There are two kinds of quantum fluctuations relevant to cosmology that we focus on in this article: those that form the seeds for structure formation in the early universe and those giving rise to Boltzmann brains in the late universe. First, structure formation requires slight inhomogeneities in the density of matter in the early universe, which are then amplified by the effect of gravity, leading to clumping of matter into stars and galaxies. According to inflation theory, quantum fluctuations form the seeds of these inhomogeneities. However, these quantum fluctuations are described by a quantum state that is homogeneous and isotropic, and this raises a problem, connected to the foundations of quantum theory, as the unitary evolution alone cannot break the symmetry of the quantum state. Second, Boltzmann brains are random agglomerates of particles that, by extreme coincidence, form functioning brains. Unlikely as these coincidences are, they seem to be predicted to occur in a quantum universe as vacuum fluctuations if the universe continues to exist for an infinite (or just very long) time; in fact, they are predicted to occur over and over, even forming the majority of all brains in the history of the universe. We provide a brief introduction to the Bohmian version of quantum theory and explain why in this version Boltzmann brains, an undesirable kind of fluctuation, do not occur (or at least not often), while inhomogeneous seeds for structure formation, a desirable kind of fluctuation, do.
There are two kinds of quantum fluctuations relevant to cosmology that we focus on in this article: those that form the seeds for structure formation in the early universe and those giving rise to Boltzmann brains in the late universe. First, structure formation requires slight inhomogeneities in the density of matter in the early universe, which are then amplified by the effect of gravity, leading to clumping of matter into stars and galaxies. According to inflation theory, quantum fluctuations form the seeds of these inhomogeneities. However, these quantum fluctuations are described by a quantum state that is homogeneous and isotropic, and this raises a problem, connected to the foundations of quantum theory, as the unitary evolution alone cannot break the symmetry of the quantum state. Second, Boltzmann brains are random agglomerates of particles that, by extreme coincidence, form functioning brains. Unlikely as these coincidences are, they seem to be predicted to occur in a quantum universe as vacuum fluctuations if the universe continues to exist for an infinite (or just very long) time; in fact, they are predicted to occur over and over, even forming the majority of all brains in the history of the universe. We provide a brief introduction to the Bohmian version of quantum theory and explain why in this version Boltzmann brains, an undesirable kind of fluctuation, do not occur (or at least not often), while inhomogeneous seeds for structure formation, a desirable kind of fluctuation, do.
Most versions of classical physics imply that if the 4-volume of the entire space-time is infinite or at least extremely large, then random fluctuations in the matter will by coincidence create copies of us in remote places, so called "Boltzmann brains." That is a problem because it leads to the wrong prediction that _we_ should be Boltzmann brains. The question arises, how can any theory avoid making this wrong prediction? In quantum physics, it turns out that the discussion requires a formulation of quantum theory that is more precise than the orthodox interpretation. Using Bohmian mechanics for this purpose, we point out a possible solution to the problem based on the phenomenon of "freezing" of configurations.
There is a persistent state of confusion regarding the account of the quantum origin of the seeds of cosmological structure during inflation. The issue is the transition from the quantum uncertainties in the homogeneous and isotropic initial state, into the late-time "classical" anisotropies and inhomogeneities. There seems to be a widespread belief that decoherence addresses the issue in a satisfactory way. This view is taken, often implicitly, by most researchers working in the field. This can be seen most clearly in those accounts intended on facing the issue directly. For instance, a recent article [C. Kiefer and D. Polarski, arXiv: 0810.0087] argues just that, and presents a detailed explanation of the justifications. The explicit nature of that account will allow us to discuss the issue in detail. There are, of course, various other works that often indirectly address the issue with similar approaches (see Refs. 2–13). This type of arguments do not only implicitly assume that decoherence offers a satisfactory solution to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, but also that, in particular, such approach is applicable to these quantum aspects of cosmology. We will review here, why do we, together with various other researchers in the field, consider that this assumption is not correct in general. Moreover as previously discussed in Refs. 22–26, we will argue that the cosmological situation is one where the measurement problem of quantum mechanics appears in a particular exacerbated form, and that, it is this, even sharper conundrum, that should be addressed when dealing with the inflationary account of the origin of the seeds of cosmic structure in the early Universe. We briefly discuss the ideas behind what we feel might be a promising approach to deal with this problem.
We discuss here a not very well advertised problem afflicting the standard inflationary account of the origin of structure in the universe as the result of the, so called, quantum fluctuations of the inflaton field. We will show that such account is based on the properties of a quantum state that is homogeneous and isotropic, and that there is in the usual proposal no explanation for the emergence of inhomogeneities and anisotropies through a dynamics that preserves those symmetries in the quantum state. We will see that the issue can be seen as connected with the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, an unsatisfactory conceptual aspect of current quantum theory, which becomes intractable in the cosmological context at hand. We will see that one can address the issue adding the assumption that a new, and fundamental process in physics plays an essential role in this situation, (and naturally in other situations as well), and that unlike other cases, the cosmological problem at hand offers a path to investigate under empirical guidance some of the characteristics of this new physics.
Introduction Contemporary cosmology includes inflation as one of its central components. It corresponds to a period of accelerated expansion thought to have occurred very early in cosmic history, which takes the universe from relatively generic post Planckian era conditions to a stage where it is well described (with exponential accuracy in the number of e-folds) by a flat Robertson–Walker space-time (which describes a homogeneous and isotropic cosmology). It was initially proposed to resolve various naturalness problems: flatness, horizons, and the excess of massive relic objects, such as topological defects, that were expected to populate the universe according to grand unified theories (GUT). Nowadays, it is lauded because it predicts that the universe's mean density should be essentially identical to the critical value, a very peculiar situation which corresponds to a spatially flat universe. The existing data support this prediction. However, its biggest success is claimed to be the natural account for the emergence of the seeds of cosmic structure in terms of primordial quantum fluctuations, and the correct estimate of the corresponding microwave spectrum. This represents, thus, a situation which requires the combined application of general relativity (GR) and quantum theory, and that, moreover, is tied with observable imprints left from the early universe, in both the radiation in cosmic microwave background (CMB), and in the large scale cosmological structure we can observe today. It should not be surprising that, when dealing with attempts to apply our theories to the universe as a whole, we should come face to face with some of the most profound conceptual problems facing our current physical ideas. In fact, J. Hartle had noted long ago [28] that serious difficulties must be faced when attempting to apply quantum theory to cosmology, although the situations that were envisioned in those early works corresponded to the even more daunting problem of full quantum cosmology, and not the limited use of quantum theory to consider perturbative aspects, which is what is required in the treatment of the inflationary origin of the seeds of cosmic structure. This led him and his collaborators to consider the Consistent Histories framework, which is claimed to offer a version of quantum theory that does not rely on any fundamental notion of measurements, as the favored approach to use in such contexts. We will have a bit more to say about this shortly.
Abstract The eternal inflation problem continues to be considered one of standard's cosmology most serious shortcomings. This arises when one considers the effects of “quantum fluctuations” on the zero mode of inflaton field during a Hubble time in the inflationary epoch. In the slow-roll regime it is quite clear that such quantum fluctuations could dwarf the classical rolling down of the inflaton, and with overwhelming probability this prevents inflation from ever ending. When one recognizes that quantum fluctuations can not be taken as synonymous of stochastic fluctuations, but rather intrinsic levels of indefiniteness in the quantities in question, one concludes that the eternal inflation problem simply does not exist. However, the same argument would serve to invalidate the account for the generation of the primordial seeds of cosmic structure as has been amply discussed elsewhere [1,2,3]. In order to do address that issue, one must explain the breaking of homogeneity and isotropy of the situation prevailing during the early inflationary epoch (at both the quantum and classical levels of the description). For that one needs to rely on some additional element, beyond those present in the traditional treatments. The so called spontaneous collapse theories offer a viable candidate for that element, namely the stochastic and spontaneous state reduction characteristic of those proposals possesses the basic features to break those symmetries. In fact, a version of the CSL theory adapted to the cosmological context has been shown to offer a satisfactory account for the origin the seeds of cosmic structure with an adequate power spectrum [2], and will serve as the basis of our analysis. However, once such stochastic collapse is introduced into the theoretical framework the eternal inflation problem has the potential reappear. In this manuscript we explore those issues in detail and discuss an avenue that seems to allow for a satisfactory account for the generation of the primordial inhomogeneities and anisotropies while freeing the theory from the eternal inflation problem.
We put forward a quantum model of cosmology that is exactly periodic but avoids the Boltzmann Brain problem. If the universe is described by a quantum state evolving unitarily in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, its evolution will be recurrent: given enough time, the state will return arbitrarily close to its initial state. There is a worry that such a scenario cannot be phenomenologically acceptable, because the state will spend most of its time in a high-entropy equilibrium macrostate, with rare fluctuations downward in entropy, and the vast majority of observers will be minimal fluctuations away from equilibrium, or ``Boltzmann Brains." Here we show that this is not necessarily true. If the differences in energy eigenvalues are commensurable, the evolution is not simple recurrent, but exactly periodic. Moreover, if the state starts at minimum thermodynamic entropy, its evolution can feature a distinguished entropy excursion that is much more pronounced than one would expect from the conventional expression P(ΔS)∝exp(−ΔS). This excursion could represent our Big Bang, with relatively few Boltzmann fluctuations occurring in the subsequent equilibrium phase before a Big Crunch occurs and the cycle begins again. We speculate on the spacetime interpretation of this kind of quantum universe.