Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1606.07936 · Applied Mathematics

The Uncertainty Principle in Terms of Isoperimetric Inequalities

Thomas Schürmann

Published Jan 1, 2017• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Simultaneous measurements of position and momentum are considered in n dimensions. We find, that for a particle whose position is strictly localized in a compact domain (spatial uncertainty) with non-empty boundary, the standard deviation of its momentum is sharply bounded by , while is the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Laplacian on D.

DOI
10.4236/am.2017.83025

Related papers

Confidence uncertainty: position and momentum can be jointly determined with a guaranteed probability

Jia-Yi Lin, Xin-Yu Li, Wei Wang +1 more

Standard-deviation and entropic formulations of uncertainty principle capture the spread of the probability distribution but say little about the probability itself contained in a small region. We introduce the confidence uncertainty $Δ^{c}x(θ_x)$ as the minimal Lebesgue measure of the support set in which the particle is found with probability at least $θ_x$, and the companion interval confidence uncertainty $Δ^{I}x(θ_x)$ which restricts the support to a single interval. We prove two complementary uncertainty inequalities. (i) For $θ_x+θ_p\le 1$ both confidence uncertainties can be made arbitrarily small simultaneously, so that no nontrivial product bound holds; in particular, position and momentum can be jointly localised with probability at least~$50\%$. (ii) For $θ_x+θ_p>1$ a lower bound holds: combining Lenard's projection inequality with the Donoho--Stark operator-norm bound we obtain $Δ^{c}x\,Δ^{c}p\geq 2π\hbar\bigl(\sqrt{θ_xθ_p}-\sqrt{(1-θ_x)(1-θ_p)}\bigr)^{\!2}$, and for the interval version we obtain the sharp implicit Landau--Pollak bound $Δ^{I}x\,Δ^{I}p\geq 4\hbar\,λ_{0}^{-1}\!\bigl((\sqrt{θ_xθ_p}-\sqrt{(1-θ_x)(1-θ_p)})^{2}\bigr)$, where $λ_{0}(c)$ is the largest prolate-spheroidal eigenvalue. We support the analytical bounds with numerical evaluation of $λ_{0}(c)$, provide closed-form small-$c$ and large-$c$ asymptotics, compute the optimal Slepian-superposition states that saturate the interval bound, and compare the resulting product against the variance Heisenberg--Kennard, the Białynicki-Birula--Mycielski entropic, and the Donoho--Stark concentration bounds. The unified picture provides a complete phase diagram on $(θ_x,θ_p)\in[0,1]^{2}$.

quant-pharXiv:2605.04484•Physics Letters A•May 7, 2026•0 citations

A single particle uncertainty relation

Thomas Schürmann

We consider successive measurements of position and momentum of a single particle. Let P be the conditional probability to measure the momentum k with precision dk, given a previously successful position measurement q with precision dq. Several upper bounds for the probability P are determined. For arbitrary, but given precision dq, dk, these bounds refer to the variation of q, k and the state vector of the particle. A weak bound is given by the inequality P <= dkdq/h, where h is Planck's quantum of action. It is non-trivial for all measurements with dkdq < h. A sharper bound is obtained by applying the Hilbert-Schmidt-norm. As our main result the least upper bound of P is determined. All bounds are independent of the order with which the measuring of position and momentum is made.

arXiv:quant-ph/0303005•Mar 2, 2003•1 citation

Determining Certain Position and Momentum of a Particle from Uncertainty Principle

Muhammad Yasin

This article will show you how to measure the position and momentum of a particle simultaneously from the principle of uncertainty .From the principle of position-momentum uncertainty, the position and momentum of a particle can be determined at the same time by fulfilling the condition of uncertainty by multiplying a constant k with the fixed value of position and momentum. Which is known as the principle of certainty

•Mar 2, 2021•0 citations

Uncertainty Principles for Position- and Momentum-Like Operators

Lara Ortelli, Gael Silva

At the quantum scale, objects such as fundamental particles, atoms, and molecules are modeled as localized wavepackets rather than concrete objects. As such, some quantities that are well-defined at our human scale physics instead become uncertain. For instance, quantum objects do not have a precise position, and instead their position is understood probabilistically and we look to the expected, or average, value of the position. Another quirk of quantum mechanics is that quantities such as position and momentum become operators that act on functions, similar to matrices acting on vectors. As such, quantities that may have commuted classically may not at the quantum level. For instance, position (x) and momentum (p) commute in classical physics (xp = px), but they do not commute at the quantum level (xp ≠ px). For noncommuting operators A and B, the uncertainty principle qualitatively describes how well one can know A and B simultaneously: the more certain one is of the value of A, the less one knows the value B and vice versa. The standard example is that of position and momentum: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that the more certain one is of the position of a quantum object, the more uncertain one is about its momentum. The classic uncertainty principles between noncommuting operators are those of position and momentum, the z and x or y components of angular momentum, and number and phase operators. These operators are very rigid and do not provide easy generalization to more general operators. In this project, we used an infinite matrix representation to analyze the uncertainty principle underlying position and momentum which allows for broader generalization. The biggest component of this project was determining eigenvalues of infinite banded matrices which was aided by the use of the mathematical software Mathematica.

•Mar 27, 2026•0 citations

More certainty about the uncertainty principle

Jan Hilgevoord, Jos Uffink

The uncertainty principle of position and momentum is a mathematically more involved relation than is usually realised. The well-known Heisenberg uncertainty relation between standard deviations is much too weak to express the uncertainty principle. By employing other notions of width, relations are given which do express the uncertainty principle.

European Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1985•21 citations

Determining Certain Position and Momentum of a Particle from Uncertainty Principle

Muhammad Yasin

This article will show you how to measure the position and momentum of a particle simultaneously from the principle of uncertainty .From the principle of position-momentum uncertainty, the position and momentum of a particle can be determined at the same time by fulfilling the condition of uncertainty by multiplying a constant k with the fixed value of position and momentum. Which is known as the principle of certainty.

•Mar 2, 2021•0 citations
Simultaneous measurements of position and momentum are considered in n dimensions. We find, that for a particle whose position is strictly localized in a compact domain (spatial uncertainty) with non-empty boundary, the standard deviation of its momentum is sharply bounded by , while is the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of the Laplacian on D.
Standard-deviation and entropic formulations of uncertainty principle capture the spread of the probability distribution but say little about the probability itself contained in a small region. We introduce the confidence uncertainty Δcx(θx)Δ^{c}x(θ_x)Δcx(θx​) as the minimal Lebesgue measure of the support set in which the particle is found with probability at least θxθ_xθx​, and the companion interval confidence uncertainty ΔIx(θx)Δ^{I}x(θ_x)ΔIx(θx​) which restricts the support to a single interval. We prove two complementary uncertainty inequalities. (i) For θx+θp≤1θ_x+θ_p\le 1θx​+θp​≤1 both confidence uncertainties can be made arbitrarily small simultaneously, so that no nontrivial product bound holds; in particular, position and momentum can be jointly localised with probability at least~50%50\%50%. (ii) For θx+θp>1θ_x+θ_p>1θx​+θp​>1 a lower bound holds: combining Lenard's projection inequality with the Donoho--Stark operator-norm bound we obtain Δcx Δcp≥2πℏ(θxθp−(1−θx)(1−θp)) ⁣2Δ^{c}x\,Δ^{c}p\geq 2π\hbar\bigl(\sqrt{θ_xθ_p}-\sqrt{(1-θ_x)(1-θ_p)}\bigr)^{\!2}ΔcxΔcp≥2πℏ(θx​θp​​−(1−θx​)(1−θp​)​)2, and for the interval version we obtain the sharp implicit Landau--Pollak bound ΔIx ΔIp≥4ℏ λ0−1 ⁣((θxθp−(1−θx)(1−θp))2)Δ^{I}x\,Δ^{I}p\geq 4\hbar\,λ_{0}^{-1}\!\bigl((\sqrt{θ_xθ_p}-\sqrt{(1-θ_x)(1-θ_p)})^{2}\bigr)ΔIxΔIp≥4ℏλ0−1​((θx​θp​​−(1−θx​)(1−θp​)​)2), where λ0(c)λ_{0}(c)λ0​(c) is the largest prolate-spheroidal eigenvalue. We support the analytical bounds with numerical evaluation of λ0(c)λ_{0}(c)λ0​(c), provide closed-form small-ccc and large-ccc asymptotics, compute the optimal Slepian-superposition states that saturate the interval bound, and compare the resulting product against the variance Heisenberg--Kennard, the Białynicki-Birula--Mycielski entropic, and the Donoho--Stark concentration bounds. The unified picture provides a complete phase diagram on (θx,θp)∈[0,1]2(θ_x,θ_p)\in[0,1]^{2}(θx​,θp​)∈[0,1]2.
We consider successive measurements of position and momentum of a single particle. Let P be the conditional probability to measure the momentum k with precision dk, given a previously successful position measurement q with precision dq. Several upper bounds for the probability P are determined. For arbitrary, but given precision dq, dk, these bounds refer to the variation of q, k and the state vector of the particle. A weak bound is given by the inequality P <= dkdq/h, where h is Planck's quantum of action. It is non-trivial for all measurements with dkdq < h. A sharper bound is obtained by applying the Hilbert-Schmidt-norm. As our main result the least upper bound of P is determined. All bounds are independent of the order with which the measuring of position and momentum is made.
At the quantum scale, objects such as fundamental particles, atoms, and molecules are modeled as localized wavepackets rather than concrete objects. As such, some quantities that are well-defined at our human scale physics instead become uncertain. For instance, quantum objects do not have a precise position, and instead their position is understood probabilistically and we look to the expected, or average, value of the position. Another quirk of quantum mechanics is that quantities such as position and momentum become operators that act on functions, similar to matrices acting on vectors. As such, quantities that may have commuted classically may not at the quantum level. For instance, position (x) and momentum (p) commute in classical physics (xp = px), but they do not commute at the quantum level (xp ≠ px). For noncommuting operators A and B, the uncertainty principle qualitatively describes how well one can know A and B simultaneously: the more certain one is of the value of A, the less one knows the value B and vice versa. The standard example is that of position and momentum: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that the more certain one is of the position of a quantum object, the more uncertain one is about its momentum. The classic uncertainty principles between noncommuting operators are those of position and momentum, the z and x or y components of angular momentum, and number and phase operators. These operators are very rigid and do not provide easy generalization to more general operators. In this project, we used an infinite matrix representation to analyze the uncertainty principle underlying position and momentum which allows for broader generalization. The biggest component of this project was determining eigenvalues of infinite banded matrices which was aided by the use of the mathematical software Mathematica.