Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1603.05776 · Physical Review A

Products of weak values: Uncertainty relations, complementarity, and incompatibility

Michael J. W. Hall, Arun Kumar Pati, Junde Wu

Published May 27, 2016• 37 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The products of weak values of quantum observables are shown to be of value in deriving quantum uncertainty and complementarity relations, for both weak and strong measurement statistics. First, a ``product representation formula'' allows the standard Heisenberg uncertainty relation to be derived from a classical uncertainty relation for complex random variables. We show this formula also leads to strong uncertainty relations for unitary operators and underlies an interpretation of weak values as optimal (complex) estimates of quantum observables. Furthermore, we show that two incompatible observables that are weakly and strongly measured in a weak measurement context obey a complementarity relation under the interchange of these observables, in the form of an upper bound on the product of the corresponding weak values. Moreover, general tradeoff relations between weak purity, quantum purity, and quantum incompatibility, and also between weak and strong joint probability distributions, are obtained based on products of real and imaginary components of weak values, where these relations quantify the degree to which weak probabilities can take anomalous values in a given context.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.93.052118

Related papers

Uncertainty and Complementarity Relations in Weak Measurement

Arun Kumar Pati, Junde Wu

We prove uncertainty relations that quantitatively express the impossibility of jointly sharp preparation of pre- and post-selected quantum states for measuring incompatible observables during the weak measurement. By defining a suitable operator whose average in the pre-selected quantum state gives the weak value, we show that one can have new uncertainty relations for variances of two such operators corresponding to two non-commuting observables. These generalize the recent stronger uncertainty relations that give non-trivial lower bounds for the sum of variances of two observables which fully capture the concept of incompatible observables. Furthermore, we show that weak values for two non-commuting projection operators obey a complementarity relation. Specifically, we show that for a pre-selected state if we measure a projector corresponding to an observable $A$ weakly followed by the strong measurement of another observable $B$ (for the post-selection) and, for the same pre-selected state we measure a projector corresponding to an observable $B$ weakly followed by the strong measurement of the observable $A$ (for the post-selection), then the product of these two weak values is always less than one. This shows that even though individually they are complex and can be large, their product is always bounded.

arXiv:1411.7218•Nov 26, 2014•3 citations

On the Weak Value and Uncertainty Relations based on Quasi-Joint-Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics

宰河 李

A general prescription for the construction of quasi-joint-probability distributions intended to describe the "joint behaviour" of an arbitrary pair of (generally non-commuting) quantum observables, along with its application to the geometric/statistical interpretation of Aharonov's weak value and a proposal for new uncertainty relations, are presented.The introduction of such distributions is motivated by two complementary approaches: one from a bottom-up and strictly operational construction by carefully examining the mathematical framework of the conditioned measurement scheme, and the other from a top-down viewpoint by applying the results of spectral theorem for normal operators and its Fourier transforms.It is revealed that, for a pair of simultaneously measurable observables, the distribution reduces to the unique standard joint-probability distribution of the pair as expected, whereas for a non-commuting pair, there exists an inherent indefiniteness for the choice of such distributions, admitting a multitude of candidates that qualify to describe the "joint behaviour" of the pair.The L 2 structures induced by the quasi-joint-probability distributions are then found to provide statistical interpretation of the geometric structures that can be naturally introduced on the space of operators on the underlying Hilbert space.As possible applications of our findings, we focus on orthogonal projections and inner products of observables, and observe that such geometric concepts can respectively be given statistical interpretations as "conditionings" and "correlations".Incidentally, weak values A w are given a geometric/statistical interpretation as either the orthogonal projection of an observable A on the subspace generated by another observable B (or equivalently, as the conditioning of A given B with respect to the quasi-joint-probability distribution under consideration).Moreover, the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality applied on inner products of two observables (or equivalently, correlations between the pair) leads to novel inequalities interpreted as uncertainty relations for approximation/estimation, which entails the time-energy uncertainty relation as its special case.

•Mar 24, 2016•0 citations

Strong Variance-Based Uncertainty Relations and Uncertainty Intervals

Yunlong Xiao, Naihuan Jing, Bing Yu +2 more

Uncertainty relations occupy a fundamental position in quantum mechanics. We propose stronger variance-based uncertainty relations for the product and sum of variances of two incompatible observables in a finite dimensional Hilbert space. It is shown that the new uncertainty relations provide near-optimal state-dependent bounds, which can be useful for quantum metrology, entanglement detection etc. in quantum information theory. It is further shown that the uncertainty relations are related to the spreads of the distribution of measurement outcomes caused by incompatible observables. Intuitively, this means that the ability of learning the distribution has both the upper and lower bounds. Combination of these bounds provides naturally an uncertainty interval which captures the essence of uncertainty in quantum theory. Finally, we explain how to employ entropic uncertainty relations to derive lower bounds for the product of variances of incompatible observables.

•Oct 5, 2016•0 citations

On the estimation of interaction parameters in weak measurements

Holger Friedrich Hofmann, Timothy C. Ralph, Ping Koy Lam

Since weak measurements are known to produce measurement values that can be much larger than the maximal eigenvalues of the measured observable, it is an interesting question how this enhancement of the measurement signal relates to the sensitivity of quantum measurements as investigated in the field of quantum metrology. In this presentation, it is pointed out that the estimation of a small interaction parameter using weak measurements actually corresponds to standard quantum metrology, where the logarithmic derivatives of the final measurement probabilities are proportional to the corresponding weak values. The analysis of the general weak measurement formalism then shows that extreme weak values do not improve the sensitivity. Instead, all final measurements with real weak values have the same sensitivity as a final measurement of the eigenvalues. This result supports the view that real weak values can be interpreted as precise, zero uncertainty estimates of a quantum observable, despite their deviation from the eigenvalues of the corresponding operator.

arXiv:1012.0071•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•2 citations

Measurement uncertainty relations: characterising optimal error bounds for qubits

Tom Bullock, Paul Busch

Abstract In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.

arXiv:1512.00104•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•May 23, 2018•13 citations

Uncertainty limits for quantum metrology obtained from the statistics of weak measurements

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum metrology uses small changes in the output probabilities of a quantum measurement to estimate the magnitude of a weak interaction with the system. The sensitivity of this procedure depends on the relation between the input state, the measurement results, and the generator observable describing the effect of the weak interaction on the system. This is similar to the situation in weak measurements, where the weak value of an observable exhibits a symmetric dependence on initial and final conditions. In this paper, it is shown that the phase sensitivity of a quantum measurement is in fact given by the variance of the imaginary parts of the weak values of the generator over the different measurement outcomes. It is then possible to include the limitations of a specific quantum measurement in the uncertainty bound for phase estimates by subtracting the variance of the real parts of the weak values from the initial generator uncertainty. This uncertainty relation can be interpreted as the time-symmetric formulation of the uncertainty limit of quantum metrology, where the real parts of the weak values represent the information about the generator observable in the final measurement result.

arXiv:1005.4741•Physical Review A•Feb 22, 2011•51 citations
The products of weak values of quantum observables are shown to be of value in deriving quantum uncertainty and complementarity relations, for both weak and strong measurement statistics. First, a ``product representation formula'' allows the standard Heisenberg uncertainty relation to be derived from a classical uncertainty relation for complex random variables. We show this formula also leads to strong uncertainty relations for unitary operators and underlies an interpretation of weak values as optimal (complex) estimates of quantum observables. Furthermore, we show that two incompatible observables that are weakly and strongly measured in a weak measurement context obey a complementarity relation under the interchange of these observables, in the form of an upper bound on the product of the corresponding weak values. Moreover, general tradeoff relations between weak purity, quantum purity, and quantum incompatibility, and also between weak and strong joint probability distributions, are obtained based on products of real and imaginary components of weak values, where these relations quantify the degree to which weak probabilities can take anomalous values in a given context.
We prove uncertainty relations that quantitatively express the impossibility of jointly sharp preparation of pre- and post-selected quantum states for measuring incompatible observables during the weak measurement. By defining a suitable operator whose average in the pre-selected quantum state gives the weak value, we show that one can have new uncertainty relations for variances of two such operators corresponding to two non-commuting observables. These generalize the recent stronger uncertainty relations that give non-trivial lower bounds for the sum of variances of two observables which fully capture the concept of incompatible observables. Furthermore, we show that weak values for two non-commuting projection operators obey a complementarity relation. Specifically, we show that for a pre-selected state if we measure a projector corresponding to an observable AAA weakly followed by the strong measurement of another observable BBB (for the post-selection) and, for the same pre-selected state we measure a projector corresponding to an observable BBB weakly followed by the strong measurement of the observable AAA (for the post-selection), then the product of these two weak values is always less than one. This shows that even though individually they are complex and can be large, their product is always bounded.
A general prescription for the construction of quasi-joint-probability distributions intended to describe the "joint behaviour" of an arbitrary pair of (generally non-commuting) quantum observables, along with its application to the geometric/statistical interpretation of Aharonov's weak value and a proposal for new uncertainty relations, are presented.The introduction of such distributions is motivated by two complementary approaches: one from a bottom-up and strictly operational construction by carefully examining the mathematical framework of the conditioned measurement scheme, and the other from a top-down viewpoint by applying the results of spectral theorem for normal operators and its Fourier transforms.It is revealed that, for a pair of simultaneously measurable observables, the distribution reduces to the unique standard joint-probability distribution of the pair as expected, whereas for a non-commuting pair, there exists an inherent indefiniteness for the choice of such distributions, admitting a multitude of candidates that qualify to describe the "joint behaviour" of the pair.The L 2 structures induced by the quasi-joint-probability distributions are then found to provide statistical interpretation of the geometric structures that can be naturally introduced on the space of operators on the underlying Hilbert space.As possible applications of our findings, we focus on orthogonal projections and inner products of observables, and observe that such geometric concepts can respectively be given statistical interpretations as "conditionings" and "correlations".Incidentally, weak values A w are given a geometric/statistical interpretation as either the orthogonal projection of an observable A on the subspace generated by another observable B (or equivalently, as the conditioning of A given B with respect to the quasi-joint-probability distribution under consideration).Moreover, the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality applied on inner products of two observables (or equivalently, correlations between the pair) leads to novel inequalities interpreted as uncertainty relations for approximation/estimation, which entails the time-energy uncertainty relation as its special case.
Uncertainty relations occupy a fundamental position in quantum mechanics. We propose stronger variance-based uncertainty relations for the product and sum of variances of two incompatible observables in a finite dimensional Hilbert space. It is shown that the new uncertainty relations provide near-optimal state-dependent bounds, which can be useful for quantum metrology, entanglement detection etc. in quantum information theory. It is further shown that the uncertainty relations are related to the spreads of the distribution of measurement outcomes caused by incompatible observables. Intuitively, this means that the ability of learning the distribution has both the upper and lower bounds. Combination of these bounds provides naturally an uncertainty interval which captures the essence of uncertainty in quantum theory. Finally, we explain how to employ entropic uncertainty relations to derive lower bounds for the product of variances of incompatible observables.
Since weak measurements are known to produce measurement values that can be much larger than the maximal eigenvalues of the measured observable, it is an interesting question how this enhancement of the measurement signal relates to the sensitivity of quantum measurements as investigated in the field of quantum metrology. In this presentation, it is pointed out that the estimation of a small interaction parameter using weak measurements actually corresponds to standard quantum metrology, where the logarithmic derivatives of the final measurement probabilities are proportional to the corresponding weak values. The analysis of the general weak measurement formalism then shows that extreme weak values do not improve the sensitivity. Instead, all final measurements with real weak values have the same sensitivity as a final measurement of the eigenvalues. This result supports the view that real weak values can be interpreted as precise, zero uncertainty estimates of a quantum observable, despite their deviation from the eigenvalues of the corresponding operator.
Abstract In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.
Quantum metrology uses small changes in the output probabilities of a quantum measurement to estimate the magnitude of a weak interaction with the system. The sensitivity of this procedure depends on the relation between the input state, the measurement results, and the generator observable describing the effect of the weak interaction on the system. This is similar to the situation in weak measurements, where the weak value of an observable exhibits a symmetric dependence on initial and final conditions. In this paper, it is shown that the phase sensitivity of a quantum measurement is in fact given by the variance of the imaginary parts of the weak values of the generator over the different measurement outcomes. It is then possible to include the limitations of a specific quantum measurement in the uncertainty bound for phase estimates by subtracting the variance of the real parts of the weak values from the initial generator uncertainty. This uncertainty relation can be interpreted as the time-symmetric formulation of the uncertainty limit of quantum metrology, where the real parts of the weak values represent the information about the generator observable in the final measurement result.