Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1510.04805 · Physica Scripta

How many principles does it take to change a light bulb…into a laser?

Howard M. Wiseman

Published Feb 3, 2016• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Quantum optics did not, and could not, flourish without the laser. The present paper is not about the principles of laser construction, still less a history of how the laser was invented. Rather, it addresses the question: what are the fundamental features that distinguish laser light from thermal light? The obvious answer, ‘laser light is coherent’, is, I argue, so vague that it must be put aside at the start, albeit to revisit later. A more specific, quantum theoretic, version, ‘laser light is in a coherent state’, is simply wrong in this context: both laser light and thermal light can equally well be described by coherent states, with amplitudes that vary stochastically in space. Instead, my answer to the titular question is that four principles are needed: high directionality, monochromaticity, high brightness, and stable intensity. Combining the first three of these principles suffices to show, in a quantitative way—involving, indeed, very large dimensionless quantities (up to )—that a laser must be constructed very differently from a light bulb. This quantitative analysis is quite simple, and is easily relatable to ‘coherence’, yet is not to be found in any textbooks on quantum optics to my knowledge. The fourth principle is the most subtle and, perhaps surprisingly, is the only one related to coherent states in the quantum optics sense: it implies that the description in terms of coherent states is the only simple description of a laser beam. Interestingly, this leads to the (not, as it turns out, entirely new) prediction that narrowly filtered laser beams are indistinguishable from similarly filtered thermal beams. I hope that other educators find this material useful; it may contain surprises even for researchers who have been in the field longer than I have.

DOI
10.1088/0031-8949/91/3/033001

Related papers

Comment on "How many principles does it take to change a light bulb ... into a laser?" by Howard M. Wiseman, Physica Scripta 91 (3), 033001 (2016)

Wolfgang Elsäßer

In this comment on "How many principles does it take to change a light bulb ... into a laser?" by Howard M. Wiseman, Physica Scripta 91 (3), 033001 (2016) I am analyzing this extremely nicely formulated question in the framework of the Hanbury-Brown & Twiss experiment thus celebrating also its 60th anniversary. I am giving a straightforward, concise and unique answer on this question, emphasizing that the intensity correlations or the photon statistics make the difference between a light bulb and a laser.

arXiv:1607.03647•Jul 13, 2016•2 citations

Physics and applications: Quantum optics

Azeddine Messikh, Youssouf Hamidou Issoufa

Quantum optics was born in the first years of the 20th century. The first papers leading to further ideas of quanta of light were presented by Max Planck and Albert Einstein. Their pioneering papers laid the foundations for the theory of quantum optics. However, one should remember that for the birth of the formal theory of quantisation of light, the development of quantum mechanics was necessary. Interestingly, the word ’photon’ appeared for the first time in a paper by a Gilbert Lewis, a chemist, in 1926 and was later used by P.A.M. Dirac, a physicist, the next year. The modern sense of the term quantum optics was established in 1956 when Hanbury Brown and Twiss built the intensity interferometr and performed their famous experiment in which correlations between two light beams were measured. Although the results of their experiment could be explained on the basis of the classical theory of light, with some quantumcomponent to the process of photodetection, their result is commonly accepted as the beginning of the modern quantum optics era. The next milestone in the development of quantum optics was the invention of laser in 1960. The physical properties of the light generated by lasers were considerably different from those characterising the light generated by classical thermal sources. This fact was a great impulse leading to further development of quantum optics’ ideas. The first of them were presented in the fundamental papers written by Glauber, describing new states of light quantum coherent states.

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Reply to Elsässer's Comment on "How many principles does it take to change a light bulb ... into a laser?"

Howard M. Wiseman

In his Comment, Elsässer claims that the answer to my titular question is one, not four as I have it. He goes on to give the singular principle that supposedly captures the difference between a light-bulb and a laser: $g^{(2)}(τ=0)=1$. His claim is unconsidered and wrong, his proposed principle is impossible to apply and, when corrected, redundant (it then becomes one of the four I list already), his arguments are manifestly misdirected. My paper stands as is.

arXiv:1608.00176•Jul 31, 2016•0 citations

Quantum co-operation and superfluids

Tony Hey, Patrick Walters

… there are certain situations in which the peculiarities of quantum mechanics can come out in a special way on a large scale. Richard Feynman Laser light Nowadays, everyone has heard of lasers, and laser light displays are a frequent ingredient of modern rock concerts. Laser light has many applications, ranging from astronomy to hydrogen fusion. What is the special feature of laser light that makes it so useful? The answer to this question involves a property of wave motion known as ‘coherence’, with light photons acting together in a special form of quantum mechanical co-operation. This type of quantum co-operation will turn out to be vital for an understanding of the peculiar behaviour of quantum ‘superfluids’. To understand the special nature of laser light, however, we must first explain what is meant by coherence. Consider the simple wave motion shown in Fig. 7.1. We see that the pattern repeats itself after one wavelength and the frequency of the wave corresponds to the number of wavelengths sent out per second. If this wave is a wave on a string, each point on the string just moves up and down with a certain amplitude: the maximum distance the point can move out to before it starts to come back. Up to now, this is really all we have needed to know about waves. Now consider two waves of the same wavelength but started at slightly different times, as shown in Fig. 7.2.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Oct 23, 2003•2 citations

Coherent control in bulk and nanostructure semiconductors

John E. Sipe, Henry M. van Driel

Laser light has been used as a probe of atoms, molecules, and solids since the invention of the laser. The use of laser light in a more active role, to modify and process surfaces, and initiate chemical reactions, followed shortly thereafter. But usually it is the intensity and the directionality of the laser light that is employed, not necessarily its coherence, and not particularly the fact that it has a well-defined phase. 'Coherence control' can be broadly understood as the set of processes whereby light modifies matter in a way that is critically dependent on the incident light beams possessing well-defined phases. While in a laser matter is manipulated to produce light of the desired properties, in coherent control light is manipulated -- in particular, its phase and intensity is adjusted -- to produce a material response of the desired type. Of the various coherent control processes that are currently being investigated, some involve a transition in the material medium from an initial state to a final state by two or more possible processes. With each of these is associated a quantum mechanical amplitude, and hence the probability for the transition can show interference effects between the two amplitudes, just as in the familiar two-slit interference experiment the probability for the electron to be observed at a given position involves a probability that is the square of the sum of two amplitudes. In quantum interference control (QUIC), the relative phase of the two amplitudes is adjusted by adjusting the relative phase of two polarizations of a single beam, or the relative phase of two beams at different frequencies. It is this particular type of coherent control that is of interest in this communication.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Apr 23, 1998•0 citations

Ruling the Waves

Ian S. Osborne, Robert Coontz

T hink about coherent systems, and odds are that the first example to cross your mind will be a laser: a device that emits monochromatic light homogenized so that the photons propagate with their phase in lockstep. The well-defined wavefront of the laser beam makes it possible to focus the light to spot sizes on the order of the wavelength of the light without the aberrations usually observed with the random wavefront of incoherent light. The well-defined phase also provides a medium capable of storing and carrying information more efficiently than the intensity-modulated signals typical of incoherent sources. These useful properties of coherence have made lasers almost ubiquitous in science and technology, and that “almost” is shrinking by the day. In general, coherence comes about when individual components of a system act in unison, either in phase or with a fixed phase difference between the components. More accurately, the system can be described as a local oscillator whose wavefunction contains phase and amplitude terms that define how the system evolves in space and time. The collection of articles in this special issue describes the recent progress and developments of coherence in optical, atomic, and semiconductor systems, and how manipulating that coherence may lead to useful applications and to experimental systems for studying the elements of quantum mechanics. Since the first demonstration of the laser in 1960, progress in improving the extent of the spatial and temporal coherence of laser light has been steady. Psaltis (p. [1359][1]) reviews developments in optical coherence and highlights examples of the key role coherence has played in applications in imaging, communication, and information processing and storage. Just as lasers revolutionized the field of optics, many researchers have high expectations that other coherent systems will provide similar advances in their respective fields. Exploiting the fundamental tenet of quantum mechanics whereby particles have the properties of waves, Kasevich (p. [1363][2]) reviews coherence effects in collections of cold atoms and describes how the shorter wavelengths associated with atoms and the recent accessibility of bright coherent atom sources may lead to precision measurements beyond anything currently available to the optical regime. For integration and potential applications, the ideal system would be based in semiconductors. Snoke (p. [1368][3]) describes recent work toward the formation of coherent semiconductor systems. With coherence in the atomic and optical systems generally comprising macroscopic systems, Mabuchi and Doherty (p. [1372][4]) look at coherence effects at the quantum limit, probing the interactions between single atoms and single photons confined to high-quality cavities. In addition to providing invaluable information on the limits of quantum mechanics, such effects might also shed new light on information science in the quantum regime. The section opens with a pair of News features by staff writers Charles Seife and Robert Service. Seife presents a smattering of common applications that scientists and engineers have found for coherent waves, whether in light, sound, or subatomic particles. Service describes efforts to create new coherent sources of the type of radiation known as “hard” x-rays—a long-sought range of high frequencies with enormous potential for scientific research, technology, and medicine. [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078823 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1079430 [3]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078082 [4]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078446

Science•Nov 14, 2002•38 citations
Abstract Quantum optics did not, and could not, flourish without the laser. The present paper is not about the principles of laser construction, still less a history of how the laser was invented. Rather, it addresses the question: what are the fundamental features that distinguish laser light from thermal light? The obvious answer, ‘laser light is coherent’, is, I argue, so vague that it must be put aside at the start, albeit to revisit later. A more specific, quantum theoretic, version, ‘laser light is in a coherent state’, is simply wrong in this context: both laser light and thermal light can equally well be described by coherent states, with amplitudes that vary stochastically in space. Instead, my answer to the titular question is that four principles are needed: high directionality, monochromaticity, high brightness, and stable intensity. Combining the first three of these principles suffices to show, in a quantitative way—involving, indeed, very large dimensionless quantities (up to )—that a laser must be constructed very differently from a light bulb. This quantitative analysis is quite simple, and is easily relatable to ‘coherence’, yet is not to be found in any textbooks on quantum optics to my knowledge. The fourth principle is the most subtle and, perhaps surprisingly, is the only one related to coherent states in the quantum optics sense: it implies that the description in terms of coherent states is the only simple description of a laser beam. Interestingly, this leads to the (not, as it turns out, entirely new) prediction that narrowly filtered laser beams are indistinguishable from similarly filtered thermal beams. I hope that other educators find this material useful; it may contain surprises even for researchers who have been in the field longer than I have.
In this comment on "How many principles does it take to change a light bulb ... into a laser?" by Howard M. Wiseman, Physica Scripta 91 (3), 033001 (2016) I am analyzing this extremely nicely formulated question in the framework of the Hanbury-Brown & Twiss experiment thus celebrating also its 60th anniversary. I am giving a straightforward, concise and unique answer on this question, emphasizing that the intensity correlations or the photon statistics make the difference between a light bulb and a laser.
Quantum optics was born in the first years of the 20th century. The first papers leading to further ideas of quanta of light were presented by Max Planck and Albert Einstein. Their pioneering papers laid the foundations for the theory of quantum optics. However, one should remember that for the birth of the formal theory of quantisation of light, the development of quantum mechanics was necessary. Interestingly, the word ’photon’ appeared for the first time in a paper by a Gilbert Lewis, a chemist, in 1926 and was later used by P.A.M. Dirac, a physicist, the next year. The modern sense of the term quantum optics was established in 1956 when Hanbury Brown and Twiss built the intensity interferometr and performed their famous experiment in which correlations between two light beams were measured. Although the results of their experiment could be explained on the basis of the classical theory of light, with some quantumcomponent to the process of photodetection, their result is commonly accepted as the beginning of the modern quantum optics era. The next milestone in the development of quantum optics was the invention of laser in 1960. The physical properties of the light generated by lasers were considerably different from those characterising the light generated by classical thermal sources. This fact was a great impulse leading to further development of quantum optics’ ideas. The first of them were presented in the fundamental papers written by Glauber, describing new states of light quantum coherent states.
In his Comment, Elsässer claims that the answer to my titular question is one, not four as I have it. He goes on to give the singular principle that supposedly captures the difference between a light-bulb and a laser: g(2)(τ=0)=1g^{(2)}(τ=0)=1g(2)(τ=0)=1. His claim is unconsidered and wrong, his proposed principle is impossible to apply and, when corrected, redundant (it then becomes one of the four I list already), his arguments are manifestly misdirected. My paper stands as is.
… there are certain situations in which the peculiarities of quantum mechanics can come out in a special way on a large scale. Richard Feynman Laser light Nowadays, everyone has heard of lasers, and laser light displays are a frequent ingredient of modern rock concerts. Laser light has many applications, ranging from astronomy to hydrogen fusion. What is the special feature of laser light that makes it so useful? The answer to this question involves a property of wave motion known as ‘coherence’, with light photons acting together in a special form of quantum mechanical co-operation. This type of quantum co-operation will turn out to be vital for an understanding of the peculiar behaviour of quantum ‘superfluids’. To understand the special nature of laser light, however, we must first explain what is meant by coherence. Consider the simple wave motion shown in Fig. 7.1. We see that the pattern repeats itself after one wavelength and the frequency of the wave corresponds to the number of wavelengths sent out per second. If this wave is a wave on a string, each point on the string just moves up and down with a certain amplitude: the maximum distance the point can move out to before it starts to come back. Up to now, this is really all we have needed to know about waves. Now consider two waves of the same wavelength but started at slightly different times, as shown in Fig. 7.2.
Laser light has been used as a probe of atoms, molecules, and solids since the invention of the laser. The use of laser light in a more active role, to modify and process surfaces, and initiate chemical reactions, followed shortly thereafter. But usually it is the intensity and the directionality of the laser light that is employed, not necessarily its coherence, and not particularly the fact that it has a well-defined phase. 'Coherence control' can be broadly understood as the set of processes whereby light modifies matter in a way that is critically dependent on the incident light beams possessing well-defined phases. While in a laser matter is manipulated to produce light of the desired properties, in coherent control light is manipulated -- in particular, its phase and intensity is adjusted -- to produce a material response of the desired type. Of the various coherent control processes that are currently being investigated, some involve a transition in the material medium from an initial state to a final state by two or more possible processes. With each of these is associated a quantum mechanical amplitude, and hence the probability for the transition can show interference effects between the two amplitudes, just as in the familiar two-slit interference experiment the probability for the electron to be observed at a given position involves a probability that is the square of the sum of two amplitudes. In quantum interference control (QUIC), the relative phase of the two amplitudes is adjusted by adjusting the relative phase of two polarizations of a single beam, or the relative phase of two beams at different frequencies. It is this particular type of coherent control that is of interest in this communication.
T hink about coherent systems, and odds are that the first example to cross your mind will be a laser: a device that emits monochromatic light homogenized so that the photons propagate with their phase in lockstep. The well-defined wavefront of the laser beam makes it possible to focus the light to spot sizes on the order of the wavelength of the light without the aberrations usually observed with the random wavefront of incoherent light. The well-defined phase also provides a medium capable of storing and carrying information more efficiently than the intensity-modulated signals typical of incoherent sources. These useful properties of coherence have made lasers almost ubiquitous in science and technology, and that “almost” is shrinking by the day. In general, coherence comes about when individual components of a system act in unison, either in phase or with a fixed phase difference between the components. More accurately, the system can be described as a local oscillator whose wavefunction contains phase and amplitude terms that define how the system evolves in space and time. The collection of articles in this special issue describes the recent progress and developments of coherence in optical, atomic, and semiconductor systems, and how manipulating that coherence may lead to useful applications and to experimental systems for studying the elements of quantum mechanics. Since the first demonstration of the laser in 1960, progress in improving the extent of the spatial and temporal coherence of laser light has been steady. Psaltis (p. [1359][1]) reviews developments in optical coherence and highlights examples of the key role coherence has played in applications in imaging, communication, and information processing and storage. Just as lasers revolutionized the field of optics, many researchers have high expectations that other coherent systems will provide similar advances in their respective fields. Exploiting the fundamental tenet of quantum mechanics whereby particles have the properties of waves, Kasevich (p. [1363][2]) reviews coherence effects in collections of cold atoms and describes how the shorter wavelengths associated with atoms and the recent accessibility of bright coherent atom sources may lead to precision measurements beyond anything currently available to the optical regime. For integration and potential applications, the ideal system would be based in semiconductors. Snoke (p. [1368][3]) describes recent work toward the formation of coherent semiconductor systems. With coherence in the atomic and optical systems generally comprising macroscopic systems, Mabuchi and Doherty (p. [1372][4]) look at coherence effects at the quantum limit, probing the interactions between single atoms and single photons confined to high-quality cavities. In addition to providing invaluable information on the limits of quantum mechanics, such effects might also shed new light on information science in the quantum regime. The section opens with a pair of News features by staff writers Charles Seife and Robert Service. Seife presents a smattering of common applications that scientists and engineers have found for coherent waves, whether in light, sound, or subatomic particles. Service describes efforts to create new coherent sources of the type of radiation known as “hard” x-rays—a long-sought range of high frequencies with enormous potential for scientific research, technology, and medicine. [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078823 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1079430 [3]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078082 [4]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078446