Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1606.09306 · Entropy

A Royal Road to Quantum Theory (or Thereabouts)

Alexander Wilce

Published Mar 26, 2018• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This paper fails to derive quantum mechanics from a few simple postulates. However, it gets very close, and does so without much exertion. More precisely, I obtain a representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic systems in terms of Euclidean Jordan algebras, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework within which real, complex and quaternionic QM can play happily together and allows some (but not too much) room for more exotic alternatives. (This is a leisurely summary, based on recent lectures, of material from the papers arXiv:1206:2897 and arXiv:1507.06278, the latter joint work with Howard Barnum and Matthew Graydon. Some further ideas are also explored, developing the connection between conjugate systems and the possibility of forming stable measurement records and making connections between this approach and the categorical approach to quantum theory.).

DOI
10.3390/e20040227

Related papers

A Royal Road to Quantum Mechanics (or Thereabouts)

Alexander Wilce

This paper fails to derive quantum mechanics from a few simple postulates. But it gets very close --- and it does so without much exertion. More exactly, I obtain a representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic systems in terms of euclidean Jordan algebras, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework within which real, complex and quaternionic QM can play happily together, and allows some --- but not too much --- room for more exotic alternatives.

•Jun 29, 2016•0 citations

A Royal Road to Quantum Theory (or Thereabouts), Extended Abstract

Alexander Wilce

A representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic models in terms of formally real Jordan algebras is obtained, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework in which real, complex and quaternionic quantum mechanics can be treated on an equal footing, and allows some (but not too much) room for other alternatives. This is based on earlier work (arXiv:1206:2897), but the development here is further simplified, and also extended in several ways. I also discuss the possibilities for organizing probabilistic models, subject to the assumptions discussed here, into symmetric monoidal categories, showing that such a category will automatically have a dagger-compact structure. (Recent joint work with Howard Barnum and Matthew Graydon (arXiv:1507.06278) exhibits several categories of this kind.)

Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science•Jan 1, 2017•4 citations

A Royal Road to Quantum Theory (or Thereabouts), Extended Abstract

Alexander Wilce

A representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic models in terms of formally real Jordan algebras is obtained, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework in which real, complex and quaternionic quantum mechanics can be treated on an equal footing, and allows some (but not too much) room for other alternatives. This is based on earlier work (arXiv:1206:2897), but the development here is further simplified, and also extended in several ways. I also discuss the possibilities for organizing probabilistic models, subject to the assumptions discussed here, into symmetric monoidal categories, showing that such a category will automatically have a dagger-compact structure. (Recent joint work with Howard Barnum and Matthew Graydon (arXiv:1507.06278) exhibits several categories of this kind.)

arXiv:1701.00664•Jan 3, 2017•34 citations

Conjugates, Filters and Quantum Mechanics

Alexander Wilce

The Jordan structure of finite-dimensional quantum theory is derived, in a conspicuously easy way, from a few simple postulates concerning abstract probabilistic models (each defined by a set of basic measurements and a convex set of states). The key assumption is that each system A can be paired with an isomorphic conjugate system, A¯ , by means of a non-signaling bipartite state ηA perfectly and uniformly correlating each basic measurement on A with its counterpart on A¯ . In the case of a quantum-mechanical system associated with a complex Hilbert space H , the conjugate system is that associated with the conjugate Hilbert space H , and ηA corresponds to the standard maximally entangled EPR state on H⊗H¯ . A second ingredient is the notion of a reversible filter , that is, a probabilistically reversible process that independently attenuates the sensitivity of detectors associated with a measurement. In addition to offering more flexibility than most existing reconstructions of finite-dimensional quantum theory, the approach taken here has the advantage of not relying on any form of the ``no restriction" hypothesis. That is, it is not assumed that arbitrary effects are physically measurable, nor that arbitrary families of physically measurable effects summing to the unit effect, represent physically accessible observables. (An appendix shows how a version of Hardy's ``subpace axiom" can replace several assumptions native to this paper, although at the cost of disallowing superselection rules.)

arXiv:1206.2897•Quantum•Jul 8, 2019•26 citations

Rational Quantum Mechanics

Sergio Da Silva

AbstractStandard quantum mechanics is formulated using complex Hilbert spaces, real-valued probabilities, continuous one-parameter dynamics, and—where particles and fields have continuous degrees of freedom —function spaces constructed over continua such as R3 . In that precise mathematical sense, the real and complex continua are deeply embedded in the standard theory. It does not follow, however, that experiments have demonstrated the physical existence of an uncountable set of exact real numbers, still less that individual quantum systems physically “store” infinitely many digits. Every preparation, control operation, and measurement has finite precision, and many quantum predictions can be approximated arbitrarily closely using countable or finite descriptions.This distinction matters because the continuum is sometimes blamed for quantum theory's conceptual strangeness. That diagnosis is mostly unsupported. Superposition, interference, uncertainty, noncommutativity, entanglement, contextuality, Bell-inequality violations, and no-cloning already occur in finite-dimensional quantum systems and do not depend in any straightforward way on continuous position space or arbitrary irrational numbers. Restricting a Hilbert space to rational, algebraic, computable, or finitely specified states therefore does not automatically produce classical physics. Indeed, dense restricted subsets can approximate ordinary quantum predictions to arbitrary finite accuracy, although turning such a subset into a complete physical theory requires much more: closed dynamics, a composition rule, a measurement theory, robustness, and new empirical predictions.A particularly developed contemporary alternative is Tim Palmer's Invariant Set Theory and its recent formulation as Rational Quantum Mechanics (RaQM). RaQM is not accurately described as simply “quantum mechanics with irrational numbers banned.” It restricts the bases in which states are physically defined through number-theoretic rationality conditions, represents admissible states using finite bit strings, invokes a fractal invariant state space equipped with a non-Euclidean, p-adic-like metric, and violates Bell measurement independence at the level of exact counterfactual settings. Palmer's 2026 proposal further predicts a finite qubit-information capacity and an eventual saturation of quantum computational advantage. These are genuine, potentially falsifiable proposals, but they remain speculative and have not displaced standard quantum theory.The strongest conclusion is consequently asymmetric. There is a serious foundational question about whether the continuum is an ontological feature of nature or an extraordinarily efficient mathematical completion. Finite precision prevents existing experiments from proving a literal continuum. But there is presently little evidence that continuum mathematics causes quantum phenomena. Any discrete replacement must still account quantitatively for interference, contextuality, Bell correlations, entanglement, spectroscopy, atomic structure, and quantum computation. Discreteness can change quantum physics only when it is accompanied by additional physical postulates—and those postulates, rather than discreteness alone, must ultimately face experiment.

•Oct 17, 2026•0 citations

A simple and quantum-mechanically motivated characterization of the formally real Jordan algebras

Gerd Niestegge

Quantum theory’s Hilbert space apparatus in its finite-dimensional version is nearly reconstructed from four simple and quantum-mechanically motivated postulates for a quantum logic. The reconstruction process is not complete, since it excludes the two-dimensional Hilbert space and still includes the exceptional Jordan algebras, which are not part of the Hilbert space apparatus. Options for physically meaningful potential generalizations of the apparatus are discussed.

•Jan 1, 2020•4 citations
This paper fails to derive quantum mechanics from a few simple postulates. However, it gets very close, and does so without much exertion. More precisely, I obtain a representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic systems in terms of Euclidean Jordan algebras, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework within which real, complex and quaternionic QM can play happily together and allows some (but not too much) room for more exotic alternatives. (This is a leisurely summary, based on recent lectures, of material from the papers arXiv:1206:2897 and arXiv:1507.06278, the latter joint work with Howard Barnum and Matthew Graydon. Some further ideas are also explored, developing the connection between conjugate systems and the possibility of forming stable measurement records and making connections between this approach and the categorical approach to quantum theory.).
A representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic models in terms of formally real Jordan algebras is obtained, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework in which real, complex and quaternionic quantum mechanics can be treated on an equal footing, and allows some (but not too much) room for other alternatives. This is based on earlier work (arXiv:1206:2897), but the development here is further simplified, and also extended in several ways. I also discuss the possibilities for organizing probabilistic models, subject to the assumptions discussed here, into symmetric monoidal categories, showing that such a category will automatically have a dagger-compact structure. (Recent joint work with Howard Barnum and Matthew Graydon (arXiv:1507.06278) exhibits several categories of this kind.)
A representation of finite-dimensional probabilistic models in terms of formally real Jordan algebras is obtained, in a strikingly easy way, from simple assumptions. This provides a framework in which real, complex and quaternionic quantum mechanics can be treated on an equal footing, and allows some (but not too much) room for other alternatives. This is based on earlier work (arXiv:1206:2897), but the development here is further simplified, and also extended in several ways. I also discuss the possibilities for organizing probabilistic models, subject to the assumptions discussed here, into symmetric monoidal categories, showing that such a category will automatically have a dagger-compact structure. (Recent joint work with Howard Barnum and Matthew Graydon (arXiv:1507.06278) exhibits several categories of this kind.)
The Jordan structure of finite-dimensional quantum theory is derived, in a conspicuously easy way, from a few simple postulates concerning abstract probabilistic models (each defined by a set of basic measurements and a convex set of states). The key assumption is that each system A can be paired with an isomorphic conjugate system, A¯ , by means of a non-signaling bipartite state ηA perfectly and uniformly correlating each basic measurement on A with its counterpart on A¯ . In the case of a quantum-mechanical system associated with a complex Hilbert space H , the conjugate system is that associated with the conjugate Hilbert space H , and ηA corresponds to the standard maximally entangled EPR state on H⊗H¯ . A second ingredient is the notion of a reversible filter , that is, a probabilistically reversible process that independently attenuates the sensitivity of detectors associated with a measurement. In addition to offering more flexibility than most existing reconstructions of finite-dimensional quantum theory, the approach taken here has the advantage of not relying on any form of the ``no restriction" hypothesis. That is, it is not assumed that arbitrary effects are physically measurable, nor that arbitrary families of physically measurable effects summing to the unit effect, represent physically accessible observables. (An appendix shows how a version of Hardy's ``subpace axiom" can replace several assumptions native to this paper, although at the cost of disallowing superselection rules.)
AbstractStandard quantum mechanics is formulated using complex Hilbert spaces, real-valued probabilities, continuous one-parameter dynamics, and—where particles and fields have continuous degrees of freedom —function spaces constructed over continua such as R3 . In that precise mathematical sense, the real and complex continua are deeply embedded in the standard theory. It does not follow, however, that experiments have demonstrated the physical existence of an uncountable set of exact real numbers, still less that individual quantum systems physically “store” infinitely many digits. Every preparation, control operation, and measurement has finite precision, and many quantum predictions can be approximated arbitrarily closely using countable or finite descriptions.This distinction matters because the continuum is sometimes blamed for quantum theory's conceptual strangeness. That diagnosis is mostly unsupported. Superposition, interference, uncertainty, noncommutativity, entanglement, contextuality, Bell-inequality violations, and no-cloning already occur in finite-dimensional quantum systems and do not depend in any straightforward way on continuous position space or arbitrary irrational numbers. Restricting a Hilbert space to rational, algebraic, computable, or finitely specified states therefore does not automatically produce classical physics. Indeed, dense restricted subsets can approximate ordinary quantum predictions to arbitrary finite accuracy, although turning such a subset into a complete physical theory requires much more: closed dynamics, a composition rule, a measurement theory, robustness, and new empirical predictions.A particularly developed contemporary alternative is Tim Palmer's Invariant Set Theory and its recent formulation as Rational Quantum Mechanics (RaQM). RaQM is not accurately described as simply “quantum mechanics with irrational numbers banned.” It restricts the bases in which states are physically defined through number-theoretic rationality conditions, represents admissible states using finite bit strings, invokes a fractal invariant state space equipped with a non-Euclidean, p-adic-like metric, and violates Bell measurement independence at the level of exact counterfactual settings. Palmer's 2026 proposal further predicts a finite qubit-information capacity and an eventual saturation of quantum computational advantage. These are genuine, potentially falsifiable proposals, but they remain speculative and have not displaced standard quantum theory.The strongest conclusion is consequently asymmetric. There is a serious foundational question about whether the continuum is an ontological feature of nature or an extraordinarily efficient mathematical completion. Finite precision prevents existing experiments from proving a literal continuum. But there is presently little evidence that continuum mathematics causes quantum phenomena. Any discrete replacement must still account quantitatively for interference, contextuality, Bell correlations, entanglement, spectroscopy, atomic structure, and quantum computation. Discreteness can change quantum physics only when it is accompanied by additional physical postulates—and those postulates, rather than discreteness alone, must ultimately face experiment.