:2501.15986•Physical Review A•Sep 2, 2025•1 citation

Unifying quantum smoothing theories with extended retrodiction

Mingxuan Liu, Ge Bai, Valerio Scarani

Estimating the state of an open quantum system monitored over time requires incorporating information from past measurements (filtering) and, for improved accuracy, also from future measurements (smoothing). While classical smoothing is well understood within a Bayesian framework, its quantum generalization has been challenging, leading to distinct and seemingly incompatible approaches. In this work, we demonstrate that quantum state smoothing hinges on a uniquely quantum feature: the fundamental dependence of retrodiction on prior correlations. We introduce auxiliary systems into the prior to represent specified correlations formed during preparation and evolution, and formulate quantum state smoothing as extended Bayesian retrodiction. This framework identifies previous approaches as different choices of the extended prior, and naturally extends it to other choices that have not been considered before. We also give an information-theoretic characterization of the choices of prior, in terms of the average entropy of the smoothed states. Our results establish quantum state smoothing as a fundamentally retrodictive process just like classical smoothing, with proper quantum features clearly identified.

arXiv:2510.08447•npj Quantum Information•Nov 1, 2026•0 citations

Density operators

Benjamin W. Schumacher, Michael D. Westmoreland

Beyond state vectors We cannot always assign a definite state vector |ψ〉 to a quantum system Q. It may be that Q is part of a composite system RQ that is in an entangled state |Ψ (RQ) 〉. Or it may be that our knowledge of the preparation of Q is insufficient to determine a particular state |ψ〉. Consider, for instance, a qubit sent from Alice to Bob during the BB84 key distribution protocol from Section 4.4. The state of this qubit could be |0〉, |1〉, |+〉 or |−〉, each with equal likelihood. In either case – whether Q is a subsystem of an entangled system, or the state of Q is determined by a probabilistic process – we cannot specify a quantum state vector |ψ〉 for Q. Nevertheless, in either case we are in a position to make statistical predictions about the outcomes of measurements on Q. In this chapter we describe the mathematical machinery for doing this. Mixtures of states Suppose the state of Q arises by a random process, so that the state |ψ α 〉 is prepared with probability p α . The possible states |ψ α 〉 need not be orthogonal (as you can see in the BB84 example above). We call this situation a mixture of the states |ψ α 〉, or a mixed state for short. One way to interpret a mixed state is to return to the idea of an ensemble of systems, which we introduced in Section 3.3.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2010•0 citations
Wave functions and density matrices represent our knowledge about a quantum system and give probabilities for the outcomes of measurements. If the combined dynamics and measurements on a system lead to a density matrix \ensuremathρ(t)\ensuremath{\rho}(t)\ensuremathρ(t) with only diagonal elements in a given basis ∣n\ensuremath⟩{|n\ensuremath{\rangle}}∣n\ensuremath⟩, it may be treated as a classical mixture, i.e., a system which randomly occupies the basis states ∣n\ensuremath⟩|n\ensuremath{\rangle}∣n\ensuremath⟩ with probabilities \ensuremathρnn(t){\ensuremath{\rho}}_{nn}(t)\ensuremathρnn​(t). Equivalent to so-called smoothing in classical probability theory, subsequent probing of the occupation of the states ∣n\ensuremath⟩|n\ensuremath{\rangle}∣n\ensuremath⟩ may improve our ability to retrodict what was the outcome of a projective state measurement at time ttt. Here, we show with experiments on a superconducting qubit that the smoothed probabilities do not, in the same way as the diagonal elements of \ensuremathρ(t)\ensuremath{\rho}(t)\ensuremathρ(t), permit a classical mixture interpretation of the state of the system at the past time ttt.
In quantum mechanics, the measurement outcome of an observable in a quantum system is intrinsically random, yielding a probability distribution. The state of the quantum system can be described by a density matrix (t), which depends on the information accumulated until time t, and represents our knowledge about the system. The density matrix (t) gives probabilities for the outcomes of measurements at time t. Further probing of the quantum system allows us to refine our prediction in hindsight. In this thesis, we experimentally examine a quantum smoothing theory in a superconducting qubit by introducing an auxiliary matrix E(t) which is conditioned on information obtained from time t to a final time T. With the complete information before and after time t, the pair of matrices [(t), E(t)] can be used to make smoothed predictions for the measurement outcome at time t. We apply the quantum smoothing theory in the case of continuous weak measurement unveiling the retrodicted quantum trajectories and weak values. In the case of strong projective measurement, while the density matrix (t) with only diagonal elements in a given basis |n> may be treated as a classical mixture, we demonstrate a failure of this classical mixture description in determining the smoothed probabilities for the measurement outcome at time t with both diagonal (t) and diagonal E(t). We study the correlations between quantum states and weak measurement signals and examine aspects of the time symmetry of continuous quantum measurement. We also extend our study of quantum smoothing theory to the case of resonance fluorescence of a superconducting qubit with homodyne measurement and observe some interesting effects such as the modification of the excited state probabilities, weak values, and evolution of the predicted and retrodicted trajectories.
A density matrix ρ(t) yields probabilistic information about the outcome of measurements on a quantum system. We introduce here the past quantum state, which, at time T, accounts for the state of a quantum system at earlier times t<T. The past quantum state Ξ(t) is composed of two objects, ρ(t) and E(t), conditioned on the dynamics and the probing of the system until t and in the time interval [t, T], respectively. The past quantum state is characterized by its ability to make better predictions for the unknown outcome of any measurement at t than the conventional quantum state at that time. On the one hand, our formalism shows how smoothing procedures for estimation of past classical signals by a quantum probe [M. Tsang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 250403 (2009)] apply also to describe the past state of the quantum system itself. On the other hand, it generalizes theories of pre- and postselected quantum states [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, J. Phys. A 24, 2315 (1991)] to systems subject to any quantum measurement scenario, any coherent evolution, and any Markovian dissipation processes.
State smoothing is a technique to estimate a state at a particular time, conditioned on information obtained both before (past) and after (future) that time.For a classical system, the smoothed state is a normalized product of the filtered state (a state conditioned only on the past measurement information and the initial preparation) and the retrofiltered effect (depending only on the future measurement information).For the quantum case, while there are well-established analogues of the filtered state (ρ F ) and the retrofiltered effect ( ÊR ), their product does not, in general, provide a valid quantum state for smoothing.However, this procedure does seem to work when ρ F and ÊR are mutually diagonalizable.This fact has been used to obtain smoothed quantum states-purer than the filtered states-in a number of experiments on continuously monitored quantum systems, in cavity QED and atomic systems.In this paper we show that there is an implicit assumption underlying this technique: that if all the information were known to the observer, the true system state would be one of the diagonal basis states.This assumption does not necessarily hold, as the missing information is quantum information.It could be known to the observer only if it were turned into a classical measurement record, but then its nature would depend on the choice of measurement.We show by a simple model that, depending on that measurement choice, the smoothed quantum state can: agree with that from the classical method, disagree with it but still be co-diagonal with it, or not even be co-diagonal with it.That is, just because filtering and retrofiltering appear classical does not mean classical smoothing theory is applicable in quantum experiments.
Smoothing is a technique for estimating the state of an imperfectly monitored open system by combining both prior and posterior measurement information. In the quantum regime, current approaches to smoothing either give unphysical outcomes, due to the non-commutativity of the measurements at different times, or require assumptions about how the environment is measuring the system, which with current technology is unverifiable. We propose a novel definition of the smoothed quantum state based on quantum Bayesian retrodiction, which mirrors the classical retrodictive approach to smoothing. This approach always yields physical results and does not require any assumption on the environment. We show that this smoothed state has, on average, greater purity than the state reconstructed using just the prior information. Finally, we make a connection with the smoothing theory of Guevara and Wiseman in a well-studied regime, and describe from a purely quantum perspective how it conditions on the posterior information.
Estimating the state of an open quantum system monitored over time requires incorporating information from past measurements (filtering) and, for improved accuracy, also from future measurements (smoothing). While classical smoothing is well understood within a Bayesian framework, its quantum generalization has been challenging, leading to distinct and seemingly incompatible approaches. In this work, we demonstrate that quantum state smoothing hinges on a uniquely quantum feature: the fundamental dependence of retrodiction on prior correlations. We introduce auxiliary systems into the prior to represent specified correlations formed during preparation and evolution, and formulate quantum state smoothing as extended Bayesian retrodiction. This framework identifies previous approaches as different choices of the extended prior, and naturally extends it to other choices that have not been considered before. We also give an information-theoretic characterization of the choices of prior, in terms of the average entropy of the smoothed states. Our results establish quantum state smoothing as a fundamentally retrodictive process just like classical smoothing, with proper quantum features clearly identified.
Beyond state vectors We cannot always assign a definite state vector |ψ〉 to a quantum system Q. It may be that Q is part of a composite system RQ that is in an entangled state |Ψ (RQ) 〉. Or it may be that our knowledge of the preparation of Q is insufficient to determine a particular state |ψ〉. Consider, for instance, a qubit sent from Alice to Bob during the BB84 key distribution protocol from Section 4.4. The state of this qubit could be |0〉, |1〉, |+〉 or |−〉, each with equal likelihood. In either case – whether Q is a subsystem of an entangled system, or the state of Q is determined by a probabilistic process – we cannot specify a quantum state vector |ψ〉 for Q. Nevertheless, in either case we are in a position to make statistical predictions about the outcomes of measurements on Q. In this chapter we describe the mathematical machinery for doing this. Mixtures of states Suppose the state of Q arises by a random process, so that the state |ψ α 〉 is prepared with probability p α . The possible states |ψ α 〉 need not be orthogonal (as you can see in the BB84 example above). We call this situation a mixture of the states |ψ α 〉, or a mixed state for short. One way to interpret a mixed state is to return to the idea of an ensemble of systems, which we introduced in Section 3.3.