Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1508.02779 · The European Physical Journal D

On the fundamental role of dynamics in quantum physics

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Published May 1, 2016• 19 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1140/epjd/e2016-70086-8

Related papers

QUANTUM DYNAMICS IN PHASE SPACE

Vladimir S. Filinov

International Conference on Progress in Nonequilibrium Green's Functions (PNGF)•May 1, 2000•0 citations

The role of quantum measurements in physical processes and protocols

Benjamin Cruikshank, Kurt Jacobs

Abstract In this mainly pedagogical article, we discuss under what circumstances measurements play a special role in quantum processes. In particular, we discuss the following facts that appear to be a common area of confusion. (i) From a fundamental point of view, measurements play no special role whatsoever: all dynamics that can be generated by measurements can be generated by unitary processes (for which post-selection is no exception). (ii) From a purely physical point of view, measurements are not ‘outside’ of quantum mechanics. (iii) The only difference between the abilities of measurement-based protocols and unitary circuits for quantum computing comes from practical (technology dependent) constraints. We emphasise the importance of distinguishing between differences that are (i) fundamental but without physical import; (ii) fundamental and possess physical import; and (iii) are not fundamental but have practical import. We also emphasise the importance of separating theoretical and experimental elements of measurement, primarily projection and amplification , which are physically very different. Note that since we are concerned with facts regarding physical processes, this article has little if anything to do with interpretations of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1707.04241•Quantum Science and Technology•Jul 7, 2017•5 citations

The dynamic foundation of quantum mechanics

V. J. Lee

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•May 19, 2006•0 citations

Algorithmic Container for Physics

Yu. I. Ozhigov, Al. Y. Ozhigov, Guillaume Adenier +4 more

We represent some arguments for the possibility to embed quantum physics to the special algorithmic container which permits to extend its methods to the dynamics of thousands of particles. The key role is played by the absolute decoherence model in which the limitation of classical computational resources in the simulation is treated as the fundamental source of decoherence. We show how quantum dynamics could be visualized by means of the method of collective behavior.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•4 citations

Reduced dynamics in quantum mechanics

L. Lanz, Luigi A. Lugiato, G. Ramella

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•0 citations

Quantum phase analysis with quantum trajectories: A step towards the creation of a Bohmian thinking

Ángel S. Sanz, Salvador Miret-Artés

We introduce a pedagogical discussion on Bohmian mechanics and its physical implications in connection with the important role played by the quantum phase in the dynamics of quantum processes. In particular, we focus on phenomena such as quantum coherence, diffraction, and interference, due to their historical relevance in the development of the quantum theory and their key role in a myriad of fundamental and applied problems of current interest.

arXiv:1104.1296•American Journal of Physics•May 17, 2012•40 citations
Abstract In this mainly pedagogical article, we discuss under what circumstances measurements play a special role in quantum processes. In particular, we discuss the following facts that appear to be a common area of confusion. (i) From a fundamental point of view, measurements play no special role whatsoever: all dynamics that can be generated by measurements can be generated by unitary processes (for which post-selection is no exception). (ii) From a purely physical point of view, measurements are not ‘outside’ of quantum mechanics. (iii) The only difference between the abilities of measurement-based protocols and unitary circuits for quantum computing comes from practical (technology dependent) constraints. We emphasise the importance of distinguishing between differences that are (i) fundamental but without physical import; (ii) fundamental and possess physical import; and (iii) are not fundamental but have practical import. We also emphasise the importance of separating theoretical and experimental elements of measurement, primarily projection and amplification , which are physically very different. Note that since we are concerned with facts regarding physical processes, this article has little if anything to do with interpretations of quantum mechanics.