Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1602.01135

Why Super-Quantum, Non-Signaling Correlations Cannot Exist

Pierre Uzan

Published Feb 2, 2016• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The idea that non-local correlations stronger than quantum correlations between two no-signaling systems could theoretically exist is based on an incorrect statistical interpretation of the no-signaling condition. This article shows that any physically realizable no-signaling box involving local incompatible observables indeed requires to be described in a non-commutative, quantum-like language of operators -which leads to the derivation of the Tsirelson bound and then contradicts this idea.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1602.01135

Related papers

Why superquantum, no-signaling correlations cannot exist

Pierre Uzan

The idea that nonlocal correlations stronger than quantum correlations between two no-signaling systems could “theoretically” exist is based on an incorrect statistical interpretation of the no-signaling condition. This article shows that any physically realizable no-signaling “box” involving local incompatible observables indeed requires to be described in a noncommutative, quantum-like language of operators, which leads to the derivation of the Tsirelson bound and then contradicts this idea.

Physics Essays•Jun 15, 2020•1 citation

Super-Quantum Correlations: A Necessary Clarification

Pierre Uzan

This paper proposes a necessary clarification about the problematic of super-quantum correlations, whose mainstream debate relies on an incorrect, statistical interpretation of the no-signaling condition. The no-signaling condition is an informational constraint that limits the strength of non-local correlations to the Tsirelson bound.

Journal of Quantum Information Science•Jan 1, 2018•2 citations

Super-Quantum Correlations: How to Interpret the No-Signaling Condition?

Pierre Uzan

This article deals with the question of the maximal correlation degree of two intelligent machines that cannot exchange any signals. After reminding the reader of the incorrectness of the mainstream statistical interpretation of the “no-signaling” condition, its informational meaning is explored. It is emphasized that if Pawlowski et al.’s Information Causality Principle correctly expresses (and generalizes) the no-signaling condition, its application is, for now, based on a specific scenario (suggested by van Dam) and a no less specific (and simplified) relationship between mutual information and correlators. A more general informational interpretation of the no-signaling condition from which the Tsirelson bound can be derived is then formulated in terms of correlational independence.

Transactions on Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence•Jul 7, 2022•0 citations

Bounds on nonlocal correlations in the presence of signaling and their application to topological zero modes

Carmi, A., Yaroslav Herasymenko, Cohen, E. +1 more

Bell's theorem renders quantum correlations distinct from those of any local-realistic model. Although being stronger than classical correlations, quantum correlations are limited by the Tsirelson bound. This bound, however, applies for Hermitian, commutative operators corresponding to non-signaling observables in Alice's and Bob's spacelike-separated labs. As an attempt to explore theories beyond quantum mechanics and analyze the uniqueness of the latter, we examine in this work the extent of non-local correlations when relaxing these fundamental assumptions, which allows for theories with non-local signaling. We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, the Tsirelson bound in the Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario, and similarly other related bounds on non-local correlations, remain effective as long as we maintain the Hilbert space structure of the theory. Furthermore, in the case of Hermitian observables we find novel relations between non-locality, local correlations, and signaling. We demonstrate that such non-local signaling theories are naturally simulated by quantum systems of parafermionic zero modes. We numerically study the derived bounds in parafermionic systems, confirming the bounds' validity yet finding a drastic difference between correlations of 'signaling' and 'non-signaling' sets of observables. We also propose an experimental procedure for measuring the relevant correlations.

•Jan 1, 2019•7 citations

Bounds on nonlocal correlations in the presence of signaling and their application to topological zero modes

Avishy Carmi, Yaroslav Herasymenko, Eliahu Cohen +1 more

Abstract Bell’s theorem renders quantum correlations distinct from those of any local-realistic model. Although being stronger than classical correlations, quantum correlations are limited by the Tsirelson bound. This bound, however, applies for Hermitian, commutative operators corresponding to non-signaling observables in Alice’s and Bob’s spacelike-separated labs. As an attempt to explore theories beyond quantum mechanics and analyze the uniqueness of the latter, we examine in this work the extent of non-local correlations when relaxing these fundamental assumptions, which allows for theories with non-local signaling. We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, the Tsirelson bound in the Bell–Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt scenario, and similarly other related bounds on non-local correlations, remain effective as long as we maintain the Hilbert space structure of the theory. Furthermore, in the case of Hermitian observables we find novel relations between non-locality, local correlations, and signaling. We demonstrate that such non-local signaling theories are naturally simulated by quantum systems of parafermionic zero modes. We numerically study the derived bounds in parafermionic systems, confirming the bounds’ validity yet finding a drastic difference between correlations of ‘signaling’ and ‘non-signaling’ sets of observables. We also propose an experimental procedure for measuring the relevant correlations.

arXiv:1809.06749•New Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 2019•10 citations

The Debate on Super-quantum Correlations: Statistical Misinterpretation and Logical Fallacy

Pierre Uzan

This article shows that the mainstream discussion about super-quantum correlations is skewed by an incorrect interpretation of the “no-signaling” condition (NS). Referring to counter-examples, it shows that the usual probabilistic interpretation of (NS), whose link with relativistic causality is doubtful, is too weak to assert the absence of any exchange of information between the parties. A relevant informal interpretation of (NS) is nothing but a particular specification of Pawlowski’s Information Causality principle, which rules out the possibility of correlations stronger than the strongest quantum correlations.

Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International)•Mar 4, 2022•0 citations
The idea that non-local correlations stronger than quantum correlations between two no-signaling systems could theoretically exist is based on an incorrect statistical interpretation of the no-signaling condition. This article shows that any physically realizable no-signaling box involving local incompatible observables indeed requires to be described in a non-commutative, quantum-like language of operators -which leads to the derivation of the Tsirelson bound and then contradicts this idea.
The idea that nonlocal correlations stronger than quantum correlations between two no-signaling systems could “theoretically” exist is based on an incorrect statistical interpretation of the no-signaling condition. This article shows that any physically realizable no-signaling “box” involving local incompatible observables indeed requires to be described in a noncommutative, quantum-like language of operators, which leads to the derivation of the Tsirelson bound and then contradicts this idea.
This article deals with the question of the maximal correlation degree of two intelligent machines that cannot exchange any signals. After reminding the reader of the incorrectness of the mainstream statistical interpretation of the “no-signaling” condition, its informational meaning is explored. It is emphasized that if Pawlowski et al.’s Information Causality Principle correctly expresses (and generalizes) the no-signaling condition, its application is, for now, based on a specific scenario (suggested by van Dam) and a no less specific (and simplified) relationship between mutual information and correlators. A more general informational interpretation of the no-signaling condition from which the Tsirelson bound can be derived is then formulated in terms of correlational independence.
Bell's theorem renders quantum correlations distinct from those of any local-realistic model. Although being stronger than classical correlations, quantum correlations are limited by the Tsirelson bound. This bound, however, applies for Hermitian, commutative operators corresponding to non-signaling observables in Alice's and Bob's spacelike-separated labs. As an attempt to explore theories beyond quantum mechanics and analyze the uniqueness of the latter, we examine in this work the extent of non-local correlations when relaxing these fundamental assumptions, which allows for theories with non-local signaling. We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, the Tsirelson bound in the Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario, and similarly other related bounds on non-local correlations, remain effective as long as we maintain the Hilbert space structure of the theory. Furthermore, in the case of Hermitian observables we find novel relations between non-locality, local correlations, and signaling. We demonstrate that such non-local signaling theories are naturally simulated by quantum systems of parafermionic zero modes. We numerically study the derived bounds in parafermionic systems, confirming the bounds' validity yet finding a drastic difference between correlations of 'signaling' and 'non-signaling' sets of observables. We also propose an experimental procedure for measuring the relevant correlations.
Abstract Bell’s theorem renders quantum correlations distinct from those of any local-realistic model. Although being stronger than classical correlations, quantum correlations are limited by the Tsirelson bound. This bound, however, applies for Hermitian, commutative operators corresponding to non-signaling observables in Alice’s and Bob’s spacelike-separated labs. As an attempt to explore theories beyond quantum mechanics and analyze the uniqueness of the latter, we examine in this work the extent of non-local correlations when relaxing these fundamental assumptions, which allows for theories with non-local signaling. We prove that, somewhat surprisingly, the Tsirelson bound in the Bell–Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt scenario, and similarly other related bounds on non-local correlations, remain effective as long as we maintain the Hilbert space structure of the theory. Furthermore, in the case of Hermitian observables we find novel relations between non-locality, local correlations, and signaling. We demonstrate that such non-local signaling theories are naturally simulated by quantum systems of parafermionic zero modes. We numerically study the derived bounds in parafermionic systems, confirming the bounds’ validity yet finding a drastic difference between correlations of ‘signaling’ and ‘non-signaling’ sets of observables. We also propose an experimental procedure for measuring the relevant correlations.
This article shows that the mainstream discussion about super-quantum correlations is skewed by an incorrect interpretation of the “no-signaling” condition (NS). Referring to counter-examples, it shows that the usual probabilistic interpretation of (NS), whose link with relativistic causality is doubtful, is too weak to assert the absence of any exchange of information between the parties. A relevant informal interpretation of (NS) is nothing but a particular specification of Pawlowski’s Information Causality principle, which rules out the possibility of correlations stronger than the strongest quantum correlations.