Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1505.05577

Derivation of Quantum Mechanics algebraic structure from invariance of the laws of Nature under system composition and Leibniz identity

Florin Moldoveanu

Published May 21, 2015• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Products and tensor products are linked by a universal property. Imposing the invariance of the laws of Nature under tensor composition along with Leibniz identity determines quantum and classical mechanics algebraic structure through the interplay between products, coproducts, and the tensor product. Violations of Bell's inequalities distinguishes quantum from classical mechanics.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1505.05577

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics reconstruction from invariance of the laws of nature under tensor composition

Florin Moldoveanu

Quantum and classical mechanics are derived using four natural physical principles: (1) the laws of nature are invariant under time evolution, (2) the laws of nature are invariant under tensor composition, (3) the laws of nature are relational, and (4) positivity (the ability to define a physical state). Quantum mechanics is singled out by a fifth experimentally justified postulate: nature violates Bell's inequalities.

arXiv:1407.7610•Jul 29, 2014•0 citations

Quantum mechanics from invariance principles

Florin Moldoveanu

Quantum mechanics is an extremely successful theory of nature and yet it lacks an intuitive axiomatization. In contrast, the special theory of relativity is well understood and is rooted into natural or experimentally justified postulates. Here we introduce an axiomatization approach to quantum mechanics which is very similar to special theory of relativity derivation. The core idea is that a composed system obeys the same laws of nature as its components. This leads to a Jordan-Lie algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics. The starting assumptions are minimal: the laws of nature are invariant under time evolution, the laws of nature are invariant under tensor composition, the laws of nature are relational, together with the ability to define a physical state (positivity). Quantum mechanics is singled out by a fifth experimentally justified postulate: nature violates Bell inequalities.

arXiv:1303.3935•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jul 3, 2015•1 citation

Four Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Are Three

Gabriele Carcassi, Lorenzo Maccone, C. Aidala

The tensor product postulate of quantum mechanics states that the Hilbert space of a composite system is the tensor product of the components' Hilbert spaces. All current formalizations of quantum mechanics that do not contain this postulate contain some equivalent postulate or assumption (sometimes hidden). Here we give a natural definition of a composite system as a set containing the component systems and show how one can logically derive the tensor product rule from the state postulate and from the measurement postulate. In other words, our Letter reduces by one the number of postulates necessary to quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2003.11007•Physical Review Letters•Mar 16, 2021•23 citations

Mixing quantum and classical mechanics and uniqueness of Planck's constant

Debendranath Sahoo

Observables of quantum or classical mechanics form algebras called quantum or classical Hamilton algebras (HAs), respectively (Grgin and Petersen 1974 J. Math. Phys. 15 764, Sahoo 1977 Pramana 8 545). We show that the tensor product of two quantum HAs, each characterized by a different Planck's constant (PC), is an algebra of the same type characterized by yet another PC. The algebraic structure of mixed quantum and classical systems is then analysed by taking the limit of vanishing PC in one of the component algebras. This approach provides new insight into failures of various formalisms dealing with mixed quantum–classical systems. It shows that in the interacting mixed quantum–classical description, there can be no back-reaction of the quantum system on the classical system. A natural algebraic requirement involving restriction of the tensor product of two quantum HAs to their components proves that PC is unique.

arXiv:quant-ph/0301044•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 6, 2004•41 citations

Demystification of quantum entanglement

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein was dreamed of. Quantum mechanics is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem (which will not be discussed in this paper).

arXiv:0905.4791•May 29, 2009•5 citations

Quantum Mechanics. Algebraic Structure and States

Franco Strocchi

We briefly review the basic structure of quantum mechanics (QM) with the aim of covering both the case of systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom (ordinary QM) as well as the case of systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom (briefly infinite systems ).

Theoretical and mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations
Products and tensor products are linked by a universal property. Imposing the invariance of the laws of Nature under tensor composition along with Leibniz identity determines quantum and classical mechanics algebraic structure through the interplay between products, coproducts, and the tensor product. Violations of Bell's inequalities distinguishes quantum from classical mechanics.
Quantum mechanics is an extremely successful theory of nature and yet it lacks an intuitive axiomatization. In contrast, the special theory of relativity is well understood and is rooted into natural or experimentally justified postulates. Here we introduce an axiomatization approach to quantum mechanics which is very similar to special theory of relativity derivation. The core idea is that a composed system obeys the same laws of nature as its components. This leads to a Jordan-Lie algebraic formulation of quantum mechanics. The starting assumptions are minimal: the laws of nature are invariant under time evolution, the laws of nature are invariant under tensor composition, the laws of nature are relational, together with the ability to define a physical state (positivity). Quantum mechanics is singled out by a fifth experimentally justified postulate: nature violates Bell inequalities.
The tensor product postulate of quantum mechanics states that the Hilbert space of a composite system is the tensor product of the components' Hilbert spaces. All current formalizations of quantum mechanics that do not contain this postulate contain some equivalent postulate or assumption (sometimes hidden). Here we give a natural definition of a composite system as a set containing the component systems and show how one can logically derive the tensor product rule from the state postulate and from the measurement postulate. In other words, our Letter reduces by one the number of postulates necessary to quantum mechanics.
Observables of quantum or classical mechanics form algebras called quantum or classical Hamilton algebras (HAs), respectively (Grgin and Petersen 1974 J. Math. Phys. 15 764, Sahoo 1977 Pramana 8 545). We show that the tensor product of two quantum HAs, each characterized by a different Planck's constant (PC), is an algebra of the same type characterized by yet another PC. The algebraic structure of mixed quantum and classical systems is then analysed by taking the limit of vanishing PC in one of the component algebras. This approach provides new insight into failures of various formalisms dealing with mixed quantum–classical systems. It shows that in the interacting mixed quantum–classical description, there can be no back-reaction of the quantum system on the classical system. A natural algebraic requirement involving restriction of the tensor product of two quantum HAs to their components proves that PC is unique.
One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein was dreamed of. Quantum mechanics is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem (which will not be discussed in this paper).