arXiv:1512.02516

Aspects of work

Peter Talkner A, Peter Hänggi A

Published Dec 8, 2015• 4 citations

Abstract

Various approaches of defining and determining work performed on a quantum system are compared. Any operational definition of work, however, must allow for two facts, first, that work characterizes a process rather than an instantaneous state of a system, and, second, that quantum systems are sensitive to the interactions with a measurement apparatus. We compare different measurement scenarios on the basis of the resulting post-measurement states and the according probabilities for finding a particular work value. In particular, we analyze a recently proposed work-meter for the case of a Gaussian pointer state and compare it with the results obtained by two projective and, alternatively, two Gaussian measurements. In the limit of a strong effective measurement strength the work distribution of projective two energy measurements can be recovered. In the opposite limit the average of work becomes independent of any measurement. Yet the fluctuations about this value diverge. The performance of the work-meter is illustrated by the example of a spin in a suddenly changing magnetic field.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1512.02516

Related papers

Aspects of quantum work

Peter Talkner A, Peter Hänggi A

Various approaches of defining and determining work performed on a quantum system are compared. Any operational definition of work, however, must allow for two facts: first, that work characterizes a process rather than an instantaneous state of a system and, second, that quantum systems are sensitive to the interactions with a measurement apparatus. We compare different measurement scenarios on the basis of the resulting postmeasurement states and the according probabilities for finding a particular work value. In particular, we analyze a recently proposed work meter for the case of a Gaussian pointer state and compare it with the results obtained by two projective and, alternatively, two Gaussian measurements. In the limit of a strong effective measurement strength the work distribution of projective two energy measurements can be recovered. In the opposite limit the average of work becomes independent of any measurement. Yet the fluctuations about this value diverge. The performance of the work meter is illustrated by the example of a spin in a suddenly changing magnetic field.

Physical review. EFeb 23, 2016195 citations

Conditional work statistics of quantum measurements

Mohammady, Mohammad, Alessandro Romito

In this paper we introduce a definition for conditional energy changes due to general quantum measurements, as the change in the conditional energy evaluated before, and after, the measurement process. By imposing minimal physical requirements on these conditional energies, we show that the most general expression for the conditional energy after the measurement is simply the expected value of the Hamiltonian given the post-measurement state. Conversely, the conditional energy before the measurement process is shown to be given by the real component of the weak value of the Hamiltonian. Our definition generalises well-known notions of distributions of internal energy change, such as that given by stochastic thermodynamics. By determining the conditional energy change of both system and measurement apparatus, we obtain the full conditional work statistics of quantum measurements, and show that this vanishes for all measurement outcomes if the measurement process conserves the total energy. Additionally, by incorporating the measurement process within a cyclic heat engine, we quantify the non-recoverable work due to measurements. This is shown to always be non-negative, thus satisfying the second law, and will be independent of the apparatus specifics for two classes of projective measurements.

Aug 19, 201921 citations

Conditional work statistics of quantum measurements

Majid Mohammady, Alessandro Romito

arXiv:1809.09010QuantumAug 19, 201918 citations

Quantum fluctuation theorems and power measurements

B. Prasanna Venkatesh, Gentaro Watanabe, Peter Talkner

Work in the paradigm of the quantum fluctuation theorems of Crooks and Jarzynski is determined by projective measurements of energy at the beginning and end of the force protocol. In analogy to classical systems, we consider an alternative definition of work given by the integral of the supplied power determined by integrating up the results of repeated measurements of the instantaneous power during the force protocol. We observe that such a definition of work, in spite of taking account of the process dependence, has different possible values and statistics from the work determined by the conventional two energy measurement approach (TEMA). In the limit of many projective measurements of power, the system’s dynamics is frozen in the power measurement basis due to the quantum Zeno effect leading to statistics only trivially dependent on the force protocol. In general the Jarzynski relation is not satisfied except for the case when the instantaneous power operator commutes with the total Hamiltonian at all times. We also consider properties of the joint statistics of power-based definition of work and TEMA work in protocols where both values are determined. This allows us to quantify their correlations. Relaxing the projective measurement condition, weak continuous measurements of power are considered within the stochastic master equation formalism. Even in this scenario the power-based work statistics is in general not able to reproduce qualitative features of the TEMA work statistics.

arXiv:1503.03228New Journal of PhysicsAug 3, 201531 citations

Jarzynski equation for a simple quantum system: Comparing two definitions of work

Andreas Engel, Roman Nolte

The validity of the Jarzynski equation for a very simple, exactly solvable quantum system is analyzed. The implications of two different definitions of work proposed in the literature are investigated. The first one derives from measurements of the system energy at the beginning and at the end of the process under consideration making the work a classical stochastic variable with transition probabilities derived from quantum-mechanics. In the second definition an operator of work is introduced and the average in the Jarzynski equation is a quantum expectation value. For the first definition a general quantum-mechanical version of the Jarzynski equation is known to hold. For the second one the Jarzynski equation fails to yield the free energy difference at low temperature.

arXiv:cond-mat/0612527Europhysics Letters (EPL)Jun 6, 200763 citations

Energetics of quantum measurements

Léa Bresque

Quantum measurements are known to affect the state of the measured system. Such a measurement backaction is due to the interaction of the quantum system with the measuring device. When the measured observable and the system's Hamiltonian do not commute, the backaction can lead to a mean energy change of the system. This energy change has been dubbed "quantum heat" and, in association with feedback processes and/or the interaction with thermal bath(s), proves to be a genuinely quantum resource to fuel new kinds quantum engines. We propose such a measurement powered engine exploiting the non-commutativity of local and non-local operations on a bipartite quantum system.We then investigate the origin of the quantum heat. Even if one cannot model the full dynamics of a measurement due to the collapse of the wavefunction, the energetic aspects can still be investigated by modeling the so-called pre-measurement. During this step, the system interacts and gets correlated with a quantum system which can be viewed as a small part of the measuring apparatus and called the quantum meter. Ideally, at the end of this process, the system's reduced state will be fully decohered in the measurement basis, thus corresponding to the averaged collapsed output states given by the measurement postulate. We find that the quantum heat received by the measured system corresponds to the energy necessary to turn off the coupling between the meter and the system. Using generalized definitions of heat and work, we moreover characterize the work and heat nature of these energy exchanges.Tracing the source of this energy one step further, we propose an autonomous description of a measurement. This is done by considering a flying qubit measured by the quantum field of the cavity it crosses. The interaction being position dependent, the kinetic degree of freedom is providing the required energy to switch on and off the interaction between the qubit and the meter field. A full quantum treatment allows us to evaluate the impact of the finite spatial and momentum extension of the qubit wavepacket. Since the kinetic degree of freedom can be affected by the interaction, it does not simply generate a time dependent Hamiltonian for the other degrees of freedom. We find the correction to this ideal dynamic and analyse its consequences on the nature of the energy fluxes. %spread/extension/broadnessTaking the opposite point of view, we compare the measurement cost of a qubit by a field propagating in a waveguide, depending on the initial state of the field. In the context of a circuit quantum electrodynamics setup, we find that thermal and coherent fields induce the same backaction on the qubit given the same energy constraints.The results presented and discussed in this thesis contribute to unravel the mysterious effects and mechanisms due to quantum measurements. Notably, they give an outlook to further analyse quantum measurement-based engines and to understand the energetic resource that measurements cost and constitute at the same time.

Oct 20, 20220 citations