We show that an improvement to the best known quantum lower bound for GRAPH-COLLISION problem implies an improvement to the best known lower bound for TRIANGLE problem in the quantum query complexity model.In GRAPH-COLLISION we are given free access to a graph (V, E) and access to a function f : V → {0, 1} as a black box.We are asked to determine if there exist (u, v) ∈ E, such that f (u) = f (v) = 1.In TRIANGLE we have a black box access to an adjacency matrix of a graph and we have to determine if the graph contains a triangle.For both of these problems the known lower bounds are trivial (Ω( √ n) and Ω(n), respectively) and there is no known matching upper bound.
We show that an improvement to the best known quantum lower bound for GRAPH-COLLISION problem implies an improvement to the best known lower bound for TRIANGLE problem in the quantum query complexity model.In GRAPH-COLLISION we are given free access to a graph (V, E) and access to a function f : V → {0, 1} as a black box.We are asked to determine if there exist (u, v) ∈ E, such that f (u) = f (v) = 1.In TRIANGLE we have a black box access to an adjacency matrix of a graph and we have to determine if the graph contains a triangle.For both of these problems the known lower bounds are trivial (Ω( √ n) and Ω(n), respectively) and there is no known matching upper bound.
We consider the quantum query complexity of local search as a function of graph geometry. Given a graph G=(V,E) with n vertices and black box access to a function f:V→R, the goal is find a vertex v that is a local minimum, i.e. with f(v)≤f(u) for all (u,v)∈E, using as few oracle queries as possible. We show that the quantum query complexity of local search on G is Ω(gn43), where g is the vertex congestion of the graph. For a β-expander with maximum degree Δ, this implies a lower bound of $ Ω\bigl(\frac{\sqrtβ \; n^{\frac{1}{4}}}{\sqrtΔ \; \log{n}} \bigr)$. We obtain these bounds by applying the strong weighted adversary method to a construction by Brânzei, Choo, and Recker (2024). As a corollary, on constant degree expanders, we derive a lower bound of Ω(lognn41). This improves upon the best prior quantum lower bound of $Ω\bigl( \frac{n^{\frac{1}{8}}}{\log{n}}\bigr) $ by Santha and Szegedy (2004). In contrast to the classical setting, a gap remains in the quantum case between our lower bound and the best-known upper bound of O(n31) for such graphs.
We study one-way quantum communication lower bounds for search problems. Unlike decision problems, search problems can have many valid outputs, which pose a fundamental barrier to standard quantum lower-bound techniques. We overcome this by developing a novel method based on matrix discrepancy, which allows us to bound the output measurements of a quantum protocol jointly.
As applications of our method, we establish the first tight quantum lower bounds for two fundamental search problems in some natural parameter regimes: collision finding and triangle finding. For collision finding, we prove a tight Ω(N1/4) one-way quantum communication lower bound. Previously, the best-known quantum communication lower bound for collision finding was Ω(N1/12) due to Göös and Jain (RANDOM 2022), and no stronger bound was known even under the one-way restriction. For triangle finding in graph streams, we prove a one-pass quantum streaming space lower bound of Ω(ΔV) for graphs with m edges, Θ(m) triangles, and constant ΔE, where ΔV and ΔE denote the maximum number of triangles sharing a common vertex and edge, respectively, under the condition that 1≤ΔV≤m2/3. This constitutes the first nontrivial quantum space lower bound in this regime, matching the classical upper bound of Jayaram and Kallaugher (RANDOM 2021) up to logarithmic factors. Notably, our method also recovers the classical lower bound of Kallaugher and Price (SODA 2017) through an entirely different argument, avoiding their Boolean-Hidden-Matching reduction that breaks down for quantum protocols.
The quantum query complexity of subgraph-containment problems, which ask whether a given subgraph H is present in an input graph G, has been the subject of considerable study. However, even for relatively simple subgraphs, such as paths and cycles, a complete understanding of their query complexities remains elusive. In this work, we consider several variants of path- and cycle-containment problems in the adjacency matrix model, where we search for paths or cycles of constant length k. We compare the settings where the graphs are directed or undirected, where the goal is to detect or find the existence of a path/cycle, and where the path/cycle we are looking for has length exactly k, or at most k. We also consider several promise versions of these problems, where we suppose that the input graph has a certain structure. We characterize the relative difficulty of these variants of the path/cycle-containment problems, by relating them to one another using randomized reductions, and grouping them into equivalence classes.
When we restrict our attention to path-containment problems, we get a dichotomy result. Some of the path-containment problems can be solved using a linear number of queries, and all the others are equivalent to one another (and additionally to several cycle-containment problems) under randomized reductions, up to constant overhead. For the latter equivalence class, we prove a novel quantum-walk-based algorithm that achieves query complexity O(n3/2−αk), where αk∈Θ(c−k) and c=3+17/2≈1.33, beating the previous best upper bound O(n3/2) on its query complexity. We also provide a conditional lower bound based on the graph-collision problem, which implies that this equivalence class does not admit linear-query quantum algorithms unless graph collision admits an O(n) query algorithm.
Subgraph detection asks whether an n-vertex graph, accessed through queries to its adjacency matrix, contains a copy of a fixed graph H. We prove the first unconditional superlinear lower bounds on the bounded-error quantum query complexity of this problem, answering a longstanding open question. A copy of H is a certificate of constant size, so the adversary method with nonnegative weights cannot prove superlinear lower bounds.
For every fixed r≥4, detecting the clique Kr requires nλr−o(1) queries, where λ4=19/18, the exponents λr increase strictly with r, and λr≥2−42/r+O(1/r). More generally, we prove superlinear lower bounds for detecting every fixed connected graph H with chromatic number c≥4. These bounds approach quadratic as c grows: for sufficiently large c, detection requires n2−O(loglogc/c)−o(1) queries. Chromatic number alone does not characterize the quantum query complexity of subgraph detection: we show that detecting the complete bipartite graph Kr,r requires nβr−o(1) queries, where β10=181/180 and βr≥2−O(1/r).
Our main technical result is a lower bound for finding an all-ones certificate from a known family when the input bits are sampled independently. Its proof combines Zhandry's compressed oracle [CRYPTO 2019] with conditioning on a randomly planted certificate, adapting an argument of Belovs [FOCS 2026]. Our hard instances are built from graphs containing many copies of the desired subgraph with limited overlap. For cliques, we use a construction of Gowers and Janzer [CPC 2021]; for complete bipartite graphs, we use a random construction.
In this paper, we consider the parameterized quantum query complexity for graph problems. We design parameterized quantum query algorithms for k-vertex cover and k-matching problems, and present lower bounds on the parameterized quantum query complexity. Then, we show that our quantum query algorithms are optimal up to a constant factor when the parameters are small. Our main results are as follows. Parameterized quantum query complexity of vertex cover. In the k-vertex cover problem, we are given an undirected graph G with n vertices and an integer k, and the objective is to determine whether G has a vertex cover of size at most k. We show that the quantum query complexity of the k-vertex cover problem is O(√kn + k^{3/2}√n) in the adjacency matrix model. For the design of the quantum query algorithm, we use the method of kernelization, a well-known tool for the design of parameterized classical algorithms, combined with Grover’s search. Parameterized quantum query complexity of matching. In the k-matching problem, we are given an undirected graph G with n vertices and an integer k, and the objective is to determine whether G has a matching of size at least k. We show that the quantum query complexity of the k-matching problem is O(√kn + k²) in the adjacency matrix model. We obtain this upper bound by using Grover’s search carefully and analyzing the number of Grover’s searches by making use of potential functions. We also show that the quantum query complexity of the maximum matching problem is O(√pn + p²) where p is the size of the maximum matching. For small p, it improves known bounds Õ(n^{3/2}) for bipartite graphs [Blikstad-v.d.Brand-Efron-Mukhopadhyay-Nanongkai, FOCS 2022] and O(n^{7/4}) for general graphs [Kimmel-Witter, WADS 2021]. Lower bounds on parameterized quantum query complexity. We also present lower bounds on the quantum query complexities of the k-vertex cover and k-matching problems. The lower bounds prove the optimality of the above parameterized quantum query algorithms up to a constant factor when k is small. Indeed, the quantum query complexities of the k-vertex cover and k-matching problems are both Θ(√k n) when k = O(√n) and k = O(n^{2/3}), respectively.
The edge connectivity of a simple graph is the least number of edges whose removal disconnects the graph. We study the quantum query complexity of computing the edge connectivity of a simple graph with n vertices and m edges in both the adjacency matrix and adjacency array models. For classical randomized algorithms, Ω(n2) and Ω(m) lower bounds are known for these models, respectively, showing that the trivial algorithm is optimal in terms of query complexity for both cases. In contrast, we show upper bounds of O~(n3/2) and O~(mn) on the quantum query complexity of computing edge connectivity in the adjacency matrix and adjacency array models, respectively. Our upper bound is tight up to logarithmic factors for the adjacency matrix model, while for the adjacency array model the best quantum query lower bound we know is Ω(n). Our upper bounds follow by combining a lemma on the structure of near-minimum cuts due to Rubinstein, Schramm and Weinberg (ITCS 2018) with a quantum sparsification algorithm by Apers and de Wolf (FOCS 2020).
For a weighted graph, instead of edge connectivity the relevant notion is the weight of a minimum cut, i.e. the minimum total weight of a set of edges whose removal disconnects the graph. For weighted graphs we show that in the worst case Ω(n2) queries can be needed to compute the weight of a minimum cut by a quantum algorithm in both the adjacency matrix and adjacency array models, thus no quantum speedup is possible in this case.