Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1603.08607

Comments on the two-photon interferometry

Fujio Shimizu

Published Mar 29, 2016• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this article we try to describe the physics of a standard optical interferometer fed by "quantum" photons in terms of primitive, nevertheless accurate formulation. We derive explicit interferene patterns and show how they vary depending on the input photon state.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1603.08607

Related papers

Nonclassical interferometry with intelligent light

Constantin Brif, A. Mann

We study the phase sensitivity of SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers fed by two-mode field states which are intelligent states for Hermitian generators of the SU(2) and SU(1,1) groups, respectively. Intelligent states minimize uncertainty relations and this makes possible an essential reduction of the quantum noise in interferometers. Exact closed expressions for the minimum detectable phase shift are obtained in terms of the Jacobi polynomials. These expressions are compared with results for some conventional input states, and some known results for the squeezed input states are reviewed. It is shown that the phase sensitivity for an interferometer that employs squeezing-producing active devices (such as four-wave mixers) should be analyzed in two regimes: (i) fixed input state and variable interferometer, and (ii) fixed interferometer and variable input state. The behavior of the phase sensitivity is essentially different in these two regimes. The use of the SU(2) intelligent states allows us to achieve a phase sensitivity of order 1/N\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{} (where N\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{} is the total number of photons passing through the phase shifters of the interferometer) without adding four-wave mixers. This avoids the duality in the behavior of the phase sensitivity that occurs for the squeezed input. On the other hand, the SU(1,1) intelligent states have the property of achieving the phase sensitivity of order 1/N\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{} in both regimes. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

arXiv:quant-ph/9608021•Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1996•97 citations

Quantum effects in one-photon and two-photon interference

L. Mandeļ

After introducing some basic definitions, the article describes several optical interference experiments in which quantum effects appear. An analysis of these experiments leads to some new and improved measurement techniques and to a better understanding of the quantum state.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Mar 1, 1999•315 citations

Quantum metrology with two-mode photon-subtracted squeezed vacuum

Liu Hao, Song Hongbin, Huang Heyu +3 more

We investigate the phase sensitivity of a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) with an input of a non-Gaussian quantum entangled state, Two-Mode Photon-Subtracted Squeezed Vacuum states (TMPSSV). Parity detection is carried out at the output of the interferometer to obtain the phase uncertainty, which is a physical parameter that can quantify the sensitivity of interferometry. According to the simulation results, TMPSSV has a smaller phase uncertainty than the Two-Mode Squeezed Vacuum state (TMSV) in the entire range of the squeezing parameter which means the sensitivity of interferometry based on TMPSSV is higher than that of TMSV. Therefore, non-Gaussian entanglement based on TMPSSV provides a promising quantum resource for an ultra-sensitivity optical interferometer far beyond the standard quantum limit.

Tenth International Conference on Information Optics and Photonics•Dec 5, 2024•0 citations

Two-Photon Interferometry II: Interference of Randomly Paired Photons

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Sep 16, 2025•0 citations

Two-photon interference of multimode two-photon pairs with an unbalanced interferometer (4 pages)

Tomoyuki Horikiri, Yasuo Yanagihara, H. Wang +1 more

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Simultaneously estimating two phase shifts with a power-recycled tri-port interferometer fed by coherent states

Jiandong Zhang, Zijing Zhang, Longzhu Cen +2 more

Supersensitive phase estimation was and is one of the principal goals in the field of precision measurements. In this paper, we study a power-recycled tri-port interferometer that enables the protocol to estimate two phase shifts simultaneously. Each sensitivity of the phase shift is the shot-noise limit 1/N with two coherent states as inputs (3N/2 photons on average), and the balanced homodyne detection is performed on the outputs. Fundamental sensitivity limits of two estimated phases are studied by calculating the quantum Fisher information. Finally, we discuss the effects of photon loss on the phase sensitivity.

OSA Continuum•Dec 13, 2018•2 citations
We study the phase sensitivity of SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers fed by two-mode field states which are intelligent states for Hermitian generators of the SU(2) and SU(1,1) groups, respectively. Intelligent states minimize uncertainty relations and this makes possible an essential reduction of the quantum noise in interferometers. Exact closed expressions for the minimum detectable phase shift are obtained in terms of the Jacobi polynomials. These expressions are compared with results for some conventional input states, and some known results for the squeezed input states are reviewed. It is shown that the phase sensitivity for an interferometer that employs squeezing-producing active devices (such as four-wave mixers) should be analyzed in two regimes: (i) fixed input state and variable interferometer, and (ii) fixed interferometer and variable input state. The behavior of the phase sensitivity is essentially different in these two regimes. The use of the SU(2) intelligent states allows us to achieve a phase sensitivity of order 1/N\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{} (where N\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{} is the total number of photons passing through the phase shifters of the interferometer) without adding four-wave mixers. This avoids the duality in the behavior of the phase sensitivity that occurs for the squeezed input. On the other hand, the SU(1,1) intelligent states have the property of achieving the phase sensitivity of order 1/N\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{} in both regimes. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
We investigate the phase sensitivity of a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) with an input of a non-Gaussian quantum entangled state, Two-Mode Photon-Subtracted Squeezed Vacuum states (TMPSSV). Parity detection is carried out at the output of the interferometer to obtain the phase uncertainty, which is a physical parameter that can quantify the sensitivity of interferometry. According to the simulation results, TMPSSV has a smaller phase uncertainty than the Two-Mode Squeezed Vacuum state (TMSV) in the entire range of the squeezing parameter which means the sensitivity of interferometry based on TMPSSV is higher than that of TMSV. Therefore, non-Gaussian entanglement based on TMPSSV provides a promising quantum resource for an ultra-sensitivity optical interferometer far beyond the standard quantum limit.
Supersensitive phase estimation was and is one of the principal goals in the field of precision measurements. In this paper, we study a power-recycled tri-port interferometer that enables the protocol to estimate two phase shifts simultaneously. Each sensitivity of the phase shift is the shot-noise limit 1/N with two coherent states as inputs (3N/2 photons on average), and the balanced homodyne detection is performed on the outputs. Fundamental sensitivity limits of two estimated phases are studied by calculating the quantum Fisher information. Finally, we discuss the effects of photon loss on the phase sensitivity.