Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1508.07614 · Physical Review A

Comment on “One-state vector formalism for the evolution of a quantum state through nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers”

Lev Vaidman A

Published Mar 31, 2016• 24 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Bartkiewicz et al. [Phys. Rev. A 91, 012103 (2015)] provided an alternative analysis of an experiment performed by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)] which presented surprising evidence regarding the past of photons passing through an interferometer. They argued that the quantity used by Danan et al. is not a suitable which-path witness, and proposed an alternative. The weaknesses of the analysis are discussed, and it is argued that the alternative, analyzed properly, provides no new predictions.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.93.036103

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘One-state vector formalism for the evolution of a quantum state through nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers’ ”

Karol Bartkiewicz, Antonín Černoch, Dalibor Javůrek +3 more

In our recent paper [Phys. Rev. A 91, 012103 (2015)] we have provided an alternative description of a highly debated experiment by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)]. The former paper has been recently commented on by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 93, 036103 (2016)]. In this Reply we demonstrate that the comments are either invalid or, where valid, do not affect the results of our original paper.

Physical Review A•Mar 31, 2016•7 citations

One-state vector formalism for the evolution of a quantum state through nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers

Karol Bartkiewicz, Antonín Černoch, Dalibor Javůrek +3 more

Linear-optical interferometers play a key role in designing circuits for quantum information processing and quantum communications. Even though nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers appear easy to describe, there are occasions when they provide unintuitive results. This paper explains the results of a highly discussed experiment performed by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013).] using a standard approach. We provide a simple and intuitive one-state vector formalism capable of interpreting their experiment. Additionally, we cross-checked our model with a classical-physics-based approach and found that both models are in complete agreement. We argue that the quantity used in the mentioned experiment is not a suitable which-path witness, producing seemingly contraintuitive results. To circumvent this issue, we establish a more reliable which-path witness and show that it yields well-expected outcomes of the experiment.

arXiv:1410.8454•Physical Review A•Jan 12, 2015•39 citations

Comment on “Which-way information in a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer”

Lev Vaidman A

Poto\ifmmode \check{c}\else \v{c}\fi{}ek and Ferenczi [Phys. Rev. A 92, 023829 (2015)] provided an analysis of the experimental evidence obtained by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)] for the surprising behavior of photons passing through an interferometer, in particular, motion on disconnected paths. Poto\ifmmode \check{c}\else \v{c}\fi{}ek and Ferenczi reproduced the results of the experiment, but when analyzing its modification, they claimed that the reasoning of Danan et al., which led to disconnected paths, is erroneous. It is argued here that the criticism of Poto\ifmmode \check{c}\else \v{c}\fi{}ek and Ferenczi is unfounded.

arXiv:1509.02388•Physical Review A•Jan 26, 2016•27 citations

An Improved Experiment to Determine the ‘Past of a Particle’ in the Nested Mach–Zehnder Interferometer

Alon Ben-Israel, Lukas Knips, Jan Dziewior +4 more

We argue that the modification proposed by Li et al. [Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 (2015) 050303] to the experiment of Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 240402] does not test the past of the photon as characterized by local weak traces. Instead of answering the questions: (i) were the photons in A? (ii) were the photons in B? and (iii) were the photons in C? the proposed experiment measures a degenerate operator answering the questions: (i) were the photons in A? and (ii) were the photons in B and C together? A negative answer to the last question does not tell us if photons were present in B or C. On the other hand, a simple variation of the proposal by Li et al. does provide conceptually better evidence for the past of the pre- and post-selected photon, but this evidence will be in agreement with the results of Danan et al.

arXiv:1701.04109•Chinese Physics Letters•Feb 1, 2017•19 citations

Which-way information in a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer

Václav Potoček, Gergely Ferenczi

Recently, A. Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)] performed a much-discussed experiment in which which-way information was obtained from the light in a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer by weak measurement. The presented analysis using the two-state vector formalism drew the conclusions that the photons followed disconnected paths. We analyze this experiment using standard quantum optical methods and arrive at analytical expressions that match the experimental results without the need for such disconnected photon paths. We also propose a simple amendment to the experiment capable of displaying new phenomena, highlighting the advantages of our description.

Physical Review A•Aug 17, 2015•41 citations

Comment on “Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer”

Lev Vaidman A

Griffiths [Phys. Rev. A 94, 032115 (2016)] analyzed, in the framework of a consistent histories interpretation, the controversy regarding the approach to the past of a quantum particle introduced by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)]. I argue that Griffith's criticism of my approach using an analysis of experiments with weak probes is unfounded.

Physical Review A•Jun 28, 2017•36 citations
Bartkiewicz et al. [Phys. Rev. A 91, 012103 (2015)] provided an alternative analysis of an experiment performed by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)] which presented surprising evidence regarding the past of photons passing through an interferometer. They argued that the quantity used by Danan et al. is not a suitable which-path witness, and proposed an alternative. The weaknesses of the analysis are discussed, and it is argued that the alternative, analyzed properly, provides no new predictions.
Linear-optical interferometers play a key role in designing circuits for quantum information processing and quantum communications. Even though nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers appear easy to describe, there are occasions when they provide unintuitive results. This paper explains the results of a highly discussed experiment performed by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013).] using a standard approach. We provide a simple and intuitive one-state vector formalism capable of interpreting their experiment. Additionally, we cross-checked our model with a classical-physics-based approach and found that both models are in complete agreement. We argue that the quantity used in the mentioned experiment is not a suitable which-path witness, producing seemingly contraintuitive results. To circumvent this issue, we establish a more reliable which-path witness and show that it yields well-expected outcomes of the experiment.
Poto\ifmmode \check{c}\else \v{c}\fi{}ek and Ferenczi [Phys. Rev. A 92, 023829 (2015)] provided an analysis of the experimental evidence obtained by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)] for the surprising behavior of photons passing through an interferometer, in particular, motion on disconnected paths. Poto\ifmmode \check{c}\else \v{c}\fi{}ek and Ferenczi reproduced the results of the experiment, but when analyzing its modification, they claimed that the reasoning of Danan et al., which led to disconnected paths, is erroneous. It is argued here that the criticism of Poto\ifmmode \check{c}\else \v{c}\fi{}ek and Ferenczi is unfounded.
We argue that the modification proposed by Li et al. [Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 (2015) 050303] to the experiment of Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 240402] does not test the past of the photon as characterized by local weak traces. Instead of answering the questions: (i) were the photons in A? (ii) were the photons in B? and (iii) were the photons in C? the proposed experiment measures a degenerate operator answering the questions: (i) were the photons in A? and (ii) were the photons in B and C together? A negative answer to the last question does not tell us if photons were present in B or C. On the other hand, a simple variation of the proposal by Li et al. does provide conceptually better evidence for the past of the pre- and post-selected photon, but this evidence will be in agreement with the results of Danan et al.
Recently, A. Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)] performed a much-discussed experiment in which which-way information was obtained from the light in a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer by weak measurement. The presented analysis using the two-state vector formalism drew the conclusions that the photons followed disconnected paths. We analyze this experiment using standard quantum optical methods and arrive at analytical expressions that match the experimental results without the need for such disconnected photon paths. We also propose a simple amendment to the experiment capable of displaying new phenomena, highlighting the advantages of our description.