Time plays a crucial role in the intuitive understanding of the world around us. Within quantum mechanics, however, time is not usually treated as an observable quantity; it enters merely as a parameter in the laws of motion of physical systems. Here we take an operational approach to time. Towards this goal we consider quantum clocks, i.e., quantum systems that generate an observable time scale. We then study the quality of quantum clocks in terms of their ability to stay synchronised. To quantify this, we introduce the "Alternate Ticks Game" and analyse a few strategies pertinent to this game.
Time plays a crucial role in the intuitive understanding of the world around us. Within quantum mechanics, however, time is not usually treated as an observable quantity; it enters merely as a parameter in the laws of motion of physical systems. Here we take an operational approach to time. Towards this goal we consider quantum clocks, i.e., quantum systems that generate an observable time scale. We then study the quality of quantum clocks in terms of their ability to stay synchronised. To quantify this, we introduce the "Alternate Ticks Game" and analyse a few strategies pertinent to this game.
In standard quantum theory, time is not an observable. It enters as a parameter in the Schrödinger equation, but there is no measurement operator associated to it. Nevertheless, one may take an operational viewpoint and regard time as the information one can read from clocks. The Alternate Ticks Game, introduced in arXiv:1506.01373, is a completely operational means to quantify the accuracy of time scales generated by clocks. The idea is to count the number of ticks that two copies of a clock can produce until they run out of synchronisation. Here we investigate the performance of stochastic clocks in this game. These are clocks which are classical in the sense that they do not exploit quantum coherence. Our results support earlier conjectures that their accuracy grows linearly in the size of the clockwork, measured in terms of the dimension of the associated Hilbert space. In particular, we derive explicit bounds on the accuracy of a natural class of stochastic clocks, the stochastic ladder clocks.
The concept of entanglement is at the heart of quantum physics.It plays a central role in all quantum phenomena involving composite systems.Interestingly, there is an intriguing idea that has attracted considerable attention recently, according to which quantum entanglement may also be essential for understanding the very emergence of time and dynamical evolution.Within this point of view, sometimes referred to as the timeless picture of quantum dynamics, the Universe is regarded as consisting of a clock and a system (or "rest of the Universe") that are jointly in a stationary quantum state, and time evolution arises as an emergent phenomenon rooted at the entanglement between the clock and the system.Here we provide a pedagogical and self-contained exposition, at the upper undergraduate level, of the role of entanglement in this timeless evolution approach to quantum mechanics.In particular, we give a detailed explanation of how the entanglement between the clock and the system is directly and quantitatively related to the average distinguishability between the states of the system at different times.
The problem of time is a deep paradox in our physical description of the world. According to Aristotle's relational theory, time is a measure of change and does not exist on its own. In contrast, quantum mechanics, just like Newtonian mechanics, is equipped with a master clock that dictates the evolution of a system. This clock is infinitely precise and tacitly supplied free of charge from outside physics. Not only does this absolute time make it notoriously difficult to make a consistent theory of quantum gravity, it is also the underlying problem in establishing the second law. Indeed, contrary to our experience, the Wheeler-deWitt equation --a canonical quantization of general relativity-- predicts a static universe. Similarly, when simply concerned with the dynamics of a closed quantum system, there is no second law because the Von Neumann entropy is invariant under unitary transformations. Here we are mainly concerned with the latter problem and we show that it can be resolved by attributing a minimal amount of resources to the measurement of time. Although there is an absolute time in quantum mechanics, an observer can only establish a time by measuring a clock. For a local measurement, the minimal entropy production is equal to the number of ticks. This lower bound is attained by a black hole.
Time – what it is and its nature – has from the beginning held mysteries for layman, philosopher, and physicist alike. Periodic phenomena from motions of heavenly bodies and pendulums to quantal atomic clocks provide the means to measure time intervals, and Newton’s absolute time is a background flow against which classical and non-relativistic quantum physics is played out. While internally consistent, these two fields of physics are incompatible with the requirement of treating space and time on an equal footing. Quantum field theories provide the answer, as both treated as parameters, physics residing instead in the states and operators. But even in classical physics and quantum mechanics, time-independent descriptions provide an alternative to an explicitly time-dependent one. These, including a general method of approach called invariant imbedding, are discussed as alternative representations of an underlying reality that is the concern of physics.
Precise time synchronisation underpins critical infrastructure from telecommunications and financial markets to power grids and scientific metrology. Several families of quantum protocols have been proposed and demonstrated for clock synchronisation and time distribution, exploiting entangled photon pairs, quantum key distribution (QKD) correlations, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, and entangled clock networks. We critically assess these approaches, reviewing the main quantum time synchronisation (QTS) protocol families, quantifying the gap between theory and experiment, and identifying practical bottlenecks in sources, detectors, and channels. We survey the classical timing landscape from Network Time Protocol (NTP) and GPS to laboratory-grade optical frequency transfer, and compare quantum and classical methods at equivalent maturity. We examine use cases including financial trading, power grids, telecommunications, scientific metrology, and military applications, evaluating whether quantum timing offers a realistic advantage. We show that time transfer, not clock performance, is now the bottleneck for distributed optical timekeeping: the best demonstrated synchronisation uncertainty (2.46~ps) falls two to three orders of magnitude short of what optical clocks with fractional frequency uncertainties of 10−18--10−19 require. Our assessment is that quantum time synchronisation will not replace classical methods for most applications in the near-to-medium future. Its near-term value lies in physical-layer security against timing manipulation and integration with quantum communication networks, while closing the synchronisation gap for scientific metrology remains the most critical open challenge.
Natural and engineered classical systems are replete with examples of synchronization, understood as the adjustment of rhythms of physical systems. Such synchronization is at the heart of the stability of several classical technologies, such as mechanical bridges and electrical networks. Given the advent of quantum simulation and computation technologies, it is natural to study a quantum analogue of synchronization and explore novel applications. This review surveys synchronization in few and many-body quantum systems, measures that quantify them, and their applications to quantum technologies.