arXiv:1603.02269

Algebraic Theory of Measurement Processes in Quantum Systems

C. A. M. de Melo, B. M. Pimentel, Ramirez, J. A.

Published Mar 7, 2016• 0 citations

Abstract

Here we deal in a pedagogical way with an approach to construct an algebraic structure for the Quantum Mechanical measurement processes from the concept of \emph{Measurement Symbol}. Such concept was conceived by Julian S. Schwinger and constitutes a fundamental piece in his variational formalism and its several applications.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1603.02269

Related papers

An Algebraic Approach to the Quantum Theory of Measurements

Ziro Maki

Some fundamental aspects in quantum-mechanical meaurements are discussed by following up Schwinger's measurement algebra with a necessary generalization. It is demonstrated that the perfect measurement and the reduction of states are equivalent in the physical contents, and that the theory needs no extraneous concept of probability beyond usual statistical probabilities used for characterized the state of ensembles.

Progress of Theoretical PhysicsOct 1, 19901 citation

A gentle introduction to Schwinger’s formulation of quantum mechanics: The groupoid picture

Florio M. Ciaglia, Alberto Ibort, Giuseppe Marmo

In this paper, we review Schwinger’s formulation of Quantum Mechanics and argue that the mathematical structure behind Schwinger’s “Symbolism of Atomic Measurements” is that of a groupoid. In this framework, both the Hilbert space (Schrödinger picture) and the [Formula: see text]-algebra (Heisenberg picture) of the system turn out to be derived concepts, that is, they arise from the underlying groupoid structure.

arXiv:1807.00519Modern Physics Letters AJun 21, 201835 citations

The measurement problem in quantum mechanics

Gennaro Auletta, Mauro Fortunato, Giorgio Parisi A

In most textbooks, measurement does not receive the full attention it deserves and sometimes is even not treated at all, apart a brief and cryptic mention of the “reduction of the wave packet.” However, in the last decades, the situation has profoundly changed and it is time to consider measurement a fundamental part of quantum mechanics, even, to a certain extent, an important generalization of the traditional theory (see also Chs. 14–15). This chapter consists of three major parts. In the first block (Secs. 9.1–9.4) we develop the main physical features of the measurement process: the heart of the argument is here represented by the aspects related to the interpretation. In the second part (Secs. 9.5–9.8) we discuss several special (and partly interdependent) topics of measurement: the heart here is represented by experimental aspects. In the third part (Secs. 9.9–9.12) we deal with the measurement process on a more formal plane, making use, in particular, of the generalization represented by the concepts of effect and positive operator valued measure (POVM). As we have said, the measurement problem is one of the most fundamental issues in the conceptual structure of quantum mechanics (as described in Sec. 9.1) and has a long history that will be examined in Sec. 9.2. In this context, the existence of apparently paradoxical quantum states comes about: the so-called Schrödinger cat states (see Sec. 9.3).

Cambridge University Press eBooksApr 16, 20091 citation

Schwinger’s picture of quantum mechanics

Florio M. Ciaglia, F. Di Cosmo, A. Ibort +1 more

In this paper, we will present the main features of what can be called Schwinger’s foundational approach to Quantum Mechanics. The basic ingredients of this formulation are the selective measurements, whose algebraic composition rules define a mathematical structure called groupoid, which is associated with any physical system. After the introduction of the basic axioms of a groupoid, the concepts of observables and states, statistical interpretation and evolution are derived. An example is finally introduced to support the theoretical description of this approach.

arXiv:2002.09326International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern PhysicsFeb 13, 202020 citations

Grounding the randomness of quantum measurement

Gregg S. Jaeger

Julian Schwinger provided to physics a mathematical reconstruction of quantum mechanics on the basis of the characteristics of sequences of measurements occurring at the atomic level of physical structure. The central component of this reconstruction is an algebra of symbols corresponding to quantum measurements, conceived of as discrete processes, which serve to relate experience to theory; collections of outcomes of identically circumscribed such measurements are attributed expectation values, which constitute the predictive content of the theory. The outcomes correspond to certain phase parameters appearing in the corresponding symbols, which are complex numbers, the algebra of which he finds by a process he refers to as 'induction'. Schwinger assumed these (individually unpredictable) phase parameters to take random, uniformly distributed definite values within a natural range. I have previously suggested that the 'principle of plenitude' may serve as a basis in principle for the occurrence of the definite measured values that are those members of the collections of measurement outcomes from which the corresponding observed statistics derive (Jaeger 2015Found. Phys.45, 806-819. (doi:10.1007/s10701-015-9893-6)). Here, I evaluate Schwinger's assumption in the context of recent critiques of the notion of randomness and explicitly relate the randomness of these phases with the principle of plenitude and, in this way, provide a fundamental grounding for the objective, physically irreducible probabilities, conceived of as graded possibilities, that are attributed to measurement outcomes by quantum mechanics.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesApr 19, 201616 citations

A short note about the dynamical description of the measurement process in quantum physics

J. Richert, Khalil, Tarek

The measurement process of observables in a quantum system comes out to be an unsovable problem which started in the early times of the development of the theory. In the present note we consider the measured system part of an open system interacting with the measuring device and show under which ideal conditions the measure process may ideally work. Our procedure leads to the conclusion that there is no hope that any experimental procedure will be able to lead to a clean solution of the process, except maybe in very specific cases. The reasons for this situation are deeply rooted in the fundamental properties of quantum theory.

arXiv:2312.12922Dec 20, 20230 citations