Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1510.07825 · Lecture notes in computer science

Span-Program-Based Quantum Algorithms for Graph Bipartiteness and Connectivity

Agnis Āriņš

Published Jan 1, 2016• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-29817-7_4

Related papers

Span programs and optimal quantum query algorithms

Ben W. Reichardt

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2010•0 citations

Span Programs and Quantum Algorithms for st-Connectivity and Claw Detection

Aleksandrs Belovs, Ben W. Reichardt

arXiv:1203.2603•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2012•47 citations

Studies of properties of bipartite graphs with quantum programming

Kh. P. Gnatenko

arXiv:2507.16653•Physics Letters A•Nov 24, 2025•0 citations

Span-Program-Based Quantum Algorithm for Evaluating Unbalanced Formulas

Ben W. Reichardt

arXiv:0907.1622•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2014•20 citations

A dynamic programming approach for distributing quantum circuits by bipartite graphs

Zohreh Davarzani, Mariam Zomorodi Moghadam, Mahboobeh Houshmand +1 more

arXiv:2005.01052•Quantum Information Processing•Sep 25, 2020•53 citations

Quantum Algorithms for Connectivity and Related Problems

Michael Jarret, Stacey Jeffery, Shelby Kimmel +1 more

An important family of span programs, st-connectivity span programs, have been used to design quantum algorithms in various contexts, including a number of graph problems and formula evaluation problems. The complexity of the resulting algorithms depends on the largest positive witness size of any 1-input, and the largest negative witness size of any 0-input. Belovs and Reichardt first showed that the positive witness size is exactly characterized by the effective resistance of the input graph, but only rough upper bounds were known previously on the negative witness size. We show that the negative witness size in an st-connectivity span program is exactly characterized by the capacitance of the input graph. This gives a tight analysis for algorithms based on st-connectivity span programs on any set of inputs. We use this analysis to give a new quantum algorithm for estimating the capacitance of a graph. We also describe a new quantum algorithm for deciding if a graph is connected, which improves the previous best quantum algorithm for this problem if we're promised that either the graph has at least kappa>1 components, or the graph is connected and has small average resistance, which is upper bounded by the diameter. We also give an alternative algorithm for deciding if a graph is connected that can be better than our first algorithm when the maximum degree is small. Finally, using ideas from our second connectivity algorithm, we give an algorithm for estimating the algebraic connectivity of a graph, the second largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian.

arXiv:1804.10591•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2018•4 citations
An important family of span programs, st-connectivity span programs, have been used to design quantum algorithms in various contexts, including a number of graph problems and formula evaluation problems. The complexity of the resulting algorithms depends on the largest positive witness size of any 1-input, and the largest negative witness size of any 0-input. Belovs and Reichardt first showed that the positive witness size is exactly characterized by the effective resistance of the input graph, but only rough upper bounds were known previously on the negative witness size. We show that the negative witness size in an st-connectivity span program is exactly characterized by the capacitance of the input graph. This gives a tight analysis for algorithms based on st-connectivity span programs on any set of inputs. We use this analysis to give a new quantum algorithm for estimating the capacitance of a graph. We also describe a new quantum algorithm for deciding if a graph is connected, which improves the previous best quantum algorithm for this problem if we're promised that either the graph has at least kappa>1 components, or the graph is connected and has small average resistance, which is upper bounded by the diameter. We also give an alternative algorithm for deciding if a graph is connected that can be better than our first algorithm when the maximum degree is small. Finally, using ideas from our second connectivity algorithm, we give an algorithm for estimating the algebraic connectivity of a graph, the second largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian.