Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1507.04141 · European Journal of Physics

Revealing a quantum feature of dimensionless uncertainty in linear and quadratic potentials by changing potential intervals

R Kheiri

Published Aug 5, 2016• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract As an undergraduate exercise, in an article (2012 Am. J. Phys. 80 780–14 ), quantum and classical uncertainties for dimensionless variables of position and momentum were evaluated in three potentials: infinite well, bouncing ball, and harmonic oscillator. While original quantum uncertainty products depend on ℏ and the number of states ( n ), a dimensionless approach makes the comparison between quantum uncertainty and classical dispersion possible by excluding ℏ . But the question is whether the uncertainty still remains dependent on quantum number n . In the above-mentioned article, there lies this contrast; on the one hand, the dimensionless quantum uncertainty of the potential box approaches classical dispersion only in the limit of large quantum numbers ( n → ∞ )—consistent with the correspondence principle. On the other hand, similar evaluations for bouncing ball and harmonic oscillator potentials are equal to their classical counterparts independent of n . This equality may hide the quantum feature of low energy levels. In the current study, we change the potential intervals in order to make them symmetric for the linear potential and non-symmetric for the quadratic potential. As a result, it is shown in this paper that the dimensionless quantum uncertainty of these potentials in the new potential intervals is expressed in terms of quantum number n . In other words, the uncertainty requires the correspondence principle in order to approach the classical limit. Therefore, it can be concluded that the dimensionless analysis, as a useful pedagogical method, does not take away the quantum feature of the n -dependence of quantum uncertainty in general. Moreover, our numerical calculations include the higher powers of the position for the potentials.

DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/37/5/055411

Related papers

Dimensional analysis and the correspondence between classical and quantum uncertainty

Viola Gattus, Sotirios Karamitsos

Abstract Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is often cited as an example of a ‘purely quantum’ relation with no analogue in the classical limit where ℏ → 0. However, this formulation of the classical limit is problematic for many reasons, one of which is dimensional analysis. Since ℏ is a dimensionful constant, we may always work in natural units in which ℏ = 1. Dimensional analysis teaches us that all physical laws can be expressed purely in terms of dimensionless quantities. This indicates that the existence of a dimensionally consistent constraint on ΔxΔp requires the existence of a dimensionful parameter with units of action, and that any definition of the classical limit must be formulated in terms of dimensionless quantities (such as quantum numbers). Therefore, bounds on classical uncertainty (formulated in terms of statistical ensembles) can only be written in terms of dimensionful scales of the system under consideration, and can be readily compared to their quantum counterparts after being non-dimensionalized. We compare the uncertainty of certain coupled classical systems and their quantum counterparts (such as harmonic oscillators and particles in a box), and show that they converge in the classical limit. We find that since these systems feature additional dimensionful scales, the uncertainty bounds are dependent on multiple dimensionless parameters, in accordance with dimensional considerations.

arXiv:2102.10857•European Journal of Physics•Jul 16, 2020•6 citations

Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

James W. Rohlf

The harmonic oscillator is defined by a quadratic potential. Many important problems in physics reduce to that of a quantum harmonic oscillator because the leading term of a potential near its minimum is quadratic. It is a general and noteworthy feature of quantum systems that the lowest energy is not zero. Calculate the probability that the quantum oscillator is found beyond the classical limit. Agreement with the uncertainty principle may be checked by calculating the expectation values of x2 and p2 and then taking the square root of the product. For large quantum numbers, the solution must approach that of the classical harmonic oscillator.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 18, 2023•1 citation

Quantum–classical correspondence for a particle in a homogeneous field

Sumita Singh, Smriti P Suman, Vijay A. Singh

Abstract The correspondence principle provides a prescription to connect quantum physics to classical. It asserts that the physical quantities evaluated quantum mechanically approach their respective classical values for large quantum numbers. This has been shown for the pedagogically important cases of the particle in a box and a harmonic oscillator. However, a particle in a constant field has a wave function related to the Airy function and has at best been treated numerically. Employing energy eigenstates we obtain the expectation values of the position, the momentum and their moments upto fourth order, rigorously and without resorting to numerical or graphical techniques. We compare them with the corresponding classical values. We also examine the uncertainty product for the system.

European Journal of Physics•Sep 26, 2016•6 citations

Comparison of classical and quantum mechanical uncertainties

John Peslak

A comparison of classical and quantum uncertainties is presented for the particle-in-a-box, the harmonic oscillator, and the one-electron atom. It is found that the quantum results reduce to the classical in the limit of either very large quantum numbers or h→0. A classical uncertainty principle is derived and compared with its quantum analogue. A possible relationship between zero-point motion and the uncertainty principle is noted.

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1979•18 citations

Radial Uncertainty Product for Spherically Symmetric Potential in Position Space

Avoy Jana

This paper presents a detailed analysis of the radial uncertainty product for quantum systems with spherically symmetric potentials. Using the principles of quantum mechanics, the study derives the radial uncertainty relation analogous to the Cartesian form and investigates its implications for three key spherically symmetric potentials: the Hydrogen atom, the infinite spherical potential well, and the spherical harmonic oscillator, all within the non-relativistic regime. Employing the Schrodinger equation in spherical coordinates, the paper rigorously evaluates the normalized radial wave functions, expectation values, and uncertainties associated with both position and momentum. Analytical derivations and numerical computations highlight the dependence of the uncertainty product on quantum numbers and system-specific parameters.

arXiv:2501.14831•Jan 23, 2025•0 citations

One-dimensional pseudoharmonic oscillator: classical remarks and quantum-information theory

O. Olendski

Abstract Motion along semi-infinite straight line in a potential that is a combination of positive quadratic and inverse quadratic functions of the position is considered with the emphasis on the analysis of its quantum-information properties. Classical measure of symmetry of the potential is proposed and its dependence on the particle energy and the factor a describing a relative strength of its constituents is described; in particular, it is shown that a variation of the parameter a alters the shape from the half-harmonic oscillator (HHO) at a = 0 to the perfectly symmetric one of the double frequency oscillator (DFO) in the limit of huge a . Quantum consideration focuses on the analysis of information-theoretical measures, such as standard deviations, Shannon, Rényi and Tsallis entropies together with Fisher information, Onicescu energy and non–Gaussianity. For doing this, among others, a method of calculating momentum waveforms is proposed that results in their analytic expressions in form of the confluent hypergeometric functions. Increasing parameter a modifies the measures in such a way that they gradually transform into those corresponding to the DFO what, in particular, means that the lowest orbital saturates Heisenberg, Shannon, Rényi and Tsallis uncertainty relations with the corresponding position and momentum non–Gaussianities turning to zero. A simple expression is derived of the orbital-independent lower threshold of the semi-infinite range of the dimensionless Rényi/Tsallis coefficient where momentum components of these one-parameter entropies exist which shows that it varies between 1/4 at HHO and zero when a tends to infinity. Physical interpretation of obtained mathematical results is provided.

arXiv:2304.06428•Journal of Physics Communications•Apr 1, 2023•7 citations
Abstract As an undergraduate exercise, in an article (2012 Am. J. Phys. 80 780–14 ), quantum and classical uncertainties for dimensionless variables of position and momentum were evaluated in three potentials: infinite well, bouncing ball, and harmonic oscillator. While original quantum uncertainty products depend on ℏ and the number of states ( n ), a dimensionless approach makes the comparison between quantum uncertainty and classical dispersion possible by excluding ℏ . But the question is whether the uncertainty still remains dependent on quantum number n . In the above-mentioned article, there lies this contrast; on the one hand, the dimensionless quantum uncertainty of the potential box approaches classical dispersion only in the limit of large quantum numbers ( n → ∞ )—consistent with the correspondence principle. On the other hand, similar evaluations for bouncing ball and harmonic oscillator potentials are equal to their classical counterparts independent of n . This equality may hide the quantum feature of low energy levels. In the current study, we change the potential intervals in order to make them symmetric for the linear potential and non-symmetric for the quadratic potential. As a result, it is shown in this paper that the dimensionless quantum uncertainty of these potentials in the new potential intervals is expressed in terms of quantum number n . In other words, the uncertainty requires the correspondence principle in order to approach the classical limit. Therefore, it can be concluded that the dimensionless analysis, as a useful pedagogical method, does not take away the quantum feature of the n -dependence of quantum uncertainty in general. Moreover, our numerical calculations include the higher powers of the position for the potentials.
Abstract Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is often cited as an example of a ‘purely quantum’ relation with no analogue in the classical limit where ℏ → 0. However, this formulation of the classical limit is problematic for many reasons, one of which is dimensional analysis. Since ℏ is a dimensionful constant, we may always work in natural units in which ℏ = 1. Dimensional analysis teaches us that all physical laws can be expressed purely in terms of dimensionless quantities. This indicates that the existence of a dimensionally consistent constraint on ΔxΔp requires the existence of a dimensionful parameter with units of action, and that any definition of the classical limit must be formulated in terms of dimensionless quantities (such as quantum numbers). Therefore, bounds on classical uncertainty (formulated in terms of statistical ensembles) can only be written in terms of dimensionful scales of the system under consideration, and can be readily compared to their quantum counterparts after being non-dimensionalized. We compare the uncertainty of certain coupled classical systems and their quantum counterparts (such as harmonic oscillators and particles in a box), and show that they converge in the classical limit. We find that since these systems feature additional dimensionful scales, the uncertainty bounds are dependent on multiple dimensionless parameters, in accordance with dimensional considerations.
The harmonic oscillator is defined by a quadratic potential. Many important problems in physics reduce to that of a quantum harmonic oscillator because the leading term of a potential near its minimum is quadratic. It is a general and noteworthy feature of quantum systems that the lowest energy is not zero. Calculate the probability that the quantum oscillator is found beyond the classical limit. Agreement with the uncertainty principle may be checked by calculating the expectation values of x2 and p2 and then taking the square root of the product. For large quantum numbers, the solution must approach that of the classical harmonic oscillator.
Abstract The correspondence principle provides a prescription to connect quantum physics to classical. It asserts that the physical quantities evaluated quantum mechanically approach their respective classical values for large quantum numbers. This has been shown for the pedagogically important cases of the particle in a box and a harmonic oscillator. However, a particle in a constant field has a wave function related to the Airy function and has at best been treated numerically. Employing energy eigenstates we obtain the expectation values of the position, the momentum and their moments upto fourth order, rigorously and without resorting to numerical or graphical techniques. We compare them with the corresponding classical values. We also examine the uncertainty product for the system.
This paper presents a detailed analysis of the radial uncertainty product for quantum systems with spherically symmetric potentials. Using the principles of quantum mechanics, the study derives the radial uncertainty relation analogous to the Cartesian form and investigates its implications for three key spherically symmetric potentials: the Hydrogen atom, the infinite spherical potential well, and the spherical harmonic oscillator, all within the non-relativistic regime. Employing the Schrodinger equation in spherical coordinates, the paper rigorously evaluates the normalized radial wave functions, expectation values, and uncertainties associated with both position and momentum. Analytical derivations and numerical computations highlight the dependence of the uncertainty product on quantum numbers and system-specific parameters.
Abstract Motion along semi-infinite straight line in a potential that is a combination of positive quadratic and inverse quadratic functions of the position is considered with the emphasis on the analysis of its quantum-information properties. Classical measure of symmetry of the potential is proposed and its dependence on the particle energy and the factor a describing a relative strength of its constituents is described; in particular, it is shown that a variation of the parameter a alters the shape from the half-harmonic oscillator (HHO) at a = 0 to the perfectly symmetric one of the double frequency oscillator (DFO) in the limit of huge a . Quantum consideration focuses on the analysis of information-theoretical measures, such as standard deviations, Shannon, Rényi and Tsallis entropies together with Fisher information, Onicescu energy and non–Gaussianity. For doing this, among others, a method of calculating momentum waveforms is proposed that results in their analytic expressions in form of the confluent hypergeometric functions. Increasing parameter a modifies the measures in such a way that they gradually transform into those corresponding to the DFO what, in particular, means that the lowest orbital saturates Heisenberg, Shannon, Rényi and Tsallis uncertainty relations with the corresponding position and momentum non–Gaussianities turning to zero. A simple expression is derived of the orbital-independent lower threshold of the semi-infinite range of the dimensionless Rényi/Tsallis coefficient where momentum components of these one-parameter entropies exist which shows that it varies between 1/4 at HHO and zero when a tends to infinity. Physical interpretation of obtained mathematical results is provided.