Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1602.08149 · Physical Review A

Ising formulation of associative memory models and quantum annealing recall

Siddhartha Santra, Omar Shehab, Radhakrishnan Balu

Published Dec 27, 2017• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Associative memory models, in theoretical neuro- and computer sciences, can generally store at most a linear number of memories. Recalling memories in these models can be understood as retrieval of the energy minimizing configuration of classical Ising spins, closest in Hamming distance to an imperfect input memory, where the energy landscape is determined by the set of stored memories. We present an Ising formulation for associative memory models and consider the problem of memory recall using quantum annealing. We show that allowing for input-dependent energy landscapes allows storage of up to an exponential number of memories (in terms of the number of neurons). Further, we show how quantum annealing may naturally be used for recall tasks in such input-dependent energy landscapes, although the recall time may increase with the number of stored memories. Theoretically, we obtain the radius of attractor basins $R(N)$ and the capacity $C(N)$ of such a scheme and their tradeoffs. Our calculations establish that for randomly chosen memories the capacity of our model using the Hebbian learning rule as a function of problem size can be expressed as $C(N)=O({e}^{{C}_{1}N})$, ${C}_{1}\ensuremath{\ge}0$, and succeeds on randomly chosen memory sets with a probability of $(1\ensuremath{-}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}{C}_{2}N})$, ${C}_{2}\ensuremath{\ge}0$ with ${C}_{1}+{C}_{2}={(0.5\ensuremath{-}f)}^{2}/(1\ensuremath{-}f)$, where $f=R(N)/N$, $0\ensuremath{\le}f\ensuremath{\le}0.5$, is the radius of attraction in terms of the Hamming distance of an input probe from a stored memory as a fraction of the problem size. We demonstrate the application of this scheme on a programmable quantum annealing device, the D-wave processor.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.96.062330

Related papers

High-Capacity Quantum Associative Memories

M. C. Diamantini, Carlo A. Trugenberger

We review our models of quantum associative memories that represent the “quantization” of fully coupled neural networks like the Hopfield model. The idea is to replace the classical irreversible attractor dynamics driven by an Ising model with pattern-dependent weights by the reversible rotation of an input quantum state onto an output quantum state consisting of a linear superposition with probability amplitudes peaked on the stored pattern closest to the input in Hamming distance, resulting in a high probability of measuring a memory pattern very similar to the input. The unitary operator implementing this transformation can be formulated as a sequence of one-qubit and two-qubit elementary quantum gates and is thus the exponential of an ordered quantum Ising model with sequential operations and with pattern-dependent interactions, exactly as in the classical case. Probabilistic quantum memories, that make use of postselection of the measurement result of control qubits, overcome the famed linear storage limitation of their classical counterparts because they permit to completely eliminate crosstalk and spurious memories. The number of control qubits plays the role of an inverse fictitious temperature. The accuracy of pattern retrieval can be tuned by lowering the fictitious temperature under a critical value for quantum content association while the complexity of the retrieval algorithm remains polynomial for any number of patterns polynomial in the number of qubits. These models thus solve the capacity shortage problem of classical associative memories, providing a polynomial improvement in capacity. The price to pay is the probabilistic nature of information retrieval.

arXiv:1506.01231•Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics•Jan 1, 2016•8 citations

Adiabatic quantum optimization for associative memory recall

Hadayat Seddiqi, Travis S. Humble

Hopfield networks are a variant of associative memory that recall patterns stored in the couplings of an Ising model. Stored memories are conventionally accessed as fixed points in the network dynamics that correspond to energetic minima of the spin state. We show that memories stored in a Hopfield network may also be recalled by energy minimization using adiabatic quantum optimization (AQO). Numerical simulations of the underlying quantum dynamics allow us to quantify AQO recall accuracy with respect to the number of stored memories and noise in the input key. We investigate AQO performance with respect to how memories are stored in the Ising model according to different learning rules. Our results demonstrate that AQO recall accuracy varies strongly with learning rule, a behavior that is attributed to differences in energy landscapes. Consequently, learning rules offer a family of methods for programming adiabatic quantum optimization that we expect to be useful for characterizing AQO performance.

arXiv:1407.1904•Frontiers in Physics•Dec 22, 2014•20 citations

Optimal storage capacity of quantum Hopfield neural networks

Lukas Bödeker, Eliana Fiorelli, Markus Müller

Quantum neural networks form one pillar of the emergent field of quantum machine learning. Here quantum generalizations of classical networks realizing associative memories---capable of retrieving patterns, or memories, from corrupted initial states---have been proposed. It is a challenging open problem to analyze quantum associative memories with an extensive number of patterns and to determine the maximal number of patterns the quantum networks can reliably store, i.e., their storage capacity. In this work, we propose and explore a general method for evaluating the maximal storage capacity of quantum neural network models. By generalizing what is known as Gardner's approach in the classical realm, we exploit the theory of classical spin glasses for deriving the optimal storage capacity of quantum networks with quenched pattern variables. As an example, we apply our method to an open-system quantum associative memory formed of interacting spin-1/2 particles realizing coupled artificial neurons. The system undergoes a Markovian time evolution resulting from a dissipative retrieval dynamics that competes with a coherent quantum dynamics. We map out the nonequilibrium phase diagram and study the effect of temperature and Hamiltonian dynamics on the storage capacity. Our method opens an avenue for a systematic characterization of the storage capacity of quantum associative memories.

arXiv:2210.07894•Physical Review Research•May 1, 2023•10 citations

Theoretical framework for quantum associative memories

Adrià Labay-Mora, Eliana Fiorelli, Roberta Zambrini +1 more

Abstract Associative memory (AM) refers to the ability to relate a memory with an input and targets the restoration of corrupted patterns. It has been intensively studied in classical physical systems, as in neural networks where an attractor dynamics settles on stable solutions. Several extensions to the quantum domain have been recently reported, displaying different features. In this work, we develop a comprehensive framework for a quantum AM (QAM) based on open quantum system dynamics, which allows us to compare existing models, identify the theoretical prerequisites for performing AM tasks, and extend it in different forms. The map that achieves an exponential increase in the number of stored patterns with respect to classical systems is derived. We establish the crucial role of symmetries and dissipation in the operation of QAM. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates the feasibility of addressing both quantum and classical patterns, orthogonal and non-orthogonal memories, stationary and metastable operating regimes, and measurement-based outputs. Finally, this opens up new avenues for practical applications in quantum computing and machine learning, such as quantum error correction or quantum memories.

arXiv:2408.14272•Quantum Science and Technology•Jun 5, 2025•3 citations

Quantum Associative Memory

Andreas Wichert

Quantum associative memory (QuAM) in the domain of quantum computation is a model with a capacity exponential in the number of neurons. Most quantum machine learning algorithms including quantum associative memory suffer from the input destruction problem where the classical data must be read and after the measurement the superposition collapses. Most quantum machine learning algorithms including quantum associative memory suffer from the input destruction problem. The efficient preparation of data is possible in part for spares data. However, the input destruction problem is not solved till today, and usually theoretical speed ups are analyzed by ignoring the input problem, which is the main bottleneck for data encoding. The naming of the phases is in analogy to a living organism that prepares itself during the sleep for an active day. The advantage of quantum approach is present in the active phase.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Nov 28, 2023•0 citations

Comparing Classical Hopfield Networks and a Hybrid Quantum-Classical Associative Memory Model: Recall Accuracy, Noise Robustness, and Storage Capacity

Sanjay Shivaganesh

Associative memory, the ability to reconstruct complete information from partial or noisy cues, is a defining feature of human cognition and an enduring objective in artificial intelligence. Classical neural models such as Hopfield networks have long provided insight into distributed storage and retrieval mechanisms, yet they remain constrained by limited storage capacity and susceptibility to noise. Recent developments in quantum computing have motivated investigation of hybrid quantum-classical architectures as alternative approaches to memory representation and retrieval. This study examines how effectively hybrid quantum-classical models can reproduce associative memory functions compared to Hopfield networks, with a particular focus on recall accuracy under varying noise levels, storage capacity, and computational efficiency. Through small-scale experiments using binary patterns and hybrid quantum circuits, we evaluate potential quantum advantages and practical trade-offs. The findings contribute to ongoing discourse in quantum machine learning and cognitive modeling, underscoring both the promise and current limitations of quantum-inspired associative memory systems. Our guiding research question is: To what extent can hybrid quantum–classical models replicate associative memory functions more effectively than classical neural memory models, particularly in terms of recall accuracy under noise and storage capacity?

•Sep 14, 2026•0 citations
Associative memory models, in theoretical neuro- and computer sciences, can generally store at most a linear number of memories. Recalling memories in these models can be understood as retrieval of the energy minimizing configuration of classical Ising spins, closest in Hamming distance to an imperfect input memory, where the energy landscape is determined by the set of stored memories. We present an Ising formulation for associative memory models and consider the problem of memory recall using quantum annealing. We show that allowing for input-dependent energy landscapes allows storage of up to an exponential number of memories (in terms of the number of neurons). Further, we show how quantum annealing may naturally be used for recall tasks in such input-dependent energy landscapes, although the recall time may increase with the number of stored memories. Theoretically, we obtain the radius of attractor basins R(N)R(N)R(N) and the capacity C(N)C(N)C(N) of such a scheme and their tradeoffs. Our calculations establish that for randomly chosen memories the capacity of our model using the Hebbian learning rule as a function of problem size can be expressed as C(N)=O(eC1N)C(N)=O({e}^{{C}_{1}N})C(N)=O(eC1​N), C1\ensuremath≥0{C}_{1}\ensuremath{\ge}0C1​\ensuremath≥0, and succeeds on randomly chosen memory sets with a probability of (1\ensuremath−e\ensuremath−C2N)(1\ensuremath{-}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}{C}_{2}N})(1\ensuremath−e\ensuremath−C2​N), C2\ensuremath≥0{C}_{2}\ensuremath{\ge}0C2​\ensuremath≥0 with C1+C2=(0.5\ensuremath−f)2/(1\ensuremath−f){C}_{1}+{C}_{2}={(0.5\ensuremath{-}f)}^{2}/(1\ensuremath{-}f)C1​+C2​=(0.5\ensuremath−f)2/(1\ensuremath−f), where f=R(N)/Nf=R(N)/Nf=R(N)/N, 0\ensuremath≤f\ensuremath≤0.50\ensuremath{\le}f\ensuremath{\le}0.50\ensuremath≤f\ensuremath≤0.5, is the radius of attraction in terms of the Hamming distance of an input probe from a stored memory as a fraction of the problem size. We demonstrate the application of this scheme on a programmable quantum annealing device, the D-wave processor.
We review our models of quantum associative memories that represent the “quantization” of fully coupled neural networks like the Hopfield model. The idea is to replace the classical irreversible attractor dynamics driven by an Ising model with pattern-dependent weights by the reversible rotation of an input quantum state onto an output quantum state consisting of a linear superposition with probability amplitudes peaked on the stored pattern closest to the input in Hamming distance, resulting in a high probability of measuring a memory pattern very similar to the input. The unitary operator implementing this transformation can be formulated as a sequence of one-qubit and two-qubit elementary quantum gates and is thus the exponential of an ordered quantum Ising model with sequential operations and with pattern-dependent interactions, exactly as in the classical case. Probabilistic quantum memories, that make use of postselection of the measurement result of control qubits, overcome the famed linear storage limitation of their classical counterparts because they permit to completely eliminate crosstalk and spurious memories. The number of control qubits plays the role of an inverse fictitious temperature. The accuracy of pattern retrieval can be tuned by lowering the fictitious temperature under a critical value for quantum content association while the complexity of the retrieval algorithm remains polynomial for any number of patterns polynomial in the number of qubits. These models thus solve the capacity shortage problem of classical associative memories, providing a polynomial improvement in capacity. The price to pay is the probabilistic nature of information retrieval.
Hopfield networks are a variant of associative memory that recall patterns stored in the couplings of an Ising model. Stored memories are conventionally accessed as fixed points in the network dynamics that correspond to energetic minima of the spin state. We show that memories stored in a Hopfield network may also be recalled by energy minimization using adiabatic quantum optimization (AQO). Numerical simulations of the underlying quantum dynamics allow us to quantify AQO recall accuracy with respect to the number of stored memories and noise in the input key. We investigate AQO performance with respect to how memories are stored in the Ising model according to different learning rules. Our results demonstrate that AQO recall accuracy varies strongly with learning rule, a behavior that is attributed to differences in energy landscapes. Consequently, learning rules offer a family of methods for programming adiabatic quantum optimization that we expect to be useful for characterizing AQO performance.
Quantum neural networks form one pillar of the emergent field of quantum machine learning. Here quantum generalizations of classical networks realizing associative memories---capable of retrieving patterns, or memories, from corrupted initial states---have been proposed. It is a challenging open problem to analyze quantum associative memories with an extensive number of patterns and to determine the maximal number of patterns the quantum networks can reliably store, i.e., their storage capacity. In this work, we propose and explore a general method for evaluating the maximal storage capacity of quantum neural network models. By generalizing what is known as Gardner's approach in the classical realm, we exploit the theory of classical spin glasses for deriving the optimal storage capacity of quantum networks with quenched pattern variables. As an example, we apply our method to an open-system quantum associative memory formed of interacting spin-1/2 particles realizing coupled artificial neurons. The system undergoes a Markovian time evolution resulting from a dissipative retrieval dynamics that competes with a coherent quantum dynamics. We map out the nonequilibrium phase diagram and study the effect of temperature and Hamiltonian dynamics on the storage capacity. Our method opens an avenue for a systematic characterization of the storage capacity of quantum associative memories.
Abstract Associative memory (AM) refers to the ability to relate a memory with an input and targets the restoration of corrupted patterns. It has been intensively studied in classical physical systems, as in neural networks where an attractor dynamics settles on stable solutions. Several extensions to the quantum domain have been recently reported, displaying different features. In this work, we develop a comprehensive framework for a quantum AM (QAM) based on open quantum system dynamics, which allows us to compare existing models, identify the theoretical prerequisites for performing AM tasks, and extend it in different forms. The map that achieves an exponential increase in the number of stored patterns with respect to classical systems is derived. We establish the crucial role of symmetries and dissipation in the operation of QAM. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates the feasibility of addressing both quantum and classical patterns, orthogonal and non-orthogonal memories, stationary and metastable operating regimes, and measurement-based outputs. Finally, this opens up new avenues for practical applications in quantum computing and machine learning, such as quantum error correction or quantum memories.
Quantum associative memory (QuAM) in the domain of quantum computation is a model with a capacity exponential in the number of neurons. Most quantum machine learning algorithms including quantum associative memory suffer from the input destruction problem where the classical data must be read and after the measurement the superposition collapses. Most quantum machine learning algorithms including quantum associative memory suffer from the input destruction problem. The efficient preparation of data is possible in part for spares data. However, the input destruction problem is not solved till today, and usually theoretical speed ups are analyzed by ignoring the input problem, which is the main bottleneck for data encoding. The naming of the phases is in analogy to a living organism that prepares itself during the sleep for an active day. The advantage of quantum approach is present in the active phase.
Associative memory, the ability to reconstruct complete information from partial or noisy cues, is a defining feature of human cognition and an enduring objective in artificial intelligence. Classical neural models such as Hopfield networks have long provided insight into distributed storage and retrieval mechanisms, yet they remain constrained by limited storage capacity and susceptibility to noise. Recent developments in quantum computing have motivated investigation of hybrid quantum-classical architectures as alternative approaches to memory representation and retrieval. This study examines how effectively hybrid quantum-classical models can reproduce associative memory functions compared to Hopfield networks, with a particular focus on recall accuracy under varying noise levels, storage capacity, and computational efficiency. Through small-scale experiments using binary patterns and hybrid quantum circuits, we evaluate potential quantum advantages and practical trade-offs. The findings contribute to ongoing discourse in quantum machine learning and cognitive modeling, underscoring both the promise and current limitations of quantum-inspired associative memory systems. Our guiding research question is: To what extent can hybrid quantum–classical models replicate associative memory functions more effectively than classical neural memory models, particularly in terms of recall accuracy under noise and storage capacity?