Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1504.04872 · Modern Physics Letters B

Contribution of the basis-dependent adiabatic geometric phase to noncyclic evolution

M. T. Thomaz

Published Feb 1, 2016• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The geometric phase acquired by the vector states under an adiabatic evolution along a noncyclic path can be calculated correctly in any instantaneous basis of a Hamiltonian that varies in time due to a time-dependent classical field.
DOI
10.1142/s0217984916500214

Related papers

Contribution of adiabatic phases to noncyclic evolution

M. T. Thomaz, A.C. Aguiar Pinto, M. Moutinho

We show that the difference of adiabatic phases, that are basis-dependent, in noncyclic evolution of non-degenerate quantum systems have to be taken into account to give the correct interference result in the calculation of physical quantities in states that are a superposition of instantaneous eigenstates of energy. To verify the contribution of those adiabatic phases in the interference phenomena, we consider the spin-1/2 model coupled to a precessing external magnetic field. In the model, the adiabatic phase increases in time up to reach the difference of the Berry's phases of the model when the external magnetic field completes a period.

arXiv:0908.0785•Brazilian Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 2010•1 citation

On spin evolution in a time-dependent magnetic field: Post-adiabatic corrections and geometric phases

Konstantin Yu Bliokh

arXiv:quant-ph/0702119•Physics Letters A•Jul 27, 2007•9 citations

Two geometric phases can dramatically differ from each other even if their evolution paths are sufficiently close in a pointwise manner

Da-Jian Zhang, P. Z. Zhao, Guofu Xu

One milestone in quantum physics is Berry's seminal work [Proc.~R.~Soc.~Lond.~A \textbf{392}, 45 (1984)], in which a quantal phase factor known as geometric phase was discovered to solely depend on the evolution path in state space. Here, we unveil that even an infinitesimal deviation of the initial state from the eigenstate of the initial Hamiltonian can yield a significant change of the geometric phase accompanying an adiabatic evolution. This leads to the surprising observation that two geometric phases can dramatically differ from each other even if their evolution paths are sufficiently close in a pointwise manner.

arXiv:2111.10767•Nov 21, 2021•0 citations

Inconsistency of the theory of geometric phases in adiabatic evolution

Da-Jian Zhang, P. Z. Zhao, Guofu Xu

We unveil that even an infinitesimal deviation of the initial state from the eigenstates of the initial Hamiltonian can yield a significant change in the geometric phase accompanying adiabatic evolution without degeneracies of the energy levels. This leads to the counterintuitive result that the values of two geometric phases computed from the general definition of the Berry phase [Samuel and Bhandari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2339 (1988)] can dramatically differ from each other in the adiabatic limit even if their evolution paths are sufficiently close in a pointwise manner. The result of this work indicates that the widely accepted theory of geometric phases is not very consistent in the context of adiabatic evolution involving superposed eigenstates.

Physical Review A•Apr 12, 2022•2 citations

Geometric phase in generalized Landau states

Ohjong Kwon, Jinhyoung Lee, Y. D. Kim

We obtain the exact wave functions for an electron in a certain class of time-dependent electromagnetic fields. When the time variation of the electromagnetic field is far from the adiabaticity condition, i.e., the situation is nonadiabatic, the geometric phase appears, which is a noncyclic one in general.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Jan 15, 1993•7 citations

The non-adiabatic classical geometric phase and its bundle-theoretic interpretation

Gavriel Segre

A bundle theoretic interpretation of the non-adiabatic classical geometric phase is given in the Koopman representation of dynamics

arXiv:math/0403189•Mar 10, 2004•1 citation
We show that the difference of adiabatic phases, that are basis-dependent, in noncyclic evolution of non-degenerate quantum systems have to be taken into account to give the correct interference result in the calculation of physical quantities in states that are a superposition of instantaneous eigenstates of energy. To verify the contribution of those adiabatic phases in the interference phenomena, we consider the spin-1/2 model coupled to a precessing external magnetic field. In the model, the adiabatic phase increases in time up to reach the difference of the Berry's phases of the model when the external magnetic field completes a period.
One milestone in quantum physics is Berry's seminal work [Proc.~R.~Soc.~Lond.~A \textbf{392}, 45 (1984)], in which a quantal phase factor known as geometric phase was discovered to solely depend on the evolution path in state space. Here, we unveil that even an infinitesimal deviation of the initial state from the eigenstate of the initial Hamiltonian can yield a significant change of the geometric phase accompanying an adiabatic evolution. This leads to the surprising observation that two geometric phases can dramatically differ from each other even if their evolution paths are sufficiently close in a pointwise manner.
We unveil that even an infinitesimal deviation of the initial state from the eigenstates of the initial Hamiltonian can yield a significant change in the geometric phase accompanying adiabatic evolution without degeneracies of the energy levels. This leads to the counterintuitive result that the values of two geometric phases computed from the general definition of the Berry phase [Samuel and Bhandari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2339 (1988)] can dramatically differ from each other in the adiabatic limit even if their evolution paths are sufficiently close in a pointwise manner. The result of this work indicates that the widely accepted theory of geometric phases is not very consistent in the context of adiabatic evolution involving superposed eigenstates.